Loading…

Modern Dimensional Analysis Based on Fire-Protected Steel Members’ Analysis Using Multiple Experiments

Nowadays, the real structures (considered as prototypes) subjected to fire are analysed by means of the behaviours of some reduced scale structures (defined as models). These prototype–model correlations are governed by the so-called dimensional analysis (DA) methods. These methods, starting from th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fire (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-12, Vol.5 (6), p.210
Main Authors: Gálfi, Pál-Botond, Száva, Renáta-Ildikó, Száva, Ioan, Vlase, Sorin, Gălățanu, Teofil, Jármai, Károly, Asztalos, Zsolt, Popa, Gabriel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nowadays, the real structures (considered as prototypes) subjected to fire are analysed by means of the behaviours of some reduced scale structures (defined as models). These prototype–model correlations are governed by the so-called dimensional analysis (DA) methods. These methods, starting from the Buckingham theorem, offer several dimensionless variables and based on them is the so-called Model Law (ML), which is able to foresee the predictable prototype’s answer based on the results of the experimental investigations performed exclusively on the model (usually manufactured at a reduced scale). Based on the MDA principles, in a previous paper the authors elaborated the complete ML for the heat transfer in beams with rectangular-hole cross-sections, considering unprotected as well as thermally protected structural elements. The authors, based on meticulous experimental investigations, obtained the validation of this ML for the unprotected steel members. In this contribution, the authors offer in a similar manner the ML validation for intumescent paint-protected steel members and thus the complete validation of their original ML. In their theoretical and experimental investigations, the authors involved both a real column’s element combined with its models manufactured at 1:2 and 1:4, as well as 1:10 scales too. Consequently, the obtained ML can be considered as generally valid, involving a real structural element and its model manufactured at the desired scale.
ISSN:2571-6255
2571-6255
DOI:10.3390/fire5060210