Culture as a Moderator of Epistemically Suspect Beliefs

• Published in: Frontiers in psychology 2022-02, Vol.13, p.745580-745580
• Main Authors: Majima, Yoshimasa, Walker, Alexander C, Turpin, Martin Harry, Fugelsang, Jonathan A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: analytic thinking; analytic-holistic cognition; bullshit receptivity; cultural differences; epistemically suspect beliefs; Psychology
• ISSN: 1664-1078; 1664-1078
• DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745580

A consistent finding reported in the literature is that epistemically suspect beliefs (e.g., paranormal beliefs) are less frequently endorsed by individuals with a greater tendency to think analytically. However, these results have been observed predominantly in Western participants. In the present work, we explore various individual differences known to predict epistemically suspect beliefs across both Western and Eastern cultures. Across four studies with Japanese ( = 666) and Western ( = 650) individuals, we find that the association between thinking style and beliefs varied as a function of culture. Specifically, while Westerners who scored higher on measures of Type-2 analytic thinking tended to endorse epistemically suspect beliefs less, this association was not observed in Japanese samples, suggesting that the often-observed negative association between analytic thinking and epistemically suspect beliefs may be exclusive to Western individuals. Additionally, we demonstrate that a tendency to think holistically (specifically with regards to causality) is positively associated with the endorsement of epistemically suspect beliefs within both samples. Overall, we discuss how various individual differences predict the endorsement of epistemically suspect beliefs across cultures.