Loading…
Accuracy of plant identification applications to identify plants in suspected poisoning cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre
Accidental exposure to potentially poisonous plants is a common reason for contacting poisons information centres. Although most exposures are mild, early identification can be critical for severe cases. Smartphone apps that use image recognition can serve as an alternative to traditional botanist i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Toxicology communications 2024-12, Vol.8 (1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-2f21700c17db8db5eaf3f8e318ce0fd3eed155bbcc4726b59a151f4edd63ab003 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Toxicology communications |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | McNeill, Iain Knoeckel, Robert Goggin, Anna Wylie, Carol Isoardi, Katherine |
description | Accidental exposure to potentially poisonous plants is a common reason for contacting poisons information centres. Although most exposures are mild, early identification can be critical for severe cases. Smartphone apps that use image recognition can serve as an alternative to traditional botanist identification. This study investigates the accuracy of smartphone applications compared to botanist identification in real-life plant exposure cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre. This prospective observational study analysed data from 25 plant exposure cases between February 2022 and January 2023. In these cases, images were referred to a botanist for identification and reviewed by six researchers using six different plant identification applications (Google Lens™, PictureThis, PlantSnap, LeafSnap, Plant Identifier, and Pl@ntnet™). The researchers’ identifications were then compared to the botanist’s identification. The accuracy of the applications varied considerably, PictureThis was the best, with 74% correct identification per exposure, followed by Plant Identifier and Pl@ntnet™ (both 72%). PlantSnap had the lowest accuracy (38%). Agreement between researchers using the same application also showed variation. Current smartphone plant identification applications are not reliable enough for poison information centres to use in guiding advice for plant exposure calls. Botanist identification remains the gold standard. Clinicians should be wary of their use in real-world scenarios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/24734306.2024.2377523 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4f635fcddb1a4f95a8073f3b2d2f4771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4f635fcddb1a4f95a8073f3b2d2f4771</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3150451964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-2f21700c17db8db5eaf3f8e318ce0fd3eed155bbcc4726b59a151f4edd63ab003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUdtKAzEQXUTBon6CEPC5NdfN9lGKl0JBBX0O2WSiKTVZk-xDv8MfdtttxacZ5pw5Z5hTVdcEzwhu8C3lknGG6xnFlM8ok1JQdlJNdvPpDjj9159XVzmvMcZENkw0fFL93BnTJ222KDrUbXQoyFsIxTtvdPExIN11m0OfUYlHeDuyM_IB5T53YApY1EWfY_DhAxmdIaMEDlIagGGxfAJ67QFCHhYtetlTM1oGF9PX6LUYpBNcVmdObzJcHepF9f5w_7Z4mq6eH5eLu9XUUEnLlDpKJMaGSNs2thWgHXMNMNIYwM4yAEuEaFtjuKR1K-aaCOI4WFsz3WLMLqrlqGujXqsu-S-dtipqr_aDmD6UTsWbDSjuaiacsbYlmru50A2WzLGWWuq4lGTQuhm1uhS_e8hFrWOfwnC-YkRgLsi85gNLjCyTYs7Dc_5cCVa7ONUxTrWLUx3iZL9L2JZj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3150451964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of plant identification applications to identify plants in suspected poisoning cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals</source><creator>McNeill, Iain ; Knoeckel, Robert ; Goggin, Anna ; Wylie, Carol ; Isoardi, Katherine</creator><creatorcontrib>McNeill, Iain ; Knoeckel, Robert ; Goggin, Anna ; Wylie, Carol ; Isoardi, Katherine</creatorcontrib><description>Accidental exposure to potentially poisonous plants is a common reason for contacting poisons information centres. Although most exposures are mild, early identification can be critical for severe cases. Smartphone apps that use image recognition can serve as an alternative to traditional botanist identification. This study investigates the accuracy of smartphone applications compared to botanist identification in real-life plant exposure cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre. This prospective observational study analysed data from 25 plant exposure cases between February 2022 and January 2023. In these cases, images were referred to a botanist for identification and reviewed by six researchers using six different plant identification applications (Google Lens™, PictureThis, PlantSnap, LeafSnap, Plant Identifier, and Pl@ntnet™). The researchers’ identifications were then compared to the botanist’s identification. The accuracy of the applications varied considerably, PictureThis was the best, with 74% correct identification per exposure, followed by Plant Identifier and Pl@ntnet™ (both 72%). PlantSnap had the lowest accuracy (38%). Agreement between researchers using the same application also showed variation. Current smartphone plant identification applications are not reliable enough for poison information centres to use in guiding advice for plant exposure calls. Botanist identification remains the gold standard. Clinicians should be wary of their use in real-world scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2473-4306</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4306</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/24734306.2024.2377523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Macclesfield: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Identification ; plant identification ; Poisonous species ; Poisons ; poisons information ; smartphone applications ; Smartphones ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Toxicology communications, 2024-12, Vol.8 (1)</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-2f21700c17db8db5eaf3f8e318ce0fd3eed155bbcc4726b59a151f4edd63ab003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1176-7923 ; 0000-0003-3342-7812 ; 0000-0002-2197-6841</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3150451964?