Loading…
Sampling bias in Brazilian studies on transgender and gender diverse populations: the two-step measure for assessing gender identity in surveys
Correctly recognizing gender identity in population-based surveys is essential to develop effective public health strategies to improve the living conditions of transgender and gender-diverse populations, as well as to adequately collect data on cisgender individuals. This study aims to present the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cadernos de saúde pública 2022, Vol.38 (1), p.e00180420 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-f3e4a7ebdbcb0c2a55b52d3c6eda1f012582de32ad4126617d9ffa4cdae05f863 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e00180420 |
container_title | Cadernos de saúde pública |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Costa, Angelo Brandelli Rosa, Letícia de Oliveira Fontanari, Anna Martha Vaitses |
description | Correctly recognizing gender identity in population-based surveys is essential to develop effective public health strategies to improve the living conditions of transgender and gender-diverse populations, as well as to adequately collect data on cisgender individuals. This study aims to present the two-step measure as the best strategy for assessing gender identity in Brazilian surveys, thus we performed two separate analyses. Firstly, we conducted a systematic review concerning HIV-related care among Brazilian transgender and gender-diverse populations to assess the strategy used to identify participants' gender identity. Secondly, we re-analyzed data from a recent survey that included Brazilian transgender populations, comparing characteristics and health outcomes from the sample identified by single-item and by the two-step measure. Concerning the systematic review, from 6,585 references, Brazilian research teams published seven articles, and only one study used the two-step measure. Regarding this survey, the two-step measure recognized 567 cisgender and 773 transgender and gender diverse participants among the 1,340 participants who answered the questionnaire, whereas the single-item measure was able to recognize only 540 transgender and gender diverse people. Furthermore, 31 transgender women self-identified as "transgender men" on the single-item measure. Therefore, although scarcely used in Brazil, the two-step measure is a more accurate strategy to recognize gender identity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/0102-311X00180420 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>scielo_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4e2436ff92294f4eaaa7e1242afc1b9f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0102_311X2022000104001</scielo_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4e2436ff92294f4eaaa7e1242afc1b9f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>S0102_311X2022000104001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-f3e4a7ebdbcb0c2a55b52d3c6eda1f012582de32ad4126617d9ffa4cdae05f863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kctu1DAUhi0EaofSB2CD_AIpvmYSdlAVqFSJRUFiZ53Ex4NHGTuyncL0JXhlEuaysS3b3_8f6SPkLWc3XLfsPeNMVJLzn4zxhinBXpAVr9dNpVStXpLV-f2SvM55y5iQQuoLcik1U7Jp5Ir8fYTdOPiwoZ2HTH2gnxI8-8FDoLlM1mOmMdCSIOQNBouJQrD0eLT-CVNGOsZxGqD4GPIHWn4hLb9jlQuOdIeQp4TUxRnMGXNeuo64txiKL_uldv71hPv8hrxyMGS8Pu5X5Mfnu--3X6uHb1_ubz8-VL3QulROooI1drbrO9YL0LrTwsq-RgvcMS50IyxKAVZxUdd8bVvnQPUWkGnX1PKK3B9ybYStGZPfQdqbCN78v4hpYyAV3w9oFAola-daIVrlFALMzVwoAa7nXevmrJtDVu49DtFs45TCPLx5XASYRYBgQrDZElPzMgP8APQp5pzQnQfgzCxmzQn8czI7M-8OzDh1O7Rn4qRS_gMIvaBD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sampling bias in Brazilian studies on transgender and gender diverse populations: the two-step measure for assessing gender identity in surveys</title><source>SciELO</source><creator>Costa, Angelo Brandelli ; Rosa, Letícia de Oliveira ; Fontanari, Anna Martha Vaitses</creator><creatorcontrib>Costa, Angelo Brandelli ; Rosa, Letícia de Oliveira ; Fontanari, Anna Martha Vaitses</creatorcontrib><description>Correctly recognizing gender identity in population-based surveys is essential to develop effective public health strategies to improve the living conditions of transgender and gender-diverse populations, as well as to adequately collect data on cisgender individuals. This study aims to present the two-step measure as the best strategy for assessing gender identity in Brazilian surveys, thus we performed two separate analyses. Firstly, we conducted a systematic review concerning HIV-related care among Brazilian transgender and gender-diverse populations to assess the strategy used to identify participants' gender identity. Secondly, we re-analyzed data from a recent survey that included Brazilian transgender populations, comparing characteristics and health outcomes from the sample identified by single-item and by the two-step