Loading…
Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian journal of ophthalmology 2022-10, Vol.70 (10), p.3575-3578 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93 |
container_end_page | 3578 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3575 |
container_title | Indian journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze Zor, Kürşad Küçük, Erkut |
description | Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the ages of 6 and 18, group 2 consisted of 30 participants aged 19-40, and group 3 consisted of 30 participants aged 41-75. Scotopic, mesopic, photopic, and dynamic measurements were taken with automatic pupillometry of Sirius Topographer (CSO, Firenze, Italy). The mean pupil dilation speed at the 18th second was calculated according to dynamic measurements. Results: Group 1 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than groups 2 and 3 in all static and dynamic parameters, and the mean pupil dilation speed was the highest among the groups (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters). In addition, group 2 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than group 3 (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters) and the mean pupil dilation speed was faster than group 3 (P = 0.027). Conclusion: We have presented the static and dynamic parameters and the mean speed of pupil dilatation at the 18th second with automatic pupillometry in healthy individuals in childhood, adulthood, and old age. More studies with higher participants and younger age children are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1254_22 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_493887d9840043ce9dd797dd294b2820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A721832447</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_493887d9840043ce9dd797dd294b2820</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A721832447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9k09vEzEQxVcIREvhzA1Z4sKBtPaOd21fQFHLn6BKvYDEzXJsb-J0Y6fe3VT5DnxoJiStWhTQHtby_ubNztObonjN6ClnFM7CIp1Ovl1pVlZcl-WT4pgpJUdQS_W0OKZA2YgLkEfFi65bUAqCKfm8OIKaKUq5Oi5-XSTS9aYPlpjoiNtEs8TzaliFtjV5Q1Ymm6Xvfe6IC03jMzHWpuxCnJE-ETsPrZun5N4T44a23x9RKrWOmJn_SMbkZjCxD9sua4_dBrchIZK5N8hvyDq1Q-w9dnhZPGtM2_lX-_dJ8ePzp-_nX0eXV18m5-PLka2B5RGUDR6oNaLmOC51tTHWcWikkNKCEaCAgVeG04o5aaY1a6pq6qbc2Ck4BSfFZKfrklnoVQ5LnFQnE_Sfi5Rn2mS0pPWaK5BSOCU5-gXWK-eEEs6Vik9LWVLU-rDTWg3TpXfWxz6b9pHo4y8xzPUsrbUSUsmSocC7vUBON4Pver0MnfXofvRp6HQpSqqA1hwQffsXukhDjmiVBsYrCVzV4n8UagEISqsHWjODY4bYJPw7u22tx6JkEkrOt1qjA9TMR4-jpOibgNeP-NMDPD7OY6wOFpztCmxOXZd9c-8co3obcY0R1w8ijhVvHhp-z99lGoGfO-A2tdvcXrfDrc8a2euYbv-lq6ESlb5IercNGiOs99ug77YBfgOiOhcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723370053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze ; Zor, Kürşad ; Küçük, Erkut</creator><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze ; Zor, Kürşad ; Küçük, Erkut</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the ages of 6 and 18, group 2 consisted of 30 participants aged 19-40, and group 3 consisted of 30 participants aged 41-75. Scotopic, mesopic, photopic, and dynamic measurements were taken with automatic pupillometry of Sirius Topographer (CSO, Firenze, Italy). The mean pupil dilation speed at the 18th second was calculated according to dynamic measurements. Results: Group 1 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than groups 2 and 3 in all static and dynamic parameters, and the mean pupil dilation speed was the highest among the groups (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters). In addition, group 2 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than group 3 (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters) and the mean pupil dilation speed was faster than group 3 (P = 0.027). Conclusion: We have presented the static and dynamic parameters and the mean speed of pupil dilatation at the 18th second with automatic pupillometry in healthy individuals in childhood, adulthood, and old age. More studies with higher participants and younger age children are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3689</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1254_22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36190049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; adulthood ; Age groups ; Child ; childhood ; Children ; dynamic pupillary parameters ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Original ; Physical Examination ; Pupil ; pupil dilation speed ; static pupillary parameters</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022-10, Vol.70 (10), p.3575-3578</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789821/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2723370053?