Loading…
Evaluation of nutritional and economic feed values of spent coffee grounds and Artemisia princeps residues as a ruminant feed using in vitro ruminal fermentation
Much research on animal feed has focused on finding alternative feed ingredients that can replace conventional ones (e.g., grains and beans) to reduce feed costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the economic, as well as nutritional value of spent coffee grounds (SCG) and Japanese mugwort...
Saved in:
Published in: | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2015-10, Vol.3, p.e1343-e1343, Article e1343 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-e85e7fd4d7acda966a1e6fe282dd45b86b6679345407cbbe51436629c6f227763 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-e85e7fd4d7acda966a1e6fe282dd45b86b6679345407cbbe51436629c6f227763 |
container_end_page | e1343 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e1343 |
container_title | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Seo, Jakyeom Jung, Jae Keun Seo, Seongwon |
description | Much research on animal feed has focused on finding alternative feed ingredients that can replace conventional ones (e.g., grains and beans) to reduce feed costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the economic, as well as nutritional value of spent coffee grounds (SCG) and Japanese mugwort (Artemisia princeps) residues (APR) as alternative feed ingredients for ruminants. We also investigated whether pre-fermentation using Lactobacillus spp. was a feasible way to increase the feed value of these by-products. Chemical analyses and an in vitro study were conducted for SCG, APR, and their pre-fermented forms. All the experimental diets for in vitro ruminal fermentation were formulated to contain a similar composition of crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and total digestible nutrients at 1x maintenance feed intake based on the dairy National Research Council (NRC). The control diet was composed of ryegrass, corn, soybean meal, whereas the treatments consisted of SCG, SCG fermented with Lactobacillus spp. (FSCG), APR, and its fermented form (FAPR). The treatment diets replaced 100 g/kg dry matter (DM) of the feed ingredients in the control. Costs were lower for the all treatments, except FAPR, than that of the control. After 24-h incubation, the NDF digestibility of the diets containing SCG and its fermented form were significantly lower than those of the other diets (P < 0.01); pre-fermentation tended to increase NDF digestibility (P = 0.07), especially for APR. Supplementation of SCG significantly decreased total gas production (ml/g DM) after 24-h fermentation in comparison with the control (P < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences between the control and the SCG or the APR diets in total gas production, as expressed per Korean Won (KRW). Diets supplemented with SCG or FSCG tended to have a higher total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, expressed as per KRW, compared with the control (P = 0.06). Conversely, the fermentation process of SCG and APR significantly decreased total gas production and VFA production as expressed per KRW (P < 0.05). Because of their nutrient composition and relatively lower cost, we concluded that SCG and APR could be used as alternative feed sources, replacing conventional feed ingredients. However, pre-fermentation of agricultural by-products, such as SCG and APR, may be inappropriate for improving their nutritive considering the increase in production costs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7717/peerj.1343 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_46cccb6ef25b443e9513c4edce9454a1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543438641</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_46cccb6ef25b443e9513c4edce9454a1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543438641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-e85e7fd4d7acda966a1e6fe282dd45b86b6679345407cbbe51436629c6f227763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt-K1DAUxoso7rLujQ8gAUFEmLHN3_ZGWJZVFxa80euQJqczGdpkTNqBfRzf1NOZcZ0Rm0LSc37nS3ryFcXrqlwqVamPW4C0WVaMs2fFJa2kWtRMNM9P1hfFdc6bEp-ayrJmL4sLKgWtedlcFr_udqafzOhjILEjYRqTnz9MT0xwBGwMcfCWdACOzCjkmctbCCOxscM4WaU4BZf3BTdphMFnb8g2-WBhm0mC7N1cZ_AlaRp8MFi8V5yyDyviA9n5McVjssdcGnCD_bFeFS8602e4Ps5XxY_Pd99vvy4evn25v715WFjB-LiAWoDqHHfKWGcaKU0FsgNaU-e4aGvZSqkaxgUvlW1bEBVnUtLGyo5SpSS7Ku4Pui6ajcbTDyY96mi83gdiWmmTRm970Fxaa1sJHRUt5wwaUTHLwVloUN9UqPXpoLWd2mGOhzGZ_kz0PBP8Wq_iDpWpakqFAu-PAin-xN6NGptqoe9NgDhlXSlWlpQrUSL69h90E6eEXUSqEappOFPVX2pl8Ad86CLua2dRfSM4uqeWfKaW_6FwOLxUtAJ0HuNnBe9OCtZg-nGdYz_NF5fPwQ8H0KaYc4LuqRlVqWcj672R9WxkhN-ctu8J_WNb9hvCn_CK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957994371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of nutritional and economic feed values of spent coffee grounds and Artemisia princeps residues as a ruminant feed using in vitro ruminal fermentation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Seo, Jakyeom ; Jung, Jae Keun ; Seo, Seongwon</creator><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jakyeom ; Jung, Jae Keun ; Seo, Seongwon</creatorcontrib><description>Much research on animal feed has focused on finding alternative feed ingredients that can replace conventional ones (e.g., grains and beans) to reduce feed costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the economic, as well as nutritional value of spent coffee grounds (SCG) and Japanese mugwort (Artemisia princeps) residues (APR) as alternative feed ingredients for ruminants. We also investigated whether pre-fermentation using Lactobacillus spp. was a feasible way to increase the feed value of these by-products. Chemical analyses and an in vitro study were conducted for SCG, APR, and their pre-fermented forms. All the experimental diets for in vitro ruminal fermentation were formulated to contain a similar composition of crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and total digestible nutrients at 1x maintenance feed intake based on the dairy National Research Council (NRC). The control diet was composed of ryegrass, corn, soybean meal, whereas the treatments consisted of SCG, SCG fermented with Lactobacillus spp. (FSCG), APR, and its fermented form (FAPR). The treatment diets replaced 100 g/kg dry matter (DM) of the feed ingredients in the control. Costs were lower for the all treatments, except FAPR, than that of the control. After 24-h incubation, the NDF digestibility of the diets containing SCG and its fermented form were significantly lower than those of the other diets (P < 0.01); pre-fermentation tended to increase NDF digestibility (P = 0.07), especially for APR. Supplementation of SCG significantly decreased total gas production (ml/g DM) after 24-h fermentation in comparison with the control (P < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences between the control and the SCG or the APR diets in total gas production, as expressed per Korean Won (KRW). Diets supplemented with SCG or FSCG tended to have a higher total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, expressed as per KRW, compared with the control (P = 0.06). Conversely, the fermentation process of SCG and APR significantly decreased total gas production and VFA production as expressed per KRW (P < 0.05). Because of their nutrient composition and relatively lower cost, we concluded that SCG and APR could be used as alternative feed sources, replacing conventional feed ingredients. However, pre-fermentation of agricultural by-products, such as SCG and APR, may be inappropriate for improving their nutritive considering the increase in production costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1343</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26528409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural Science ; Animal lactation ; Animal sciences ; Artemisia princeps ; Artemisia princeps residues ; Beans ; Cattle ; Coffee ; Cost control ; Diet ; Digestibility ; Dry matter ; Economic aspects ; Fatty acids ; Feed additives ; Feed industry ; Feeds ; Fermentation ; Food Science and Technology ; Gas production ; Grains ; In vitro rumen fermentation ; Laboratories ; Lactobacillus ; Lactobacillus fermentation ; Legal fees ; Livestock ; Natural gas ; Nutrients ; Nutrition ; Protein composition ; Rumen ; Spent coffee grounds ; Values ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2015-10, Vol.3, p.e1343-e1343, Article e1343</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2015 Seo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2015 Seo et al. 2015 Seo et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-e85e7fd4d7acda966a1e6fe282dd45b86b6679345407cbbe51436629c6f227763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-e85e7fd4d7acda966a1e6fe282dd45b86b6679345407cbbe51436629c6f227763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1957994371/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1957994371?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53770,53772,74873</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26528409$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jakyeom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jae Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Seongwon</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of nutritional and economic feed values of spent coffee grounds and Artemisia princeps residues as a ruminant feed using in vitro ruminal fermentation</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>Much research on animal feed has focused on finding alternative feed ingredients that can replace conventional ones (e.g., grains and beans) to reduce feed costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the economic, as well as nutritional value of spent coffee grounds (SCG) and Japanese mugwort (Artemisia princeps) residues (APR) as alternative feed ingredients for ruminants. We also investigated whether pre-fermentation using Lactobacillus spp. was a