Effect of complete feed blocks or grazing and supplementation of lambs on performance, nutrient utilisation, rumen fermentation and rumen microbial enzymes

A study to compare two feeding systems, stall feeding (SF) and grazing plus supplementation (GR) was carried out, based on intake, performance and rumen fermentation characteristics of lambs. While SF animals received ad libitum complete feed blocks (CFB), GR animals were allowed grazing for 8 h on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal (Cambridge, England) England), 2007-03, Vol.1 (2), p.221-226
Main Authors: Raghuvansi, S. K. S., Prasad, R., Tripathi, M. K., Mishra, A. S., Chaturvedi, O. H., Misra, A. K., Saraswat, B. L., Jakhmola, R. C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Chromium
Drought
Dry matter
enzymes
Famine
feed supplements
Feeding
feeding systems
Fermentation
Grazing
lamb feeding
Nitrogen
nutrient utilization
Nutrients
Organic matter
Pasture
rumen fermentation
sheep
stall feeding
stalls
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-935b8a86769a8f677930dedfff6d12529a1ba321189ce5da54f9216a6ea7f12e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-935b8a86769a8f677930dedfff6d12529a1ba321189ce5da54f9216a6ea7f12e3
container_end_page 226
container_issue 2
container_start_page 221
container_title Animal (Cambridge, England)
container_volume 1
creator Raghuvansi, S. K. S.
Prasad, R.
Tripathi, M. K.
Mishra, A. S.
Chaturvedi, O. H.
Misra, A. K.
Saraswat, B. L.
Jakhmola, R. C.
description A study to compare two feeding systems, stall feeding (SF) and grazing plus supplementation (GR) was carried out, based on intake, performance and rumen fermentation characteristics of lambs. While SF animals received ad libitum complete feed blocks (CFB), GR animals were allowed grazing for 8 h on a pasture and supplemented with concentrate mixture at 250 g per head per day. Intake in grazing animals was determined using chromium III oxide as internal marker. Intake of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and organic matter (OM) were higher ( P 
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1751731107284058
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4ef0786bfa6944fb858b9c6c92d3985c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1751731107284058</cupid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4ef0786bfa6944fb858b9c6c92d3985c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1458209351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-935b8a86769a8f677930dedfff6d12529a1ba321189ce5da54f9216a6ea7f12e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAFzA4sKlC7bjv8eqKlCpEodSiZs1ccYrlyRe7OTQvgovi7e7LAjEydbo930z9jdN85LRd4wy_f6aacl0yxjV3AgqzaPmeFta6ZZ_fXy4M3bUPCvlllJpmRBPmyPOhRDc6OPmx0UI6GeSAvFp3Aw4IwmIPemG5L8VkjJZZ7iP05rA1JOybCoz4jTDHNO0lQ0wdpWbyAZzSHmEyeMpmZY5x4qRZY5DLA_0KclLlVb__Nth67orj9Hn1EUYCE73dyOW582TAEPBF_vzpLn5cPHl_NPq6vPHy_Ozq5WXVMwr28rOgFFaWTBBaW1b2mMfQlA945JbYB20nDFjPcoepAiWMwUKQQfGsT1pLne-fYJbt8lxhHznEkT3UEh57SDP0Q_oBAaqjeoCKCtE6Iw0nfXKW9631khfvd7uvDY5fV-wzG6MxeMwwIRpKc4KY5miWlbyzV_kbVryVB_qmK2haUVVhdgOql9TSsZwGI9Rt90B988OVM2rvfHSjdgfFL9Cr8DrHRAgOVjnWNzNNaespVRba9st0e7b1nBz7Nf4x3D_bfwTXlrHSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197317606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of complete feed blocks or grazing and supplementation of lambs on performance, nutrient utilisation, rumen fermentation and rumen microbial enzymes</title><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Raghuvansi, S. K. S. ; Prasad, R. ; Tripathi, M. K. ; Mishra, A. S. ; Chaturvedi, O. H. ; Misra, A. K. ; Saraswat, B. L. ; Jakhmola, R. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raghuvansi, S. K. S. ; Prasad, R. ; Tripathi, M. K. ; Mishra, A. S. ; Chaturvedi, O. H. ; Misra, A. K. ; Saraswat, B. L. ; Jakhmola, R. C.