Loading…
The impact of global budget on expenditure, service volume, and quality of care among patients with pneumonia in a secondary hospital in China: a retrospective study
The Chinese government has begun to dampen the growth of health expenditure by implementing Global Budgets (GB). Concerns were raised about whether reductions in expenditure would lead to a deterioration of quality of care. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of GB on health expenditure, service...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC public health 2020-04, Vol.20 (1), p.522-522, Article 522 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-b52fda578ef07319a89faec4b7538aa6602592887414557220116b25b061c7563 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-b52fda578ef07319a89faec4b7538aa6602592887414557220116b25b061c7563 |
container_end_page | 522 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 522 |
container_title | BMC public health |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Guan, Xiaodong Zhang, Chi Hu, Huajie Shi, Luwen |
description | The Chinese government has begun to dampen the growth of health expenditure by implementing Global Budgets (GB). Concerns were raised about whether reductions in expenditure would lead to a deterioration of quality of care. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of GB on health expenditure, service volume and quality of care among Chinese pneumonia patients.
A secondary hospital that replaced Fee-For-Service (FFS) with GB in China in 2016 was sampled. We used daily expenditure to assess health expenditure; monthly admission, length of stay (LOS), number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics to evaluate service volume; record with multiple antibiotics and readmission to assess quality of care. Descriptive analyses were adopted to evaluate changes after the reform, logistic regression and multivariable linear regressions were used to analyze changes associated with the reform.
In 2015 and 2016, 3400 admissions from 3173 inpatients and 2342 admissions from 2246 inpatients were admitted, respectively. According to regression analyses, daily expenditure, LOS, readmission, and records with multiple antibiotic usages significantly declined after the reform. However, no significant relation was observed between GB and the number of drugs per record or record containing antibiotics.
When compared with FFS, GB can curtail health expenditure and improve quality of care. As far as service volume was concerned, LOS and monthly admission declined, while number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics were not affected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12889-020-08619-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4f564f8d93ba485597d3b08172591be7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A627349460</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4f564f8d93ba485597d3b08172591be7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A627349460</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-b52fda578ef07319a89faec4b7538aa6602592887414557220116b25b061c7563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIf4IAsceFAij_i2OGAVK34qFSJSzlbjjPZdZXYqeMs7A_ifzLbLdUWoRwSP7_3JjPziuI1o-eM6frDzLjWTUk5LamuWVOKJ8UpqxQreSX106Pvk-LFPN9QypSW_HlxIrigdSP4afH7egPEj5N1mcSerIfY2oG0S7cGBAKBXxOEzuclwXsyQ9p6B2Qbh2XEsw0duV3s4PNuL3Y2AbFjDGsy2ewh5Jn89HlDpgALwt4SH4hFGxdDZ9OObOI8-YwFEV9tfLAf8TpBToiDy34LZM5Lt3tZPOvtMMOr-_dZ8ePL5-vVt_Lq-9fL1cVV6WQtctlK3ndWKg09VYI1Vje9BVe1SgptbV1TLhucmapYJaXinDJWt1y2tGZOocVZcXnw7aK9MVPyI_6lidabOyCmtbEpezeAqXpZV73uGtHaSkvZqE60VDOFJVgLCr0-HbympR2hcziOZIdHpo9vgt-YddwaxWqtZYMG7-4NUrxdYM5m9LODYbAB4jIbLpr9bllVIfXtP9SbuKSAo9qzmMS--RFrbbEBH_qIdd3e1FzUXImqqWqKrPP_sPDpYPS4OOg94o8E_CBwuLY5Qf_QI6NmH1RzCKrBoJq7oBqBojfH03mQ_E2m-AMbieNq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2391502524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of global budget on expenditure, service volume, and quality of care among patients with pneumonia in a secondary hospital in China: a retrospective study</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Guan, Xiaodong ; Zhang, Chi ; Hu, Huajie ; Shi, Luwen</creator><creatorcontrib>Guan, Xiaodong ; Zhang, Chi ; Hu, Huajie ; Shi, Luwen</creatorcontrib><description>The Chinese government has begun to dampen the growth of health expenditure by implementing Global Budgets (GB). Concerns were raised about whether reductions in expenditure would lead to a deterioration of quality of care. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of GB on health expenditure, service volume and quality of care among Chinese pneumonia patients.
