Loading…

Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants

Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heliyon 2024-06, Vol.10 (12), p.e33325, Article e33325
Main Authors: Spit, Karlinde A., Azahaf, Siham, de Blok, Christel J.M., Duvivier, Katya M., Wiebenga, Oliver T., Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page e33325
container_title Heliyon
container_volume 10
creator Spit, Karlinde A.
Azahaf, Siham
de Blok, Christel J.M.
Duvivier, Katya M.
Wiebenga, Oliver T.
Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.
description Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy of ultrasound and MRI in assessing implant integrity. Women with silicone breast implants underwent a breast and axillary ultrasound and MRI on the same day. All tests were assessed by experienced radiologists. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound and MRI for implant rupture detection and silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes were evaluated. A total of 104 women participated in the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for detecting implant ruptures compared to MRI were 96 %, 95 %, and 96 %, respectively. MRI demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (44 %) for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes compared to ultrasound. A significant association was observed between the presence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes and/or axillary pain and the detection of silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound (χ2 (1, N = 104) = 5·1, p = 0·024). Six women exhibited silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes despite having intact first-pair implants, indicative of gel bleed. Ultrasound is nearly as effective as MRI for detecting breast implant ruptures and is superior for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes. We therefore recommend initiating radiological examination in women with breast implants with a breast and axillary ultrasound, proceeding to MRI only if the ultrasound is inconclusive. The prevalence of gel bleed is understudied and its potential adverse health effects might be underestimated. Further research is needed to explore its potential association with development of systemic symptoms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33325
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4e422daf3de1457ea4d8c081fbfe5aa8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405844024093563</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4e422daf3de1457ea4d8c081fbfe5aa8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3082309950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSnwDaI5ek46-sfUKoohCpCAlRrpbXHqcOzjrYu5H673FI-nXqydZ45vG8M2_TvCcwJ0AWF-v5LcZwl4Y5BcrnyBij4lVzSjmImeQcXj-5nzTnpawBgAi5UB1725wwBZTWwGnz-yaO2ZQ0Da7dYS5Tab__XLY-5RZ3Jk5mDGlok29LiMGmAduI5o9ZYetz2jxG-4ymjG3YbKMZxvKueeNNLHh-PM-am6svvy6_za5_fF1efr6eWc7FOOvRUY9WOqEYUVx5RSgI3ym7kM546xjhklrSAbW1YUldp4CpHoT0HSjJzprlgeuSWettDhuT73QyQf8PpLzSJo_BRtQcOaUVyhwSLjo03EkLkvjeozBmz_p0YG2nfoPO4lAnE59Bn78M4Vav0k4TQgUTFCrh45GQ098Jy6g3oViMdSSYpqIZEUwC48BfTq1iGSgl9lRxSLU5lZLRP7REQO_toNf6aAe9t4M-2KHWfXiq56HqfvmPgrFuaBcw62IDDhZdyGjHOsLwwhf_AP6fyfY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082309950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Spit, Karlinde A. ; Azahaf, Siham ; de Blok, Christel J.M. ; Duvivier, Katya M. ; Wiebenga, Oliver T. ; Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spit, Karlinde A. ; Azahaf, Siham ; de Blok, Christel J.M. ; Duvivier, Katya M. ; Wiebenga, Oliver T. ; Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy of ultrasound and MRI in assessing implant integrity. Women with silicone breast implants underwent a breast and axillary ultrasound and MRI on the same day. All tests were assessed by experienced radiologists. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound and MRI for implant rupture detection and silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes were evaluated. A total of 104 women participated in the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for detecting implant ruptures compared to MRI were 96 %, 95 %, and 96 %, respectively. MRI demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (44 %) for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes compared to ultrasound. A significant association was observed between the presence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes and/or axillary pain and the detection of silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound (χ2 (1, N = 104) = 5·1, p = 0·024). Six women exhibited silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes despite having intact first-pair implants, indicative of gel bleed. Ultrasound is nearly as effective as MRI for detecting breast implant ruptures and is superior for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes. We therefore recommend initiating radiological examination in women with breast implants with a breast and axillary ultrasound, proceeding to MRI only if the ultrasound is inconclusive. The prevalence of gel bleed is understudied and its potential adverse health effects might be underestimated. Further research is needed to explore its potential association with development of systemic symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39022001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>breasts ; gels ; Implant rupture ; lymph ; magnetism ; MRI ; pain ; prostheses ; silicone ; Silicone breast implants ; Silicone depositions ; ultrasonics ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Heliyon, 2024-06, Vol.10 (12), p.e33325, Article e33325</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1555-3682 ; 0009-0008-5016-4712</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253520/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024093563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3535,27903,27904,45759,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39022001$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spit, Karlinde A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azahaf, Siham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Blok, Christel J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duvivier, Katya M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebenga, Oliver T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants</title><title>Heliyon</title><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><description>Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy of ultrasound and MRI in assessing implant integrity. Women with silicone breast implants underwent a breast and axillary ultrasound and MRI on the same day. All tests were assessed by experienced radiologists. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound and MRI for implant rupture detection and silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes were evaluated. A total of 104 women participated in the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for detecting implant ruptures compared to MRI were 96 %, 95 %, and 96 %, respectively. MRI demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (44 %) for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes compared to ultrasound. A significant association was observed between the presence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes and/or axillary pain and the detection of silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound (χ2 (1, N = 104) = 5·1, p = 0·024). Six women exhibited silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes despite having intact first-pair implants, indicative of gel bleed. Ultrasound is nearly as effective as MRI for detecting breast implant ruptures and is superior for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes. We therefore recommend initiating radiological examination in women with breast implants with a breast and axillary ultrasound, proceeding to MRI only if the ultrasound is inconclusive. The prevalence of gel bleed is understudied and its potential adverse health effects might be underestimated. Further research is needed to explore its potential association with development of systemic symptoms.</description><subject>breasts</subject><subject>gels</subject><subject>Implant rupture</subject><subject>lymph</subject><subject>magnetism</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>prostheses</subject><subject>silicone</subject><subject>Silicone breast implants</subject><subject>Silicone depositions</subject><subject>ultrasonics</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>2405-8440</issn><issn>2405-8440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSnwDaI5ek46-sfUKoohCpCAlRrpbXHqcOzjrYu5H673FI-nXqydZ45vG8M2_TvCcwJ0AWF-v5LcZwl4Y5BcrnyBij4lVzSjmImeQcXj-5nzTnpawBgAi5UB1725wwBZTWwGnz-yaO2ZQ0Da7dYS5Tab__XLY-5RZ3Jk5mDGlok29LiMGmAduI5o9ZYetz2jxG-4ymjG3YbKMZxvKueeNNLHh-PM-am6svvy6_za5_fF1efr6eWc7FOOvRUY9WOqEYUVx5RSgI3ym7kM546xjhklrSAbW1YUldp4CpHoT0HSjJzprlgeuSWettDhuT73QyQf8PpLzSJo_BRtQcOaUVyhwSLjo03EkLkvjeozBmz_p0YG2nfoPO4lAnE59Bn78M4Vav0k4TQgUTFCrh45GQ098Jy6g3oViMdSSYpqIZEUwC48BfTq1iGSgl9lRxSLU5lZLRP7REQO_toNf6aAe9t4M-2KHWfXiq56HqfvmPgrFuaBcw62IDDhZdyGjHOsLwwhf_AP6fyfY</recordid><startdate>20240630</startdate><enddate>20240630</enddate><creator>Spit, Karlinde A.</creator><creator>Azahaf, Siham</creator><creator>de Blok, Christel J.M.</creator><creator>Duvivier, Katya M.</creator><creator>Wiebenga, Oliver T.</creator><creator>Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-3682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5016-4712</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240630</creationdate><title>Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants</title><author>Spit, Karlinde A. ; Azahaf, Siham ; de Blok, Christel J.M. ; Duvivier, Katya M. ; Wiebenga, Oliver T. ; Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>breasts</topic><topic>gels</topic><topic>Implant rupture</topic><topic>lymph</topic><topic>magnetism</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>prostheses</topic><topic>silicone</topic><topic>Silicone breast implants</topic><topic>Silicone depositions</topic><topic>ultrasonics</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spit, Karlinde A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azahaf, Siham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Blok, Christel J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duvivier, Katya M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebenga, Oliver T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spit, Karlinde A.</au><au>Azahaf, Siham</au><au>de Blok, Christel J.M.</au><au>Duvivier, Katya M.</au><au>Wiebenga, Oliver T.</au><au>Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants</atitle><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><date>2024-06-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e33325</spage><pages>e33325-</pages><artnum>e33325</artnum><issn>2405-8440</issn><eissn>2405-8440</eissn><abstract>Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy of ultrasound and MRI in assessing implant integrity. Women with silicone breast implants underwent a breast and axillary ultrasound and MRI on the same day. All tests were assessed by experienced radiologists. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound and MRI for implant rupture detection and silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes were evaluated. A total of 104 women participated in the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for detecting implant ruptures compared to MRI were 96 %, 95 %, and 96 %, respectively. MRI demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (44 %) for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes compared to ultrasound. A significant association was observed between the presence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes and/or axillary pain and the detection of silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound (χ2 (1, N = 104) = 5·1, p = 0·024). Six women exhibited silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes despite having intact first-pair implants, indicative of gel bleed. Ultrasound is nearly as effective as MRI for detecting breast implant ruptures and is superior for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes. We therefore recommend initiating radiological examination in women with breast implants with a breast and axillary ultrasound, proceeding to MRI only if the ultrasound is inconclusive. The prevalence of gel bleed is understudied and its potential adverse health effects might be underestimated. Further research is needed to explore its potential association with development of systemic symptoms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39022001</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33325</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-3682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5016-4712</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-8440
ispartof Heliyon, 2024-06, Vol.10 (12), p.e33325, Article e33325
issn 2405-8440
2405-8440
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4e422daf3de1457ea4d8c081fbfe5aa8
source PubMed (Medline); ScienceDirect Journals
subjects breasts
gels
Implant rupture
lymph
magnetism
MRI
pain
prostheses
silicone
Silicone breast implants
Silicone depositions
ultrasonics
Ultrasound
title Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A00%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%20versus%20MRI%20for%20evaluation%20of%20silicone%20leakage%20from%20silicone%20breast%20implants&rft.jtitle=Heliyon&rft.au=Spit,%20Karlinde%20A.&rft.date=2024-06-30&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e33325&rft.pages=e33325-&rft.artnum=e33325&rft.issn=2405-8440&rft.eissn=2405-8440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3082309950%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082309950&rft_id=info:pmid/39022001&rfr_iscdi=true