Loading…

Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal surgical evacuation of first trimester incomplete abortion: Comparative study

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of using vaginal misoprostol for management of first trimester spontaneous incomplete abortion as an alternative to direct vaginal surgical evacuation in our setting. This is a prospective comparative study performed on 147 patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Middle East Fertility Society journal 2014-06, Vol.19 (2), p.96-101
Main Authors: Shokry, Mahmoud, Fathalla, Mohamed, Hussien, Mostafa, Eissa, Ashraf A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f48c0d93a5f84b8abc6fa8454b2c4f9d04c6de8a6679996318f4c04fb4ab9a643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f48c0d93a5f84b8abc6fa8454b2c4f9d04c6de8a6679996318f4c04fb4ab9a643
container_end_page 101
container_issue 2
container_start_page 96
container_title Middle East Fertility Society journal
container_volume 19
creator Shokry, Mahmoud
Fathalla, Mohamed
Hussien, Mostafa
Eissa, Ashraf A.
description The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of using vaginal misoprostol for management of first trimester spontaneous incomplete abortion as an alternative to direct vaginal surgical evacuation in our setting. This is a prospective comparative study performed on 147 patients with first trimester incomplete abortion between 8 and 12weeks requesting medical management. They were divided into two groups according to patients’ choice; group (I) received misoprostol tablet 400mcg (Cytotec, Serono) every 4h for a maximum of three doses while group (II) underwent surgical vaginal evacuation directly under general anesthesia. Only 54 patients in group I and 51 patients in group II completed their follow up and included in the analysis. Although vaginal surgical evacuation was successful in solving the problem in 100% of cases, misoprostol was successful in 79.6% (p=0.0006). The overall satisfaction was slightly higher in the surgical group but almost equal percentage of both groups mentioned that they will recommend the method to a friend. No serious side effects or complications were reported in the misoprostol group. The incidence of excessive post-abortive bleeding was more in the misoprostol group than in the surgical evacuation group (p=0.0336). Also endometrium using transvaginal ultrasonography was significantly thicker in the misoprostol group than in group II (p=0.0071) but with no clinical importance as it was not associated with severe vaginal bleeding necessitating medical or surgical interventions. Although vaginal surgical evacuation is more effective than misoprostol in solving the problem still medical treatment is effective and acceptable especially when surgical management is not available or risky or patients refuse to do surgical management.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mefs.2013.05.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_46aeef38ef644d169adcd82e410d9cd4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1110569013000794</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_46aeef38ef644d169adcd82e410d9cd4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S1110569013000794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f48c0d93a5f84b8abc6fa8454b2c4f9d04c6de8a6679996318f4c04fb4ab9a643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9O5DAMxntYpAV2X2BPeYEpTpuGZMUFjfgnIe0F9hq5iTPKqDMZJZlKvD0pgzhysmX7-_T51zR_OLQcuLzatjvyue2A9y0MLcD1j-accw6rQWr42VzkvAXoVdfDeXP4j5uwx4ntQo6HFHOJE5sp5WNm8-cqH9Mm2NrQjPaIJcQ9i575kHJhJYUd5UKJhb2Nu8NEhRiOMS1nf9m6jjBVzUwsl6N7-9WceZwy_f6sl83r_d3L-nH1_O_haX37vLKCQ1l5oSw43ePglRgVjlZ6VGIQY2eF1w6ElY4USnmttZY9V15YEH4UOGqUor9snk6-LuLWHGpKTG8mYjAfg5g2BmtGO5EREol8r8hLIRyXGp11qqMaxGnrFq_u5GUroJzIf_lxMAtzszULc7MwNzCYyryKbk4iql_OgZLJNtDekguJbKkxwnfyd6sCkPI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal surgical evacuation of first trimester incomplete abortion: Comparative study</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><creator>Shokry, Mahmoud ; Fathalla, Mohamed ; Hussien, Mostafa ; Eissa, Ashraf A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shokry, Mahmoud ; Fathalla, Mohamed ; Hussien, Mostafa ; Eissa, Ashraf A.