A secondary hospital that replaced Fee-For-Service (FFS) with GB in China in 2016 was sampled. We used daily expenditure to assess health expenditure; monthly admission, length of stay (LOS), number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics to evaluate service volume; record with multiple antibiotics and readmission to assess quality of care. Descriptive analyses were adopted to evaluate changes after the reform, logistic regression and multivariable linear regressions were used to analyze changes associated with the reform.
In 2015 and 2016, 3400 admissions from 3173 inpatients and 2342 admissions from 2246 inpatients were admitted, respectively. According to regression analyses, daily expenditure, LOS, readmission, and records with multiple antibiotic usages significantly declined after the reform. However, no significant relation was observed between GB and the number of drugs per record or record containing antibiotics.
When compared with FFS, GB can curtail health expenditure and improve quality of care. As far as service volume was concerned, LOS and monthly admission declined, while number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics were not affected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08619-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32306932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Age groups ; Analysis ; Antibiotics ; Budgets ; Daily expenditure ; Drugs ; Economic reform ; Employees ; Evaluation ; Expenditures ; Fee for service ; Global budget ; Government finance ; Growth rate ; Health care costs ; Health care expenditures ; Health care policy ; Health insurance ; Hospital patients ; Hospitals ; Internal medicine ; Medical care quality ; Patients ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pneumonia ; Quality ; Quality assessment ; Quality management ; Quality of care ; Reforms ; Regression analysis ; Service volume</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2020-04, Vol.20 (1), p.522-522, Article 522</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-b52fda578ef07319a89faec4b7538aa6602592887414557220116b25b061c7563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-b52fda578ef07319a89faec4b7538aa6602592887414557220116b25b061c7563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7168859/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2391502524?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27866,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32306932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guan, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Huajie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Luwen</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of global budget on expenditure, service volume, and quality of care among patients with pneumonia in a secondary hospital in China: a retrospective study</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>The Chinese government has begun to dampen the growth of health expenditure by implementing Global Budgets (GB). Concerns were raised about whether reductions in expenditure would lead to a deterioration of quality of care. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of GB on health expenditure, service volume and quality of care among Chinese pneumonia patients.
A secondary hospital that replaced Fee-For-Service (FFS) with GB in China in 2016 was sampled. We used daily expenditure to assess health expenditure; monthly admission, length of stay (LOS), number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics to evaluate service volume; record with multiple antibiotics and readmission to assess quality of care. Descriptive analyses were adopted to evaluate changes after the reform, logistic regression and multivariable linear regressions were used to analyze changes associated with the reform.
In 2015 and 2016, 3400 admissions from 3173 inpatients and 2342 admissions from 2246 inpatients were admitted, respectively. According to regression analyses, daily expenditure, LOS, readmission, and records with multiple antibiotic usages significantly declined after the reform. However, no significant relation was observed between GB and the number of drugs per record or record containing antibiotics.
