Loading…

Evaluation of cleaning methods for change-over after the processing of cell products to avoid cross-contamination risk

Cell-processing facilities face the risk of environmental bacteria contaminating biosafety cabinets during processing, and manual handling of autologous cell products can result in contamination. We propose a risk- and evidence-based cleaning method for cross-contamination, emphasizing proteins and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Regenerative therapy 2024-06, Vol.26, p.489-495
Main Authors: Mizuno, Mitsuru, Yori, Kouichirou, Takeuchi, Toshikazu, Yamamoto, Takaaki, Ishikawa, Natsumi, Kobayashi, Megumi, Nishio, Miwako, Sekiya, Ichiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-dc834ce4cdede6a9fe1d1c16faf22d42b496144c9563d4f14cbd7a1ce196ccf23
container_end_page 495
container_issue
container_start_page 489
container_title Regenerative therapy
container_volume 26
creator Mizuno, Mitsuru
Yori, Kouichirou
Takeuchi, Toshikazu
Yamamoto, Takaaki
Ishikawa, Natsumi
Kobayashi, Megumi
Nishio, Miwako
Sekiya, Ichiro
description Cell-processing facilities face the risk of environmental bacteria contaminating biosafety cabinets during processing, and manual handling of autologous cell products can result in contamination. We propose a risk- and evidence-based cleaning method for cross-contamination, emphasizing proteins and DNA. The transition and residual risks of the culture medium were assessed by measuring both wet and dried media using fluorescence intensity. Residual proteins and DNA in dried culture medium containing HT-1080 cells were analyzed following ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, wiping, and disinfectant treatment. Wet conditions showed a higher transition to distilled water (DW), whereas dry conditions led to higher residual amounts on SUS304 plates. Various cleaning methods for residual culture medium were examined, including benzalkonium chloride with a corrosion inhibitor (BKC + I) and DW wiping, which demonstrated significantly lower residual protein and DNA compared to other methods. Furthermore, these cleaning methods were tested for residual medium containing cells, with BKC + I and DW wiping resulting in an undetectable number of cells. However, in some instances, proteins and DNA remained. The study compared cleaning methods for proteins and DNA in cell products, revealing their advantages and disadvantages. Peracetic acid (PAA) proved effective for nucleic acids but not proteins, while UV irradiation was ineffective against both proteins and DNA. Wiping emerged as the most effective method, even though traceability remained challenging. However, wiping with ETH was not effective as it caused protein immobilization. Understanding the characteristics of these cleaning methods is crucial for developing effective contamination control strategies. •We evaluated residual and cross-contamination risk using a cell culture medium.•Wetted media remaining in biosafety cabinet is prone to transition.•Dried media remaining in biosafety cabinet is difficult to remove.•Proteins and nucleic acids in media and cells remain in biosafety cabinet.•The first option to remove the remaining medium is to wipe clean with traceability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.reth.2024.07.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_494815d69eac422eb7295934cf8e7ae4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2352320424001305</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_494815d69eac422eb7295934cf8e7ae4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3092014416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-dc834ce4cdede6a9fe1d1c16faf22d42b496144c9563d4f14cbd7a1ce196ccf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIVqU_wAJ5ySbBrzwssUFVgUqV2MDa8lxfz3hI4mI7kfh7nKZUrNjY1tV53ONTVW8ZbRhl3YdzEzGfGk65bGjfUMpfVJdctLwWnMqX_7wvquuUzpRSNrSMq-F1dSEUE6yl7WW13q5mXEz2YSbBERjRzH4-kqmIB5uIC5HAycxHrMOKkRiXy5lPSB5iAExpA29EHMdtZBfIieRAzBq8JRBDSjWEOZvJz7tN9Onnm-qVM2PC66f7qvrx-fb7zdf6_tuXu5tP9zUI2efawiAkoASLFjujHDLLgHXOOM6t5AepOiYlqLYTVjom4WB7wwCZ6gAcF1fV3a5rgznrh-gnE3_rYLx-HIR41CZmX2JrqeTAWtspNCA5x0PPVauKvRuwNyiL1vtdq8T8tWDKevJpy21mDEvSgipOyzasK1C-Qx_zR3TP1ozqrT591lt9eqtP016X-grp3ZP-cpjQPlP-llUAH3cAlh9bPUadwOMMaH1EyCWS_5_-H0-yrd0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3092014416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of cleaning methods for change-over after the processing of cell products to avoid cross-contamination risk</title><source>PubMed Central(OA)</source><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Mizuno, Mitsuru ; Yori, Kouichirou ; Takeuchi, Toshikazu ; Yamamoto, Takaaki ; Ishikawa, Natsumi ; Kobayashi, Megumi ; Nishio, Miwako ; Sekiya, Ichiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Mitsuru ; Yori, Kouichirou ; Takeuchi, Toshikazu ; Yamamoto, Takaaki ; Ishikawa, Natsumi ; Kobayashi, Megumi ; Nishio, Miwako ; Sekiya, Ichiro</creatorcontrib><description>Cell-processing facilities face the risk of environmental bacteria contaminating biosafety cabinets during processing, and manual handling of autologous cell products can result in contamination. We propose a risk- and evidence-based cleaning method for cross-contamination, emphasizing proteins and DNA. The transition and residual risks of the culture medium were assessed by measuring both wet and dried media using fluorescence intensity. Residual proteins and DNA in dried culture medium containing HT-1080 cells were analyzed following ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, wiping, and disinfectant treatment. Wet conditions showed a higher transition to distilled water (DW), whereas dry conditions led to higher residual amounts on SUS304 plates. Various cleaning methods for residual culture medium were examined, including