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of using vaginal misoprostol for management of first trimester spontaneous incomplete abortion as an alternative to direct vaginal surgical evacuation in our setting. This is a prospective comparative study performed on 147 patients with first trimester incomplete abortion between 8 and 12weeks requesting medical management. They were divided into two groups according to patients’ choice; group (I) received misoprostol tablet 400mcg (Cytotec, Serono) every 4h for a maximum of three doses while group (II) underwent surgical vaginal evacuation directly under general anesthesia. Only 54 patients in group I and 51 patients in group II completed their follow up and included in the analysis. Although vaginal surgical evacuation was successful in solving the problem in 100% of cases, misoprostol was successful in 79.6% (p=0.0006). The overall satisfaction was slightly higher in the surgical group but almost equal percentage of both groups mentioned that they will recommend the method to a friend. No serious side effects or complications were reported in the misoprostol group. The incidence of excessive post-abortive bleeding was more in the misoprostol group than in the surgical evacuation group (p=0.0336). Also endometrium using transvaginal ultrasonography was significantly thicker in the misoprostol group than in group II (p=0.0071) but with no clinical importance as it was not associated with severe vaginal bleeding necessitating medical or surgical interventions. Although vaginal surgical evacuation is more effective than misoprostol in solving the problem still medical treatment is effective and acceptable especially when surgical management is not available or risky or patients refuse to do surgical management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1110-5690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mefs.2013.05.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Incomplete abortion ; Misoprostol ; Surgical vaginal evacuation ; Vaginal bleeding</subject><ispartof>Middle East Fertility Society journal, 2014-06, Vol.19 (2), p.96-101</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f48c0d93a5f84b8abc6fa8454b2c4f9d04c6de8a6679996318f4c04fb4ab9a643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f48c0d93a5f84b8abc6fa8454b2c4f9d04c6de8a6679996318f4c04fb4ab9a643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569013000794$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shokry, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fathalla, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussien, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eissa, Ashraf A.</creatorcontrib><title>Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal surgical evacuation of first trimester incomplete abortion: Comparative study</title><title>Middle East Fertility Society journal</title><description>The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of using vaginal misoprostol for management of first trimester spontaneous incomplete abortion as an alternative to direct vaginal surgical evacuation in our setting. This is a prospective comparative study performed on 147 patients with first trimester incomplete abortion between 8 and 12weeks requesting medical management. They were divided into two groups according to patients’ choice; group (I) received misoprostol tablet 400mcg (Cytotec, Serono) every 4h for a maximum of three doses while group (II) underwent surgical vaginal evacuation directly under general anesthesia. Only 54 patients in group I and 51 patients in group II completed their follow up and included in the analysis. Although vaginal surgical evacuation was successful in solving the problem in 100% of cases, misoprostol was successful in 79.6% (p=0.0006). The overall satisfaction was slightly higher in the surgical group but almost equal percentage of both groups mentioned that they will recommend the method to a friend. No serious side effects or complications were reported in the misoprostol group. The incidence of excessive post-abortive bleeding was more in the misoprostol group than in the surgical evacuation group (p=0.0336). Also endometrium using transvaginal ultrasonography was significantly thicker in the misoprostol group than in group II (p=0.0071) but with no clinical importance as it was not associated with severe vaginal bleeding necessitating medical or surgical interventions. Although vaginal surgical evacuation is more effective than misoprostol in solving the problem still medical treatment is effective and acceptable especially when surgical management is not available or risky or patients refuse to do surgical management.