When compared with FFS, GB can curtail health expenditure and improve quality of care. As far as service volume was concerned, LOS and monthly admission declined, while number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics were not affected.</description><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Daily expenditure</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Economic reform</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Fee for service</subject><subject>Global budget</subject><subject>Government finance</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Health care costs</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Service volume</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIf4IAsceFAij_i2OGAVK34qFSJSzlbjjPZdZXYqeMs7A_ifzLbLdUWoRwSP7_3JjPziuI1o-eM6frDzLjWTUk5LamuWVOKJ8UpqxQreSX106Pvk-LFPN9QypSW_HlxIrigdSP4afH7egPEj5N1mcSerIfY2oG0S7cGBAKBXxOEzuclwXsyQ9p6B2Qbh2XEsw0duV3s4PNuL3Y2AbFjDGsy2ewh5Jn89HlDpgALwt4SH4hFGxdDZ9OObOI8-YwFEV9tfLAf8TpBToiDy34LZM5Lt3tZPOvtMMOr-_dZ8ePL5-vVt_Lq-9fL1cVV6WQtctlK3ndWKg09VYI1Vje9BVe1SgptbV1TLhucmapYJaXinDJWt1y2tGZOocVZcXnw7aK9MVPyI_6lidabOyCmtbEpezeAqXpZV73uGtHaSkvZqE60VDOFJVgLCr0-HbympR2hcziOZIdHpo9vgt-YddwaxWqtZYMG7-4NUrxdYM5m9LODYbAB4jIbLpr9bllVIfXtP9SbuKSAo9qzmMS--RFrbbEBH_qIdd3e1FzUXImqqWqKrPP_sPDpYPS4OOg94o8E_CBwuLY5Qf_QI6NmH1RzCKrBoJq7oBqBojfH03mQ_E2m-AMbieNq</recordid><startdate>20200419</startdate><enddate>20200419</enddate><creator>Guan, Xiaodong</creator><creator>Zhang, Chi</creator><creator>Hu, Huajie</creator><creator>Shi, Luwen</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200419</creationdate><title>The impact of global budget on expenditure, service volume, and quality of care among patients with pneumonia in a secondary hospital in China: a retrospective study</title><author>Guan, Xiaodong ; Zhang, Chi ; Hu, Huajie ; Shi, Luwen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-b52fda578ef07319a89faec4b7538aa6602592887414557220116b25b061c7563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Daily expenditure</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Economic reform</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Fee for service</topic><topic>Global budget</topic><topic>Government finance</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Health care costs</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Service volume</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guan, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Huajie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Luwen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PHMC-Proquest健康医学期刊库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guan, Xiaodong</au><au>Zhang, Chi</au><au>Hu, Huajie</au><au>Shi, Luwen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of global budget on expenditure, service volume, and quality of care among patients with pneumonia in a secondary hospital in China: a retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-04-19</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>522-522</pages><artnum>522</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>The Chinese government has begun to dampen the growth of health expenditure by implementing Global Budgets (GB). Concerns were raised about whether reductions in expenditure would lead to a deterioration of quality of care. This paper aims to evaluate the impact of GB on health expenditure, service volume and quality of care among Chinese pneumonia patients.
A secondary hospital that replaced Fee-For-Service (FFS) with GB in China in 2016 was sampled. We used daily expenditure to assess health expenditure; monthly admission, length of stay (LOS), number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics to evaluate service volume; record with multiple antibiotics and readmission to assess quality of care. Descriptive analyses were adopted to evaluate changes after the reform, logistic regression and multivariable linear regressions were used to analyze changes associated with the reform.
In 2015 and 2016, 3400 admissions from 3173 inpatients and 2342 admissions from 2246 inpatients were admitted, respectively. According to regression analyses, daily expenditure, LOS, readmission, and records with multiple antibiotic usages significantly declined after the reform. However, no significant relation was observed between GB and the number of drugs per record or record containing antibiotics.
When compared with FFS, GB can curtail health expenditure and improve quality of care. As far as service volume was concerned, LOS and monthly admission declined, while number of drugs per record and record containing antibiotics were not affected.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>32306932</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12889-020-08619-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2458 |
ispartof | BMC public health, 2020-04, Vol.20 (1), p.522-522, Article 522 |
issn | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4f564f8d93ba485597d3b08172591be7 |
source | PubMed Central Free; PAIS Index; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Age groups Analysis Antibiotics Budgets Daily expenditure Drugs Economic reform Employees Evaluation Expenditures Fee for service Global budget Government finance Growth rate Health care costs Health care expenditures Health care policy Health insurance Hospital patients Hospitals Internal medicine Medical care quality Patients Pharmaceutical industry Pneumonia Quality Quality assessment Quality management Quality of care Reforms Regression analysis Service volume |
title | The impact of global budget on expenditure, service volume, and quality of care among patients with pneumonia in a secondary hospital in China: a retrospective study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A33%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20global%20budget%20on%20expenditure,%20service%20volume,%20and%20quality%20of%20care%20among%20patients%20with%20pneumonia%20in%20a%20secondary%20hospital%20in%20China:%20a%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Guan,%20Xiaodong&rft.date=2020-04-19&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=522-522&rft.artnum=522&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12889-020-08619-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA627349460%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-b52fda578ef07319a89faec4b7538aa6602592887414557220116b25b061c7563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2391502524&rft_id=info:pmid/32306932&rft_galeid=A627349460&rfr_iscdi=true |