Loading…

Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance

The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2022-11, Vol.262, p.119582-119582, Article 119582
Main Authors: Rong, Yachao, Chen, Ningxuan, Dong, Jiarui, Li, Qi, Yue, Xiaodong, Hu, Li, Wei, Ping
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3
container_end_page 119582
container_issue
container_start_page 119582
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 262
creator Rong, Yachao
Chen, Ningxuan
Dong, Jiarui
Li, Qi
Yue, Xiaodong
Hu, Li
Wei, Ping
description The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a monetary reward (immediate-, delayed-, vs. no-reward) was followed by a target stimulus requiring a fast and accurate response. Then, response-contingent feedback was presented indicating whether or not the participant would receive the corresponding reward. Linear mixed-effect models revealed the fastest behavioural responses and the strongest neural activity, as reflected in event-related-potentials and event-related-spectral-perturbation responses, for immediate reward, followed by delayed reward, with the slowest behavioural responses and the weakest neural activities observed in the no-reward condition. Expectations related to the cue-P3 component and the cue-delta activities predicted behavioural performance, especially in the immediate reward condition. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed that depression moderated the relationship between target-locked neural activity and behavioural performance in the delayed reward condition, with lower neural activity being related to worse behavioural performance amongst participants scoring high on depression. These results indicate that differential value representations formed through delay discounting directly affect neural responses in reward processing and directly influence the effort invested in the current task, which is reflected by behavioural responses and is in agreement with the expected value of control theory.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119582
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_48db0f83a68a48a499cc4ab8b30253ab</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811922006978</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_48db0f83a68a48a499cc4ab8b30253ab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2711278305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQbUTBdfQ_BLx46TEfne7kqMuqCwt70aOESlIZ0nZ3xqRndf69GVsUvCwEKpV69Sr1XtMQRveMsv7tuF_wlFOc4YB7TjnfM6al4k-aK0a1bLUc-NPLXYpW1dLz5kUpI6VUs05dNV9vfh7RrbDGtBSSAonzjD7CigQWTzxOcEZPMv6AXNMYAmZc1gjTdCZQM7cSlw5LXOMDkhXKN3LEHFKeYXH4snkWYCr46k_cNV8-3Hy-_tTe3X-8vX5317pOy7UVoe8VMO4ttb0WGpV1At0gbSetHTpkPthhgMEJH0BzoTz1mvfKeYvaotg1txuvTzCaY65q5LNJEM3vh5QPBvIa3YSmU3VKUALqxK4erZ3rwCorKJcCbOV6s3Edc_p-wrKaORaH0wQLplMxfKBykIKxvkJf_wcd0ykvddOKYowPSlTZd43aUC6nUjKGvx9k1Fw8NKP556G5eGg2D2vr-60Vq3gPEbMpLmIV1sdcla_bxcdJfgHtfqv8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711278305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rong, Yachao ; Chen, Ningxuan ; Dong, Jiarui ; Li, Qi ; Yue, Xiaodong ; Hu, Li ; Wei, Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Rong, Yachao ; Chen, Ningxuan ; Dong, Jiarui ; Li, Qi ; Yue, Xiaodong ; Hu, Li ; Wei, Ping</creatorcontrib><description>The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a monetary reward (immediate-, delayed-, vs. no-reward) was followed by a target stimulus requiring a fast and accurate response. Then, response-contingent feedback was presented indicating whether or not the participant would receive the corresponding reward. Linear mixed-effect models revealed the fastest behavioural responses and the strongest neural activity, as reflected in event-related-potentials and event-related-spectral-perturbation responses, for immediate reward, followed by delayed reward, with the slowest behavioural responses and the weakest neural activities observed in the no-reward condition. Expectations related to the cue-P3 component and the cue-delta activities predicted behavioural performance, especially in the immediate reward condition. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed that depression moderated the relationship between target-locked neural activity and behavioural performance in the delayed reward condition, with lower neural activity being related to worse behavioural performance amongst participants scoring high on depression. These results indicate that differential value representations formed through delay discounting directly affect neural responses in reward processing and directly influence the effort invested in the current task, which is reflected by behavioural responses and is in agreement with the expected value of control theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive ability ; Delayed reward ; Electroencephalography ; Event-related-potential ; Event-related-spectral-perturbation ; Expected values ; Feedback ; Incentives ; Information processing ; Mental depression ; Reinforcement ; Reward expectation ; Task performance</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2022-11, Vol.262, p.119582-119582, Article 119582</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 15, 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3781-3844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rong, Yachao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ningxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Jiarui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ping</creatorcontrib><title>Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><description>The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a monetary reward (immediate-, delayed-, vs. no-reward) was followed by a target stimulus requiring a fast and accurate response. Then, response-contingent feedback was presented indicating whether or not the participant would receive the corresponding reward. Linear mixed-effect models revealed the fastest behavioural responses and the strongest neural activity, as reflected in event-related-potentials and event-related-spectral-perturbation responses, for immediate reward, followed by delayed reward, with the slowest behavioural responses and the weakest neural activities observed in the no-reward condition. Expectations related to the cue-P3 component and the cue-delta activities predicted behavioural performance, especially in the immediate reward condition. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed that depression moderated the relationship between target-locked neural activity and behavioural performance in the delayed reward condition, with lower neural activity being related to worse behavioural performance amongst participants scoring high on depression. These results indicate that differential value representations formed through delay discounting directly affect neural responses in reward processing and directly influence the effort invested in the current task, which is reflected by behavioural responses and is in agreement with the expected value of control theory.</description><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Delayed reward</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Event-related-potential</subject><subject>Event-related-spectral-perturbation</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Reward expectation</subject><subject>Task performance</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU2LFDEQbUTBdfQ_BLx46TEfne7kqMuqCwt70aOESlIZ0nZ3xqRndf69GVsUvCwEKpV69Sr1XtMQRveMsv7tuF_wlFOc4YB7TjnfM6al4k-aK0a1bLUc-NPLXYpW1dLz5kUpI6VUs05dNV9vfh7RrbDGtBSSAonzjD7CigQWTzxOcEZPMv6AXNMYAmZc1gjTdCZQM7cSlw5LXOMDkhXKN3LEHFKeYXH4snkWYCr46k_cNV8-3Hy-_tTe3X-8vX5317pOy7UVoe8VMO4ttb0WGpV1At0gbSetHTpkPthhgMEJH0BzoTz1mvfKeYvaotg1txuvTzCaY65q5LNJEM3vh5QPBvIa3YSmU3VKUALqxK4erZ3rwCorKJcCbOV6s3Edc_p-wrKaORaH0wQLplMxfKBykIKxvkJf_wcd0ykvddOKYowPSlTZd43aUC6nUjKGvx9k1Fw8NKP556G5eGg2D2vr-60Vq3gPEbMpLmIV1sdcla_bxcdJfgHtfqv8</recordid><startdate>20221115</startdate><enddate>20221115</enddate><creator>Rong, Yachao</creator><creator>Chen, Ningxuan</creator><creator>Dong, Jiarui</creator><creator>Li, Qi</creator><creator>Yue, Xiaodong</creator><creator>Hu, Li</creator><creator>Wei, Ping</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3781-3844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221115</creationdate><title>Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance</title><author>Rong, Yachao ; Chen, Ningxuan ; Dong, Jiarui ; Li, Qi ; Yue, Xiaodong ; Hu, Li ; Wei, Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Delayed reward</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Event-related-potential</topic><topic>Event-related-spectral-perturbation</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Reward expectation</topic><topic>Task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rong, Yachao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ningxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Jiarui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rong, Yachao</au><au>Chen, Ningxuan</au><au>Dong, Jiarui</au><au>Li, Qi</au><au>Yue, Xiaodong</au><au>Hu, Li</au><au>Wei, Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><date>2022-11-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>262</volume><spage>119582</spage><epage>119582</epage><pages>119582-119582</pages><artnum>119582</artnum><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>The current study used a modified Monetary Incentive Delay task to examine the neural mechanisms underlying anticipating and receiving an immediate or delayed reward and examined the influence of pursuing these rewards on cognitive task performance. A pre-cue indicating the potential of gaining a monetary reward (immediate-, delayed-, vs. no-reward) was followed by a target stimulus requiring a fast and accurate response. Then, response-contingent feedback was presented indicating whether or not the participant would receive the corresponding reward. Linear mixed-effect models revealed the fastest behavioural responses and the strongest neural activity, as reflected in event-related-potentials and event-related-spectral-perturbation responses, for immediate reward, followed by delayed reward, with the slowest behavioural responses and the weakest neural activities observed in the no-reward condition. Expectations related to the cue-P3 component and the cue-delta activities predicted behavioural performance, especially in the immediate reward condition. Moreover, exploratory analyses revealed that depression moderated the relationship between target-locked neural activity and behavioural performance in the delayed reward condition, with lower neural activity being related to worse behavioural performance amongst participants scoring high on depression. These results indicate that differential value representations formed through delay discounting directly affect neural responses in reward processing and directly influence the effort invested in the current task, which is reflected by behavioural responses and is in agreement with the expected value of control theory.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119582</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3781-3844</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2022-11, Vol.262, p.119582-119582, Article 119582
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_48db0f83a68a48a499cc4ab8b30253ab
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Cognitive ability
Delayed reward
Electroencephalography
Event-related-potential
Event-related-spectral-perturbation
Expected values
Feedback
Incentives
Information processing
Mental depression
Reinforcement
Reward expectation
Task performance
title Expectations of immediate and delayed reward differentially affect cognitive task performance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A42%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expectations%20of%20immediate%20and%20delayed%20reward%20differentially%20affect%20cognitive%20task%20performance&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Rong,%20Yachao&rft.date=2022-11-15&rft.volume=262&rft.spage=119582&rft.epage=119582&rft.pages=119582-119582&rft.artnum=119582&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119582&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2711278305%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-3f668a12db0b6939e8bc3ec75b45bb74e1dfb77a7c3dfa9238d0d9268cdbe9be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711278305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true