</creatorcontrib><description>A study to compare two feeding systems, stall feeding (SF) and grazing plus supplementation (GR) was carried out, based on intake, performance and rumen fermentation characteristics of lambs. While SF animals received ad libitum complete feed blocks (CFB), GR animals were allowed grazing for 8 h on a pasture and supplemented with concentrate mixture at 250 g per head per day. Intake in grazing animals was determined using chromium III oxide as internal marker. Intake of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and organic matter (OM) were higher ( P &lt; 0.01) in SF than in GR animals. Similarly, digestibility of OM, CP and energy were higher ( P &lt; 0.01) in SF animals. Average daily gain in SF animals (101 g) was significantly ( P &lt; 0.01) higher than in GR animals (78 g) but total wool yield was similar for the two groups (856 g, SF; 782 g, GR). The pH of the rumen content, concentration of total volatile fatty acids and total activities of carboxymethyl cellulase, xylanase and esterase in the rumen liquor were similar. The concentrations (mg/dl) of total nitrogen (125, SF; 63, GR) and NH3-nitrogen (42, SF; 31, GR) were higher in SF animals than that of GR animals. A significantly higher activity ( P &lt; 0.05) of microcrystalline cellulase (24.5 v. 7.7 units) and lower activity ( P &lt; 0.05) of protease (309 v. 525 units), was observed in the rumen of SF animals than in GR animals. SF animals could therefore harness more energy through degradation of plant cell walls thus reducing breakdown of plant proteins as gluconeogenic source. The SF system of feeding where CFB was offered to sheep appeared superior to GR in terms of intake, nutrient utilisation and animal performance. Therefore the SF feeding system where CFB are offered to animals can be advocated as an alternative to grazing and supplementation feeding strategy for sheep production, especially where the pastures are highly eroded and need resting for regeneration or curing. The CFB feeding can also be adopted under adverse conditions like drought and famine, a common phenomenon in arid and semiarid conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-7311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-732X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1751731107284058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22444287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Chromium ; Drought ; Dry matter ; enzymes ; Famine ; feed supplements ; Feeding ; feeding systems ; Fermentation ; Grazing ; lamb feeding ; Nitrogen ; nutrient utilization ; Nutrients ; Organic matter ; Pasture ; rumen fermentation ; sheep ; stall feeding ; stalls</subject><ispartof>Animal (Cambridge, England), 2007-03, Vol.1 (2), p.221-226</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2007</rights><rights>The Animal Consortium</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-935b8a86769a8f677930dedfff6d12529a1ba321189ce5da54f9216a6ea7f12e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-935b8a86769a8f677930dedfff6d12529a1ba321189ce5da54f9216a6ea7f12e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22444287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raghuvansi, S. K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaturvedi, O. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misra, A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraswat, B. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakhmola, R. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of complete feed blocks or grazing and supplementation of lambs on performance, nutrient utilisation, rumen fermentation and rumen microbial enzymes</title><title>Animal (Cambridge, England)</title><addtitle>Animal</addtitle><description>A study to compare two feeding systems, stall feeding (SF) and grazing plus supplementation (GR) was carried out, based on intake, performance and rumen fermentation characteristics of lambs. While SF animals received ad libitum complete feed blocks (CFB), GR animals were allowed grazing for 8 h on a pasture and supplemented with concentrate mixture at 250 g per head per day. Intake in grazing animals was determined using chromium III oxide as internal marker. Intake of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and organic matter (OM) were higher ( P &lt; 0.01) in SF than in GR animals. Similarly, digestibility of OM, CP and energy were higher ( P &lt; 0.01) in SF animals. Average daily gain in SF animals (101 g) was significantly ( P &lt; 0.01) higher than in GR animals (78 g) but total wool yield was similar for the two groups (856 g, SF; 782 g, GR). The