Loading…
Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants
Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy...
Saved in:
Published in: | Heliyon 2024-06, Vol.10 (12), p.e33325, Article e33325 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e33325 |
container_title | Heliyon |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Spit, Karlinde A. Azahaf, Siham de Blok, Christel J.M. Duvivier, Katya M. Wiebenga, Oliver T. Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B. |
description | Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy of ultrasound and MRI in assessing implant integrity.
Women with silicone breast implants underwent a breast and axillary ultrasound and MRI on the same day. All tests were assessed by experienced radiologists. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound and MRI for implant rupture detection and silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes were evaluated.
A total of 104 women participated in the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for detecting implant ruptures compared to MRI were 96 %, 95 %, and 96 %, respectively. MRI demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (44 %) for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes compared to ultrasound. A significant association was observed between the presence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes and/or axillary pain and the detection of silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound (χ2 (1, N = 104) = 5·1, p = 0·024). Six women exhibited silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes despite having intact first-pair implants, indicative of gel bleed.
Ultrasound is nearly as effective as MRI for detecting breast implant ruptures and is superior for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes. We therefore recommend initiating radiological examination in women with breast implants with a breast and axillary ultrasound, proceeding to MRI only if the ultrasound is inconclusive. The prevalence of gel bleed is understudied and its potential adverse health effects might be underestimated. Further research is needed to explore its potential association with development of systemic symptoms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33325 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4e422daf3de1457ea4d8c081fbfe5aa8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405844024093563</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4e422daf3de1457ea4d8c081fbfe5aa8</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3082309950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSnwDaI5ek46-sfUKoohCpCAlRrpbXHqcOzjrYu5H673FI-nXqydZ45vG8M2_TvCcwJ0AWF-v5LcZwl4Y5BcrnyBij4lVzSjmImeQcXj-5nzTnpawBgAi5UB1725wwBZTWwGnz-yaO2ZQ0Da7dYS5Tab__XLY-5RZ3Jk5mDGlok29LiMGmAduI5o9ZYetz2jxG-4ymjG3YbKMZxvKueeNNLHh-PM-am6svvy6_za5_fF1efr6eWc7FOOvRUY9WOqEYUVx5RSgI3ym7kM546xjhklrSAbW1YUldp4CpHoT0HSjJzprlgeuSWettDhuT73QyQf8PpLzSJo_BRtQcOaUVyhwSLjo03EkLkvjeozBmz_p0YG2nfoPO4lAnE59Bn78M4Vav0k4TQgUTFCrh45GQ098Jy6g3oViMdSSYpqIZEUwC48BfTq1iGSgl9lRxSLU5lZLRP7REQO_toNf6aAe9t4M-2KHWfXiq56HqfvmPgrFuaBcw62IDDhZdyGjHOsLwwhf_AP6fyfY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082309950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Spit, Karlinde A. ; Azahaf, Siham ; de Blok, Christel J.M. ; Duvivier, Katya M. ; Wiebenga, Oliver T. ; Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Spit, Karlinde A. ; Azahaf, Siham ; de Blok, Christel J.M. ; Duvivier, Katya M. ; Wiebenga, Oliver T. ; Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy of ultrasound and MRI in assessing implant integrity.
Women with silicone breast implants underwent a breast and axillary ultrasound and MRI on the same day. All tests were assessed by experienced radiologists. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound and MRI for implant rupture detection and silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes were evaluated.
A total of 104 women participated in the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for detecting implant ruptures compared to MRI were 96 %, 95 %, and 96 %, respectively. MRI demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (44 %) for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes compared to ultrasound. A significant association was observed between the presence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes and/or axillary pain and the detection of silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound (χ2 (1, N = 104) = 5·1, p = 0·024). Six women exhibited silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes despite having intact first-pair implants, indicative of gel bleed.
Ultrasound is nearly as effective as MRI for detecting breast implant ruptures and is superior for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes. We therefore recommend initiating radiological examination in women with breast implants with a breast and axillary ultrasound, proceeding to MRI only if the ultrasound is inconclusive. The prevalence of gel bleed is understudied and its potential adverse health effects might be underestimated. Further research is needed to explore its potential association with development of systemic symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39022001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>breasts ; gels ; Implant rupture ; lymph ; magnetism ; MRI ; pain ; prostheses ; silicone ; Silicone breast implants ; Silicone depositions ; ultrasonics ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Heliyon, 2024-06, Vol.10 (12), p.e33325, Article e33325</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1555-3682 ; 0009-0008-5016-4712</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253520/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024093563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3535,27903,27904,45759,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39022001$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spit, Karlinde A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azahaf, Siham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Blok, Christel J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duvivier, Katya M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebenga, Oliver T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants</title><title>Heliyon</title><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><description>Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy of ultrasound and MRI in assessing implant integrity.
Women with silicone breast implants underwent a breast and axillary ultrasound and MRI on the same day. All tests were assessed by experienced radiologists. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound and MRI for implant rupture detection and silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes were evaluated.
A total of 104 women participated in the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for detecting implant ruptures compared to MRI were 96 %, 95 %, and 96 %, respectively. MRI demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (44 %) for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes compared to ultrasound. A significant association was observed between the presence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes and/or axillary pain and the detection of silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound (χ2 (1, N = 104) = 5·1, p = 0·024). Six women exhibited silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes despite having intact first-pair implants, indicative of gel bleed.
