Loading…

The Use of Footstep Sounds as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) has been proven useful in the management of gait disturbances associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Typically, the RAS consists of metronome or music-based sounds (artificial RAS), while ecological footstep sounds (ecological RAS) have never be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in neurology 2018-05, Vol.9, p.348-348
Main Authors: Murgia, Mauro, Pili, Roberta, Corona, Federica, Sors, Fabrizio, Agostini, Tiziano A, Bernardis, Paolo, Casula, Carlo, Cossu, Giovanni, Guicciardi, Marco, Pau, Massimiliano
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d0a8ae660d314c274b6fb61be9d36d60620fa58fa50c8eb42c28886a7fa6e6d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d0a8ae660d314c274b6fb61be9d36d60620fa58fa50c8eb42c28886a7fa6e6d3
container_end_page 348
container_issue
container_start_page 348
container_title Frontiers in neurology
container_volume 9
creator Murgia, Mauro
Pili, Roberta
Corona, Federica
Sors, Fabrizio
Agostini, Tiziano A
Bernardis, Paolo
Casula, Carlo
Cossu, Giovanni
Guicciardi, Marco
Pau, Massimiliano
description The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) has been proven useful in the management of gait disturbances associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Typically, the RAS consists of metronome or music-based sounds (artificial RAS), while ecological footstep sounds (ecological RAS) have never been used for rehabilitation programs. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a rehabilitation program integrated either with ecological or with artificial RAS. An observer-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effects of 5 weeks of supervised rehabilitation integrated with RAS. Thirty-eight individuals affected by PD were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (ecological vs. artificial RAS); thirty-two of them (age 68.2 ± 10.5, Hoehn and Yahr 1.5-3) concluded all phases of the study. Spatio-temporal parameters of gait and clinical variables were assessed before the rehabilitation period, at its end, and after a 3-month follow-up. Thirty-two participants were analyzed. The results revealed that both groups improved in the majority of biomechanical and clinical measures, independently of the type of sound. Moreover, exploratory analyses for separate groups were conducted, revealing improvements on spatio-temporal parameters only in the ecological RAS group. Overall, our results suggest that ecological RAS is equally effective compared to artificial RAS. Future studies should further investigate the role of ecological RAS, on the basis of information revealed by our exploratory analyses. Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues concerning the implementation of ecological sounds in the rehabilitation of PD patients are discussed. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03228888.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fneur.2018.00348
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4da4cab8df3244e8ad5421e48a163d88</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4da4cab8df3244e8ad5421e48a163d88</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2056760873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d0a8ae660d314c274b6fb61be9d36d60620fa58fa50c8eb42c28886a7fa6e6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkk1r3DAQhk1paUKae09Ft_ayW1mSZbmHwrJt0kCgZbM5i7E1ziqVpa0kF7b_IP86zm4aEoHQMB_PjJi3KN6XdM65aj73Hsc4Z7RUc0q5UK-K41JKMWOsqV4_s4-K05Ru6XR403DJ3xZHrGlKWktxXNytN0iuE5LQk7MQcsq4JVdh9CYRSGS12eXNYDuyGI3NIe7IVbbD6CDb4EkfIjkHm8kKN9BaZ_PBbz35BfG39Sn4j4l8swkh4ReyICvwJgz2HxqyDD7H4NxkrqMF965404NLePr4nhTXZ9_Xyx-zy5_nF8vF5ayrmMqz2lBQgFJSw0vRsVq0sm9l2WJjuDSSSkZ7qNR0aaewFaxjSikJdQ8SpeEnxcWBawLc6m20A8SdDmD13hHijYaYbedQCwOig1aZnjMhUIGpBCtRKCglN0pNrK8H1nZsBzQdTl8C9wL6MuLtRt-Ev7pqGsb3gE-PgBj-jJiyHmzq0DnwGMakGa1kLamq-ZRKD6ldDClF7J_alFQ_CELvBaEfBKH3gphKPjwf76ng__r5PbNStUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056760873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of Footstep Sounds as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Murgia, Mauro ; Pili, Roberta ; Corona, Federica ; Sors, Fabrizio ; Agostini, Tiziano A ; Bernardis, Paolo ; Casula, Carlo ; Cossu, Giovanni ; Guicciardi, Marco ; Pau, Massimiliano</creator><creatorcontrib>Murgia, Mauro ; Pili, Roberta ; Corona, Federica ; Sors, Fabrizio ; Agostini, Tiziano A ; Bernardis, Paolo ; Casula, Carlo ; Cossu, Giovanni ; Guicciardi, Marco ; Pau, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><description>The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) has been proven useful in the management of gait disturbances associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Typically, the RAS consists of metronome or music-based sounds (artificial RAS), while ecological footstep sounds (ecological RAS) have never been used for rehabilitation programs. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a rehabilitation program integrated either with ecological or with artificial RAS. An observer-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effects of 5 weeks of supervised rehabilitation integrated with RAS. Thirty-eight individuals affected by PD were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (ecological vs. artificial RAS); thirty-two of them (age 68.2 ± 10.5, Hoehn and Yahr 1.5-3) concluded all phases of the study. Spatio-temporal parameters of gait and clinical variables were assessed before the rehabilitation period, at its end, and after a 3-month follow-up. Thirty-two participants were analyzed. The results revealed that both groups improved in the majority of biomechanical and clinical measures, independently of the type of sound. Moreover, exploratory analyses for separate groups were conducted, revealing improvements on spatio-temporal parameters only in the ecological RAS group. Overall, our results suggest that ecological RAS is equally effective compared to artificial RAS. Future studies should further investigate the role of ecological RAS, on the basis of information revealed by our exploratory analyses. Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues concerning the implementation of ecological sounds in the rehabilitation of PD patients are discussed. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03228888.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-2295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-2295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00348</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29910764</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>auditory stimuli ; ecological sounds ; gait ; Neuroscience ; Parkinson disease ; rhythm ; rhythmic auditory stimulation</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in neurology, 2018-05, Vol.9, p.348-348</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Murgia, Pili, Corona, Sors, Agostini, Bernardis, Casula, Cossu, Guicciardi and Pau. 2018 Murgia, Pili, Corona, Sors, Agostini, Bernardis, Casula, Cossu, Guicciardi and Pau</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d0a8ae660d314c274b6fb61be9d36d60620fa58fa50c8eb42c28886a7fa6e6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d0a8ae660d314c274b6fb61be9d36d60620fa58fa50c8eb42c28886a7fa6e6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992388/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5992388/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910764$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murgia, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pili, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corona, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sors, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostini, Tiziano A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardis, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casula, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cossu, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guicciardi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pau, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of Footstep Sounds as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Frontiers in neurology</title><addtitle>Front Neurol</addtitle><description>The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) has been proven useful in the management of gait disturbances associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Typically, the RAS consists of metronome or music-based sounds (artificial RAS), while ecological footstep sounds (ecological RAS) have never been used for rehabilitation programs. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a rehabilitation program integrated either with ecological or with artificial RAS. An observer-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effects of 5 weeks of supervised rehabilitation integrated with RAS. Thirty-eight individuals affected by PD were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (ecological vs. artificial RAS); thirty-two of them (age 68.2 ± 10.5, Hoehn and Yahr 1.5-3) concluded all phases of the study. Spatio-temporal parameters of gait and clinical variables were assessed before the rehabilitation period, at its end, and after a 3-month follow-up. Thirty-two participants were analyzed. The results revealed that both groups improved in the majority of biomechanical and clinical measures, independently of the type of sound. Moreover, exploratory analyses for separate groups were conducted, revealing improvements on spatio-temporal parameters only in the ecological RAS group. Overall, our results suggest that ecological RAS is equally effective compared to artificial RAS. Future studies should further investigate the role of ecological RAS, on the basis of information revealed by our exploratory analyses. Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues concerning the implementation of ecological sounds in the rehabilitation of PD patients are discussed. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03228888.</description><subject>auditory stimuli</subject><subject>ecological sounds</subject><subject>gait</subject><subject>Neuroscience</subject><subject>Parkinson disease</subject><subject>rhythm</subject><subject>rhythmic auditory stimulation</subject><issn>1664-2295</issn><issn>1664-2295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkk1r3DAQhk1paUKae09Ft_ayW1mSZbmHwrJt0kCgZbM5i7E1ziqVpa0kF7b_IP86zm4aEoHQMB_PjJi3KN6XdM65aj73Hsc4Z7RUc0q5UK-K41JKMWOsqV4_s4-K05Ru6XR403DJ3xZHrGlKWktxXNytN0iuE5LQk7MQcsq4JVdh9CYRSGS12eXNYDuyGI3NIe7IVbbD6CDb4EkfIjkHm8kKN9BaZ_PBbz35BfG39Sn4j4l8swkh4ReyICvwJgz2HxqyDD7H4NxkrqMF965404NLePr4nhTXZ9_Xyx-zy5_nF8vF5ayrmMqz2lBQgFJSw0vRsVq0sm9l2WJjuDSSSkZ7qNR0aaewFaxjSikJdQ8SpeEnxcWBawLc6m20A8SdDmD13hHijYaYbedQCwOig1aZnjMhUIGpBCtRKCglN0pNrK8H1nZsBzQdTl8C9wL6MuLtRt-Ev7pqGsb3gE-PgBj-jJiyHmzq0DnwGMakGa1kLamq-ZRKD6ldDClF7J_alFQ_CELvBaEfBKH3gphKPjwf76ng__r5PbNStUw</recordid><startdate>20180524</startdate><enddate>20180524</enddate><creator>Murgia, Mauro</creator><creator>Pili, Roberta</creator><creator>Corona, Federica</creator><creator>Sors, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Agostini, Tiziano