measure. Concerning the systematic review, from 6,585 references, Brazilian research teams published seven articles, and only one study used the two-step measure. Regarding this survey, the two-step measure recognized 567 cisgender and 773 transgender and gender diverse participants among the 1,340 participants who answered the questionnaire, whereas the single-item measure was able to recognize only 540 transgender and gender diverse people. Furthermore, 31 transgender women self-identified as "transgender men" on the single-item measure. Therefore, although scarcely used in Brazil, the two-step measure is a more accurate strategy to recognize gender identity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0102-311X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1678-4464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/0102-311X00180420</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35043883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz</publisher><subject>Brazil ; Female ; Gender Identify ; Gender Identity ; Humans ; Male ; PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH ; Selection Bias ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic Review ; Transgender Persons</subject><ispartof>Cadernos de saúde pública, 2022, Vol.38 (1), p.e00180420</ispartof><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-f3e4a7ebdbcb0c2a55b52d3c6eda1f012582de32ad4126617d9ffa4cdae05f863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4510-8918 ; 0000-0002-0742-8152 ; 0000-0002-1457-3884</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010,24129,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35043883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costa, Angelo Brandelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Letícia de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanari, Anna Martha Vaitses</creatorcontrib><title>Sampling bias in Brazilian studies on transgender and gender diverse populations: the two-step measure for assessing gender identity in surveys</title><title>Cadernos de saúde pública</title><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><description>Correctly recognizing gender identity in population-based surveys is essential to develop effective public health strategies to improve the living conditions of transgender and gender-diverse populations, as well as to adequately collect data on cisgender individuals. This study aims to present the two-step measure as the best strategy for assessing gender identity in Brazilian surveys, thus we performed two separate analyses. Firstly, we conducted a systematic review concerning HIV-related care among Brazilian transgender and gender-diverse populations to assess the strategy used to identify participants' gender identity. Secondly, we re-analyzed data from a recent survey that included Brazilian transgender populations, comparing characteristics and health outcomes from the sample identified by single-item and by the two-step measure. Concerning the systematic review, from 6,585 references, Brazilian research teams published seven articles, and only one study used the two-step measure. Regarding this survey, the two-step measure recognized 567 cisgender and 773 transgender and gender diverse participants among the 1,340 participants who answered the questionnaire, whereas the single-item measure was able to recognize only 540 transgender and gender diverse people. Furthermore, 31 transgender women self-identified as "transgender men" on the single-item measure. Therefore, although scarcely used in Brazil, the two-step measure is a more accurate strategy to recognize gender identity.</description><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender Identify</subject><subject>Gender Identity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><subject>Transgender Persons</subject><issn>0102-311X</issn><issn>1678-4464</issn><issn>1678-4464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kctu1DAUhi0EaofSB2CD_AIpvmYSdlAVqFSJRUFiZ53Ex4NHGTuyncL0JXhlEuaysS3b3_8f6SPkLWc3XLfsPeNMVJLzn4zxhinBXpAVr9dNpVStXpLV-f2SvM55y5iQQuoLcik1U7Jp5Ir8fYTdOPiwoZ2HTH2gnxI8-8FDoLlM1mOmMdCSIOQNBouJQrD0eLT-CVNGOsZxGqD4GPIHWn4hLb9jlQuOdIeQp4TUxRnMGXNeuo64txiKL_uldv71hPv8hrxyMGS8Pu5X5Mfnu--3X6uHb1_ubz8-VL3QulROooI1drbrO9YL0LrTwsq-RgvcMS50IyxKAVZxUdd8bVvnQPUWkGnX1PKK3B9ybYStGZPfQdqbCN78v4hpYyAV3w9oFAola-daIVrlFALMzVwoAa7nXevmrJtDVu49DtFs45TCPLx5XASYRYBgQrDZElPzMgP8APQp5pzQnQfgzCxmzQn8czI7M-8OzDh1O7Rn4qRS_gMIvaBD</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Costa, Angelo Brandelli</creator><creator>Rosa, Letícia de Oliveira</creator><creator>Fontanari, Anna Martha Vaitses</creator><general>Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz</general><general>Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPN</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4510-8918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0742-8152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-3884</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Sampling