benzalkonium chloride with a corrosion inhibitor (BKC + I) and DW wiping, which demonstrated significantly lower residual protein and DNA compared to other methods. Furthermore, these cleaning methods were tested for residual medium containing cells, with BKC + I and DW wiping resulting in an undetectable number of cells. However, in some instances, proteins and DNA remained. The study compared cleaning methods for proteins and DNA in cell products, revealing their advantages and disadvantages. Peracetic acid (PAA) proved effective for nucleic acids but not proteins, while UV irradiation was ineffective against both proteins and DNA. Wiping emerged as the most effective method, even though traceability remained challenging. However, wiping with ETH was not effective as it caused protein immobilization. Understanding the characteristics of these cleaning methods is crucial for developing effective contamination control strategies. •We evaluated residual and cross-contamination risk using a cell culture medium.•Wetted media remaining in biosafety cabinet is prone to transition.•Dried media remaining in biosafety cabinet is difficult to remove.•Proteins and nucleic acids in media and cells remain in biosafety cabinet.•The first option to remove the remaining medium is to wipe clean with traceability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-3204</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-3204</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2024.07.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39131505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biosafety cabinet ; Cell-product processing ; Changeover ; Contamination control strategy ; Cross-contamination</subject><ispartof>Regenerative therapy, 2024-06, Vol.26, p.489-495</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s).</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-dc834ce4cdede6a9fe1d1c16faf22d42b496144c9563d4f14cbd7a1ce196ccf23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6331-722X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352320424001305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39131505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yori, Kouichirou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Natsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Megumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishio, Miwako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiya, Ichiro</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of cleaning methods for change-over after the processing of cell products to avoid cross-contamination risk</title><title>Regenerative therapy</title><addtitle>Regen Ther</addtitle><description>Cell-processing facilities face the risk of environmental bacteria contaminating biosafety cabinets during processing, and manual handling of autologous cell products can result in contamination. We propose a risk- and evidence-based cleaning method for cross-contamination, emphasizing proteins and DNA. The transition and residual risks of the culture medium were assessed by measuring both wet and dried media using fluorescence intensity. Residual proteins and DNA in dried culture medium containing HT-1080 cells were analyzed following ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, wiping, and disinfectant treatment. Wet conditions showed a higher transition to distilled water (DW), whereas dry conditions led to higher residual amounts on SUS304 plates. Various cleaning methods for residual culture medium were examined, including benzalkonium chloride with a corrosion inhibitor (BKC + I) and DW wiping, which demonstrated significantly lower residual protein and DNA compared to other methods. Furthermore, these cleaning methods were tested for residual medium containing cells, with BKC + I and DW wiping resulting in an undetectable number of cells. However, in some instances, proteins and DNA remained. The study compared cleaning methods for proteins and DNA in cell products, revealing their advantages and disadvantages. Peracetic acid (PAA) proved effective for nucleic acids but not proteins, while UV irradiation was ineffective against both proteins and DNA. Wiping emerged as the most effective method, even though traceability remained challenging. However, wiping with ETH was not effective as it caused protein immobilization. Understanding the characteristics of these cleaning methods is crucial for developing effective contamination control strategies. •We evaluated residual and cross-contamination risk using a cell culture medium.•Wetted media remaining in biosafety cabinet is prone to transition.•Dried media remaining in biosafety cabinet is difficult to remove.•Proteins and nucleic acids in media and cells remain in biosafety cabinet.•The first option to remove the remaining medium is to wipe clean with traceability.</description><subject>Biosafety cabinet</subject><subject>Cell-product processing</subject><subject>Changeover</subject><subject>Contamination control strategy</subject><subject>Cross-contamination</subject><issn>2352-3204</issn><issn>2352-3204</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIVqU_wAJ5ySbBrzwssUFVgUqV2MDa8lxfz3hI4mI7kfh7nKZUrNjY1tV53ONTVW8ZbRhl3YdzEzGfGk65bGjfUMpfVJdctLwWnMqX_7wvquuUzpRSNrSMq-F1dSEUE6yl7WW13q5mXEz2YSbBERjRzH4-kqmIB5uIC5HAycxHrMOKkRiXy5lPSB5iAExpA29EHMdtZBfIieRAzBq8JRBDSjWEOZvJz7tN9Onnm-qVM2PC66f7qvrx-fb7zdf6_tuXu5tP9zUI2efawiAkoASLFjujHDLLgHXOOM6t5AepOiYlqLYTVjom4WB7wwCZ6gAcF1fV3a5rgznrh-gnE3_rYLx-HIR41CZmX2JrqeTAWtspNCA5x0PPVauKvRuwNyiL1vtdq8T8tWDKevJpy21mDEvSgipOyzasK1C-Qx_zR3TP1ozqrT591lt9eqtP016X-grp3ZP-cpjQPlP-llUAH3cAlh9bPUadwOMMaH1EyCWS_5_-H0-yrd0</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Mizuno, Mitsuru</creator><creator>Yori, Kouichirou</creator><creator>Takeuchi, Toshikazu</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Takaaki</creator><creator>Ishikawa, Natsumi</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Megumi</creator><creator>Nishio, Miwako</creator><creator>Sekiya, Ichiro</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-722X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Evaluation