Does reality meet expectations? An analysis of medical students' expectations and perceived learning during mandatory research projects

• Published in: BMC medical education 2019-03, Vol.19 (1), p.93-93, Article 93
• Main Authors: Möller, Riitta, Shoshan, Maria
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes; Career development; College students; Core curriculum; Cross-Sectional Studies; Education; Education, Medical, Undergraduate - standards; Epidemiology; Ethics; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Learning; Learning Activities; Male; Medical education; Medical research; Medical schools; Medical students; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Medicine; Methods; Middle Aged; Motivation; Oral communication; Perceptions; Physicians; Problem Solving; Prospective Studies; Questionnaires; Research - education; Research activities; Research ethics; Research methodology; Researchers; Scholarly projects; Scholars; Science education; Seminars; Skills; Statistics; Students; Students, Medical - psychology; Studies; Study and teaching; Systematic review; Teaching; Teaching Methods; Undergraduate research; Undergraduate Study; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1526-x

Although much has been written about structure and outcomes of medical students' curricular research projects, less attention has been paid to the expectations on such projects. In order to foster students' scientific understanding and improve the quality of mandatory research projects, we compared students' pre-course expectations with their post-course insights regarding learning and transferable skills. A prospective cross-sectional questionnaire study. All students registered on a mandatory 20-week research project course in 2011-2013 were e-mailed questionnaires in the beginning and after the course asking them to rate statements on expectations and perceived learning on a 5-point Likert scale. Of 652 students, 358 (mean age 26 years; range 21-49; 63% females) returned both questionnaires, corresponding to a response rate of 55%. The ratings for expectations as well as perceived learning were highest for learning to search and critically appraise literature. The greatest pre- and post-course differences were indicated for participation in scientific discussions and oral communication. Surprisingly, both pre- and post-course ratings were low for research ethics. The highest post-course ratings regarding skills for future working life were given to items pertaining to understanding the scientific basis of medicine, ability to follow the development of knowledge and to critically integrate knowledge. Female students had higher expectations than male students. Those with a previous university degree had lower ratings of expectations and perceived learning. Students with basic science projects reported higher expectations and higher learning compared to students with other projects. Previous research experience had no significant influence on expectations nor learning. The correlations between post-course ratings of learning and skills showed that problem-solving ability had a relatively high correlation with all skills. Students had high expectations and perceived the course improved crucial practical skills. However, expectations were not quite met regarding aspects of scientific communication, and hypothesis formulation, likely because these require more extensive practice and feedback. Students should be actively involved in ethical discussions and oral communication should be trained repeatedly as it is an important task of doctors to communicate scientific information to patients and non-experts.