Loading…
Development of Toxic Bait to Control Invasive Wild Pigs and Reduce Damage
Populations of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are increasing in many regions of the world, in particular the United States and Australia. Invasive wild pigs cause extensive damage to ecological resources and agriculture. Development and registration of a safe and humane toxic bait offers a practica...
Saved in:
Published in: | Wildlife Society bulletin 2017-06, Vol.41 (2), p.256-263 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-f74057c5ec97a6e9bb59fa0ed8989857e9a0d7406975e07ce8202255a61ec3e13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-f74057c5ec97a6e9bb59fa0ed8989857e9a0d7406975e07ce8202255a61ec3e13 |
container_end_page | 263 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 256 |
container_title | Wildlife Society bulletin |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Snow, Nathan P. Foster, Justin A. Kinsey, John C. Humphrys, Simon T. Staples, Linton D. Hewitt, David G. Vercauteren, Kurt C. |
description | Populations of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are increasing in many regions of the world, in particular the United States and Australia. Invasive wild pigs cause extensive damage to ecological resources and agriculture. Development and registration of a safe and humane toxic bait offers a practical and costeffective tool to control invasive species. Currently, no toxicants are approved for use on invasive wild pigs in the United States and those approved in Australia are under scrutiny because of concerns regarding humaneness and effects on nontarget species. We tested a newly formulated bait containing the microencapsulated active ingredient, sodium nitrite (HOGGONE®; Animal Control Technologies Australia P/L, Victoria, Australia), that is considered humane and safer for nontarget species because it does not bioaccumulate. We examined palatability, lethality, and stability of the bait (i.e., fresh compared to 8-monthold bait) on groups of captive invasive wild pigs. We found HOGGONE1 was a preferred food item, averaging 475 g of toxic bait consumed per animal during the first night offered. Consumption of HOGGONE® resulted in 95% mortality (53 of 56) in the treatment groups across 2 treatment nights. Most mortalities (98%) occurred during the first night the toxic bait was offered. Camera evidence suggested that deaths occurred within 3 hr post-offering. The toxic bait was stable and effective up to 8 months post manufacture. Our results support current applications to register HOGGONE® for reducing damage from invasive wild pigs in the United States and Australia. Further research is required to evaluate HOGGONE® on free-ranging invasive wild pigs using bait stations that exclude nontarget species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wsb.775 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_45c7459dc24b4bd3b6c26976a43b7918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90010767</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_45c7459dc24b4bd3b6c26976a43b7918</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>90010767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-f74057c5ec97a6e9bb59fa0ed8989857e9a0d7406975e07ce8202255a61ec3e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQQIMoWLT4C4TcPEhrPjebo239KBQUrfQYstnZkrJtymZt7b83utKbzGGG4fEOD6ErSoaUEHa3j8VQKXmCeoyzfCClIKeoRzVPt8j4OerHuCKEUEFzTVkPTSewgzps17BpcajwPHx5h0fWt7gNeBw2bRNqPN3sbPQ7wAtfl_jVLyO2mxK_QfnpAE_s2i7hEp1Vto7Q_9sX6OPxYT5-Hsxenqbj-9nAcaHloFKCSOUkOK1sBroopK4sgTLXaaQCbUmZmEwrCUQ5yBlhTEqbUXAcKL9A085bBrsy28avbXMwwXrz-wjN0tim9a4GI6RTQurSMVGIouRF5ljyZlbwQmmaJ9dN53JNiLGB6uijxPwENSmoSUETeduRe1_D4T_MLN5HHX3d0avYhuZI6xSeqEzxb4Qdfc8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of Toxic Bait to Control Invasive Wild Pigs and Reduce Damage</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Snow, Nathan P. ; Foster, Justin A. ; Kinsey, John C. ; Humphrys, Simon T. ; Staples, Linton D. ; Hewitt, David G. ; Vercauteren, Kurt C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Snow, Nathan P. ; Foster, Justin A. ; Kinsey, John C. ; Humphrys, Simon T. ; Staples, Linton D. ; Hewitt, David G. ; Vercauteren, Kurt C.