bias in Brazilian studies on transgender and gender diverse populations: the two-step measure for assessing gender identity in surveys</title><author>Costa, Angelo Brandelli ; Rosa, Letícia de Oliveira ; Fontanari, Anna Martha Vaitses</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-f3e4a7ebdbcb0c2a55b52d3c6eda1f012582de32ad4126617d9ffa4cdae05f863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender Identify</topic><topic>Gender Identity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><topic>Transgender Persons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costa, Angelo Brandelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Letícia de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanari, Anna Martha Vaitses</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costa, Angelo Brandelli</au><au>Rosa, Letícia de Oliveira</au><au>Fontanari, Anna Martha Vaitses</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sampling bias in Brazilian studies on transgender and gender diverse populations: the two-step measure for assessing gender identity in surveys</atitle><jtitle>Cadernos de saúde pública</jtitle><addtitle>Cad Saude Publica</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e00180420</spage><pages>e00180420-</pages><issn>0102-311X</issn><issn>1678-4464</issn><eissn>1678-4464</eissn><abstract>Correctly recognizing gender identity in population-based surveys is essential to develop effective public health strategies to improve the living conditions of transgender and gender-diverse populations, as well as to adequately collect data on cisgender individuals. This study aims to present the two-step measure as the best strategy for assessing gender identity in Brazilian surveys, thus we performed two separate analyses. Firstly, we conducted a systematic review concerning HIV-related care among Brazilian transgender and gender-diverse populations to assess the strategy used to identify participants' gender identity. Secondly, we re-analyzed data from a recent survey that included Brazilian transgender populations, comparing characteristics and health outcomes from the sample identified by single-item and by the two-step measure. Concerning the systematic review, from 6,585 references, Brazilian research teams published seven articles, and only one study used the two-step measure. Regarding this survey, the two-step measure recognized 567 cisgender and 773 transgender and gender diverse participants among the 1,340 participants who answered the questionnaire, whereas the single-item measure was able to recognize only 540 transgender and gender diverse people. Furthermore, 31 transgender women self-identified as "transgender men" on the single-item measure. Therefore, although scarcely used in Brazil, the two-step measure is a more accurate strategy to recognize gender identity.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz</pub><pmid>35043883</pmid><doi>10.1590/0102-311X00180420</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4510-8918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0742-8152</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-3884</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0102-311X |
ispartof | Cadernos de saúde pública, 2022, Vol.38 (1), p.e00180420 |
issn | 0102-311X 1678-4464 1678-4464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4e2436ff92294f4eaaa7e1242afc1b9f |
source | SciELO |
subjects | Brazil Female Gender Identify Gender Identity Humans Male PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Selection Bias Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic Review Transgender Persons |
title | Sampling bias in Brazilian studies on transgender and gender diverse populations: the two-step measure for assessing gender identity in surveys |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A56%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scielo_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sampling%20bias%20in%20Brazilian%20studies%20on%20transgender%20and%20gender%20diverse%20populations:%20the%20two-step%20measure%20for%20assessing%20gender%20identity%20in%20surveys&rft.jtitle=Cadernos%20de%20sa%C3%BAde%20p%C3%BAblica&rft.au=Costa,%20Angelo%20Brandelli&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e00180420&rft.pages=e00180420-&rft.issn=0102-311X&rft.eissn=1678-4464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/0102-311X00180420&rft_dat=%3Cscielo_doaj_%3ES0102_311X2022000104001%3C/scielo_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-f3e4a7ebdbcb0c2a55b52d3c6eda1f012582de32ad4126617d9ffa4cdae05f863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/35043883&rft_scielo_id=S0102_311X2022000104001&rfr_iscdi=true |