Loading…
Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain
Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly. Material and Methods: In this study,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology clinical pharmacology, 2021-07, Vol.37 (3), p.464-468 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553 |
container_end_page | 468 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 464 |
container_title | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Kocayiğit, Havva Beyaz, Serbülent |
description | Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly.
Material and Methods: In this study, the genicular nerve RF treatments of patients with osteoarthritic knee pain conducted at the Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital in the algology clinic of the Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Department between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively examined. The preoperative and postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th week visual analog scale (VAS) and Turkish validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. In addition, any complications after the treatment and side effects (bleeding, neurological damage, infection, etc.) were recorded in the file.
Results: When the data of the patients were evaluated statistically, the preoperative VAS and WOMAC scores were found significantly decreased compared with the postoperative 2nd week, 6th week, and 12th week scores in patients who applied both conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cooled RF. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques.
Conclusion: We found that both cooled and conventional RF techniques in genicular nerve ablation are similarly effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoarthritis-induced knee pain and improving patients' physical functions. The complication rates are very low and there was no superiority to each other. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_126_19 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4ab35f5cf2504c31b5f0a60521aaa115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A823093435</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4ab35f5cf2504c31b5f0a60521aaa115</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A823093435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtsf2AXwzAou0mmD8uObwYh--oodBfbtTiWjxIlsuRJTkP__ZSkLQmMMHRhIz3n0bH0OsveUjIpKOEfVx5UP_lxO5v_lJSVktbPskvGOB2zipPn2SWpKzKu6VRcZK9iXBEiSMXEy-yCF5WoRckvMz_3XQ_BRO9yr3PlvcU2B9emV3eHbjDegc0DtMbrgH826NR9Dn1vjYLdYsy1D_mwxHwICEOXSnYiHwf0EIZlMINR-doh5j0Y9zp7ocFGfPPwHGW_v375Nf8-vrn9dj2f3YxV6jCOtWh1W1OqsBVYKU0qELXGigAvVK2qZlqiJrXiBFRZYVMSbLiq21bzptRC8FF2ffC2HlayD6aDcC89GLmf8GEhU3dGWZQFNFxooTQTpFCcNkITKIlgFAAo3bk-HVz9pumwVekTA9gT6emKM0u58HdyKkpWFDwJPjwIgk8nGAfZmajQWnDoN1EyUZeF4HUao-z9AV1Aas047ZNR7XA5mzJOal5wcZYqp4QSKgqWqMk_qDRa7Ey6XtQmzZ9o_6vgeIero4Ilgh2W0dvNPhin5rPgsZEdQBV8jAH10zFTInepl_vUy-PUp6J3xxf0VPIY8wR8PgBbbwcMcW03WwwysWvnt2fUsigL-fiL8L-BYRda</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596453939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kocayiğit, Havva ; Beyaz, Serbülent</creator><creatorcontrib>Kocayiğit, Havva ; Beyaz, Serbülent</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly.
Material and Methods: In this study, the genicular nerve RF treatments of patients with osteoarthritic knee pain conducted at the Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital in the algology clinic of the Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Department between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively examined. The preoperative and postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th week visual analog scale (VAS) and Turkish validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. In addition, any complications after the treatment and side effects (bleeding, neurological damage, infection, etc.) were recorded in the file.
Results: When the data of the patients were evaluated statistically, the preoperative VAS and WOMAC scores were found significantly decreased compared with the postoperative 2nd week, 6th week, and 12th week scores in patients who applied both conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cooled RF. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques.
Conclusion: We found that both cooled and conventional RF techniques in genicular nerve ablation are similarly effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoarthritis-induced knee pain and improving patients' physical functions. The complication rates are very low and there was no superiority to each other.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-9185</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2231-2730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-2730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0970-9185</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_126_19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34759563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; conventional ; cooled ; genicular nerve ; Injuries ; Knee ; Knee pain ; Original ; Osteoarthritis ; Pain ; radiofrequency</subject><ispartof>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2021-07, Vol.37 (3), p.464-468</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562443/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562443/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27439,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759563$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kocayiğit, Havva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyaz, Serbülent</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain</title><title>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly.
Material and Methods: In this study, the genicular nerve RF treatments of patients with osteoarthritic knee pain conducted at the Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital in the algology clinic of the Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Department between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively examined. The preoperative and postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th week visual analog scale (VAS) and Turkish validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. In addition, any complications after the treatment and side effects (bleeding, neurological damage, infection, etc.) were recorded in the file.