</creatorcontrib><description>Populations of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are increasing in many regions of the world, in particular the United States and Australia. Invasive wild pigs cause extensive damage to ecological resources and agriculture. Development and registration of a safe and humane toxic bait offers a practical and costeffective tool to control invasive species. Currently, no toxicants are approved for use on invasive wild pigs in the United States and those approved in Australia are under scrutiny because of concerns regarding humaneness and effects on nontarget species. We tested a newly formulated bait containing the microencapsulated active ingredient, sodium nitrite (HOGGONE®; Animal Control Technologies Australia P/L, Victoria, Australia), that is considered humane and safer for nontarget species because it does not bioaccumulate. We examined palatability, lethality, and stability of the bait (i.e., fresh compared to 8-monthold bait) on groups of captive invasive wild pigs. We found HOGGONE1 was a preferred food item, averaging 475 g of toxic bait consumed per animal during the first night offered. Consumption of HOGGONE® resulted in 95% mortality (53 of 56) in the treatment groups across 2 treatment nights. Most mortalities (98%) occurred during the first night the toxic bait was offered. Camera evidence suggested that deaths occurred within 3 hr post-offering. The toxic bait was stable and effective up to 8 months post manufacture. Our results support current applications to register HOGGONE® for reducing damage from invasive wild pigs in the United States and Australia. Further research is required to evaluate HOGGONE® on free-ranging invasive wild pigs using bait stations that exclude nontarget species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wsb.775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>feral swine ; integrated pest management ; Original Article ; pesticide ; Sus scrofa ; toxicant ; wild boar ; wildlife damage management</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 2017-06, Vol.41 (2), p.256-263</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-f74057c5ec97a6e9bb59fa0ed8989857e9a0d7406975e07ce8202255a61ec3e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-f74057c5ec97a6e9bb59fa0ed8989857e9a0d7406975e07ce8202255a61ec3e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5171-6493</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90010767$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90010767$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Snow, Nathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinsey, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrys, Simon T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staples, Linton D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vercauteren, Kurt C.</creatorcontrib><title>Development of Toxic Bait to Control Invasive Wild Pigs and Reduce Damage</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><description>Populations of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are increasing in many regions of the world, in particular the United States and Australia. Invasive wild pigs cause extensive damage to ecological resources and agriculture. Development and registration of a safe and humane toxic bait offers a practical and costeffective tool to control invasive species. Currently, no toxicants are approved for use on invasive wild pigs in the United States and those approved in Australia are under scrutiny because of concerns regarding humaneness and effects on nontarget species. We tested a newly formulated bait containing the microencapsulated active ingredient, sodium nitrite (HOGGONE®; Animal Control Technologies Australia P/L, Victoria, Australia), that is considered humane and safer for nontarget species because it does not bioaccumulate. We examined palatability, lethality, and stability of the bait (i.e., fresh compared to 8-monthold bait) on groups of captive invasive wild pigs. We found HOGGONE1 was a preferred food item, averaging 475 g of toxic bait consumed per animal during the first night offered. Consumption of HOGGONE® resulted in 95% mortality (53 of 56) in the treatment groups across 2 treatment nights. Most mortalities (98%) occurred during the first night the toxic bait was offered. Camera evidence suggested that deaths occurred within 3 hr post-offering. The toxic bait was stable and effective up to 8 months post manufacture. Our results support current applications to register HOGGONE® for reducing damage from invasive wild pigs in the United States and Australia. Further research is required to evaluate HOGGONE® on free-ranging invasive wild pigs using bait stations that exclude nontarget species.</description><subject>feral swine</subject><subject>integrated pest management</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>pesticide</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>toxicant</subject><subject>wild boar</subject><subject>wildlife damage management</subject><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQQIMoWLT4C4TcPEhrPjebo239KBQUrfQYstnZkrJtymZt7b83utKbzGGG4fEOD6ErSoaUEHa3j8VQKXmCeoyzfCClIKeoRzVPt8j4OerHuCKEUEFzTVkPTSewgzps17BpcajwPHx5h0fWt7gNeBw2bRNqPN3sbPQ7wAtfl_jVLyO2mxK_QfnpAE_s2i7hEp1Vto7Q_9sX6OPxYT5-Hsxenqbj-9nAcaHloFKCSOUkOK1sBroopK4sgTLXaaQCbUmZmEwrCUQ5yBlhTEqbUXAcKL9A085bBrsy28avbXMwwXrz-wjN0tim9a4GI6RTQurSMVGIouRF5ljyZlbwQmmaJ9dN53JNiLGB6uijxPwENSmoSUETeduRe1_D4T_MLN5HHX3d0avYhuZI6xSeqEzxb4Qdfc8</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Snow, Nathan P.