of cleaning methods for change-over after the processing of cell products to avoid cross-contamination risk</title><author>Mizuno, Mitsuru ; Yori, Kouichirou ; Takeuchi, Toshikazu ; Yamamoto, Takaaki ; Ishikawa, Natsumi ; Kobayashi, Megumi ; Nishio, Miwako ; Sekiya, Ichiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-dc834ce4cdede6a9fe1d1c16faf22d42b496144c9563d4f14cbd7a1ce196ccf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biosafety cabinet</topic><topic>Cell-product processing</topic><topic>Changeover</topic><topic>Contamination control strategy</topic><topic>Cross-contamination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yori, Kouichirou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Toshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Takaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Natsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Megumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishio, Miwako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiya, Ichiro</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Regenerative therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mizuno, Mitsuru</au><au>Yori, Kouichirou</au><au>Takeuchi, Toshikazu</au><au>Yamamoto, Takaaki</au><au>Ishikawa, Natsumi</au><au>Kobayashi, Megumi</au><au>Nishio, Miwako</au><au>Sekiya, Ichiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of cleaning methods for change-over after the processing of cell products to avoid cross-contamination risk</atitle><jtitle>Regenerative therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Regen Ther</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><spage>489</spage><epage>495</epage><pages>489-495</pages><issn>2352-3204</issn><eissn>2352-3204</eissn><abstract>Cell-processing facilities face the risk of environmental bacteria contaminating biosafety cabinets during processing, and manual handling of autologous cell products can result in contamination. We propose a risk- and evidence-based cleaning method for cross-contamination, emphasizing proteins and DNA. The transition and residual risks of the culture medium were assessed by measuring both wet and dried media using fluorescence intensity. Residual proteins and DNA in dried culture medium containing HT-1080 cells were analyzed following ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, wiping, and disinfectant treatment. Wet conditions showed a higher transition to distilled water (DW), whereas dry conditions led to higher residual amounts on SUS304 plates. Various cleaning methods for residual culture medium were examined, including benzalkonium chloride with a corrosion inhibitor (BKC + I) and DW wiping, which demonstrated significantly lower residual protein and DNA compared to other methods. Furthermore, these cleaning methods were tested for residual medium containing cells, with BKC + I and DW wiping resulting in an undetectable number of cells. However, in some instances, proteins and DNA remained. The study compared cleaning methods for proteins and DNA in cell products, revealing their advantages and disadvantages. Peracetic acid (PAA) proved effective for nucleic acids but not proteins, while UV irradiation was ineffective against both proteins and DNA. Wiping emerged as the most effective method, even though traceability remained challenging. However, wiping with ETH was not effective as it caused protein immobilization. Understanding the characteristics of these cleaning methods is crucial for developing effective contamination control strategies. •We evaluated residual and cross-contamination risk using a cell culture medium.•Wetted media remaining in biosafety cabinet is prone to transition.•Dried media remaining in biosafety cabinet is difficult to remove.•Proteins and nucleic acids in media and cells remain in biosafety cabinet.•The first option to remove the remaining medium is to wipe clean with traceability.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39131505</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.reth.2024.07.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-722X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2352-3204
ispartof Regenerative therapy, 2024-06, Vol.26, p.489-495
issn 2352-3204
2352-3204
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_494815d69eac422eb7295934cf8e7ae4
source PubMed Central(OA); ScienceDirect (Online service)
subjects Biosafety cabinet
Cell-product processing
Changeover
Contamination control strategy
Cross-contamination
title Evaluation of cleaning methods for change-over after the processing of cell products to avoid cross-contamination risk
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A41%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20cleaning%20methods%20for%20change-over%20after%20the%20processing%20of%20cell%20products%20to%20avoid%20cross-contamination%20risk&rft.jtitle=Regenerative%20therapy&rft.au=Mizuno,%20Mitsuru&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=26&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=495&rft.pages=489-495&rft.issn=2352-3204&rft.eissn=2352-3204&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.reth.2024.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3092014416%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-dc834ce4cdede6a9fe1d1c16faf22d42b496144c9563d4f14cbd7a1ce196ccf23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3092014416&rft_id=info:pmid/39131505&rfr_iscdi=true