Loading…
Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Objective: Neck management in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. Our goal was to compare the survival difference between PET-CT–guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection (END) for the treatment of cT1-2 tongue SCC. Methods: Patients with surgically treated...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in oncology 2020-06, Vol.10, p.720-720 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b593563b45154d0f9be7e9ab7787d595a4a489655b429e0bd795278934885a843 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b593563b45154d0f9be7e9ab7787d595a4a489655b429e0bd795278934885a843 |
container_end_page | 720 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 720 |
container_title | Frontiers in oncology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Zhu, Fengjie Sun, Shuhan Ba, Kai |
description | Objective:
Neck management in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. Our goal was to compare the survival difference between PET-CT–guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection (END) for the treatment of cT1-2 tongue SCC.
Methods:
Patients with surgically treated cT1-2N0 tongue SCC were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A: The decision of whether to perform neck dissection was mainly based on the results of preoperative PET-CT examinations. Group B: Patients received END treatment without preoperative PET-CT examinations. The study endpoints were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates.
Results:
Group A consisted of 66 patients, and 16 patients underwent neck dissection owing to positive PET-CT results. Group B consisted of 169 patients. The 5-year RC rates in group A and group B were 86 and 87%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (
p
= 0.731). The 5-year DSS rates in group A and group B were 93 and 90%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (
p
= 0.583).
Conclusions:
Neck dissection can be safely avoided when the PET-CT scan reveals no neck lymph node involvement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fonc.2020.00720 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4ba72ccfc8ff48b9a4b54cbd6f6f568c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4ba72ccfc8ff48b9a4b54cbd6f6f568c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2418125045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b593563b45154d0f9be7e9ab7787d595a4a489655b429e0bd795278934885a843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkc1u1DAUhSMEolXbNVsv2WTq-Ce2N0gQhlKpapEaJHaW7dwMLok9tZOi7ngH3pAnIdOpEFW9ufa9R9-1zimKNxVeUSrVaR-DWxFM8ApjQfCL4pAQykrF6LeX_90PipOcb_Byao4rTF8XB5RwKSRhh8V9E8etST7HgD7A9BMgoC_rtmzaP79-n82-gw5dgvuBPvqcwU1-0ZnQofWwe9zBs6EPyLVVSS4xamPYzICub2czxjmjBoYBNSY5H-JojotXvRkynDzWo-Lrp3XbfC4vrs7Om_cXpWO0nkrLFeU1tYxXnHW4VxYEKGOFkKLjihtmmFQ155YRBdh2QnEipKJMSm4ko0fF-Z7bRXOjt8mPJt3raLx-aMS00SZN3g2gmTWCONc72fdMWmWY5czZru7rntfSLax3e9Z2tiN0DsKUzPAE-nQS_He9iXdaELX8q1oAbx8BKd7OkCc9-uwWX0yAxSJNWCUrwjHji_R0L3Up5pyg_7emwnqXv97lr3f564f86V_giqM2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418125045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhu, Fengjie ; Sun, Shuhan ; Ba, Kai</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Fengjie ; Sun, Shuhan ; Ba, Kai</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
Neck management in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. Our goal was to compare the survival difference between PET-CT–guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection (END) for the treatment of cT1-2 tongue SCC.
Methods:
Patients with surgically treated cT1-2N0 tongue SCC were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A: The decision of whether to perform neck dissection was mainly based on the results of preoperative PET-CT examinations. Group B: Patients received END treatment without preoperative PET-CT examinations. The study endpoints were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates.
Results:
Group A consisted of 66 patients, and 16 patients underwent neck dissection owing to positive PET-CT results. Group B consisted of 169 patients. The 5-year RC rates in group A and group B were 86 and 87%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (
p
= 0.731). The 5-year DSS rates in group A and group B were 93 and 90%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (
p
= 0.583).
Conclusions:
Neck dissection can be safely avoided when the PET-CT scan reveals no neck lymph node involvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00720</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32587824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>early stage tongue cancer ; elective neck dissection ; Oncology ; PET-CT ; survival analysis ; tongue squamous cell carcinoma</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in oncology, 2020-06, Vol.10, p.720-720</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Zhu, Sun and Ba. 2020 Zhu, Sun and Ba</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b593563b45154d0f9be7e9ab7787d595a4a489655b429e0bd795278934885a843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b593563b45154d0f9be7e9ab7787d595a4a489655b429e0bd795278934885a843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297951/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297951/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Fengjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Shuhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ba, Kai</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma</title><title>Frontiers in oncology</title><description>Objective:
Neck management in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. Our goal was to compare the survival difference between PET-CT–guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection (END) for the treatment of cT1-2 tongue SCC.
Methods:
Patients with surgically treated cT1-2N0 tongue SCC were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A: The decision of whether to perform neck dissection was mainly based on the results of preoperative PET-CT examinations. Group B: Patients received END treatment without preoperative PET-CT examinations. The study endpoints were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates.
