Loading…

Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of ophthalmology 2022-10, Vol.70 (10), p.3575-3578
Main Authors: Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze, Zor, Kürşad, Küçük, Erkut
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93
container_end_page 3578
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3575
container_title Indian journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 70
creator Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze
Zor, Kürşad
Küçük, Erkut
description Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the ages of 6 and 18, group 2 consisted of 30 participants aged 19-40, and group 3 consisted of 30 participants aged 41-75. Scotopic, mesopic, photopic, and dynamic measurements were taken with automatic pupillometry of Sirius Topographer (CSO, Firenze, Italy). The mean pupil dilation speed at the 18th second was calculated according to dynamic measurements. Results: Group 1 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than groups 2 and 3 in all static and dynamic parameters, and the mean pupil dilation speed was the highest among the groups (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters). In addition, group 2 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than group 3 (P < 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters) and the mean pupil dilation speed was faster than group 3 (P = 0.027). Conclusion: We have presented the static and dynamic parameters and the mean speed of pupil dilatation at the 18th second with automatic pupillometry in healthy individuals in childhood, adulthood, and old age. More studies with higher participants and younger age children are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1254_22
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_493887d9840043ce9dd797dd294b2820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A721832447</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_493887d9840043ce9dd797dd294b2820</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A721832447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9k09vEzEQxVcIREvhzA1Z4sKBtPaOd21fQFHLn6BKvYDEzXJsb-J0Y6fe3VT5DnxoJiStWhTQHtby_ubNztObonjN6ClnFM7CIp1Ovl1pVlZcl-WT4pgpJUdQS_W0OKZA2YgLkEfFi65bUAqCKfm8OIKaKUq5Oi5-XSTS9aYPlpjoiNtEs8TzaliFtjV5Q1Ymm6Xvfe6IC03jMzHWpuxCnJE-ETsPrZun5N4T44a23x9RKrWOmJn_SMbkZjCxD9sua4_dBrchIZK5N8hvyDq1Q-w9dnhZPGtM2_lX-_dJ8ePzp-_nX0eXV18m5-PLka2B5RGUDR6oNaLmOC51tTHWcWikkNKCEaCAgVeG04o5aaY1a6pq6qbc2Ck4BSfFZKfrklnoVQ5LnFQnE_Sfi5Rn2mS0pPWaK5BSOCU5-gXWK-eEEs6Vik9LWVLU-rDTWg3TpXfWxz6b9pHo4y8xzPUsrbUSUsmSocC7vUBON4Pver0MnfXofvRp6HQpSqqA1hwQffsXukhDjmiVBsYrCVzV4n8UagEISqsHWjODY4bYJPw7u22tx6JkEkrOt1qjA9TMR4-jpOibgNeP-NMDPD7OY6wOFpztCmxOXZd9c-8co3obcY0R1w8ijhVvHhp-z99lGoGfO-A2tdvcXrfDrc8a2euYbv-lq6ESlb5IercNGiOs99ug77YBfgOiOhcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723370053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><creator>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze ; Zor, Kürşad ; Küçük, Erkut</creator><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze ; Zor, Kürşad ; Küçük, Erkut</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the ages of 6 and 18, group 2 consisted of 30 participants aged 19-40, and group 3 consisted of 30 participants aged 41-75. Scotopic, mesopic, photopic, and dynamic measurements were taken with automatic pupillometry of Sirius Topographer (CSO, Firenze, Italy). The mean pupil dilation speed at the 18th second was calculated according to dynamic measurements. Results: Group 1 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than groups 2 and 3 in all static and dynamic parameters, and the mean pupil dilation speed was the highest among the groups (P &lt; 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters). In addition, group 2 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than group 3 (P &lt; 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters) and the mean pupil dilation speed was faster than group 3 (P = 0.027). Conclusion: We have presented the static and dynamic parameters and the mean speed of pupil dilatation at the 18th second with automatic pupillometry in healthy individuals in childhood, adulthood, and old age. More studies with higher participants and younger age children are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3689</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1254_22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36190049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; adulthood ; Age groups ; Child ; childhood ; Children ; dynamic pupillary parameters ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Original ; Physical Examination ; Pupil ; pupil dilation speed ; static pupillary parameters</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022-10, Vol.70 (10), p.3575-3578</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9789821/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2723370053?