Loading…
Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies
Purpose. To report the impact of baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) on outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME. Methods. Post hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials in which 862 DME patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with intravi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of ophthalmology 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-e47c136249efa9bf4acb27881a3fab51178f6be7243b7d6f910e1bcb39e59233 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-e47c136249efa9bf4acb27881a3fab51178f6be7243b7d6f910e1bcb39e59233 |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | 2018 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 2018 |
creator | Lu, Chengxing Metzig, Carola Katz, Todd A. Gillies, Mark Midena, Edoardo Ogura, Yuichiro |
description | Purpose. To report the impact of baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) on outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME. Methods. Post hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials in which 862 DME patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks after five initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation at baseline and as needed. We compared visual and anatomical outcomes in subgroups of patients with baseline CRT |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2018/3640135 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_49f10e630ebc4907adbab54e4c2a2b2a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A590650997</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_49f10e630ebc4907adbab54e4c2a2b2a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A590650997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-e47c136249efa9bf4acb27881a3fab51178f6be7243b7d6f910e1bcb39e59233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1v0zAYxiMEYlPZjTOKhISQoJu_HV-QSjeg0tAkVk3cLMd507gk9ogTEP897lq6FXHAPvjr9z62Hz1Z9hyjU4w5PyMIF2dUMIQpf5QdE6TQFCFePN7P2dej7CTGNUqNYsY5epodESULThE-zvSiuzV2yEOdvzcRWuchn4MfetPmX2BwPo3LxtlvHmLMg8-vxsGGDmLufD40kN8sbhbn0_PPF7nxVVpdL2d3q-thrBzEZ9mT2rQRTnbjJFt-uFjOP00vrz4u5rPLqRWUD1Ng0mIqCFNQG1XWzNiSyKLAhtam5BjLohYlSMJoKStRK4wAl7akCrgilE6yxVa2Cmatb3vXmf6XDsbpu43Qr7TpB2db0EzVqVhQBKVlCklTlekGBswSQ0pikta7rdbtWHZQ2a0bB6KHJ941ehV-aF4oQdILJ9nrnUAfvo8QB925aKFtjYcwRk0QI5IpkR4-yV7-ha7D2CfTE8WQFCxJsntqZdIHnK9DutduRPWMKyQ4Ukom6vQfVOoVdM4GD7VL-wcFrx4UNGDaoYmhHQcXfDwE325B24cYe6j3ZmCkNznUmxzqXQ4T_uKhgXv4T-oS8GYLNM5X5qf7TzlITIrHPY2TOVLQ37KI6kY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407648964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lu, Chengxing ; Metzig, Carola ; Katz, Todd A. ; Gillies, Mark ; Midena, Edoardo ; Ogura, Yuichiro</creator><contributor>Toto, Lisa ; Lisa Toto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chengxing ; Metzig, Carola ; Katz, Todd A. ; Gillies, Mark ; Midena, Edoardo ; Ogura, Yuichiro ; Toto, Lisa ; Lisa Toto</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose. To report the impact of baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) on outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME. Methods. Post hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials in which 862 DME patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks after five initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation at baseline and as needed. We compared visual and anatomical outcomes in subgroups of patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. Results. At weeks 52 and 100, outcomes with intravitreal aflibercept 2q4 and 2q8 were superior to those in laser control-treated patients regardless of baseline CRT. When looked at in a binary fashion, the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser was not significantly better in the ≥400 μm than the <400 μm group; when looked at as a continuous variable, baseline CRT seemed to have an impact on the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser. Conclusions. Post hoc analyses of VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME demonstrated the benefits of intravitreal aflibercept treatment in DME patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. This trial is registered with NCT01331681 and NCT01363440.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2018/3640135</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29785301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Age ; Care and treatment ; Clinical Study ; Comparative analysis ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Lasers ; Macular degeneration ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Studies ; Type 2 diabetes ; Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of ophthalmology, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Edoardo Midena et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Edoardo Midena et al. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Edoardo Midena et al. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-e47c136249efa9bf4acb27881a3fab51178f6be7243b7d6f910e1bcb39e59233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-e47c136249efa9bf4acb27881a3fab51178f6be7243b7d6f910e1bcb39e59233</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3132-6233</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2407648964/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2407648964?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,74897</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Toto, Lisa</contributor><contributor>Lisa Toto</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chengxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzig, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillies, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midena, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies</title><title>Journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose. To report the impact of baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) on outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME. Methods. Post hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials in which 862 DME patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks after five initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation at baseline and as needed. We compared visual and anatomical outcomes in subgroups of patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. Results. At weeks 52 and 100, outcomes with intravitreal aflibercept 2q4 and 2q8 were superior to those in laser control-treated patients regardless of baseline CRT. When looked at in a binary fashion, the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser was not significantly better in the ≥400 μm than the <400 μm group; when looked at as a continuous variable, baseline CRT seemed to have an impact on the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser. Conclusions. Post hoc analyses of VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME demonstrated the benefits of intravitreal aflibercept treatment in DME patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. This trial is registered with NCT01331681 and NCT01363440.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Macular degeneration</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>2090-004X</issn><issn>2090-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1v0zAYxiMEYlPZjTOKhISQoJu_HV-QSjeg0tAkVk3cLMd507gk9ogTEP897lq6FXHAPvjr9z62Hz1Z9hyjU4w5PyMIF2dUMIQpf5QdE6TQFCFePN7P2dej7CTGNUqNYsY5epodESULThE-zvSiuzV2yEOdvzcRWuchn4MfetPmX2BwPo3LxtlvHmLMg8-vxsGGDmLufD40kN8sbhbn0_PPF7nxVVpdL2d3q-thrBzEZ9mT2rQRTnbjJFt-uFjOP00vrz4u5rPLqRWUD1Ng0mIqCFNQG1XWzNiSyKLAhtam5BjLohYlSMJoKStRK4wAl7akCrgilE6yxVa2Cmatb3vXmf6XDsbpu43Qr7TpB2db0EzVqVhQBKVlCklTlekGBswSQ0pikta7rdbtWHZQ2a0bB6KHJ941ehV-aF4oQdILJ9nrnUAfvo8QB925aKFtjYcwRk0QI5IpkR4-yV7-ha7D2CfTE8WQFCxJsntqZdIHnK9DutduRPWMKyQ4Ukom6vQfVOoVdM4GD7VL-wcFrx4UNGDaoYmhHQcXfDwE325B24cYe6j3ZmCkNznUmxzqXQ4T_uKhgXv4T-oS8GYLNM5X5qf7TzlITIrHPY2TOVLQ37KI6kY</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Lu, Chengxing</creator><creator>Metzig, Carola</creator><creator>Katz, Todd A.</creator><creator>Gillies, Mark</creator><creator>Midena, Edoardo</creator><creator>Ogura, Yuichiro</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-6233</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies</title><author>Lu, Chengxing ; Metzig, Carola ; Katz, Todd A. ; Gillies, Mark ; Midena, Edoardo ; Ogura, Yuichiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-e47c136249efa9bf4acb27881a3fab51178f6be7243b7d6f910e1bcb39e59233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Macular degeneration</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Chengxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzig, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Todd A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillies, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midena, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogura, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Chengxing</au><au>Metzig, Carola</au><au>Katz, Todd A.</au><au>Gillies, Mark</au><au>Midena, Edoardo</au><au>Ogura, Yuichiro</au><au>Toto, Lisa</au><au>Lisa Toto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2018</volume><issue>2018</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>2090-004X</issn><eissn>2090-0058</eissn><abstract>Purpose. To report the impact of baseline central retinal thickness (CRT) on outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME. Methods. Post hoc analyses of two randomized controlled trials in which 862 DME patients were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to treatment with intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks (2q4), intravitreal aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks after five initial monthly doses (2q8), or macular laser photocoagulation at baseline and as needed. We compared visual and anatomical outcomes in subgroups of patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. Results. At weeks 52 and 100, outcomes with intravitreal aflibercept 2q4 and 2q8 were superior to those in laser control-treated patients regardless of baseline CRT. When looked at in a binary fashion, the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser was not significantly better in the ≥400 μm than the <400 μm group; when looked at as a continuous variable, baseline CRT seemed to have an impact on the treatment effect of intravitreal aflibercept versus laser. Conclusions. Post hoc analyses of VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME demonstrated the benefits of intravitreal aflibercept treatment in DME patients with baseline CRT < 400 μm and ≥400 μm. This trial is registered with NCT01331681 and NCT01363440.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>29785301</pmid><doi>10.1155/2018/3640135</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-6233</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2090-004X |
ispartof | Journal of ophthalmology, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-9 |
issn | 2090-004X 2090-0058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_49f10e630ebc4907adbab54e4c2a2b2a |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Age Care and treatment Clinical Study Comparative analysis Diabetes Diabetic retinopathy Lasers Macular degeneration Patient outcomes Patients Studies Type 2 diabetes Values |
title | Impact of Baseline Central Retinal Thickness on Outcomes in the VIVID-DME and VISTA-DME Studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A45%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Baseline%20Central%20Retinal%20Thickness%20on%20Outcomes%20in%20the%20VIVID-DME%20and%20VISTA-DME%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Lu,%20Chengxing&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=2018&rft.issue=2018&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=2090-004X&rft.eissn=2090-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2018/3640135&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA590650997%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c635t-e47c136249efa9bf4acb27881a3fab51178f6be7243b7d6f910e1bcb39e59233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407648964&rft_id=info:pmid/29785301&rft_galeid=A590650997&rfr_iscdi=true |