Evaluating Data Inter-Operability of Multiple UAV–LiDAR Systems for Measuring the 3D Structure of Savanna Woodland

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-12, Vol.14 (23), p.5992
• Main Authors: Bartholomeus, Harm, Calders, Kim, Whiteside, Tim, Terryn, Louise, Krishna Moorthy, Sruthi M., Levick, Shaun R., Bartolo, Renée, Verbeeck, Hans
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Canopies; Data acquisition; Datasets; forest structure; Forests; Ground stations; Lidar; Parameters; Remote sensing; savanna woodland; Savannahs; Scanners; Sensors; tree metrics; UAV–LiDAR sensor comparison; Unmanned aerial vehicles; Vegetation; Woodlands
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs14235992

For vegetation monitoring, it is crucial to understand which changes are caused by the measurement setup and which changes are true representations of vegetation dynamics. UAV–LiDAR offers great possibilities to measure vegetation structural parameters; however, UAV–LiDAR sensors are undergoing rapid developments, and the characteristics are expected to keep changing over the years, which will introduce data inter-operability issues. Therefore, it is important to determine whether datasets acquired by different UAV–LiDAR sensors can be interchanged and if changes through time can accurately be derived from UAV–LiDAR time series. With this study, we present insights into the magnitude of differences in derived forest metrics in savanna woodland when three different UAV–LiDAR systems are being used for data acquisition. Our findings show that all three systems can be used to derive plot characteristics such as canopy height, canopy cover, and gap fractions. However, there are clear differences between the metrics derived with different sensors, which are most apparent in the lower parts of the canopy. On an individual tree level, all UAV–LiDAR systems are able to accurately capture the tree height in a savanna woodland system, but significant differences occur when crown parameters are measured with different systems. Less precise systems result in underestimations of crown areas and crown volumes. When comparing UAV–LiDAR data of forest areas through time, it is important to be aware of these differences and ensure that data inter-operability issues do not influence the change analysis. In this paper, we want to stress that it is of utmost importance to realise this and take it into consideration when combining datasets obtained with different sensors.