</description><subject>Incomplete abortion</subject><subject>Misoprostol</subject><subject>Surgical vaginal evacuation</subject><subject>Vaginal bleeding</subject><issn>1110-5690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9O5DAMxntYpAV2X2BPeYEpTpuGZMUFjfgnIe0F9hq5iTPKqDMZJZlKvD0pgzhysmX7-_T51zR_OLQcuLzatjvyue2A9y0MLcD1j-accw6rQWr42VzkvAXoVdfDeXP4j5uwx4ntQo6HFHOJE5sp5WNm8-cqH9Mm2NrQjPaIJcQ9i575kHJhJYUd5UKJhb2Nu8NEhRiOMS1nf9m6jjBVzUwsl6N7-9WceZwy_f6sl83r_d3L-nH1_O_haX37vLKCQ1l5oSw43ePglRgVjlZ6VGIQY2eF1w6ElY4USnmttZY9V15YEH4UOGqUor9snk6-LuLWHGpKTG8mYjAfg5g2BmtGO5EREol8r8hLIRyXGp11qqMaxGnrFq_u5GUroJzIf_lxMAtzszULc7MwNzCYyryKbk4iql_OgZLJNtDekguJbKkxwnfyd6sCkPI</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Shokry, Mahmoud</creator><creator>Fathalla, Mohamed</creator><creator>Hussien, Mostafa</creator><creator>Eissa, Ashraf A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal surgical evacuation of first trimester incomplete abortion: Comparative study</title><author>Shokry, Mahmoud ; Fathalla, Mohamed ; Hussien, Mostafa ; Eissa, Ashraf A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f48c0d93a5f84b8abc6fa8454b2c4f9d04c6de8a6679996318f4c04fb4ab9a643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Incomplete abortion</topic><topic>Misoprostol</topic><topic>Surgical vaginal evacuation</topic><topic>Vaginal bleeding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shokry, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fathalla, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussien, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eissa, Ashraf A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Middle East Fertility Society journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shokry, Mahmoud</au><au>Fathalla, Mohamed</au><au>Hussien, Mostafa</au><au>Eissa, Ashraf A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal surgical evacuation of first trimester incomplete abortion: Comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Middle East Fertility Society journal</jtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>96</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>96-101</pages><issn>1110-5690</issn><abstract>The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of using vaginal misoprostol for management of first trimester spontaneous incomplete abortion as an alternative to direct vaginal surgical evacuation in our setting. This is a prospective comparative study performed on 147 patients with first trimester incomplete abortion between 8 and 12weeks requesting medical management. They were divided into two groups according to patients’ choice; group (I) received misoprostol tablet 400mcg (Cytotec, Serono) every 4h for a maximum of three doses while group (II) underwent surgical vaginal evacuation directly under general anesthesia. Only 54 patients in group I and 51 patients in group II completed their follow up and included in the analysis. Although vaginal surgical evacuation was successful in solving the problem in 100% of cases, misoprostol was successful in 79.6% (p=0.0006). The overall satisfaction was slightly higher in the surgical group but almost equal percentage of both groups mentioned that they will recommend the method to a friend. No serious side effects or complications were reported in the misoprostol group. The incidence of excessive post-abortive bleeding was more in the misoprostol group than in the surgical evacuation group (p=0.0336). Also endometrium using transvaginal ultrasonography was significantly thicker in the misoprostol group than in group II (p=0.0071) but with no clinical importance as it was not associated with severe vaginal bleeding necessitating medical or surgical interventions. Although vaginal surgical evacuation is more effective than misoprostol in solving the problem still medical treatment is effective and acceptable especially when surgical management is not available or risky or patients refuse to do surgical management.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.mefs.2013.05.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1110-5690
ispartof Middle East Fertility Society journal, 2014-06, Vol.19 (2), p.96-101
issn 1110-5690
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_46aeef38ef644d169adcd82e410d9cd4
source ScienceDirect
subjects Incomplete abortion
Misoprostol
Surgical vaginal evacuation
Vaginal bleeding
title Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal surgical evacuation of first trimester incomplete abortion: Comparative study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A03%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaginal%20misoprostol%20versus%20vaginal%20surgical%20evacuation%20of%20first%20trimester%20incomplete%20abortion:%20Comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Middle%20East%20Fertility%20Society%20journal&rft.au=Shokry,%20Mahmoud&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=96-101&rft.issn=1110-5690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mefs.2013.05.007&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_doaj_%3ES1110569013000794%3C/elsevier_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-f48c0d93a5f84b8abc6fa8454b2c4f9d04c6de8a6679996318f4c04fb4ab9a643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true