</creator><creator>Foster, Justin A.</creator><creator>Kinsey, John C.</creator><creator>Humphrys, Simon T.</creator><creator>Staples, Linton D.</creator><creator>Hewitt, David G.</creator><creator>Vercauteren, Kurt C.</creator><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5171-6493</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Development of Toxic Bait to Control Invasive Wild Pigs and Reduce Damage</title><author>Snow, Nathan P. ; Foster, Justin A. ; Kinsey, John C. ; Humphrys, Simon T. ; Staples, Linton D. ; Hewitt, David G. ; Vercauteren, Kurt C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-f74057c5ec97a6e9bb59fa0ed8989857e9a0d7406975e07ce8202255a61ec3e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>feral swine</topic><topic>integrated pest management</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>pesticide</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>toxicant</topic><topic>wild boar</topic><topic>wildlife damage management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Snow, Nathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinsey, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrys, Simon T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staples, Linton D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vercauteren, Kurt C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Snow, Nathan P.</au><au>Foster, Justin A.</au><au>Kinsey, John C.</au><au>Humphrys, Simon T.</au><au>Staples, Linton D.</au><au>Hewitt, David G.</au><au>Vercauteren, Kurt C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of Toxic Bait to Control Invasive Wild Pigs and Reduce Damage</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>256-263</pages><issn>1938-5463</issn><eissn>2328-5540</eissn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><abstract>Populations of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are increasing in many regions of the world, in particular the United States and Australia. Invasive wild pigs cause extensive damage to ecological resources and agriculture. Development and registration of a safe and humane toxic bait offers a practical and costeffective tool to control invasive species. Currently, no toxicants are approved for use on invasive wild pigs in the United States and those approved in Australia are under scrutiny because of concerns regarding humaneness and effects on nontarget species. We tested a newly formulated bait containing the microencapsulated active ingredient, sodium nitrite (HOGGONE®; Animal Control Technologies Australia P/L, Victoria, Australia), that is considered humane and safer for nontarget species because it does not bioaccumulate. We examined palatability, lethality, and stability of the bait (i.e., fresh compared to 8-monthold bait) on groups of captive invasive wild pigs. We found HOGGONE1 was a preferred food item, averaging 475 g of toxic bait consumed per animal during the first night offered. Consumption of HOGGONE® resulted in 95% mortality (53 of 56) in the treatment groups across 2 treatment nights. Most mortalities (98%) occurred during the first night the toxic bait was offered. Camera evidence suggested that deaths occurred within 3 hr post-offering. The toxic bait was stable and effective up to 8 months post manufacture. Our results support current applications to register HOGGONE® for reducing damage from invasive wild pigs in the United States and Australia. Further research is required to evaluate HOGGONE® on free-ranging invasive wild pigs using bait stations that exclude nontarget species.</abstract><pub>Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.1002/wsb.775</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5171-6493</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1938-5463 |
ispartof | Wildlife Society bulletin, 2017-06, Vol.41 (2), p.256-263 |
issn | 1938-5463 2328-5540 1938-5463 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_45c7459dc24b4bd3b6c26976a43b7918 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | feral swine integrated pest management Original Article pesticide Sus scrofa toxicant wild boar wildlife damage management |
title | Development of Toxic Bait to Control Invasive Wild Pigs and Reduce Damage |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T13%3A16%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20Toxic%20Bait%20to%20Control%20Invasive%20Wild%20Pigs%20and%20Reduce%20Damage&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=Snow,%20Nathan%20P.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=256-263&rft.issn=1938-5463&rft.eissn=2328-5540&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wsb.775&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E90010767%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3495-f74057c5ec97a6e9bb59fa0ed8989857e9a0d7406975e07ce8202255a61ec3e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=90010767&rfr_iscdi=true |