Context, complexity and process in the implementation of evidence-based innovation: a realist informed review

• Published in: BMC health services research 2020-02, Vol.20 (1), p.81-81, Article 81
• Main Authors: Dryden-Palmer, K D, Parshuram, C S, Berta, W B
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: complexity; context; Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration; Diffusion of Innovation; evidence utilization; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-Based Practice - organization & administration; health care; Health services; Health Services Research; Humans; Implementation; Innovations; Knowledge; knowledge translation; Medical practice; Medical research; Nature; Practice; Realism (Literature); Setting (Literature); Theory; Translational Medical Research; User behavior
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-4935-y

This review of scholarly work in health care knowledge translation advances understanding of implementation components that support the complete and timely integration of new knowledge. We adopt a realist approach to investigate what is known from the current literature about the impact of, and the potential relationships between, context, complexity and implementation process. Informed by two distinct pathways, knowledge utilization and knowledge translation, we utilize Rogers' Diffusion of Innovations theory (DOI) and Harvey and Kitson's integrated- Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Service framework (PARIHS) to ground this review. Articles from 5 databases; Medline, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar and a search of authors were retrieved. Themes and patterns related to these implementation components were extracted. Literature was selected for inclusion by consensus. Data extraction was iterative and was moderated by the authors. A total of 67 articles were included in the review. Context was a central component to implementation. It was not clear how and to what extent context impacted implementation. Complexity was found to be a characteristic of context, implementation process, innovations and a product of the relationship between these three elements. Social processes in particular were reported as influential however; descriptions of how these social process impact were limited. Multiple theoretical and operational models were found to ground implementation processes. We offer an emerging conceptual model to illustrate the key discoveries. The review findings indicate there are dynamic relationship between context, complexity and implementation process for enhancing uptake of evidence-based knowledge in hospital settings. These are represented in a conceptual model. Limited empiric evidence was found to explain the nature of the relationships.