Ultrasound is nearly as effective as MRI for detecting breast implant ruptures and is superior for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes. We therefore recommend initiating radiological examination in women with breast implants with a breast and axillary ultrasound, proceeding to MRI only if the ultrasound is inconclusive. The prevalence of gel bleed is understudied and its potential adverse health effects might be underestimated. Further research is needed to explore its potential association with development of systemic symptoms.</description><subject>breasts</subject><subject>gels</subject><subject>Implant rupture</subject><subject>lymph</subject><subject>magnetism</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>prostheses</subject><subject>silicone</subject><subject>Silicone breast implants</subject><subject>Silicone depositions</subject><subject>ultrasonics</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>2405-8440</issn><issn>2405-8440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSnwDaI5ek46-sfUKoohCpCAlRrpbXHqcOzjrYu5H673FI-nXqydZ45vG8M2_TvCcwJ0AWF-v5LcZwl4Y5BcrnyBij4lVzSjmImeQcXj-5nzTnpawBgAi5UB1725wwBZTWwGnz-yaO2ZQ0Da7dYS5Tab__XLY-5RZ3Jk5mDGlok29LiMGmAduI5o9ZYetz2jxG-4ymjG3YbKMZxvKueeNNLHh-PM-am6svvy6_za5_fF1efr6eWc7FOOvRUY9WOqEYUVx5RSgI3ym7kM546xjhklrSAbW1YUldp4CpHoT0HSjJzprlgeuSWettDhuT73QyQf8PpLzSJo_BRtQcOaUVyhwSLjo03EkLkvjeozBmz_p0YG2nfoPO4lAnE59Bn78M4Vav0k4TQgUTFCrh45GQ098Jy6g3oViMdSSYpqIZEUwC48BfTq1iGSgl9lRxSLU5lZLRP7REQO_toNf6aAe9t4M-2KHWfXiq56HqfvmPgrFuaBcw62IDDhZdyGjHOsLwwhf_AP6fyfY</recordid><startdate>20240630</startdate><enddate>20240630</enddate><creator>Spit, Karlinde A.</creator><creator>Azahaf, Siham</creator><creator>de Blok, Christel J.M.</creator><creator>Duvivier, Katya M.</creator><creator>Wiebenga, Oliver T.</creator><creator>Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-3682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5016-4712</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240630</creationdate><title>Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants</title><author>Spit, Karlinde A. ; Azahaf, Siham ; de Blok, Christel J.M. ; Duvivier, Katya M. ; Wiebenga, Oliver T. ; Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>breasts</topic><topic>gels</topic><topic>Implant rupture</topic><topic>lymph</topic><topic>magnetism</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>prostheses</topic><topic>silicone</topic><topic>Silicone breast implants</topic><topic>Silicone depositions</topic><topic>ultrasonics</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spit, Karlinde A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azahaf, Siham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Blok, Christel J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duvivier, Katya M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebenga, Oliver T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spit, Karlinde A.</au><au>Azahaf, Siham</au><au>de Blok, Christel J.M.</au><au>Duvivier, Katya M.</au><au>Wiebenga, Oliver T.</au><au>Nanayakkara, Prabath W.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants</atitle><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><date>2024-06-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e33325</spage><pages>e33325-</pages><artnum>e33325</artnum><issn>2405-8440</issn><eissn>2405-8440</eissn><abstract>Implant ruptures and gel bleed are not uncommon among women with silicone breast implants. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is traditionally considered the gold standard diagnostic modality, recent studies suggest ultrasound might be an acceptable alternative. This study compares the efficacy of ultrasound and MRI in assessing implant integrity.
Women with silicone breast implants underwent a breast and axillary ultrasound and MRI on the same day. All tests were assessed by experienced radiologists. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound and MRI for implant rupture detection and silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes were evaluated.
A total of 104 women participated in the study. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ultrasound for detecting implant ruptures compared to MRI were 96 %, 95 %, and 96 %, respectively. MRI demonstrated significantly lower sensitivity (44 %) for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes compared to ultrasound. A significant association was observed between the presence of enlarged axillary lymph nodes and/or axillary pain and the detection of silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes on ultrasound (χ2 (1, N = 104) = 5·1, p = 0·024). Six women exhibited silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes despite having intact first-pair implants, indicative of gel bleed.
Ultrasound is nearly as effective as MRI for detecting breast implant ruptures and is superior for detecting silicone depositions in axillary lymph nodes. We therefore recommend initiating radiological examination in women with breast implants with a breast and axillary ultrasound, proceeding to MRI only if the ultrasound is inconclusive. The prevalence of gel bleed is understudied and its potential adverse health effects might be underestimated. Further research is needed to explore its potential association with development of systemic symptoms.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39022001</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33325</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-3682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5016-4712</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2405-8440 |
ispartof | Heliyon, 2024-06, Vol.10 (12), p.e33325, Article e33325 |
issn | 2405-8440 2405-8440 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4e422daf3de1457ea4d8c081fbfe5aa8 |
source | PubMed (Medline); ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | breasts gels Implant rupture lymph magnetism MRI pain prostheses silicone Silicone breast implants Silicone depositions ultrasonics Ultrasound |
title | Ultrasound versus MRI for evaluation of silicone leakage from silicone breast implants |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A00%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%20versus%20MRI%20for%20evaluation%20of%20silicone%20leakage%20from%20silicone%20breast%20implants&rft.jtitle=Heliyon&rft.au=Spit,%20Karlinde%20A.&rft.date=2024-06-30&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e33325&rft.pages=e33325-&rft.artnum=e33325&rft.issn=2405-8440&rft.eissn=2405-8440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3082309950%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bed2fec8d5931949f91205f79c68dafcd31482c1702c22082d79039b058f70983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082309950&rft_id=info:pmid/39022001&rfr_iscdi=true |