Comparing reliability between 3D imaging and 2D photography for external nasal anthropometry

This study investigates and compares the reliability and reproducibility of two facial anthropometric methods about external nasal angles, 3D imaging and conventional 2D photography. 2D photograph images and 3D images about external nose of 30 volunteers were taken using digital camera and Morpheus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2022-03, Vol.12 (1), p.4531-4531, Article 4531
Main Authors: Seo, Yoon-Soo, Jo, Ki-Hun, Kim, Joo-Yeon, Kwon, Jae-Hwan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
639/624/1107/510
692/698
Anthropometry
Body measurements
Correlation coefficient
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
multidisciplinary
Nose - diagnostic imaging
Photography
Photography - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Statistical analysis
Three dimensional imaging
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-b77e962fea1e5d0b101aff2d741d20c54cb59a93d176117a4949e007dc30fa263
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-b77e962fea1e5d0b101aff2d741d20c54cb59a93d176117a4949e007dc30fa263
container_end_page 4531
container_issue 1
container_start_page 4531
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 12
creator Seo, Yoon-Soo
Jo, Ki-Hun
Kim, Joo-Yeon
Kwon, Jae-Hwan
description This study investigates and compares the reliability and reproducibility of two facial anthropometric methods about external nasal angles, 3D imaging and conventional 2D photography. 2D photograph images and 3D images about external nose of 30 volunteers were taken using digital camera and Morpheus 3D scanner. To evaluate intra-rater reliability, each images were taken over two different days for each subject by the same researcher. To evaluate inter-rater reliability, another researcher took each images for each subject on the first day. The reliability of each method for measuring 4 external nasal angle is obtained using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and compared. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of both 3D imaging and 2D photography had excellent agreement in all 4 nasal angles. In the nasofacial angular parameter, Inter-rater ICC, 2D photography was significantly higher than 3D imaging. Result of intra-rater ICC also showed both 3D imaging and 2D photography had good reliability in all 4 nasal angles. Similar to those of inter-rater ICC, nasofacial angular parameter showed statistically significant differences between 3D imaging and 2D photography. In terms of reliability, both 2D and 3D showed appropriate anthropometric results and considering its own advantage, each methods can be used complementarily.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-022-08714-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_47923316354444c6b5b9f5bd4dd1537a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_47923316354444c6b5b9f5bd4dd1537a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2640328880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-b77e962fea1e5d0b101aff2d741d20c54cb59a93d176117a4949e007dc30fa263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEolXpH-CAInHhEvBnHF-Q0JZCpUpc4IZkTeJJNqskDrYXyL-v05TScmAO9sjzzOuxZ7LsJSVvKeHVuyCo1FVBGCtIpagolifZKSNCFowz9vSBf5Kdh3AgySTTgurn2QlPXqkqeZp937lxBt9PXe5x6KHuhz4ueY3xF-KU84u8H6FbwzDZnF3k895F13mY90veOp_j74h-giGfIKQVprj3bnYjRr-8yJ61MAQ8v9vPsm-XH7_uPhfXXz5d7T5cF40UJBa1UqhL1iJQlJbUlFBoW2aVoJaRxDS11KC5paqkVIHQQiMhyjactMBKfpZdbbrWwcHMPpXsF-OgN7cHzncGfOybAY1QmnFOSy5FsqasZa1bWVthLZVcQdJ6v2nNx3pE2-AUPQyPRB9Hpn5vOvfTVJopIUUSeHMn4N2PI4Zoxj40OAwwoTsGw0pBOKuqiiT09T_owR3Xz9woWZZUrRTbqMa7EDy298VQYtZZMNssmDQL5nYWzJKSXj18xn3Kn84ngG9AmNfuo_97939kbwAhnr_H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640566170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing reliability between 3D imaging and 2D photography for external nasal anthropometry</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Seo, Yoon-Soo ; Jo, Ki-Hun ; Kim, Joo-Yeon ; Kwon, Jae-Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Seo, Yoon-Soo ; Jo, Ki-Hun ; Kim, Joo-Yeon ; Kwon, Jae-Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates and compares the reliability and reproducibility of two facial anthropometric methods about external nasal angles, 3D imaging and conventional 2D photography. 2D photograph images and 3D images about external nose of 30 volunteers were taken using digital camera and Morpheus 3D scanner. To evaluate intra-rater reliability, each images were taken over two different days for each subject by the same researcher. To evaluate inter-rater reliability, another researcher took each images for each subject on the first day. The reliability of each method for measuring 4 external nasal angle is obtained using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and compared. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of both 3D imaging and 2D photography had excellent agreement in all 4 nasal angles. In the nasofacial angular parameter, Inter-rater ICC, 2D photography was significantly higher than 3D imaging. Result of intra-rater ICC also showed both 3D imaging and 2D photography had good reliability in all 4 nasal angles. Similar to those of inter-rater ICC, nasofacial angular parameter showed statistically significant differences between 3D imaging and 2D photography. In terms of reliability, both 2D and 3D showed appropriate anthropometric results and considering its own advantage, each methods can be used complementarily.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08714-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35296785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>639/624/1107/510 ; 692/698 ; Anthropometry ; Body measurements ; Correlation coefficient ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; multidisciplinary ; Nose - diagnostic imaging ; Photography ; Photography - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Statistical analysis ; Three dimensional imaging</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2022-03, Vol.12 (1), p.4531-4531, Article 4531</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-b77e962fea1e5d0b101aff2d741d20c54cb59a93d176117a4949e007dc30fa263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-b77e962fea1e5d0b101aff2d741d20c54cb59a93d176117a4949e007dc30fa263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2640566170/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2640566170?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35296785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seo, Yoon-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, Ki-Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joo-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Jae-Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing reliability between 3D imaging and 2D photography for external nasal anthropometry</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>This study investigates and compares the reliability and reproducibility of two facial anthropometric methods about external nasal angles, 3D imaging and conventional 2D photography. 