Results: When the data of the patients were evaluated statistically, the preoperative VAS and WOMAC scores were found significantly decreased compared with the postoperative 2nd week, 6th week, and 12th week scores in patients who applied both conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cooled RF. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques.
Conclusion: We found that both cooled and conventional RF techniques in genicular nerve ablation are similarly effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoarthritis-induced knee pain and improving patients' physical functions. The complication rates are very low and there was no superiority to each other.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>conventional</subject><subject>cooled</subject><subject>genicular nerve</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee pain</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>radiofrequency</subject><issn>0970-9185</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><issn>0970-9185</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtsf2AXwzAou0mmD8uObwYh--oodBfbtTiWjxIlsuRJTkP__ZSkLQmMMHRhIz3n0bH0OsveUjIpKOEfVx5UP_lxO5v_lJSVktbPskvGOB2zipPn2SWpKzKu6VRcZK9iXBEiSMXEy-yCF5WoRckvMz_3XQ_BRO9yr3PlvcU2B9emV3eHbjDegc0DtMbrgH826NR9Dn1vjYLdYsy1D_mwxHwICEOXSnYiHwf0EIZlMINR-doh5j0Y9zp7ocFGfPPwHGW_v375Nf8-vrn9dj2f3YxV6jCOtWh1W1OqsBVYKU0qELXGigAvVK2qZlqiJrXiBFRZYVMSbLiq21bzptRC8FF2ffC2HlayD6aDcC89GLmf8GEhU3dGWZQFNFxooTQTpFCcNkITKIlgFAAo3bk-HVz9pumwVekTA9gT6emKM0u58HdyKkpWFDwJPjwIgk8nGAfZmajQWnDoN1EyUZeF4HUao-z9AV1Aas047ZNR7XA5mzJOal5wcZYqp4QSKgqWqMk_qDRa7Ey6XtQmzZ9o_6vgeIero4Ilgh2W0dvNPhin5rPgsZEdQBV8jAH10zFTInepl_vUy-PUp6J3xxf0VPIY8wR8PgBbbwcMcW03WwwysWvnt2fUsigL-fiL8L-BYRda</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Kocayiğit, Havva</creator><creator>Beyaz, Serbülent</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain</title><author>Kocayiğit, Havva ; Beyaz, Serbülent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>conventional</topic><topic>cooled</topic><topic>genicular nerve</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee pain</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>radiofrequency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kocayiğit, Havva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyaz, Serbülent</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kocayiğit, Havva</au><au>Beyaz, Serbülent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>468</epage><pages>464-468</pages><issn>0970-9185</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><eissn>2231-2730</eissn><eissn>0970-9185</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly.
Material and Methods: In this study, the genicular nerve RF treatments of patients with osteoarthritic knee pain conducted at the Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital in the algology clinic of the Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Department between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively examined. The preoperative and postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th week visual analog scale (VAS) and Turkish validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. In addition, any complications after the treatment and side effects (bleeding, neurological damage, infection, etc.) were recorded in the file.
Results: When the data of the patients were evaluated statistically, the preoperative VAS and WOMAC scores were found significantly decreased compared with the postoperative 2nd week, 6th week, and 12th week scores in patients who applied both conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cooled RF. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques.
Conclusion: We found that both cooled and conventional RF techniques in genicular nerve ablation are similarly effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoarthritis-induced knee pain and improving patients' physical functions. The complication rates are very low and there was no superiority to each other.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>34759563</pmid><doi>10.4103/joacp.JOACP_126_19</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0970-9185 |
ispartof | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2021-07, Vol.37 (3), p.464-468 |
issn | 0970-9185 2231-2730 2231-2730 0970-9185 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4ab35f5cf2504c31b5f0a60521aaa115 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess); PubMed Central |
subjects | Care and treatment conventional cooled genicular nerve Injuries Knee Knee pain Original Osteoarthritis Pain radiofrequency |
title | Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A07%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cooled%20and%20conventional%20radiofrequency%20applications%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20osteoarthritic%20knee%20pain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anaesthesiology,%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Kocayi%C4%9Fit,%20Havva&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=468&rft.pages=464-468&rft.issn=0970-9185&rft.eissn=2231-2730&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_126_19&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA823093435%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596453939&rft_id=info:pmid/34759563&rft_galeid=A823093435&rfr_iscdi=true |