Loading…
Inter-comparison of elemental and organic carbon mass measurements from three North American national long-term monitoring networks at a co-located site
Carbonaceous aerosol is a major contributor to the total aerosol load and being monitored by diverse measurement approaches. Here, 10 years (2005–2015) of continuous carbonaceous aerosol measurements collected at the Centre of Atmospheric Research Experiments (CARE) in Egbert, Ontario, Canada, on qu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Atmospheric measurement techniques 2019-08, Vol.12 (8), p.4543-4560 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-13f085e8d15d7d5fbf38c714141e5d91411fab42f2487eb3b37902deb4fc67693 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-13f085e8d15d7d5fbf38c714141e5d91411fab42f2487eb3b37902deb4fc67693 |
container_end_page | 4560 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 4543 |
container_title | Atmospheric measurement techniques |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Chan, Tak W Huang, Lin Banwait, Kulbir Zhang, Wendy Ernst, Darrell Wang, Xiaoliang Watson, John G Chow, Judith C Green, Mark Czimczik, Claudia I Santos, Guaciara M Sharma, Sangeeta Jones, Keith |
description | Carbonaceous aerosol is a major contributor to the total aerosol load and
being monitored by diverse measurement approaches. Here, 10 years
(2005–2015) of continuous carbonaceous aerosol measurements collected at the
Centre of Atmospheric Research Experiments (CARE) in Egbert, Ontario, Canada,
on quartz-fiber filters by three independent networks (Interagency
Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments, IMPROVE; Canadian Air and
Precipitation Monitoring Network, CAPMoN; and Canadian Aerosol Baseline
Measurement, CABM) were compared. Specifically, the study evaluated how
differences in sample collection and analysis affected the concentrations of
total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC). Results
show that different carbonaceous fractions measured by various networks were
consistent and comparable in general among the three networks over the 10-year period, even with different sampling systems/frequencies, analytical
protocols, and artifact corrections. The CAPMoN TC, OC, and EC obtained from
the DRI
model 2001 thermal–optical carbon analyzer following the IMPROVE-TOR
protocol (denoted as DRI-TOR) method were lower than those determined from the
IMPROVE_A TOR method by 17 %, 14 %, and 18 %,
respectively. When using transmittance for charring correction, the
corresponding carbonaceous fractions obtained from the Sunset-TOT were lower
by as much as 30 %, 15 %, and 75 %, respectively. In comparison, the
CABM TC, OC, and EC obtained from a thermal method, EnCan-Total-900 (ECT9), were higher than
the corresponding fractions from IMPROVE_A TOR by 20 %–30 %,
0 %–15 %, and 60 %–80 %, respectively. Ambient OC and EC concentrations were
found to increase when ambient temperature exceeded 10 ∘C. These
increased ambient concentrations of OC during summer were possibly
attributed to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and forest fire
emissions, while elevated EC concentrations were potentially influenced by
forest fire emissions and increased vehicle emissions. Results also show
that the pyrolyzed organic carbon (POC) obtained from the ECT9 protocol could provide additional information on SOA although more
research is still needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5194/amt-12-4543-2019 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4d999089048a46eca1819ade75e1a2c5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A597461785</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4d999089048a46eca1819ade75e1a2c5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A597461785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-13f085e8d15d7d5fbf38c714141e5d91411fab42f2487eb3b37902deb4fc67693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk2LFDEQhhtRcF29ewx48tBr0p10J8dh8WNgUfDjHKrTld6MnWRMMqz-E3-umR1RB6QOFSpvPcULb9M8Z_RKMMVfgS8t61oueN92lKkHzQWTw9hKweXDf96Pmyc57ygdOBu7i-bnNhRMrYl-D8nlGEi0BFf0GAqsBMJMYlogOEMMpKn-e8iZeIR8SPeqTGyKnpTbhEjex1RuycZjcgYCCVBcDJWzxrC09ZAnPgZXYnJhIQHLXUxfM4FCgJjYrtFAwZlkV_Bp88jCmvHZ737ZfHnz-vP1u_bmw9vt9eamNVzSarm3VAqUMxPzOAs72V6akfFaKGZVG7Mw8c52XI449VM_KtrNOHFrhnFQ_WWzPXHnCDu9T85D-qEjOH0_qOY1pOLMiprPSikqFeUS-IAGmGQKZhwFMuiMqKwXJ9Y-xW8HzEXv4iFV_1l33agGRZno_6oWqFAXbCwJjHfZ6I1QIx_YKI-sq_-oas3onYkBravzs4WXZwtVU_B7WeCQs95--niupSetSTHnhPaPcUb1MU66xkmzTh_jpI9x6n8BQOW-MA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2279690153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-comparison of elemental and organic carbon mass measurements from three North American national long-term monitoring networks at a co-located site</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Chan, Tak W ; Huang, Lin ; Banwait, Kulbir ; Zhang, Wendy ; Ernst, Darrell ; Wang, Xiaoliang ; Watson, John G ; Chow, Judith C ; Green, Mark ; Czimczik, Claudia I ; Santos, Guaciara M ; Sharma, Sangeeta ; Jones, Keith</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Tak W ; Huang, Lin ; Banwait, Kulbir ; Zhang, Wendy ; Ernst, Darrell ; Wang, Xiaoliang ; Watson, John G ; Chow, Judith C ; Green, Mark ; Czimczik, Claudia I ; Santos, Guaciara M ; Sharma, Sangeeta ; Jones, Keith</creatorcontrib><description>Carbonaceous aerosol is a major contributor to the total aerosol load and