A</creator><creator>Bernardis, Paolo</creator><creator>Casula, Carlo</creator><creator>Cossu, Giovanni</creator><creator>Guicciardi, Marco</creator><creator>Pau, Massimiliano</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180524</creationdate><title>The Use of Footstep Sounds as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Murgia, Mauro ; Pili, Roberta ; Corona, Federica ; Sors, Fabrizio ; Agostini, Tiziano A ; Bernardis, Paolo ; Casula, Carlo ; Cossu, Giovanni ; Guicciardi, Marco ; Pau, Massimiliano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d0a8ae660d314c274b6fb61be9d36d60620fa58fa50c8eb42c28886a7fa6e6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>auditory stimuli</topic><topic>ecological sounds</topic><topic>gait</topic><topic>Neuroscience</topic><topic>Parkinson disease</topic><topic>rhythm</topic><topic>rhythmic auditory stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murgia, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pili, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corona, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sors, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agostini, Tiziano A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardis, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casula, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cossu, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guicciardi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pau, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murgia, Mauro</au><au>Pili, Roberta</au><au>Corona, Federica</au><au>Sors, Fabrizio</au><au>Agostini, Tiziano A</au><au>Bernardis, Paolo</au><au>Casula, Carlo</au><au>Cossu, Giovanni</au><au>Guicciardi, Marco</au><au>Pau, Massimiliano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of Footstep Sounds as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Neurol</addtitle><date>2018-05-24</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>348</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>348-348</pages><issn>1664-2295</issn><eissn>1664-2295</eissn><abstract>The use of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) has been proven useful in the management of gait disturbances associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Typically, the RAS consists of metronome or music-based sounds (artificial RAS), while ecological footstep sounds (ecological RAS) have never been used for rehabilitation programs. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a rehabilitation program integrated either with ecological or with artificial RAS. An observer-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effects of 5 weeks of supervised rehabilitation integrated with RAS. Thirty-eight individuals affected by PD were randomly assigned to one of the two conditions (ecological vs. artificial RAS); thirty-two of them (age 68.2 ± 10.5, Hoehn and Yahr 1.5-3) concluded all phases of the study. Spatio-temporal parameters of gait and clinical variables were assessed before the rehabilitation period, at its end, and after a 3-month follow-up. Thirty-two participants were analyzed. The results revealed that both groups improved in the majority of biomechanical and clinical measures, independently of the type of sound. Moreover, exploratory analyses for separate groups were conducted, revealing improvements on spatio-temporal parameters only in the ecological RAS group. Overall, our results suggest that ecological RAS is equally effective compared to artificial RAS. Future studies should further investigate the role of ecological RAS, on the basis of information revealed by our exploratory analyses. Theoretical, methodological, and practical issues concerning the implementation of ecological sounds in the rehabilitation of PD patients are discussed. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03228888.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>29910764</pmid><doi>10.3389/fneur.2018.00348</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-2295
ispartof Frontiers in neurology, 2018-05, Vol.9, p.348-348
issn 1664-2295
1664-2295
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4da4cab8df3244e8ad5421e48a163d88
source PubMed Central
subjects auditory stimuli
ecological sounds
gait
Neuroscience
Parkinson disease
rhythm
rhythmic auditory stimulation
title The Use of Footstep Sounds as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation for Gait Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T13%3A01%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20Footstep%20Sounds%20as%20Rhythmic%20Auditory%20Stimulation%20for%20Gait%20Rehabilitation%20in%20Parkinson's%20Disease:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20neurology&rft.au=Murgia,%20Mauro&rft.date=2018-05-24&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=348&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=348-348&rft.issn=1664-2295&rft.eissn=1664-2295&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fneur.2018.00348&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2056760873%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-7d0a8ae660d314c274b6fb61be9d36d60620fa58fa50c8eb42c28886a7fa6e6d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056760873&rft_id=info:pmid/29910764&rfr_iscdi=true