Results:
Group A consisted of 66 patients, and 16 patients underwent neck dissection owing to positive PET-CT results. Group B consisted of 169 patients. The 5-year RC rates in group A and group B were 86 and 87%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (
p
= 0.731). The 5-year DSS rates in group A and group B were 93 and 90%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (
p
= 0.583).
Conclusions:
Neck dissection can be safely avoided when the PET-CT scan reveals no neck lymph node involvement.</description><subject>early stage tongue cancer</subject><subject>elective neck dissection</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>PET-CT</subject><subject>survival analysis</subject><subject>tongue squamous cell carcinoma</subject><issn>2234-943X</issn><issn>2234-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplkc1u1DAUhSMEolXbNVsv2WTq-Ce2N0gQhlKpapEaJHaW7dwMLok9tZOi7ngH3pAnIdOpEFW9ufa9R9-1zimKNxVeUSrVaR-DWxFM8ApjQfCL4pAQykrF6LeX_90PipOcb_Byao4rTF8XB5RwKSRhh8V9E8etST7HgD7A9BMgoC_rtmzaP79-n82-gw5dgvuBPvqcwU1-0ZnQofWwe9zBs6EPyLVVSS4xamPYzICub2czxjmjBoYBNSY5H-JojotXvRkynDzWo-Lrp3XbfC4vrs7Om_cXpWO0nkrLFeU1tYxXnHW4VxYEKGOFkKLjihtmmFQ155YRBdh2QnEipKJMSm4ko0fF-Z7bRXOjt8mPJt3raLx-aMS00SZN3g2gmTWCONc72fdMWmWY5czZru7rntfSLax3e9Z2tiN0DsKUzPAE-nQS_He9iXdaELX8q1oAbx8BKd7OkCc9-uwWX0yAxSJNWCUrwjHji_R0L3Up5pyg_7emwnqXv97lr3f564f86V_giqM2</recordid><startdate>20200610</startdate><enddate>20200610</enddate><creator>Zhu, Fengjie</creator><creator>Sun, Shuhan</creator><creator>Ba, Kai</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200610</creationdate><title>Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma</title><author>Zhu, Fengjie ; Sun, Shuhan ; Ba, Kai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b593563b45154d0f9be7e9ab7787d595a4a489655b429e0bd795278934885a843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>early stage tongue cancer</topic><topic>elective neck dissection</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>PET-CT</topic><topic>survival analysis</topic><topic>tongue squamous cell carcinoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Fengjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Shuhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ba, Kai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Fengjie</au><au>Sun, Shuhan</au><au>Ba, Kai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle><date>2020-06-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><spage>720</spage><epage>720</epage><pages>720-720</pages><issn>2234-943X</issn><eissn>2234-943X</eissn><abstract>Objective:
Neck management in cT1-2N0 tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains controversial. Our goal was to compare the survival difference between PET-CT–guided neck dissection and elective neck dissection (END) for the treatment of cT1-2 tongue SCC.
Methods:
Patients with surgically treated cT1-2N0 tongue SCC were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were divided into two groups. Group A: The decision of whether to perform neck dissection was mainly based on the results of preoperative PET-CT examinations. Group B: Patients received END treatment without preoperative PET-CT examinations. The study endpoints were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates.
Results:
Group A consisted of 66 patients, and 16 patients underwent neck dissection owing to positive PET-CT results. Group B consisted of 169 patients. The 5-year RC rates in group A and group B were 86 and 87%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (
p
= 0.731). The 5-year DSS rates in group A and group B were 93 and 90%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (
p
= 0.583).
Conclusions:
Neck dissection can be safely avoided when the PET-CT scan reveals no neck lymph node involvement.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>32587824</pmid><doi>10.3389/fonc.2020.00720</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2234-943X |
ispartof | Frontiers in oncology, 2020-06, Vol.10, p.720-720 |
issn | 2234-943X 2234-943X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4ba72ccfc8ff48b9a4b54cbd6f6f568c |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | early stage tongue cancer elective neck dissection Oncology PET-CT survival analysis tongue squamous cell carcinoma |
title | Comparison Between PET-CT–Guided Neck Dissection and Elective Neck Dissection in cT1-2N0 Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A13%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20Between%20PET-CT%E2%80%93Guided%20Neck%20Dissection%20and%20Elective%20Neck%20Dissection%20in%20cT1-2N0%20Tongue%20Squamous%20Cell%20Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20oncology&rft.au=Zhu,%20Fengjie&rft.date=2020-06-10&rft.volume=10&rft.spage=720&rft.epage=720&rft.pages=720-720&rft.issn=2234-943X&rft.eissn=2234-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fonc.2020.00720&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2418125045%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-b593563b45154d0f9be7e9ab7787d595a4a489655b429e0bd795278934885a843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418125045&rft_id=info:pmid/32587824&rfr_iscdi=true |