The Validity of a Three-Dimensional Motion Capture System and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod in Connection with an Assessment of Ground Contact Time While Running in Place

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2023-08, Vol.23 (16), p.7155
• Main Authors: Drobnič, Miha, Verdel, Nina, Holmberg, Hans-Christer, Supej, Matej
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 3D kinematics; accelerometer; Accuracy; Algorithms; Analysis; Avionics industry; Biomechanics; Cameras; Centre - Centre for Sports and Performance Technology (SPORTC); Centrumbildning - Centrum för idrotts- och prestationsteknologi (SPORTC); Communication; Computer animation; Computer programs; Exercise; Fitness equipment; Force; force plate; Fysioterapi; Humidity; IMU; inertial sensor; Laboratories; Metabolism; Motion capture; Physical fitness; Physiotherapy; Running; Sensors; wearables
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s23167155

A three-dimensional motion capture system (MoCap) and the Garmin Running Dynamics Pod can be utilised to monitor a variety of dynamic parameters during running. The present investigation was designed to examine the validity of these two systems for determining ground contact times while running in place by comparing the values obtained with those provided by the bilateral force plate (gold standard). Eleven subjects completed three 20-s runs in place at self-selected rates, starting slowly, continuing at an intermediate pace, and finishing rapidly. The ground contact times obtained with both systems differed significantly from the gold standard at all three rates, as well as for all the rates combined (p < 0.001 in all cases), with the smallest mean bias at the fastest step rate for both (11.5 ± 14.4 ms for MoCap and −81.5 ± 18.4 ms for Garmin). This algorithm was developed for the determination of ground contact times during normal running and was adapted here for the assessment of running in place by the MoCap, which could be one explanation for its lack of validity. In conclusion, the wearables developed for monitoring normal running cannot be assumed to be suitable for determining ground contact times while running in place.