Nurse rostering: understanding the current shift work scheduling processes, benefits, limitations, and potential fatigue risks

• Published in: BMC nursing 2024-04, Vol.23 (1), p.295-295, Article 295
• Main Authors: Booker, Lauren A, Mills, Jane, Bish, Melanie, Spong, Jo, Deacon-Crouch, Melissa, Skinner, Timothy C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Absenteeism; Case studies; Consent; Data analysis; Demographic aspects; Employers; Ethics; Fatigue; Grounded theory; Health aspects; Healthcare workforce; Hospitals; Influence; Interviews; Nurses; Occupational health; Occupational health and safety; Participation; Physiological aspects; Risk factors; Shift work; Sleep
• ISSN: 1472-6955; 1472-6955
• DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-01949-2

Implementing appropriate shift work schedules can help mitigate the risk of sleep impairment and reduce fatigue of healthcare workers, reducing occupational health and safety risks. In Australia, the organisation has a responsibility to make sure all reasonable measures are taken to reduce fatigue of staff. Therefore, it is important to assess what the current rostering processes is for staff responsible for creating the rosters for nurses. The aims of the project were to understand (1) who creates the rosters and what the process is, (2) what training and knowledge these staff have in establishing rostering schedules that optimise the sleep and wellbeing of staff, and (3) what the benefits and limitations are of current rostering practices. Findings were generated through semi-structured interviews, using cluster coding to form categories. Twenty four nurses responsible for rostering staff were interviewed from three different sites in Victoria (one metropolitan and two regional/rural hospitals). Data was analysed using selected grounded theory methods with thematic analysis. The common themes that came out of the interviews were that rostering staff were under prepared, unaware of fatigue and safety guidelines and polices from governing bodies and had not received any education or training before taking on the role. The most common rostering style was self-rostering, where staff could submit preferences. However, there were concerns about staff fatigue but were divided as to who should be responsible, with many saying it was up to staff to preference shifts that they could cope with. The final theme was cultural barriers to change. While self-rostering resulted in staff having more freedom and flexibility,  shift preferences may be influenced more so by a need to fit with lifestyle rather than to minimise fatigue and increase safety in the workplace. Greater consideration of the impact of shift work schedules on fatigue is required to ensure that the layers of clinical governance in health care organisations minimise the risk of occupation health and safety issues for employees delivering direct patient care.