pH of the rumen content, concentration of total volatile fatty acids and total activities of carboxymethyl cellulase, xylanase and esterase in the rumen liquor were similar. The concentrations (mg/dl) of total nitrogen (125, SF; 63, GR) and NH3-nitrogen (42, SF; 31, GR) were higher in SF animals than that of GR animals. A significantly higher activity ( P &lt; 0.05) of microcrystalline cellulase (24.5 v. 7.7 units) and lower activity ( P &lt; 0.05) of protease (309 v. 525 units), was observed in the rumen of SF animals than in GR animals. SF animals could therefore harness more energy through degradation of plant cell walls thus reducing breakdown of plant proteins as gluconeogenic source. The SF system of feeding where CFB was offered to sheep appeared superior to GR in terms of intake, nutrient utilisation and animal performance. Therefore the SF feeding system where CFB are offered to animals can be advocated as an alternative to grazing and supplementation feeding strategy for sheep production, especially where the pastures are highly eroded and need resting for regeneration or curing. The CFB feeding can also be adopted under adverse conditions like drought and famine, a common phenomenon in arid and semiarid conditions.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>enzymes</subject><subject>Famine</subject><subject>feed supplements</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>feeding systems</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>lamb feeding</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nutrient utilization</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>rumen fermentation</subject><subject>sheep</subject><subject>stall feeding</subject><subject>stalls</subject><issn>1751-7311</issn><issn>1751-732X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAFzA4sKlC7bjv8eqKlCpEodSiZs1ccYrlyRe7OTQvgovi7e7LAjEydbo930z9jdN85LRd4wy_f6aacl0yxjV3AgqzaPmeFta6ZZ_fXy4M3bUPCvlllJpmRBPmyPOhRDc6OPmx0UI6GeSAvFp3Aw4IwmIPemG5L8VkjJZZ7iP05rA1JOybCoz4jTDHNO0lQ0wdpWbyAZzSHmEyeMpmZY5x4qRZY5DLA_0KclLlVb__Nth67orj9Hn1EUYCE73dyOW582TAEPBF_vzpLn5cPHl_NPq6vPHy_Ozq5WXVMwr28rOgFFaWTBBaW1b2mMfQlA945JbYB20nDFjPcoepAiWMwUKQQfGsT1pLne-fYJbt8lxhHznEkT3UEh57SDP0Q_oBAaqjeoCKCtE6Iw0nfXKW9631khfvd7uvDY5fV-wzG6MxeMwwIRpKc4KY5miWlbyzV_kbVryVB_qmK2haUVVhdgOql9TSsZwGI9Rt90B988OVM2rvfHSjdgfFL9Cr8DrHRAgOVjnWNzNNaespVRba9st0e7b1nBz7Nf4x3D_bfwTXlrHSA</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Raghuvansi, S. K. S.</creator><creator>Prasad, R.</creator><creator>Tripathi, M. K.</creator><creator>Mishra, A. S.</creator><creator>Chaturvedi, O. H.</creator><creator>Misra, A. K.</creator><creator>Saraswat, B. L.</creator><creator>Jakhmola, R. C.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Effect of complete feed blocks or grazing and supplementation of lambs on performance, nutrient utilisation, rumen fermentation and rumen microbial enzymes</title><author>Raghuvansi, S. K. S. ; Prasad, R. ; Tripathi, M. K. ; Mishra, A. S. ; Chaturvedi, O. H. ; Misra, A. K. ; Saraswat, B. L. ; Jakhmola, R. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-935b8a86769a8f677930dedfff6d12529a1ba321189ce5da54f9216a6ea7f12e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>enzymes</topic><topic>Famine</topic><topic>feed supplements</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>feeding systems</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>lamb feeding</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nutrient utilization</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>rumen fermentation</topic><topic>sheep</topic><topic>stall feeding</topic><topic>stalls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raghuvansi, S. K. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mishra, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaturvedi, O. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misra, A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saraswat, B. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakhmola, R. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raghuvansi, S. K. S.</au><au>Prasad, R.</au><au>Tripathi, M. K.</au><au>Mishra, A. S.</au><au>Chaturvedi, O. H.</au><au>Misra, A. K.</au><au>Saraswat, B. L.