Enhancing Cone-Beam CT Image Quality in TIPSS Procedures Using AI Denoising

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) 2024-09, Vol.14 (17), p.1989
• Main Authors: Dehdab, Reza, Brendlin, Andreas S, Grözinger, Gerd, Almansour, Haidara, Brendel, Jan Michael, Gassenmaier, Sebastian, Ghibes, Patrick, Werner, Sebastian, Nikolaou, Konstantin, Afat, Saif
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: AI denoising; Algorithms; Artificial intelligence; Automation; Body mass index; cone-beam computed tomography; image quality analysis; Patients; Radiation; radiation dose reduction; Radiology; Software; TIPSS (Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt); Veins & arteries
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171989

This study evaluates a deep learning-based denoising algorithm to improve the trade-off between radiation dose, image noise, and motion artifacts in TIPSS procedures, aiming for shorter acquisition times and reduced radiation with maintained diagnostic quality. In this retrospective study, TIPSS patients were divided based on CBCT acquisition times of 6 s and 3 s. Traditional weighted filtered back projection (Original) and an AI denoising algorithm (AID) were used for image reconstructions. Objective assessments of image quality included contrast, noise levels, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) through place-consistent region-of-interest (ROI) measurements across various critical areas pertinent to the TIPSS procedure. Subjective assessments were conducted by two blinded radiologists who evaluated the overall image quality, sharpness, contrast, and motion artifacts for each dataset combination. Statistical significance was determined using a mixed-effects model ( ≤ 0.05). From an initial cohort of 60 TIPSS patients, 44 were selected and paired. The mean dose-area product (DAP) for the 6 s acquisitions was 5138.50 ± 1325.57 µGy·m , significantly higher than the 2514.06 ± 691.59 µGym obtained for the 3 s series. CNR was highest in the 6 s-AID series ( < 0.05). Both denoised and original series showed consistent contrast for 6 s and 3 s acquisitions, with no significant noise differences between the 6 s Original and 3 s AID images ( > 0.9). Subjective assessments indicated superior quality in 6 s-AID images, with no significant overall quality difference between the 6 s-Original and 3 s-AID series ( > 0.9). The AI denoising algorithm enhances CBCT image quality in TIPSS procedures, allowing for shorter scans that reduce radiation exposure and minimize motion artifacts.