The influence of contact lenses with different optical designs on the binocular vision and visual behavior of young adults

• Published in: Scientific reports 2022-04, Vol.12 (1), p.6573-6573, Article 6573
• Main Authors: Chen, Shyan-Tarng, Tung, Hsiao-Ching, Chen, Yan-Ting, Tien, Chuen-Lin, Yeh, Chih-Wei, Lian, Jheng-Sin, Cheng, Ching-Ying
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 692/1537; 692/700; Accommodation, Ocular; Acuity; Balance; Behavior; Binocular vision; Contact Lenses; Eye examinations; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; multidisciplinary; Questionnaires; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Vergence eye movements; Vision Tests; Vision, Binocular; Visual Acuity; Young Adult; Young adults
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10580-7

Theoretically, contact lenses change the accommodation and vergence demands of the eyes and directly or indirectly influence binocular vision. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of different optical designs of contact lenses on binocular vision and visual behavior among young adults. In this randomized, single-blinded experimental study, visual behavioral performance (VBP) and Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaires were used for preliminary screening. Nineteen myopic subjects aged 20–26 years (21.59 ± 1.40 years) participated in the study. Baseline values for subjective refraction and binocular visual functions were evaluated. All the subjects were randomly grouped to wear different optical designs of single-vision, progressive, and bifocal contact lenses. Eye examinations were performed on the first day (CL baseline), 2nd week, and 4th week of wearing the lenses. In addition, subjects completed the VBP and visual quality questionnaire again at the end of the examination. Single-vision contact lenses (Lens 1) increased accommodative lag, negative relative accommodation, and distant and near vergence; however, vergence facilities, accommodative facilities, heterophoria, and the comfort and posture balance dimensions in the VBP questionnaire were improved. Progressive contact lenses (Lens 2) reduced the lag of accommodation and near vergence; in addition, vergence facilities and accommodative facilities were also improved. Bifocal contact lenses (Lens 3) affected negative and positive relative accommodation, but vergence facilities and accommodative facilities also progressed. Furthermore, both progressive (Lens 2) and bifocal (Lens 3) contact lenses enhanced overall visual behavioral performance. In terms of visual quality, single-vision contact lenses (Lens 1) were the most comfortable, progressive and bifocal contact lenses reduced distant visual acuity and stability, progressive contact lenses (Lens 2) had more complaints about halos at night, and bifocal contact lens (Lens 3) users were more likely to have double vision. Compared with single-vision contact lenses, progressive and bifocal contact lenses relaxed accommodation, reduced the lag of accommodation, and improved visual behavioral performance. Although the vergence function showed a significant change, it did not show worse trends when wearing contact lenses. Contact lenses with different optical designs have a great influence on binocular vision and visual behaviora