2D photograph images and 3D images about external nose of 30 volunteers were taken using digital camera and Morpheus 3D scanner. To evaluate intra-rater reliability, each images were taken over two different days for each subject by the same researcher. To evaluate inter-rater reliability, another researcher took each images for each subject on the first day. The reliability of each method for measuring 4 external nasal angle is obtained using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and compared. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of both 3D imaging and 2D photography had excellent agreement in all 4 nasal angles. In the nasofacial angular parameter, Inter-rater ICC, 2D photography was significantly higher than 3D imaging. Result of intra-rater ICC also showed both 3D imaging and 2D photography had good reliability in all 4 nasal angles. Similar to those of inter-rater ICC, nasofacial angular parameter showed statistically significant differences between 3D imaging and 2D photography. In terms of reliability, both 2D and 3D showed appropriate anthropometric results and considering its own advantage, each methods can be used complementarily.</description><subject>639/624/1107/510</subject><subject>692/698</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Body measurements</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nose - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Photography - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Three dimensional imaging</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEolXpH-CAInHhEvBnHF-Q0JZCpUpc4IZkTeJJNqskDrYXyL-v05TScmAO9sjzzOuxZ7LsJSVvKeHVuyCo1FVBGCtIpagolifZKSNCFowz9vSBf5Kdh3AgySTTgurn2QlPXqkqeZp937lxBt9PXe5x6KHuhz4ueY3xF-KU84u8H6FbwzDZnF3k895F13mY90veOp_j74h-giGfIKQVprj3bnYjRr-8yJ61MAQ8v9vPsm-XH7_uPhfXXz5d7T5cF40UJBa1UqhL1iJQlJbUlFBoW2aVoJaRxDS11KC5paqkVIHQQiMhyjactMBKfpZdbbrWwcHMPpXsF-OgN7cHzncGfOybAY1QmnFOSy5FsqasZa1bWVthLZVcQdJ6v2nNx3pE2-AUPQyPRB9Hpn5vOvfTVJopIUUSeHMn4N2PI4Zoxj40OAwwoTsGw0pBOKuqiiT09T_owR3Xz9woWZZUrRTbqMa7EDy298VQYtZZMNssmDQL5nYWzJKSXj18xn3Kn84ngG9AmNfuo_97939kbwAhnr_H</recordid><startdate>20220316</startdate><enddate>20220316</enddate><creator>Seo, Yoon-Soo</creator><creator>Jo, Ki-Hun</creator><creator>Kim, Joo-Yeon</creator><creator>Kwon, Jae-Hwan</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220316</creationdate><title>Comparing reliability between 3D imaging and 2D photography for external nasal anthropometry</title><author>Seo, Yoon-Soo ; Jo, Ki-Hun ; Kim, Joo-Yeon ; Kwon, Jae-Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-b77e962fea1e5d0b101aff2d741d20c54cb59a93d176117a4949e007dc30fa263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>639/624/1107/510</topic><topic>692/698</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Body measurements</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nose - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Photography - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Three dimensional imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seo, Yoon-Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, Ki-Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Joo-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Jae-Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seo, Yoon-Soo</au><au>Jo, Ki-Hun</au><au>Kim, Joo-Yeon</au><au>Kwon, Jae-Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing reliability between 3D imaging and 2D photography for external nasal anthropometry</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2022-03-16</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4531</spage><epage>4531</epage><pages>4531-4531</pages><artnum>4531</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>This study investigates and compares the reliability and reproducibility of two facial anthropometric methods about external nasal angles, 3D imaging and conventional 2D photography. 2D photograph images and 3D images about external nose of 30 volunteers were taken using digital camera and Morpheus 3D scanner. To evaluate intra-rater reliability, each images were taken over two different days for each subject by the same researcher. To evaluate inter-rater reliability, another researcher took each images for each subject on the first day. The reliability of each method for measuring 4 external nasal angle is obtained using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and compared. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of both 3D imaging and 2D photography had excellent agreement in all 4 nasal angles. In the nasofacial angular parameter, Inter-rater ICC, 2D photography was significantly higher than 3D imaging. Result of intra-rater ICC also showed both 3D imaging and 2D photography had good reliability in all 4 nasal angles. Similar to those of inter-rater ICC, nasofacial angular parameter showed statistically significant differences between 3D imaging and 2D photography. In terms of reliability, both 2D and 3D showed appropriate anthropometric results and considering its own advantage, each methods can be used complementarily.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>35296785</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-022-08714-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2022-03, Vol.12 (1), p.4531-4531, Article 4531
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_47923316354444c6b5b9f5bd4dd1537a
source PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 639/624/1107/510
692/698
Anthropometry
Body measurements
Correlation coefficient
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
multidisciplinary
Nose - diagnostic imaging
Photography
Photography - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Statistical analysis
Three dimensional imaging
title Comparing reliability between 3D imaging and 2D photography for external nasal anthropometry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A33%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20reliability%20between%203D%20imaging%20and%202D%20photography%20for%20external%20nasal%20anthropometry&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Seo,%20Yoon-Soo&rft.date=2022-03-16&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4531&rft.epage=4531&rft.pages=4531-4531&rft.artnum=4531&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-022-08714-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2640328880%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-b77e962fea1e5d0b101aff2d741d20c54cb59a93d176117a4949e007dc30fa263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640566170&rft_id=info:pmid/35296785&rfr_iscdi=true