</au><au>Jakhmola, R. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of complete feed blocks or grazing and supplementation of lambs on performance, nutrient utilisation, rumen fermentation and rumen microbial enzymes</atitle><jtitle>Animal (Cambridge, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Animal</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>221-226</pages><issn>1751-7311</issn><eissn>1751-732X</eissn><abstract>A study to compare two feeding systems, stall feeding (SF) and grazing plus supplementation (GR) was carried out, based on intake, performance and rumen fermentation characteristics of lambs. While SF animals received ad libitum complete feed blocks (CFB), GR animals were allowed grazing for 8 h on a pasture and supplemented with concentrate mixture at 250 g per head per day. Intake in grazing animals was determined using chromium III oxide as internal marker. Intake of dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and organic matter (OM) were higher ( P &lt; 0.01) in SF than in GR animals. Similarly, digestibility of OM, CP and energy were higher ( P &lt; 0.01) in SF animals. Average daily gain in SF animals (101 g) was significantly ( P &lt; 0.01) higher than in GR animals (78 g) but total wool yield was similar for the two groups (856 g, SF; 782 g, GR). The pH of the rumen content, concentration of total volatile fatty acids and total activities of carboxymethyl cellulase, xylanase and esterase in the rumen liquor were similar. The concentrations (mg/dl) of total nitrogen (125, SF; 63, GR) and NH3-nitrogen (42, SF; 31, GR) were higher in SF animals than that of GR animals. A significantly higher activity ( P &lt; 0.05) of microcrystalline cellulase (24.5 v. 7.7 units) and lower activity ( P &lt; 0.05) of protease (309 v. 525 units), was observed in the rumen of SF animals than in GR animals. SF animals could therefore harness more energy through degradation of plant cell walls thus reducing breakdown of plant proteins as gluconeogenic source. The SF system of feeding where CFB was offered to sheep appeared superior to GR in terms of intake, nutrient utilisation and animal performance. Therefore the SF feeding system where CFB are offered to animals can be advocated as an alternative to grazing and supplementation feeding strategy for sheep production, especially where the pastures are highly eroded and need resting for regeneration or curing. The CFB feeding can also be adopted under adverse conditions like drought and famine, a common phenomenon in arid and semiarid conditions.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>22444287</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1751731107284058</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-7311
ispartof Animal (Cambridge, England), 2007-03, Vol.1 (2), p.221-226
issn 1751-7311
1751-732X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4ef0786bfa6944fb858b9c6c92d3985c
source ScienceDirect®
subjects Animals
Chromium
Drought
Dry matter
enzymes
Famine
feed supplements
Feeding
feeding systems
Fermentation
Grazing
lamb feeding
Nitrogen
nutrient utilization
Nutrients
Organic matter
Pasture
rumen fermentation
sheep
stall feeding
stalls
title Effect of complete feed blocks or grazing and supplementation of lambs on performance, nutrient utilisation, rumen fermentation and rumen microbial enzymes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A23%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20complete%20feed%20blocks%20or%20grazing%20and%20supplementation%20of%20lambs%20on%20performance,%20nutrient%20utilisation,%20rumen%20fermentation%20and%20rumen%20microbial%20enzymes&rft.jtitle=Animal%20(Cambridge,%20England)&rft.au=Raghuvansi,%20S.%20K.%20S.&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=221-226&rft.issn=1751-7311&rft.eissn=1751-732X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1751731107284058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1458209351%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-935b8a86769a8f677930dedfff6d12529a1ba321189ce5da54f9216a6ea7f12e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197317606&rft_id=info:pmid/22444287&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1751731107284058&rfr_iscdi=true