Loading…

Drained and undrained shear strenght of silty sand: effect of the reconstruction methods and other parameters

The effects of confining pressure, relative density and sample preparation methods on the shearing strength of Chlef sand were studied in this article. For this purpose, the results of drained and undrained monotonic triaxial compression tests performed on samples with initial density of 0.29 and 0....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geologia Croatica 2011-06, Vol.64 (2), p.163-171
Main Authors: Della, Noureddine, Arab, Ahmed, Belkhatir, Mostefa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2154-3968e86465d262776f7e112bc3fb927ec0f5ccb1603bcdd56231ca950ce6f15c3
cites
container_end_page 171
container_issue 2
container_start_page 163
container_title Geologia Croatica
container_volume 64
creator Della, Noureddine
Arab, Ahmed
Belkhatir, Mostefa
description The effects of confining pressure, relative density and sample preparation methods on the shearing strength of Chlef sand were studied in this article. For this purpose, the results of drained and undrained monotonic triaxial compression tests performed on samples with initial density of 0.29 and 0.80 under initial confining pressures ranged from 50 to 200 kPa are presented. The specimens were prepared by two depositional methods namely dry funnel pluviation and wet deposition. It was found that there was a marked difference in the undrained behavior even though the density and stress conditions were identical. The conclusion was that the soil fabric was responsible for this result. The results indicated also that at low confining pressures, the specimens reconstituted by the wet deposition method exhibited complete static liquefaction (zero effective confining pressure and zero stress difference). As confining pressures and densities were increased, the effective stress paths indicated increasing resistance to liquefaction by showing increasing dilatant tendencies. The same trends were observed in drained tests results in the form of an increase in the volumetric strain and the rapid transition from the contractancy phase to the dilatancy phase.
doi_str_mv 10.4154/gc.2011.14
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_hrcak</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4f1b71ee218940e494422dd0b9ea8039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4f1b71ee218940e494422dd0b9ea8039</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_4f1b71ee218940e494422dd0b9ea8039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2154-3968e86465d262776f7e112bc3fb927ec0f5ccb1603bcdd56231ca950ce6f15c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LxDAQhosouH5c_AU5i10zSZq23mT9BMGLgreQTibbrruNJN3D_nu7Hwie5p133nlgmCy7Aj5VUKjbOU4FB5iCOsomIKXMVVUWxzvNcy7512l2ltKCc6mFLifZ6iHarifHbO_YuneHLrVkI0tDpH7eDix4lrrlsGFpjN0x8p5w5w4tsUgY-jG6xqELPVvR0AaXdsAwziP7sdGOLsV0kZ14u0x0eajn2efT48fsJX97f36d3b_lKMYrclnriiqtdOGEFmWpfUkAokHpm1qUhNwXiA1oLht0rtBCAtq64EjaQ4HyPHvdc12wC_MTu5WNGxNsZ3ZGiHNj49Dhkozy0JRAJKCqFSdVKyWEc7ypyVZc1iPrZs9qI9rvf7C9kyLSKE0JXFZj_HofxxhSiuT_NoCb7Y_MHM32RwaU_AVgd4WO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drained and undrained shear strenght of silty sand: effect of the reconstruction methods and other parameters</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Della, Noureddine ; Arab, Ahmed ; Belkhatir, Mostefa</creator><creatorcontrib>Della, Noureddine ; Arab, Ahmed ; Belkhatir, Mostefa</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of confining pressure, relative density and sample preparation methods on the shearing strength of Chlef sand were studied in this article. For this purpose, the results of drained and undrained monotonic triaxial compression tests performed on samples with initial density of 0.29 and 0.80 under initial confining pressures ranged from 50 to 200 kPa are presented. The specimens were prepared by two depositional methods namely dry funnel pluviation and wet deposition. It was found that there was a marked difference in the undrained behavior even though the density and stress conditions were identical. The conclusion was that the soil fabric was responsible for this result. The results indicated also that at low confining pressures, the specimens reconstituted by the wet deposition method exhibited complete static liquefaction (zero effective confining pressure and zero stress difference). As confining pressures and densities were increased, the effective stress paths indicated increasing resistance to liquefaction by showing increasing dilatant tendencies. The same trends were observed in drained tests results in the form of an increase in the volumetric strain and the rapid transition from the contractancy phase to the dilatancy phase.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1330-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1333-4875</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4154/gc.2011.14</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hrvatskigeološkiinstitut</publisher><subject>confinement ; density ; drained ; dry funnel pluviation ; liquefaction ; liquefaction, sand, drained, undrained, dry funnel pluviation, wet deposition, confinement, density, residual strength, volumetric strain ; residual strength ; sand ; undrained ; volumetric strain ; wet deposition</subject><ispartof>Geologia Croatica, 2011-06, Vol.64 (2), p.163-171</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2154-3968e86465d262776f7e112bc3fb927ec0f5ccb1603bcdd56231ca950ce6f15c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Della, Noureddine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arab, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belkhatir, Mostefa</creatorcontrib><title>Drained and undrained shear strenght of silty sand: effect of the reconstruction methods and other parameters</title><title>Geologia Croatica</title><description>The effects of confining pressure, relative density and sample preparation methods on the shearing strength of Chlef sand were studied in this article. For this purpose, the results of drained and undrained monotonic triaxial compression tests performed on samples with initial density of 0.29 and 0.80 under initial confining pressures ranged from 50 to 200 kPa are presented. The specimens were prepared by two depositional methods namely dry funnel pluviation and wet deposition. It was found that there was a marked difference in the undrained behavior even though the density and stress conditions were identical. The conclusion was that the soil fabric was responsible for this result. The results indicated also that at low confining pressures, the specimens reconstituted by the wet deposition method exhibited complete static liquefaction (zero effective confining pressure and zero stress difference). As confining pressures and densities were increased, the effective stress paths indicated increasing resistance to liquefaction by showing increasing dilatant tendencies. The same trends were observed in drained tests results in the form of an increase in the volumetric strain and the rapid transition from the contractancy phase to the dilatancy phase.