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36190049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zor, Kürşad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Küçük, Erkut</creatorcontrib><title>Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers</title><title>Indian journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Indian J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the ages of 6 and 18, group 2 consisted of 30 participants aged 19-40, and group 3 consisted of 30 participants aged 41-75. Scotopic, mesopic, photopic, and dynamic measurements were taken with automatic pupillometry of Sirius Topographer (CSO, Firenze, Italy). The mean pupil dilation speed at the 18th second was calculated according to dynamic measurements. Results: Group 1 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than groups 2 and 3 in all static and dynamic parameters, and the mean pupil dilation speed was the highest among the groups (P &lt; 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters). In addition, group 2 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than group 3 (P &lt; 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters) and the mean pupil dilation speed was faster than group 3 (P = 0.027). Conclusion: We have presented the static and dynamic parameters and the mean speed of pupil dilatation at the 18th second with automatic pupillometry in healthy individuals in childhood, adulthood, and old age. More studies with higher participants and younger age children are needed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>adulthood</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>dynamic pupillary parameters</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Physical Examination</subject><subject>Pupil</subject><subject>pupil dilation speed</subject><subject>static pupillary parameters</subject><issn>0301-4738</issn><issn>1998-3689</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9k09vEzEQxVcIREvhzA1Z4sKBtPaOd21fQFHLn6BKvYDEzXJsb-J0Y6fe3VT5DnxoJiStWhTQHtby_ubNztObonjN6ClnFM7CIp1Ovl1pVlZcl-WT4pgpJUdQS_W0OKZA2YgLkEfFi65bUAqCKfm8OIKaKUq5Oi5-XSTS9aYPlpjoiNtEs8TzaliFtjV5Q1Ymm6Xvfe6IC03jMzHWpuxCnJE-ETsPrZun5N4T44a23x9RKrWOmJn_SMbkZjCxD9sua4_dBrchIZK5N8hvyDq1Q-w9dnhZPGtM2_lX-_dJ8ePzp-_nX0eXV18m5-PLka2B5RGUDR6oNaLmOC51tTHWcWikkNKCEaCAgVeG04o5aaY1a6pq6qbc2Ck4BSfFZKfrklnoVQ5LnFQnE_Sfi5Rn2mS0pPWaK5BSOCU5-gXWK-eEEs6Vik9LWVLU-rDTWg3TpXfWxz6b9pHo4y8xzPUsrbUSUsmSocC7vUBON4Pver0MnfXofvRp6HQpSqqA1hwQffsXukhDjmiVBsYrCVzV4n8UagEISqsHWjODY4bYJPw7u22tx6JkEkrOt1qjA9TMR4-jpOibgNeP-NMDPD7OY6wOFpztCmxOXZd9c-8co3obcY0R1w8ijhVvHhp-z99lGoGfO-A2tdvcXrfDrc8a2euYbv-lq6ESlb5IercNGiOs99ug77YBfgOiOhcI</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze</creator><creator>Zor, Kürşad</creator><creator>Küçük, Erkut</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers</title><author>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze ; Zor, Kürşad ; Küçük, Erkut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>adulthood</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>dynamic pupillary parameters</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Physical Examination</topic><topic>Pupil</topic><topic>pupil dilation speed</topic><topic>static pupillary parameters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zor, Kürşad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Küçük, Erkut</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yıldırım Biçer, Gamze</au><au>Zor, Kürşad</au><au>Küçük, Erkut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3575</spage><epage>3578</epage><pages>3575-3578</pages><issn>0301-4738</issn><eissn>1998-3689</eissn><abstract>Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the normative pupillometry values and mean pupil dilatation speed in healthy individuals in different age groups in our study. Methods: The study group included 180 eyes of 90 healthy volunteers in different age groups. Group 1 consisted of 30 participants between the ages of 6 and 18, group 2 consisted of 30 participants aged 19-40, and group 3 consisted of 30 participants aged 41-75. Scotopic, mesopic, photopic, and dynamic measurements were taken with automatic pupillometry of Sirius Topographer (CSO, Firenze, Italy). The mean pupil dilation speed at the 18th second was calculated according to dynamic measurements. Results: Group 1 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than groups 2 and 3 in all static and dynamic parameters, and the mean pupil dilation speed was the highest among the groups (P &lt; 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters). In addition, group 2 had a significantly larger pupil diameter than group 3 (P &lt; 0.001 for all static and dynamic parameters) and the mean pupil dilation speed was faster than group 3 (P = 0.027). Conclusion: We have presented the static and dynamic parameters and the mean speed of pupil dilatation at the 18th second with automatic pupillometry in healthy individuals in childhood, adulthood, and old age. More studies with higher participants and younger age children are needed.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>36190049</pmid><doi>10.4103/ijo.IJO_1254_22</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4738
ispartof Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022-10, Vol.70 (10), p.3575-3578
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_493887d9840043ce9dd797dd294b2820
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central Free
subjects Adolescent
Adult
adulthood
Age groups
Child
childhood
Children
dynamic pupillary parameters
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Original
Physical Examination
Pupil
pupil dilation speed
static pupillary parameters
title Do static and dynamic pupillary parameters differ according to childhood, adulthood, and old age? A quantitative study in healthy volunteers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20static%20and%20dynamic%20pupillary%20parameters%20differ%20according%20to%20childhood,%20adulthood,%20and%20old%20age?%20A%20quantitative%20study%20in%20healthy%20volunteers&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Y%C4%B1ld%C4%B1r%C4%B1m%20Bi%C3%A7er,%20Gamze&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3575&rft.epage=3578&rft.pages=3575-3578&rft.issn=0301-4738&rft.eissn=1998-3689&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1254_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA721832447%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631r-32fc630ca7641990d6aacd43f8788c3a739313e9a4051d8ab61f55bdb4acb3d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723370053&rft_id=info:pmid/36190049&rft_galeid=A721832447&rfr_iscdi=true