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36190049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zor, Kürşad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Küçük, Erkut</creatorcontrib><title>Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers</title><title>Indian journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Indian J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the ages of 6 and 18, group 2 consisted of 30 participants aged 19-40, and group 3 consisted of 30 participants aged 41-75. Scotopic, mesopic, photopic, and dynamic measurements were taken with automatic pupillometry of Sirius Topographer (CSO, Firenze, Italy). The mean pupil dilation speed at the 18th second was calculated according to dynamic measurements. Results: Group 1 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than groups 2 and 3 in all static and dynamic parameters, and the mean pupil dilation speed was the highest among the groups (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters). In addition, group 2 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than group 3 (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters) and the mean pupil dilation speed was faster than group 3 (P = 0.027). Conclusion: We have presented the static and dynamic parameters and the mean speed of pupil dilatation at the 18th second with automatic pupillometry in healthy individuals in childhood, adulthood, and old age. More studies with higher participants and younger age children are needed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>adulthood</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>dynamic pupillary parameters</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Physical Examination</subject><subject>Pupil</subject><subject>pupil dilation speed</subject><subject>static pupillary parameters</subject><issn>0301-4738</issn><issn>1998-3689</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9k09vEzEQxVcIREvhzA1Z4sKBtPaOd21fQFHLn6BKvYDEzXJsb-J0Y6fe3VT5DnxoJiStWhTQHtby_ubNztObonjN6ClnFM7CIp1Ovl1pVlZcl-WT4pgpJUdQS_W0OKZA2YgLkEfFi65bUAqCKfm8OIKaKUq5Oi5-XSTS9aYPlpjoiNtEs8TzaliFtjV5Q1Ymm6Xvfe6IC03jMzHWpuxCnJE-ETsPrZun5N4T44a23x9RKrWOmJn_SMbkZjCxD9sua4_dBrchIZK5N8hvyDq1Q-w9dnhZPGtM2_lX-_dJ8ePzp-_nX0eXV18m5-PLka2B5RGUDR6oNaLmOC51tTHWcWikkNKCEaCAgVeG04o5aaY1a6pq6qbc2Ck4BSfFZKfrklnoVQ5LnFQnE_Sfi5Rn2mS0pPWaK5BSOCU5-gXWK-eEEs6Vik9LWVLU-rDTWg3TpXfWxz6b9pHo4y8xzPUsrbUSUsmSocC7vUBON4Pver0MnfXofvRp6HQpSqqA1hwQffsXukhDjmiVBsYrCVzV4n8UagEISqsHWjODY4bYJPw7u22tx6JkEkrOt1qjA9TMR4-jpOibgNeP-NMDPD7OY6wOFpztCmxOXZd9c-8co3obcY0R1w8ijhVvHhp-z99lGoGfO-A2tdvcXrfDrc8a2euYbv-lq6ESlb5IercNGiOs99ug77YBfgOiOhcI</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze</creator><creator>Zor, Kürşad</creator><creator>Küçük, Erkut</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers</title><author>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze ; Zor, Kürşad ; Küçük, Erkut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>adulthood</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>dynamic pupillary parameters</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Physical Examination</topic><topic>Pupil</topic><topic>pupil dilation speed</topic><topic>static pupillary parameters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zor, Kürşad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Küçük, Erkut</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze</au><au>Zor, Kürşad</au><au>Küçük, Erkut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3575</spage><epage>3578</epage><pages>3575-3578</pages><issn>0301-4738</issn><eissn>1998-3689</eissn><abstract>Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the ages of 6 and 18, group 2 consisted of 30 participants aged 19-40, and group 3 consisted of 30 participants aged 41-75. Scotopic, mesopic, photopic, and dynamic measurements were taken with automatic pupillometry of Sirius Topographer (CSO, Firenze, Italy). The mean pupil dilation speed at the 18th second was calculated according to dynamic measurements. Results: Group 1 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than groups 2 and 3 in all static and dynamic parameters, and the mean pupil dilation speed was the highest among the groups (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters). In addition, group 2 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than group 3 (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters) and the mean pupil dilation speed was faster than group 3 (P = 0.027). Conclusion: We have presented the static and dynamic parameters and the mean speed of pupil dilatation at the 18th second with automatic pupillometry in healthy individuals in childhood, adulthood, and old age. More studies with higher participants and younger age children are needed.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>36190049</pmid><doi>10.4103/ijo.IJO_1254_22</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4738 |
ispartof | Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022-10, Vol.70 (10), p.3575-3578 |
issn | 0301-4738 1998-3689 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_493887d9840043ce9dd797dd294b2820 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central Free |
subjects | Adolescent Adult adulthood Age groups Child childhood Children dynamic pupillary parameters Healthy Volunteers Humans Original Physical Examination Pupil pupil dilation speed static pupillary parameters |
title | Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20static%20and%20dynamic%20pupillary%20parameters%20differ%20according%20to%20childhood,%20adulthood,%20and%20old%20age?%20A%20quantitative%20study%20in%20healthy%20volunteers&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Y%C4%B1ld%C4%B1r%C4%B1m%20Bi%C3%A7er,%20Gamze&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3575&rft.epage=3578&rft.pages=3575-3578&rft.issn=0301-4738&rft.eissn=1998-3689&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1254_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA721832447%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723370053&rft_id=info:pmid/36190049&rft_galeid=A721832447&rfr_iscdi=true |