Loading…
Efficiency of Virucidal Disinfectants on Wood Surfaces in Animal Husbandry
The aim of this study was to test the inactivation of viruses on germ carriers of different types of wood using a disinfectant in order to assess the biosafety of wood as a building material in animal husbandry. The laboratory disinfectant efficacy tests were based on German testing guidelines and c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Microorganisms (Basel) 2024-05, Vol.12 (5), p.1019 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-b14478dbd7e0ae59b69b301d8cbf6a6b260a88a3bec7d6d4328773af3b7c938b3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1019 |
container_title | Microorganisms (Basel) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Oettler, Martin J Conraths, Franz J Roesler, Uwe Reiche, Sven Homeier-Bachmann, Timo Denzin, Nicolai |
description | The aim of this study was to test the inactivation of viruses on germ carriers of different types of wood using a disinfectant in order to assess the biosafety of wood as a building material in animal husbandry. The laboratory disinfectant efficacy tests were based on German testing guidelines and current European standards. Five different types of wood germ carriers, i.e., spruce (
), pine (
), poplar (
sp.), beech (
) and Douglas fir (
), were inoculated with enveloped or non-enveloped viruses and then treated with one of three different disinfectants. The results revealed that intact, fine-sawn timber with a low roughness depth can be effectively inactivated. Peracetic acid proved to be the most effective disinfectant across all tests. Regardless of the pathogen and the type of wood, a concentration of 0.1% of the pure substance at a temperature of 10 °C and an exposure time of one hour can be recommended. At a temperature of -10 °C, a concentration of 0.75% is recommended. The basic chemicals formic acid and glutaraldehyde demonstrated only limited effectiveness overall. The synergistic effects of various wood components on the inactivation of viruses offer potential for further investigation. Disinfectant tests should also be conclusively verified in field trials to ensure that the results from standardised laboratory tests can be transferred to real stable conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/microorganisms12051019 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_47429d52c8704847ac5f8d36b3afaa8d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A795465146</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_47429d52c8704847ac5f8d36b3afaa8d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A795465146</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-b14478dbd7e0ae59b69b301d8cbf6a6b260a88a3bec7d6d4328773af3b7c938b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUslOHDEUtKJEAU34BdRSLrkM2O39OCIkECHlkO1oPW_Iox6b2N2H-fuYDJBF2Ac_PVWV6y0InRJ8RqnG57vkain1FnJqu0ZGzAkm-gU6HrEU61Fg-fKv-AidtLbF_WhCFSev0RFVUo-KqWP06TLG5FLIbj-UOHxPdXHJwzS8Ty3lGNwMeW5DycOPUvzwZakRXGhDysMmp10HXi3NQvZ1_wa9ijC1cPLwrtC3D5dfL67WN58_Xl9sbtaOCTmvLWFMKm-9DBgC11ZoSzHxytkoQNhuGZQCaoOTXnhGRyUlhUitdJoqS1fo-qDrC2zNXe0u6t4USOZ3ovfFQJ2Tm4Jhko3a89EpiZliEhyPylNhux5Aj1bo3UHrrpafS2iz2aXmwjRBDmVphmKBqSR81B369j_otiw190o7imuuycjkH9Qt9P97B8tcwd2Lmo3UnAlOmOios2dQ_frQZ1tyiKnn_yGIA6EPvrUa4lPdBJv7nTDP70Qnnj64Xuwu-Cfa4wbQX3HUtAE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3059591247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficiency of Virucidal Disinfectants on Wood Surfaces in Animal Husbandry</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Oettler, Martin J ; Conraths, Franz J ; Roesler, Uwe ; Reiche, Sven ; Homeier-Bachmann, Timo ; Denzin, Nicolai</creator><creatorcontrib>Oettler, Martin J ; Conraths, Franz J ; Roesler, Uwe ; Reiche, Sven ; Homeier-Bachmann, Timo ; Denzin, Nicolai</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to test the inactivation of viruses on germ carriers of different types of wood using a disinfectant in order to assess the biosafety of wood as a building material in animal husbandry. The laboratory disinfectant efficacy tests were based on German testing guidelines and current European standards. Five different types of wood germ carriers, i.e., spruce (
), pine (
), poplar (
sp.), beech (
) and Douglas fir (
), were inoculated with enveloped or non-enveloped viruses and then treated with one of three different disinfectants. The results revealed that intact, fine-sawn timber with a low roughness depth can be effectively inactivated. Peracetic acid proved to be the most effective disinfectant across all tests. Regardless of the pathogen and the type of wood, a concentration of 0.1% of the pure substance at a temperature of 10 °C and an exposure time of one hour can be recommended. At a temperature of -10 °C, a concentration of 0.75% is recommended. The basic chemicals formic acid and glutaraldehyde demonstrated only limited effectiveness overall. The synergistic effects of various wood components on the inactivation of viruses offer potential for further investigation. Disinfectant tests should also be conclusively verified in field trials to ensure that the results from standardised laboratory tests can be transferred to real stable conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-2607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12051019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38792848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal culture ; Animal husbandry ; Antiseptics ; Biosafety ; Cell culture ; Comparative analysis ; Construction ; Deactivation ; Disinfectants ; disinfection ; Disinfection & disinfectants ; Disinfection and disinfectants ; Environmental aspects ; Farms ; Formic acid ; glutaraldehyde ; Hardwoods ; Hygiene ; Inactivation ; Laboratory tests ; Peracetic acid ; Physiological aspects ; Pine trees ; Porous materials ; Pseudotsuga menziesii ; Safety and security measures ; Synergistic effect ; Test methods ; Testing ; Viruses ; Wood</subject><ispartof>Microorganisms (Basel), 2024-05, Vol.12 (5), p.1019</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-b14478dbd7e0ae59b69b301d8cbf6a6b260a88a3bec7d6d4328773af3b7c938b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6268-5207 ; 0000-0002-7400-9409 ; 0009-0000-8596-1211 ; 0000-0001-7575-2483 ; 0000-0002-8135-3814 ; 0000-0003-4705-6792</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3059591247/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3059591247?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,74997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38792848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oettler, Martin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conraths, Franz J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roesler, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiche, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homeier-Bachmann, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denzin, Nicolai</creatorcontrib><title>Efficiency of Virucidal Disinfectants on Wood Surfaces in Animal Husbandry</title><title>Microorganisms (Basel)</title><addtitle>Microorganisms</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to test the inactivation of viruses on germ carriers of different types of wood using a disinfectant in order to assess the biosafety of wood as a building material in animal husbandry. The laboratory disinfectant efficacy tests were based on German testing guidelines and current European standards. Five different types of wood germ carriers, i.e., spruce (
), pine (
), poplar (
sp.), beech (
) and Douglas fir (
), were inoculated with enveloped or non-enveloped viruses and then treated with one of three different disinfectants. The results revealed that intact, fine-sawn timber with a low roughness depth can be effectively inactivated. Peracetic acid proved to be the most effective disinfectant across all tests. Regardless of the pathogen and the type of wood, a concentration of 0.1% of the pure substance at a temperature of 10 °C and an exposure time of one hour can be recommended. At a temperature of -10 °C, a concentration of 0.75% is recommended. The basic chemicals formic acid and glutaraldehyde demonstrated only limited effectiveness overall. The synergistic effects of various wood components on the inactivation of viruses offer potential for further investigation. Disinfectant tests should also be conclusively verified in field trials to ensure that the results from standardised laboratory tests can be transferred to real stable conditions.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal culture</subject><subject>Animal husbandry</subject><subject>Antiseptics</subject><subject>Biosafety</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Deactivation</subject><subject>Disinfectants</subject><subject>disinfection</subject><subject>Disinfection & disinfectants</subject><subject>Disinfection and disinfectants</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Formic acid</subject><subject>glutaraldehyde</subject><subject>Hardwoods</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Inactivation</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Peracetic acid</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Porous materials</subject><subject>Pseudotsuga menziesii</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Synergistic effect</subject><subject>Test methods</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>2076-2607</issn><issn>2076-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUslOHDEUtKJEAU34BdRSLrkM2O39OCIkECHlkO1oPW_Iox6b2N2H-fuYDJBF2Ac_PVWV6y0InRJ8RqnG57vkain1FnJqu0ZGzAkm-gU6HrEU61Fg-fKv-AidtLbF_WhCFSev0RFVUo-KqWP06TLG5FLIbj-UOHxPdXHJwzS8Ty3lGNwMeW5DycOPUvzwZakRXGhDysMmp10HXi3NQvZ1_wa9ijC1cPLwrtC3D5dfL67WN58_Xl9sbtaOCTmvLWFMKm-9DBgC11ZoSzHxytkoQNhuGZQCaoOTXnhGRyUlhUitdJoqS1fo-qDrC2zNXe0u6t4USOZ3ovfFQJ2Tm4Jhko3a89EpiZliEhyPylNhux5Aj1bo3UHrrpafS2iz2aXmwjRBDmVphmKBqSR81B369j_otiw190o7imuuycjkH9Qt9P97B8tcwd2Lmo3UnAlOmOios2dQ_frQZ1tyiKnn_yGIA6EPvrUa4lPdBJv7nTDP70Qnnj64Xuwu-Cfa4wbQX3HUtAE</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Oettler, Martin J</creator><creator>Conraths, Franz J</creator><creator>Roesler, Uwe</creator><creator>Reiche, Sven</creator><creator>Homeier-Bachmann, Timo</creator><creator>Denzin, Nicolai</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-5207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-9409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8596-1211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-2483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-3814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-6792</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Efficiency of Virucidal Disinfectants on Wood Surfaces in Animal Husbandry</title><author>Oettler, Martin J ; Conraths, Franz J ; Roesler, Uwe ; Reiche, Sven ; Homeier-Bachmann, Timo ; Denzin, Nicolai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-b14478dbd7e0ae59b69b301d8cbf6a6b260a88a3bec7d6d4328773af3b7c938b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal culture</topic><topic>Animal husbandry</topic><topic>Antiseptics</topic><topic>Biosafety</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Deactivation</topic><topic>Disinfectants</topic><topic>disinfection</topic><topic>Disinfection & disinfectants</topic><topic>Disinfection and disinfectants</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Formic acid</topic><topic>glutaraldehyde</topic><topic>Hardwoods</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Inactivation</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Peracetic acid</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Porous materials</topic><topic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Synergistic effect</topic><topic>Test methods</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oettler, Martin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conraths, Franz J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roesler, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiche, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homeier-Bachmann, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denzin, Nicolai</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Microorganisms (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oettler, Martin J</au><au>Conraths, Franz J</au><au>Roesler, Uwe</au><au>Reiche, Sven</au><au>Homeier-Bachmann, Timo</au><au>Denzin, Nicolai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficiency of Virucidal Disinfectants on Wood Surfaces in Animal Husbandry</atitle><jtitle>Microorganisms (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Microorganisms</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1019</spage><pages>1019-</pages><issn>2076-2607</issn><eissn>2076-2607</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to test the inactivation of viruses on germ carriers of different types of wood using a disinfectant in order to assess the biosafety of wood as a building material in animal husbandry. The laboratory disinfectant efficacy tests were based on German testing guidelines and current European standards. Five different types of wood germ carriers, i.e., spruce (
), pine (
), poplar (
sp.), beech (
) and Douglas fir (
), were inoculated with enveloped or non-enveloped viruses and then treated with one of three different disinfectants. The results revealed that intact, fine-sawn timber with a low roughness depth can be effectively inactivated. Peracetic acid proved to be the most effective disinfectant across all tests. Regardless of the pathogen and the type of wood, a concentration of 0.1% of the pure substance at a temperature of 10 °C and an exposure time of one hour can be recommended. At a temperature of -10 °C, a concentration of 0.75% is recommended. The basic chemicals formic acid and glutaraldehyde demonstrated only limited effectiveness overall. The synergistic effects of various wood components on the inactivation of viruses offer potential for further investigation. Disinfectant tests should also be conclusively verified in field trials to ensure that the results from standardised laboratory tests can be transferred to real stable conditions.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38792848</pmid><doi>10.3390/microorganisms12051019</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6268-5207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7400-9409</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8596-1211</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-2483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-3814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-6792</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2076-2607 |
ispartof | Microorganisms (Basel), 2024-05, Vol.12 (5), p.1019 |
issn | 2076-2607 2076-2607 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_47429d52c8704847ac5f8d36b3afaa8d |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central |
subjects | Agriculture Animal culture Animal husbandry Antiseptics Biosafety Cell culture Comparative analysis Construction Deactivation Disinfectants disinfection Disinfection & disinfectants Disinfection and disinfectants Environmental aspects Farms Formic acid glutaraldehyde Hardwoods Hygiene Inactivation Laboratory tests Peracetic acid Physiological aspects Pine trees Porous materials Pseudotsuga menziesii Safety and security measures Synergistic effect Test methods Testing Viruses Wood |
title | Efficiency of Virucidal Disinfectants on Wood Surfaces in Animal Husbandry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A19%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficiency%20of%20Virucidal%20Disinfectants%20on%20Wood%20Surfaces%20in%20Animal%20Husbandry&rft.jtitle=Microorganisms%20(Basel)&rft.au=Oettler,%20Martin%20J&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1019&rft.pages=1019-&rft.issn=2076-2607&rft.eissn=2076-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/microorganisms12051019&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA795465146%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-b14478dbd7e0ae59b69b301d8cbf6a6b260a88a3bec7d6d4328773af3b7c938b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3059591247&rft_id=info:pmid/38792848&rft_galeid=A795465146&rfr_iscdi=true |