feasible way to increase the feed value of these by-products. Chemical analyses and an in vitro study were conducted for SCG, APR, and their pre-fermented forms. All the experimental diets for in vitro ruminal fermentation were formulated to contain a similar composition of crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and total digestible nutrients at 1x maintenance feed intake based on the dairy National Research Council (NRC). The control diet was composed of ryegrass, corn, soybean meal, whereas the treatments consisted of SCG, SCG fermented with Lactobacillus spp. (FSCG), APR, and its fermented form (FAPR). The treatment diets replaced 100 g/kg dry matter (DM) of the feed ingredients in the control. Costs were lower for the all treatments, except FAPR, than that of the control. After 24-h incubation, the NDF digestibility of the diets containing SCG and its fermented form were significantly lower than those of the other diets (P < 0.01); pre-fermentation tended to increase NDF digestibility (P = 0.07), especially for APR. Supplementation of SCG significantly decreased total gas production (ml/g DM) after 24-h fermentation in comparison with the control (P < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences between the control and the SCG or the APR diets in total gas production, as expressed per Korean Won (KRW). Diets supplemented with SCG or FSCG tended to have a higher total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, expressed as per KRW, compared with the control (P = 0.06). Conversely, the fermentation process of SCG and APR significantly decreased total gas production and VFA production as expressed per KRW (P < 0.05). Because of their nutrient composition and relatively lower cost, we concluded that SCG and APR could be used as alternative feed sources, replacing conventional feed ingredients. However, pre-fermentation of agricultural by-products, such as SCG and APR, may be inappropriate for improving their nutritive considering the increase in production costs.</description><subject>Agricultural Science</subject><subject>Animal lactation</subject><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Artemisia princeps</subject><subject>Artemisia princeps residues</subject><subject>Beans</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Feed industry</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Food Science and Technology</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>Grains</subject><subject>In vitro rumen fermentation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lactobacillus</subject><subject>Lactobacillus fermentation</subject><subject>Legal fees</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Protein composition</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Spent coffee grounds</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt-K1DAUxoso7rLujQ8gAUFEmLHN3_ZGWJZVFxa80euQJqczGdpkTNqBfRzf1NOZcZ0Rm0LSc37nS3ryFcXrqlwqVamPW4C0WVaMs2fFJa2kWtRMNM9P1hfFdc6bEp-ayrJmL4sLKgWtedlcFr_udqafzOhjILEjYRqTnz9MT0xwBGwMcfCWdACOzCjkmctbCCOxscM4WaU4BZf3BTdphMFnb8g2-WBhm0mC7N1cZ_AlaRp8MFi8V5yyDyviA9n5McVjssdcGnCD_bFeFS8602e4Ps5XxY_Pd99vvy4evn25v715WFjB-LiAWoDqHHfKWGcaKU0FsgNaU-e4aGvZSqkaxgUvlW1bEBVnUtLGyo5SpSS7Ku4Pui6ajcbTDyY96mi83gdiWmmTRm970Fxaa1sJHRUt5wwaUTHLwVloUN9UqPXpoLWd2mGOhzGZ_kz0PBP8Wq_iDpWpakqFAu-PAin-xN6NGptqoe9NgDhlXSlWlpQrUSL69h90E6eEXUSqEappOFPVX2pl8Ad86CLua2dRfSM4uqeWfKaW_6FwOLxUtAJ0HuNnBe9OCtZg-nGdYz_NF5fPwQ8H0KaYc4LuqRlVqWcj672R9WxkhN-ctu8J_WNb9hvCn_CK</recordid><startdate>20151022</startdate><enddate>20151022</enddate><creator>Seo, Jakyeom</creator><creator>Jung, Jae Keun</creator><creator>Seo, Seongwon</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151022</creationdate><title>Evaluation of nutritional and economic feed values of spent coffee grounds and Artemisia princeps residues as a ruminant feed using in vitro ruminal fermentation</title><author>Seo, Jakyeom ; Jung, Jae Keun ; Seo, Seongwon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-e85e7fd4d7acda966a1e6fe282dd45b86b6679345407cbbe51436629c6f227763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agricultural Science</topic><topic>Animal lactation</topic><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Artemisia princeps</topic><topic>Artemisia princeps residues</topic><topic>Beans</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Feed industry</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Food Science and Technology</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>Grains</topic><topic>In vitro rumen fermentation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lactobacillus</topic><topic>Lactobacillus fermentation</topic><topic>Legal fees</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Protein composition</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Spent coffee grounds</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jakyeom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Jae Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Seongwon</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seo, Jakyeom</au><au>Jung, Jae Keun</au><au>Seo, Seongwon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of nutritional and economic feed values of spent coffee grounds and Artemisia princeps residues as a ruminant feed using in vitro ruminal fermentation</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2015-10-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>3</volume><spage>e1343</spage><epage>e1343</epage><pages>e1343-e1343</pages><artnum>e1343</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Much research on animal feed has focused on finding alternative feed ingredients that can replace conventional ones (e.g., grains and beans) to reduce feed costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the economic, as well as nutritional value of spent coffee grounds (SCG) and Japanese mugwort (Artemisia princeps) residues (APR) as alternative feed ingredients for ruminants. We also investigated whether pre-fermentation using Lactobacillus spp. was a feasible way to increase the feed value of these by-products. Chemical analyses and an in vitro study were conducted for SCG, APR, and their pre-fermented forms. All the experimental diets for in vitro ruminal fermentation were formulated to contain a similar composition of crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and total digestible nutrients at 1x maintenance feed intake based on the dairy National Research Council (NRC). The control diet was composed of ryegrass, corn, soybean meal, whereas the treatments consisted of SCG, SCG fermented with Lactobacillus spp. (FSCG), APR, and its fermented form (FAPR). The treatment diets replaced 100 g/kg dry matter (DM) of the feed ingredients in the control. Costs were lower for the all treatments, except FAPR, than that of the control. After 24-h incubation, the NDF digestibility of the diets containing SCG and its fermented form were significantly lower than those of the other diets (P < 0.01); pre-fermentation tended to increase NDF digestibility (P = 0.07), especially for APR. Supplementation of SCG significantly decreased total gas production (ml/g DM) after 24-h fermentation in comparison with the control (P < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences between the control and the SCG or the APR diets in total gas production, as expressed per Korean Won (KRW). Diets supplemented with SCG or FSCG tended to have a higher total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration, expressed as per KRW, compared with the control (P = 0.06). Conversely, the fermentation process of SCG and APR significantly decreased total gas production and VFA production as expressed per KRW (P < 0.05). Because of their nutrient composition and relatively lower cost, we concluded that SCG and APR could be used as alternative feed sources, replacing conventional feed ingredients. However, pre-fermentation of agricultural by-products, such as SCG and APR, may be inappropriate for improving their nutritive considering the increase in production costs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><pmid>26528409</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.1343</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2167-8359 |
ispartof | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2015-10, Vol.3, p.e1343-e1343, Article e1343 |
issn | 2167-8359 2167-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_46cccb6ef25b443e9513c4edce9454a1 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Agricultural Science Animal lactation Animal sciences Artemisia princeps Artemisia princeps residues Beans Cattle Coffee Cost control Diet Digestibility Dry matter Economic aspects Fatty acids Feed additives Feed industry Feeds Fermentation Food Science and Technology Gas production Grains In vitro rumen fermentation Laboratories Lactobacillus Lactobacillus fermentation Legal fees Livestock Natural gas Nutrients Nutrition Protein composition Rumen Spent coffee grounds Values Zoology |
title | Evaluation of nutritional and economic feed values of spent coffee grounds and Artemisia princeps residues as a ruminant feed using in vitro ruminal fermentation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A28%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20nutritional%20and%20economic%20feed%20values%20of%20spent%20coffee%20grounds%20and%20Artemisia%20princeps%20residues%20as%20a%20ruminant%20feed%20using%20in%20vitro%20ruminal%20fermentation&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Seo,%20Jakyeom&rft.date=2015-10-22&rft.volume=3&rft.spage=e1343&rft.epage=e1343&rft.pages=e1343-e1343&rft.artnum=e1343&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.1343&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA543438641%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-e85e7fd4d7acda966a1e6fe282dd45b86b6679345407cbbe51436629c6f227763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957994371&rft_id=info:pmid/26528409&rft_galeid=A543438641&rfr_iscdi=true |