being monitored by diverse measurement approaches. Here, 10 years
(2005–2015) of continuous carbonaceous aerosol measurements collected at the
Centre of Atmospheric Research Experiments (CARE) in Egbert, Ontario, Canada,
on quartz-fiber filters by three independent networks (Interagency
Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments, IMPROVE; Canadian Air and
Precipitation Monitoring Network, CAPMoN; and Canadian Aerosol Baseline
Measurement, CABM) were compared. Specifically, the study evaluated how
differences in sample collection and analysis affected the concentrations of
total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC). Results
show that different carbonaceous fractions measured by various networks were
consistent and comparable in general among the three networks over the 10-year period, even with different sampling systems/frequencies, analytical
protocols, and artifact corrections. The CAPMoN TC, OC, and EC obtained from
the DRI
model 2001 thermal–optical carbon analyzer following the IMPROVE-TOR
protocol (denoted as DRI-TOR) method were lower than those determined from the
IMPROVE_A TOR method by 17 %, 14 %, and 18 %,
respectively. When using transmittance for charring correction, the
corresponding carbonaceous fractions obtained from the Sunset-TOT were lower
by as much as 30 %, 15 %, and 75 %, respectively. In comparison, the
CABM TC, OC, and EC obtained from a thermal method, EnCan-Total-900 (ECT9), were higher than
the corresponding fractions from IMPROVE_A TOR by 20 %–30 %,
0 %–15 %, and 60 %–80 %, respectively. Ambient OC and EC concentrations were
found to increase when ambient temperature exceeded 10 ∘C. These
increased ambient concentrations of OC during summer were possibly
attributed to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and forest fire
emissions, while elevated EC concentrations were potentially influenced by
forest fire emissions and increased vehicle emissions. Results also show
that the pyrolyzed organic carbon (POC) obtained from the ECT9 protocol could provide additional information on SOA although more
research is still needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-8548</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1867-1381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-8548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-4543-2019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Aerosol measurements ; Aerosols ; Air monitoring ; Air pollution ; Air quality monitoring stations ; Ambient temperature ; Atmospheric research ; Carbon ; Chemical properties ; Comparative analysis ; Composition ; Corrections ; Fires ; Forest fires ; Location ; Measurement ; Networks ; Organic carbon ; Particulate organic carbon ; Precipitation ; Precipitation monitoring ; Protocol (computers) ; Secondary aerosols ; Sunset ; Vehicle emissions</subject><ispartof>Atmospheric measurement techniques, 2019-08, Vol.12 (8), p.4543-4560</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Copernicus GmbH</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-13f085e8d15d7d5fbf38c714141e5d91411fab42f2487eb3b37902deb4fc67693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-13f085e8d15d7d5fbf38c714141e5d91411fab42f2487eb3b37902deb4fc67693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2345-7308 ; 0000-0002-8200-4632 ; 0000-0002-1752-6899 ; 0000-0003-4706-0556</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2279690153/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2279690153?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,2096,25734,27905,27906,36993,44571,74875</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Tak W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banwait, Kulbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Darrell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, John G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Judith C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czimczik, Claudia I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Guaciara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-comparison of elemental and organic carbon mass measurements from three North American national long-term monitoring networks at a co-located site</title><title>Atmospheric measurement techniques</title><description>Carbonaceous aerosol is a major contributor to the total aerosol load and
being monitored by diverse measurement approaches. Here, 10 years
(2005–2015) of continuous carbonaceous aerosol measurements collected at the
Centre of Atmospheric Research Experiments (CARE) in Egbert, Ontario, Canada,
on quartz-fiber filters by three independent networks (Interagency
Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments, IMPROVE; Canadian Air and
Precipitation Monitoring Network, CAPMoN; and Canadian Aerosol Baseline
Measurement, CABM) were compared. Specifically, the study evaluated how
differences in sample collection and analysis affected the concentrations of
total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC). Results
show that different carbonaceous fractions measured by various networks were
