Oncology practitioners' perspectives and practice patterns of post-treatment cancer survivorship care in the Asia-Pacific region: results from the STEP study

Most efforts to advance cancer survivorship care have occurred in Western countries. There has been limited research towards gaining a comprehensive understanding of survivorship care provision in the Asia-Pacific region. This study aimed to establish the perceptions of responsibility, confidence, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC cancer 2017-11, Vol.17 (1), p.715-715, Article 715
Main Authors: Chan, Raymond Javan, Yates, Patsy, Li, Qiuping, Komatsu, Hiroko, Lopez, Violeta, Thandar, Myat, Chacko, Selva Titus, So, Winnie Kwok Wei, Pongthavornkamol, Kanaungnit, Yi, Myungsun, Pittayapan, Pongpak, Butcon, Jesson, Wyld, David, Molassiotis, Alex
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Asia-Pacific region
Cancer
Cancer survivors
Cancer survivorship
Care and treatment
Health aspects
Health professionals
Oncology practitioner
Perspectives
Practice patterns
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Most efforts to advance cancer survivorship care have occurred in Western countries. There has been limited research towards gaining a comprehensive understanding of survivorship care provision in the Asia-Pacific region. This study aimed to establish the perceptions of responsibility, confidence, and frequency of survivorship care practices of oncology practitioners and examine their perspectives on factors that impede quality survivorship care. A cross-sectional survey of hospital-based oncology practitioners in 10 Asia-Pacific countries was undertaken between May 2015-October 2016. The participating countries included Australia, Hong Kong, China, Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore, India, Myanmar, and The Philippines. The survey was administered using paper-based or online questionnaires via specialist cancer care settings, educational meetings, and professional organisations. In total, 1501 oncology practitioners participated in the study. When comparing the subscales of responsibility perception, frequency and confidence, Australian practitioners had significantly higher ratings than practitioners in Hong Kong, Japan, Thailand, and Singapore (all p 
ISSN:1471-2407
1471-2407
DOI:10.1186/s12885-017-3733-3