</description><subject>confinement</subject><subject>density</subject><subject>drained</subject><subject>dry funnel pluviation</subject><subject>liquefaction</subject><subject>liquefaction, sand, drained, undrained, dry funnel pluviation, wet deposition, confinement, density, residual strength, volumetric strain</subject><subject>residual strength</subject><subject>sand</subject><subject>undrained</subject><subject>volumetric strain</subject><subject>wet deposition</subject><issn>1330-030X</issn><issn>1333-4875</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LxDAQhosouH5c_AU5i10zSZq23mT9BMGLgreQTibbrruNJN3D_nu7Hwie5p133nlgmCy7Aj5VUKjbOU4FB5iCOsomIKXMVVUWxzvNcy7512l2ltKCc6mFLifZ6iHarifHbO_YuneHLrVkI0tDpH7eDix4lrrlsGFpjN0x8p5w5w4tsUgY-jG6xqELPVvR0AaXdsAwziP7sdGOLsV0kZ14u0x0eajn2efT48fsJX97f36d3b_lKMYrclnriiqtdOGEFmWpfUkAokHpm1qUhNwXiA1oLht0rtBCAtq64EjaQ4HyPHvdc12wC_MTu5WNGxNsZ3ZGiHNj49Dhkozy0JRAJKCqFSdVKyWEc7ypyVZc1iPrZs9qI9rvf7C9kyLSKE0JXFZj_HofxxhSiuT_NoCb7Y_MHM32RwaU_AVgd4WO</recordid><startdate>20110630</startdate><enddate>20110630</enddate><creator>Della, Noureddine</creator><creator>Arab, Ahmed</creator><creator>Belkhatir, Mostefa</creator><general>Hrvatskigeološkiinstitut</general><general>Croatian Geological Survey</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>VP8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110630</creationdate><title>Drained and undrained shear strenght of silty sand: effect of the reconstruction methods and other parameters</title><author>Della, Noureddine ; Arab, Ahmed ; Belkhatir, Mostefa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2154-3968e86465d262776f7e112bc3fb927ec0f5ccb1603bcdd56231ca950ce6f15c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>confinement</topic><topic>density</topic><topic>drained</topic><topic>dry funnel pluviation</topic><topic>liquefaction</topic><topic>liquefaction, sand, drained, undrained, dry funnel pluviation, wet deposition, confinement, density, residual strength, volumetric strain</topic><topic>residual strength</topic><topic>sand</topic><topic>undrained</topic><topic>volumetric strain</topic><topic>wet deposition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Della, Noureddine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arab, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belkhatir, Mostefa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geologia Croatica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Della, Noureddine</au><au>Arab, Ahmed</au><au>Belkhatir, Mostefa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drained and undrained shear strenght of silty sand: effect of the reconstruction methods and other parameters</atitle><jtitle>Geologia Croatica</jtitle><date>2011-06-30</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>163-171</pages><issn>1330-030X</issn><eissn>1333-4875</eissn><abstract>The effects of confining pressure, relative density and sample preparation methods on the shearing strength of Chlef sand were studied in this article. For this purpose, the results of drained and undrained monotonic triaxial compression tests performed on samples with initial density of 0.29 and 0.80 under initial confining pressures ranged from 50 to 200 kPa are presented. The specimens were prepared by two depositional methods namely dry funnel pluviation and wet deposition. It was found that there was a marked difference in the undrained behavior even though the density and stress conditions were identical. The conclusion was that the soil fabric was responsible for this result. The results indicated also that at low confining pressures, the specimens reconstituted by the wet deposition method exhibited complete static liquefaction (zero effective confining pressure and zero stress difference). As confining pressures and densities were increased, the effective stress paths indicated increasing resistance to liquefaction by showing increasing dilatant tendencies. The same trends were observed in drained tests results in the form of an increase in the volumetric strain and the rapid transition from the contractancy phase to the dilatancy phase.</abstract><pub>Hrvatskigeološkiinstitut</pub><doi>10.4154/gc.2011.14</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1330-030X
ispartof Geologia Croatica, 2011-06, Vol.64 (2), p.163-171
issn 1330-030X
1333-4875
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4f1b71ee218940e494422dd0b9ea8039
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects confinement
density
drained
dry funnel pluviation
liquefaction
liquefaction, sand, drained, undrained, dry funnel pluviation, wet deposition, confinement, density, residual strength, volumetric strain
residual strength
sand
undrained
volumetric strain
wet deposition
title Drained and undrained shear strenght of silty sand: effect of the reconstruction methods and other parameters
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A28%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_hrcak&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drained%20and%20undrained%20shear%20strenght%20of%20silty%20sand:%20effect%20of%20the%20reconstruction%20methods%20and%20other%20parameters&rft.jtitle=Geologia%20Croatica&rft.au=Della,%20Noureddine&rft.date=2011-06-30&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=163-171&rft.issn=1330-030X&rft.eissn=1333-4875&rft_id=info:doi/10.4154/gc.2011.14&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_hrcak%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_4f1b71ee218940e494422dd0b9ea8039%3C/doaj_hrcak%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2154-3968e86465d262776f7e112bc3fb927ec0f5ccb1603bcdd56231ca950ce6f15c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true