Large Vessel Activity and Low-Frequency Underwater Sound Benchmarks in United States Waters

• Published in: Frontiers in Marine Science 2021-11, Vol.8
• Main Authors: Haver, Samara M., Adams, Jeffrey D., Hatch, Leila T., Van Parijs, Sofie M., Dziak, Robert P., Haxel, Joseph, Heppell, Scott A., McKenna, Megan F., Mellinger, David K., Gedamke, Jason
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustic tracking; Acoustics; Ambient noise; anthropogenic noise; automatic information systems; Benchmarks; biologically important areas; Canyons; COVID-19; Economics; Environmental impact; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Exclusive economic zone; Exclusive economic zones; Indicators; Marine environment; Marine organisms; National monuments; National parks; Nature conservation; Noise; Noise levels; passive acoustic monitoring; Sanctuaries; Seamounts; Shipping; Shipping noise; Sound; Sound measurement; Sound sources; soundscape; Underwater; Wildlife sanctuaries
• ISSN: 2296-7745; 2296-7745
• DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.669528

Chronic low-frequency noise from commercial shipping is a worldwide threat to marine animals that rely on sound for essential life functions. Although the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recognizes the potential negative impacts of shipping noise in marine environments, there are currently no standard metrics to monitor and quantify shipping noise in U.S. marine waters. However, one-third octave band acoustic measurements centered at 63 and 125 Hz are used as international (European Union Marine Strategy Framework Directive) indicators for underwater ambient noise levels driven by shipping activity. We apply these metrics to passive acoustic monitoring data collected over 20 months in 2016–2017 at five dispersed sites throughout the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone: Alaskan Arctic, Hawaii, Gulf of Mexico, Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument (Northwest Atlantic), and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary (Northeast Pacific). To verify the relationship between shipping activity and underwater sound levels, vessel movement data from the Automatic Identification System (AIS) were paired to each passive acoustic monitoring site. Daily average sound levels were consistently near to or higher than 100 dB re 1 μPa in both the 63 and 125 Hz one-third octave bands at sites with high levels of shipping traffic (Gulf of Mexico, Northeast Canyons and Seamounts, and Cordell Bank). Where cargo vessels were less common (the Arctic and Hawaii), daily average sound levels were comparatively lower. Specifically, sound levels were ∼20 dB lower year-round in Hawaii and ∼10-20 dB lower in the Alaskan Arctic, depending on the season. Although these band-level measurements can only generally facilitate differentiation of sound sources, these results demonstrate that international acoustic indicators of commercial shipping can be applied to data collected in U.S. waters as a unified metric to approximate the influence of shipping as a driver of ambient noise levels, provide critical information to managers and policy makers about the status of marine environments, and to identify places and times for more detailed investigation regarding environmental impacts.