Loading…
Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance
The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a mo...
Saved in:
Published in: | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2022-11, Vol.262, p.119582-119582, Article 119582 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3 |
container_end_page | 119582 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 119582 |
container_title | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) |
container_volume | 262 |
creator | Rong, Yachao Chen, Ningxuan Dong, Jiarui Li, Qi Yue, Xiaodong Hu, Li Wei, Ping |
description | The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a monetary reward (immediate-, delayed-, vs. no-reward) was followed by a target stimulus requiring a fast and accurate response. Then, response-contingent feedback was presented indicating whether or not the participant would receive the corresponding reward. Linear mixed-effect models revealed the fastest behavioural responses and the strongest neural activity, as reflected in event-related-potentials and event-related-spectral-perturbation responses, for immediate reward, followed by delayed reward, with the slowest behavioural responses and the weakest neural activities observed in the no-reward condition. Expectations related to the cue-P3 component and the cue-delta activities predicted behavioural performance, especially in the immediate reward condition. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed that depression moderated the relationship between target-locked neural activity and behavioural performance in the delayed reward condition, with lower neural activity being related to worse behavioural performance amongst participants scoring high on depression. These results indicate that differential value representations formed through delay discounting directly affect neural responses in reward processing and directly influence the effort invested in the current task, which is reflected by behavioural responses and is in agreement with the expected value of control theory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119582 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_48db0f83a68a48a499cc4ab8b30253ab</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811922006978</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_48db0f83a68a48a499cc4ab8b30253ab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2711278305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQbUTBdfQ_BLx46TEfne7kqMuqCwt70aOESlIZ0nZ3xqRndf69GVsUvCwEKpV69Sr1XtMQRveMsv7tuF_wlFOc4YB7TjnfM6al4k-aK0a1bLUc-NPLXYpW1dLz5kUpI6VUs05dNV9vfh7RrbDGtBSSAonzjD7CigQWTzxOcEZPMv6AXNMYAmZc1gjTdCZQM7cSlw5LXOMDkhXKN3LEHFKeYXH4snkWYCr46k_cNV8-3Hy-_tTe3X-8vX5317pOy7UVoe8VMO4ttb0WGpV1At0gbSetHTpkPthhgMEJH0BzoTz1mvfKeYvaotg1txuvTzCaY65q5LNJEM3vh5QPBvIa3YSmU3VKUALqxK4erZ3rwCorKJcCbOV6s3Edc_p-wrKaORaH0wQLplMxfKBykIKxvkJf_wcd0ykvddOKYowPSlTZd43aUC6nUjKGvx9k1Fw8NKP556G5eGg2D2vr-60Vq3gPEbMpLmIV1sdcla_bxcdJfgHtfqv8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711278305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rong, Yachao ; Chen, Ningxuan ; Dong, Jiarui ; Li, Qi ; Yue, Xiaodong ; Hu, Li ; Wei, Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Rong, Yachao ; Chen, Ningxuan ; Dong, Jiarui ; Li, Qi ; Yue, Xiaodong ; Hu, Li ; Wei, Ping</creatorcontrib><description>The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a monetary reward (immediate-, delayed-, vs. no-reward) was followed by a target stimulus requiring a fast and accurate response. Then, response-contingent feedback was presented indicating whether or not the participant would receive the corresponding reward. Linear mixed-effect models revealed the fastest behavioural responses and the strongest neural activity, as reflected in event-related-potentials and event-related-spectral-perturbation responses, for immediate reward, followed by delayed reward, with the slowest behavioural responses and the weakest neural activities observed in the no-reward condition. Expectations related to the cue-P3 component and the cue-delta activities predicted behavioural performance, especially in the immediate reward condition. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed that depression moderated the relationship between target-locked neural activity and behavioural performance in the delayed reward condition, with lower neural activity being related to worse behavioural performance amongst participants scoring high on depression. These results indicate that differential value representations formed through delay discounting directly affect neural responses in reward processing and directly influence the effort invested in the current task, which is reflected by behavioural responses and is in agreement with the expected value of control theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive ability ; Delayed reward ; Electroencephalography ; Event-related-potential ; Event-related-spectral-perturbation ; Expected values ; Feedback ; Incentives ; Information processing ; Mental depression ; Reinforcement ; Reward expectation ; Task performance</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2022-11, Vol.262, p.119582-119582, Article 119582</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 15, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3781-3844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rong, Yachao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ningxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Jiarui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ping</creatorcontrib><title>Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><description>The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a monetary reward (immediate-, delayed-, vs. no-reward) was followed by a target stimulus requiring a fast and accurate response. Then, response-contingent feedback was presented indicating whether or not the participant would receive the corresponding reward. Linear mixed-effect models revealed the fastest behavioural responses and the strongest neural activity, as reflected in event-related-potentials and event-related-spectral-perturbation responses, for immediate reward, followed by delayed reward, with the slowest behavioural responses and the weakest neural activities observed in the no-reward condition. Expectations related to the cue-P3 component and the cue-delta activities predicted behavioural performance, especially in the immediate reward condition. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed that depression moderated the relationship between target-locked neural activity and behavioural performance in the delayed reward condition, with lower neural activity being related to worse behavioural performance amongst participants scoring high on depression. These results indicate that differential value representations formed through delay discounting directly affect neural responses in reward processing and directly influence the effort invested in the current task, which is reflected by behavioural responses and is in agreement with the expected value of control theory.</description><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Delayed reward</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Event-related-potential</subject><subject>Event-related-spectral-perturbation</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reward expectation</subject><subject>Task performance</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQbUTBdfQ_BLx46TEfne7kqMuqCwt70aOESlIZ0nZ3xqRndf69GVsUvCwEKpV69Sr1XtMQRveMsv7tuF_wlFOc4YB7TjnfM6al4k-aK0a1bLUc-NPLXYpW1dLz5kUpI6VUs05dNV9vfh7RrbDGtBSSAonzjD7CigQWTzxOcEZPMv6AXNMYAmZc1gjTdCZQM7cSlw5LXOMDkhXKN3LEHFKeYXH4snkWYCr46k_cNV8-3Hy-_tTe3X-8vX5317pOy7UVoe8VMO4ttb0WGpV1At0gbSetHTpkPthhgMEJH0BzoTz1mvfKeYvaotg1txuvTzCaY65q5LNJEM3vh5QPBvIa3YSmU3VKUALqxK4erZ3rwCorKJcCbOV6s3Edc_p-wrKaORaH0wQLplMxfKBykIKxvkJf_wcd0ykvddOKYowPSlTZd43aUC6nUjKGvx9k1Fw8NKP556G5eGg2D2vr-60Vq3gPEbMpLmIV1sdcla_bxcdJfgHtfqv8</recordid><startdate>20221115</startdate><enddate>20221115</enddate><creator>Rong, Yachao</creator><creator>Chen, Ningxuan</creator><creator>Dong, Jiarui</creator><creator>Li, Qi</creator><creator>Yue, Xiaodong</creator><creator>Hu, Li</creator><creator>Wei, Ping</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3781-3844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221115</creationdate><title>Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance</title><author>Rong, Yachao ; Chen, Ningxuan ; Dong, Jiarui ; Li, Qi ; Yue, Xiaodong ; Hu, Li ; Wei, Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Delayed reward</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Event-related-potential</topic><topic>Event-related-spectral-perturbation</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reward expectation</topic><topic>Task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rong, Yachao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ningxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Jiarui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rong, Yachao</au><au>Chen, Ningxuan</au><au>Dong, Jiarui</au><au>Li, Qi</au><au>Yue, Xiaodong</au><au>Hu, Li</au><au>Wei, Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><date>2022-11-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>262</volume><spage>119582</spage><epage>119582</epage><pages>119582-119582</pages><artnum>119582</artnum><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a monetary reward (immediate-, delayed-, vs. no-reward) was followed by a target stimulus requiring a fast and accurate response. Then, response-contingent feedback was presented indicating whether or not the participant would receive the corresponding reward. Linear mixed-effect models revealed the fastest behavioural responses and the strongest neural activity, as reflected in event-related-potentials and event-related-spectral-perturbation responses, for immediate reward, followed by delayed reward, with the slowest behavioural responses and the weakest neural activities observed in the no-reward condition. Expectations related to the cue-P3 component and the cue-delta activities predicted behavioural performance, especially in the immediate reward condition. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed that depression moderated the relationship between target-locked neural activity and behavioural performance in the delayed reward condition, with lower neural activity being related to worse behavioural performance amongst participants scoring high on depression. These results indicate that differential value representations formed through delay discounting directly affect neural responses in reward processing and directly influence the effort invested in the current task, which is reflected by behavioural responses and is in agreement with the expected value of control theory.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119582</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3781-3844</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-8119 |
ispartof | NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2022-11, Vol.262, p.119582-119582, Article 119582 |
issn | 1053-8119 1095-9572 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_48db0f83a68a48a499cc4ab8b30253ab |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Cognitive ability Delayed reward Electroencephalography Event-related-potential Event-related-spectral-perturbation Expected values Feedback Incentives Information processing Mental depression Reinforcement Reward expectation Task performance |
title | Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A42%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expectations%20of%20immediate%20and%20delayed%20reward%20differentially%20affect%20cognitive%20task%20performance&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Rong,%20Yachao&rft.date=2022-11-15&rft.volume=262&rft.spage=119582&rft.epage=119582&rft.pages=119582-119582&rft.artnum=119582&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119582&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2711278305%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711278305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |