Loading…

New infusion device for use in acquisition of images during endovascular procedures: an experimental model

The contrast power injector (CPI) is the gold standard method for injecting contrast with the pressure and flow needed to generate a satisfactory images during endovascular procedures, but it is an expensive tool, narrowing its wide-scale applications. One alternative is the manual injection (MI) me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Jornal vascular brasileiro 2021-01, Vol.20, p.e20200191-e20200191
Main Authors: Schmid, Bruno Pagnin, de Alencar, Isadora Cardoso, Masson, Carolina, Molinari, Giovani José Dal Poggetto, Menezes, Fábio Hüsemann
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The contrast power injector (CPI) is the gold standard method for injecting contrast with the pressure and flow needed to generate a satisfactory images during endovascular procedures, but it is an expensive tool, narrowing its wide-scale applications. One alternative is the manual injection (MI) method, but this does not generate the pressure required for adequate visualization of anatomy. It is therefore imperative to create an alternative low-cost method that is capable of producing high quality images. To compare the injection parameters of a new mechanical device (Hand-Crank) created in a university hospital with the MI method and with the contrast power injector's ideal values. A circulation phantom was constructed to simulate the pressure in the aorto-iliac territory and the injection parameters of the two methods were compared in a laboratory setting. Student's test and the Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis. Three vascular surgery residents (the authors) performed the injections (each performed 9 tests using conventional manual injection and 9 tests using the Hand-Crank, totaling 54 injections). There were statistical differences between the two methods (p
ISSN:1677-5449
1677-7301
1677-7301
DOI:10.1590/1677-5449.200191