consistent and comparable in general among the three networks over the 10-year period, even with different sampling systems/frequencies, analytical
protocols, and artifact corrections. The CAPMoN TC, OC, and EC obtained from
the DRI
model 2001 thermal–optical carbon analyzer following the IMPROVE-TOR
protocol (denoted as DRI-TOR) method were lower than those determined from the
IMPROVE_A TOR method by 17 %, 14 %, and 18 %,
respectively. When using transmittance for charring correction, the
corresponding carbonaceous fractions obtained from the Sunset-TOT were lower
by as much as 30 %, 15 %, and 75 %, respectively. In comparison, the
CABM TC, OC, and EC obtained from a thermal method, EnCan-Total-900 (ECT9), were higher than
the corresponding fractions from IMPROVE_A TOR by 20 %–30 %,
0 %–15 %, and 60 %–80 %, respectively. Ambient OC and EC concentrations were
found to increase when ambient temperature exceeded 10 ∘C. These
increased ambient concentrations of OC during summer were possibly
attributed to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and forest fire
emissions, while elevated EC concentrations were potentially influenced by
forest fire emissions and increased vehicle emissions. Results also show
that the pyrolyzed organic carbon (POC) obtained from the ECT9 protocol could provide additional information on SOA although more
research is still needed.</description><subject>Aerosol measurements</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air monitoring</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air quality monitoring stations</subject><subject>Ambient temperature</subject><subject>Atmospheric research</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Corrections</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Forest fires</subject><subject>Location</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Particulate organic carbon</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation monitoring</subject><subject>Protocol (computers)</subject><subject>Secondary aerosols</subject><subject>Sunset</subject><subject>Vehicle emissions</subject><issn>1867-8548</issn><issn>1867-1381</issn><issn>1867-8548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk2LFDEQhhtRcF29ewx48tBr0p10J8dh8WNgUfDjHKrTld6MnWRMMqz-E3-umR1RB6QOFSpvPcULb9M8Z_RKMMVfgS8t61oueN92lKkHzQWTw9hKweXDf96Pmyc57ygdOBu7i-bnNhRMrYl-D8nlGEi0BFf0GAqsBMJMYlogOEMMpKn-e8iZeIR8SPeqTGyKnpTbhEjex1RuycZjcgYCCVBcDJWzxrC09ZAnPgZXYnJhIQHLXUxfM4FCgJjYrtFAwZlkV_Bp88jCmvHZ737ZfHnz-vP1u_bmw9vt9eamNVzSarm3VAqUMxPzOAs72V6akfFaKGZVG7Mw8c52XI449VM_KtrNOHFrhnFQ_WWzPXHnCDu9T85D-qEjOH0_qOY1pOLMiprPSikqFeUS-IAGmGQKZhwFMuiMqKwXJ9Y-xW8HzEXv4iFV_1l33agGRZno_6oWqFAXbCwJjHfZ6I1QIx_YKI-sq_-oas3onYkBravzs4WXZwtVU_B7WeCQs95--niupSetSTHnhPaPcUb1MU66xkmzTh_jpI9x6n8BQOW-MA</recordid><startdate>20190826</startdate><enddate>20190826</enddate><creator>Chan, Tak W</creator><creator>Huang, Lin</creator><creator>Banwait, Kulbir</creator><creator>Zhang, Wendy</creator><creator>Ernst, Darrell</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaoliang</creator><creator>Watson, John G</creator><creator>Chow, Judith C</creator><creator>Green, Mark</creator><creator>Czimczik, Claudia I</creator><creator>Santos, Guaciara M</creator><creator>Sharma, Sangeeta</creator><creator>Jones, Keith</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2345-7308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-4632</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-6899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-0556</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190826</creationdate><title>Inter-comparison of elemental and organic carbon mass measurements from three North American national long-term monitoring networks at a co-located site</title><author>Chan, Tak W ; Huang, Lin ; Banwait, Kulbir ; Zhang, Wendy ; Ernst, Darrell ; Wang, Xiaoliang ; Watson, John G ; Chow, Judith C ; Green, Mark ; Czimczik, Claudia I ; Santos, Guaciara M ; Sharma, Sangeeta ; Jones, Keith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-13f085e8d15d7d5fbf38c714141e5d91411fab42f2487eb3b37902deb4fc67693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aerosol measurements</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air monitoring</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air quality monitoring stations</topic><topic>Ambient temperature</topic><topic>Atmospheric research</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Corrections</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Forest fires</topic><topic>Location</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Particulate organic carbon</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation monitoring</topic><topic>Protocol (computers)</topic><topic>Secondary aerosols</topic><topic>Sunset</topic><topic>Vehicle emissions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Tak W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banwait, Kulbir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wendy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, Darrell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, John G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Judith C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czimczik, Claudia I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Guaciara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Atmospheric measurement techniques</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Tak W</au><au>Huang, Lin</au><au>Banwait, Kulbir</au><au>Zhang, Wendy</au><au>Ernst, Darrell</au><au>Wang, Xiaoliang</au><au>Watson, John G</au><au>Chow, Judith C</au><au>Green, Mark</au><au>Czimczik, Claudia I</au><au>Santos, Guaciara M</au><au>Sharma, Sangeeta</au><au>Jones, Keith</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-comparison of elemental and organic carbon mass measurements from three North American national long-term monitoring networks at a co-located site</atitle><jtitle>Atmospheric measurement techniques</jtitle><date>2019-08-26</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4543</spage><epage>4560</epage><pages>4543-4560</pages><issn>1867-8548</issn><issn>1867-1381</issn><eissn>1867-8548</eissn><abstract>Carbonaceous aerosol is a major contributor to the total aerosol load and
being monitored by diverse measurement approaches. Here, 10 years
(2005–2015) of continuous carbonaceous aerosol measurements collected at the
Centre of Atmospheric Research Experiments (CARE) in Egbert, Ontario, Canada,
on quartz-fiber filters by three independent networks (Interagency
Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments, IMPROVE; Canadian Air and
Precipitation Monitoring Network, CAPMoN; and Canadian Aerosol Baseline
Measurement, CABM) were compared. Specifically, the study evaluated how
differences in sample collection and analysis affected the concentrations of
total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC). Results
show that different carbonaceous fractions measured by various networks were
consistent and comparable in general among the three networks over the 10-year period, even with different sampling systems/frequencies, analytical
protocols, and artifact corrections. The CAPMoN TC, OC, and EC obtained from
the DRI
model 2001 thermal–optical carbon analyzer following the IMPROVE-TOR
protocol (denoted as DRI-TOR) method were lower than those determined from the
IMPROVE_A TOR method by 17 %, 14 %, and 18 %,
respectively. When using transmittance for charring correction, the
corresponding carbonaceous fractions obtained from the Sunset-TOT were lower
by as much as 30 %, 15 %, and 75 %, respectively. In comparison, the
CABM TC, OC, and EC obtained from a thermal method, EnCan-Total-900 (ECT9), were higher than
the corresponding fractions from IMPROVE_A TOR by 20 %–30 %,
0 %–15 %, and 60 %–80 %, respectively. Ambient OC and EC concentrations were
found to increase when ambient temperature exceeded 10 ∘C. These
increased ambient concentrations of OC during summer were possibly
attributed to secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation and forest fire
emissions, while elevated EC concentrations were potentially influenced by
forest fire emissions and increased vehicle emissions. Results also show
that the pyrolyzed organic carbon (POC) obtained from the ECT9 protocol could provide additional information on SOA although more
research is still needed.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/amt-12-4543-2019</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2345-7308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8200-4632</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-6899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-0556</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1867-8548 |
ispartof | Atmospheric measurement techniques, 2019-08, Vol.12 (8), p.4543-4560 |
issn | 1867-8548 1867-1381 1867-8548 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4d999089048a46eca1819ade75e1a2c5 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Aerosol measurements Aerosols Air monitoring Air pollution Air quality monitoring stations Ambient temperature Atmospheric research Carbon Chemical properties Comparative analysis Composition Corrections Fires Forest fires Location Measurement Networks Organic carbon Particulate organic carbon Precipitation Precipitation monitoring Protocol (computers) Secondary aerosols Sunset Vehicle emissions |
title | Inter-comparison of elemental and organic carbon mass measurements from three North American national long-term monitoring networks at a co-located site |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A06%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-comparison%20of%20elemental%20and%20organic%20carbon%20mass%20measurements%20from%20three%20North%20American%20national%20long-term%20monitoring%20networks%20at%20a%20co-located%20site&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric%20measurement%20techniques&rft.au=Chan,%20Tak%20W&rft.date=2019-08-26&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4543&rft.epage=4560&rft.pages=4543-4560&rft.issn=1867-8548&rft.eissn=1867-8548&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/amt-12-4543-2019&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA597461785%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-13f085e8d15d7d5fbf38c714141e5d91411fab42f2487eb3b37902deb4fc67693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2279690153&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A597461785&rfr_iscdi=true |