Effect of an interactive cardiopulmonary resuscitation assist device with an automated external defibrillator synchronised with a ventilator on the CPR performance of emergency medical service staff: a randomised simulation study

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2017-04, Vol.25 (1), p.36-36, Article 36
• Main Authors: Nitzschke, Rainer, Doehn, Christoph, Kersten, Jan F, Blanz, Julian, Kalwa, Tobias J, Scotti, Norman A, Kubitz, Jens C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Advanced life support; Airway management; Algorithms; Automation; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - instrumentation; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - standards; CPR; CPR assist devices; Cross-Over Studies; Defibrillators; Education and simulation; Emergency medical service; Emergency Medical Services - standards; Emergency services; Female; gjenoppliving; hjerte-lunge-redning (HLR); Humans; Lifesaving; Male; Manikins; Masks; Medical technology; Original Research; Paramedics; Prospective Studies; Simulation; Simulation Training - standards; Teams; Venous access; Ventilators; Ventilators, Mechanical; Vocational education; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1757-7241; 1757-7241
• DOI: 10.1186/s13049-017-0379-8

The present study evaluates whether the quality of advanced cardiac life support (ALS) is improved with an interactive prototype assist device. This device consists of an automated external defibrillator linked to a ventilator and provides synchronised visual and acoustic instructions for guidance through the ALS algorithm and assistance for face-mask ventilations. We compared the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality of emergency medical system (EMS) staff members using the study device or standard equipment in a mannequin simulation study with a prospective, controlled, randomised cross-over study design. Main outcome was the effect of the study device compared to the standard equipment and the effect of the number of prior ALS trainings of the EMS staff on the CPR quality. Data were analysed using analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) and binary logistic regression, accounting for the study design. In 106 simulations of 56 two-person rescuer teams, the mean hands-off time was 24.5% with study equipment and 23.5% with standard equipment (Difference 1.0% (95% CI: -0.4 to 2.5%); p = 0.156). With both types of equipment, the hands-off time decreased with an increasing cumulative number of previous CPR trainings (p = 0.042). The study equipment reduced the mean time until administration of adrenaline (epinephrine) by 23 s (p = 0.003) and that of amiodarone by 17 s (p = 0.016). It also increased the mean number of changes in the person doing chest compressions (0.6 per simulation; p