Loading…

Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain

Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly. Material and Methods: In this study,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology clinical pharmacology, 2021-07, Vol.37 (3), p.464-468
Main Authors: Kocayiğit, Havva, Beyaz, Serbülent
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553
container_end_page 468
container_issue 3
container_start_page 464
container_title Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
container_volume 37
creator Kocayiğit, Havva
Beyaz, Serbülent
description Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly. Material and Methods: In this study, the genicular nerve RF treatments of patients with osteoarthritic knee pain conducted at the Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital in the algology clinic of the Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Department between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively examined. The preoperative and postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th week visual analog scale (VAS) and Turkish validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. In addition, any complications after the treatment and side effects (bleeding, neurological damage, infection, etc.) were recorded in the file. Results: When the data of the patients were evaluated statistically, the preoperative VAS and WOMAC scores were found significantly decreased compared with the postoperative 2nd week, 6th week, and 12th week scores in patients who applied both conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cooled RF. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques. Conclusion: We found that both cooled and conventional RF techniques in genicular nerve ablation are similarly effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoarthritis-induced knee pain and improving patients' physical functions. The complication rates are very low and there was no superiority to each other.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_126_19
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4ab35f5cf2504c31b5f0a60521aaa115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A823093435</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4ab35f5cf2504c31b5f0a60521aaa115</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A823093435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtsf2AXwzAou0mmD8uObwYh--oodBfbtTiWjxIlsuRJTkP__ZSkLQmMMHRhIz3n0bH0OsveUjIpKOEfVx5UP_lxO5v_lJSVktbPskvGOB2zipPn2SWpKzKu6VRcZK9iXBEiSMXEy-yCF5WoRckvMz_3XQ_BRO9yr3PlvcU2B9emV3eHbjDegc0DtMbrgH826NR9Dn1vjYLdYsy1D_mwxHwICEOXSnYiHwf0EIZlMINR-doh5j0Y9zp7ocFGfPPwHGW_v375Nf8-vrn9dj2f3YxV6jCOtWh1W1OqsBVYKU0qELXGigAvVK2qZlqiJrXiBFRZYVMSbLiq21bzptRC8FF2ffC2HlayD6aDcC89GLmf8GEhU3dGWZQFNFxooTQTpFCcNkITKIlgFAAo3bk-HVz9pumwVekTA9gT6emKM0u58HdyKkpWFDwJPjwIgk8nGAfZmajQWnDoN1EyUZeF4HUao-z9AV1Aas047ZNR7XA5mzJOal5wcZYqp4QSKgqWqMk_qDRa7Ey6XtQmzZ9o_6vgeIero4Ilgh2W0dvNPhin5rPgsZEdQBV8jAH10zFTInepl_vUy-PUp6J3xxf0VPIY8wR8PgBbbwcMcW03WwwysWvnt2fUsigL-fiL8L-BYRda</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596453939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kocayiğit, Havva ; Beyaz, Serbülent</creator><creatorcontrib>Kocayiğit, Havva ; Beyaz, Serbülent</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly. Material and Methods: In this study, the genicular nerve RF treatments of patients with osteoarthritic knee pain conducted at the Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital in the algology clinic of the Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Department between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively examined. The preoperative and postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th week visual analog scale (VAS) and Turkish validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. In addition, any complications after the treatment and side effects (bleeding, neurological damage, infection, etc.) were recorded in the file. Results: When the data of the patients were evaluated statistically, the preoperative VAS and WOMAC scores were found significantly decreased compared with the postoperative 2nd week, 6th week, and 12th week scores in patients who applied both conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cooled RF. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques. Conclusion: We found that both cooled and conventional RF techniques in genicular nerve ablation are similarly effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoarthritis-induced knee pain and improving patients' physical functions. The complication rates are very low and there was no superiority to each other.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-9185</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2231-2730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-2730</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0970-9185</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_126_19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34759563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; conventional ; cooled ; genicular nerve ; Injuries ; Knee ; Knee pain ; Original ; Osteoarthritis ; Pain ; radiofrequency</subject><ispartof>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2021-07, Vol.37 (3), p.464-468</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562443/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562443/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27439,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759563$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kocayiğit, Havva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyaz, Serbülent</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain</title><title>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly. Material and Methods: In this study, the genicular nerve RF treatments of patients with osteoarthritic knee pain conducted at the Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital in the algology clinic of the Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Department between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively examined. The preoperative and postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th week visual analog scale (VAS) and Turkish validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. In addition, any complications after the treatment and side effects (bleeding, neurological damage, infection, etc.) were recorded in the file. Results: When the data of the patients were evaluated statistically, the preoperative VAS and WOMAC scores were found significantly decreased compared with the postoperative 2nd week, 6th week, and 12th week scores in patients who applied both conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cooled RF. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques. Conclusion: We found that both cooled and conventional RF techniques in genicular nerve ablation are similarly effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoarthritis-induced knee pain and improving patients' physical functions. The complication rates are very low and there was no superiority to each other.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>conventional</subject><subject>cooled</subject><subject>genicular nerve</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee pain</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>radiofrequency</subject><issn>0970-9185</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><issn>0970-9185</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11r2zAUhs3YWLtsf2AXwzAou0mmD8uObwYh--oodBfbtTiWjxIlsuRJTkP__ZSkLQmMMHRhIz3n0bH0OsveUjIpKOEfVx5UP_lxO5v_lJSVktbPskvGOB2zipPn2SWpKzKu6VRcZK9iXBEiSMXEy-yCF5WoRckvMz_3XQ_BRO9yr3PlvcU2B9emV3eHbjDegc0DtMbrgH826NR9Dn1vjYLdYsy1D_mwxHwICEOXSnYiHwf0EIZlMINR-doh5j0Y9zp7ocFGfPPwHGW_v375Nf8-vrn9dj2f3YxV6jCOtWh1W1OqsBVYKU0qELXGigAvVK2qZlqiJrXiBFRZYVMSbLiq21bzptRC8FF2ffC2HlayD6aDcC89GLmf8GEhU3dGWZQFNFxooTQTpFCcNkITKIlgFAAo3bk-HVz9pumwVekTA9gT6emKM0u58HdyKkpWFDwJPjwIgk8nGAfZmajQWnDoN1EyUZeF4HUao-z9AV1Aas047ZNR7XA5mzJOal5wcZYqp4QSKgqWqMk_qDRa7Ey6XtQmzZ9o_6vgeIero4Ilgh2W0dvNPhin5rPgsZEdQBV8jAH10zFTInepl_vUy-PUp6J3xxf0VPIY8wR8PgBbbwcMcW03WwwysWvnt2fUsigL-fiL8L-BYRda</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Kocayiğit, Havva</creator><creator>Beyaz, Serbülent</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain</title><author>Kocayiğit, Havva ; Beyaz, Serbülent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>conventional</topic><topic>cooled</topic><topic>genicular nerve</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee pain</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>radiofrequency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kocayiğit, Havva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyaz, Serbülent</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kocayiğit, Havva</au><au>Beyaz, Serbülent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>468</epage><pages>464-468</pages><issn>0970-9185</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><eissn>2231-2730</eissn><eissn>0970-9185</eissn><abstract>Background and Aims: Osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative joint disease that affects the joint cartilage and surrounding tissues. It has been determined that osteoarthritis-induced knee pain is the most common cause of physical disability in the elderly. Material and Methods: In this study, the genicular nerve RF treatments of patients with osteoarthritic knee pain conducted at the Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital in the algology clinic of the Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Department between January 2016 and December 2016 were retrospectively examined. The preoperative and postoperative 2nd, 6th, and 12th week visual analog scale (VAS) and Turkish validated Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were recorded. In addition, any complications after the treatment and side effects (bleeding, neurological damage, infection, etc.) were recorded in the file. Results: When the data of the patients were evaluated statistically, the preoperative VAS and WOMAC scores were found significantly decreased compared with the postoperative 2nd week, 6th week, and 12th week scores in patients who applied both conventional radiofrequency (RF) and cooled RF. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques. Conclusion: We found that both cooled and conventional RF techniques in genicular nerve ablation are similarly effective in reducing pain in patients with osteoarthritis-induced knee pain and improving patients' physical functions. The complication rates are very low and there was no superiority to each other.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>34759563</pmid><doi>10.4103/joacp.JOACP_126_19</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0970-9185
ispartof Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2021-07, Vol.37 (3), p.464-468
issn 0970-9185
2231-2730
2231-2730
0970-9185
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4ab35f5cf2504c31b5f0a60521aaa115
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess); PubMed Central
subjects Care and treatment
conventional
cooled
genicular nerve
Injuries
Knee
Knee pain
Original
Osteoarthritis
Pain
radiofrequency
title Comparison of cooled and conventional radiofrequency applications for the treatment of osteoarthritic knee pain
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A07%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cooled%20and%20conventional%20radiofrequency%20applications%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20osteoarthritic%20knee%20pain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anaesthesiology,%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Kocayi%C4%9Fit,%20Havva&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=468&rft.pages=464-468&rft.issn=0970-9185&rft.eissn=2231-2730&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_126_19&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA823093435%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725s-f5dfd911ced5e7cf07a59fe70a34c9c7b86ef09c30ac67eb60eb3c9ddf3b6f553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596453939&rft_id=info:pmid/34759563&rft_galeid=A823093435&rfr_iscdi=true