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,25734,27905,27906,36993,44571</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McNeill, Iain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoeckel, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goggin, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isoardi, Katherine</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of plant identification applications to identify plants in suspected poisoning cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre</title><title>Toxicology communications</title><description>Accidental exposure to potentially poisonous plants is a common reason for contacting poisons information centres. Although most exposures are mild, early identification can be critical for severe cases. Smartphone apps that use image recognition can serve as an alternative to traditional botanist identification. This study investigates the accuracy of smartphone applications compared to botanist identification in real-life plant exposure cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre. This prospective observational study analysed data from 25 plant exposure cases between February 2022 and January 2023. In these cases, images were referred to a botanist for identification and reviewed by six researchers using six different plant identification applications (Google Lens™, PictureThis, PlantSnap, LeafSnap, Plant Identifier, and Pl@ntnet™). The researchers’ identifications were then compared to the botanist’s identification. The accuracy of the applications varied considerably, PictureThis was the best, with 74% correct identification per exposure, followed by Plant Identifier and Pl@ntnet™ (both 72%). PlantSnap had the lowest accuracy (38%). Agreement between researchers using the same application also showed variation. Current smartphone plant identification applications are not reliable enough for poison information centres to use in guiding advice for plant exposure calls. Botanist identification remains the gold standard. Clinicians should be wary of their use in real-world scenarios.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>plant identification</subject><subject>Poisonous species</subject><subject>Poisons</subject><subject>poisons information</subject><subject>smartphone applications</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>2473-4306</issn><issn>2473-4306</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUdtKAzEQXUTBon6CEPC5NdfN9lGKl0JBBX0O2WSiKTVZk-xDv8MfdtttxacZ5pw5Z5hTVdcEzwhu8C3lknGG6xnFlM8ok1JQdlJNdvPpDjj9159XVzmvMcZENkw0fFL93BnTJ222KDrUbXQoyFsIxTtvdPExIN11m0OfUYlHeDuyM_IB5T53YApY1EWfY_DhAxmdIaMEDlIagGGxfAJ67QFCHhYtetlTM1oGF9PX6LUYpBNcVmdObzJcHepF9f5w_7Z4mq6eH5eLu9XUUEnLlDpKJMaGSNs2thWgHXMNMNIYwM4yAEuEaFtjuKR1K-aaCOI4WFsz3WLMLqrlqGujXqsu-S-dtipqr_aDmD6UTsWbDSjuaiacsbYlmru50A2WzLGWWuq4lGTQuhm1uhS_e8hFrWOfwnC-YkRgLsi85gNLjCyTYs7Dc_5cCVa7ONUxTrWLUx3iZL9L2JZj</recordid><startdate>20241231</startdate><enddate>20241231</enddate><creator>McNeill, Iain</creator><creator>Knoeckel, Robert</creator><creator>Goggin, Anna</creator><creator>Wylie, Carol</creator><creator>Isoardi, Katherine</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-7923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3342-7812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-6841</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241231</creationdate><title>Accuracy of plant identification applications to identify plants in suspected poisoning cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre</title><author>McNeill, Iain ; Knoeckel, Robert ; Goggin, Anna ; Wylie, Carol ; Isoardi, Katherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-2f21700c17db8db5eaf3f8e318ce0fd3eed155bbcc4726b59a151f4edd63ab003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>plant identification</topic><topic>Poisonous species</topic><topic>Poisons</topic><topic>poisons information</topic><topic>smartphone applications</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McNeill, Iain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knoeckel, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goggin, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wylie, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isoardi, Katherine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Toxicology communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McNeill, Iain</au><au>Knoeckel, Robert</au><au>Goggin, Anna</au><au>Wylie, Carol</au><au>Isoardi, Katherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of plant identification applications to identify plants in suspected poisoning cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology communications</jtitle><date>2024-12-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2473-4306</issn><eissn>2473-4306</eissn><abstract>Accidental exposure to potentially poisonous plants is a common reason for contacting poisons information centres. Although most exposures are mild, early identification can be critical for severe cases. Smartphone apps that use image recognition can serve as an alternative to traditional botanist identification. This study investigates the accuracy of smartphone applications compared to botanist identification in real-life plant exposure cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre. This prospective observational study analysed data from 25 plant exposure cases between February 2022 and January 2023. In these cases, images were referred to a botanist for identification and reviewed by six researchers using six different plant identification applications (Google Lens™, PictureThis, PlantSnap, LeafSnap, Plant Identifier, and Pl@ntnet™). The researchers’ identifications were then compared to the botanist’s identification. The accuracy of the applications varied considerably, PictureThis was the best, with 74% correct identification per exposure, followed by Plant Identifier and Pl@ntnet™ (both 72%). PlantSnap had the lowest accuracy (38%). Agreement between researchers using the same application also showed variation. Current smartphone plant identification applications are not reliable enough for poison information centres to use in guiding advice for plant exposure calls. Botanist identification remains the gold standard. Clinicians should be wary of their use in real-world scenarios.</abstract><cop>Macclesfield</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/24734306.2024.2377523</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-7923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3342-7812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-6841</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2473-4306 |
ispartof | Toxicology communications, 2024-12, Vol.8 (1) |
issn | 2473-4306 2473-4306 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4f635fcddb1a4f95a8073f3b2d2f4771 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Taylor & Francis Open Access Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Identification plant identification Poisonous species Poisons poisons information smartphone applications Smartphones Toxicology |
title | Accuracy of plant identification applications to identify plants in suspected poisoning cases referred to the Queensland Poisons Information Centre |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A53%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20plant%20identification%20applications%20to%20identify%20plants%20in%20suspected%20poisoning%20cases%20referred%20to%20the%20Queensland%20Poisons%20Information%20Centre&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20communications&rft.au=McNeill,%20Iain&rft.date=2024-12-31&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2473-4306&rft.eissn=2473-4306&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/24734306.2024.2377523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3150451964%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-2f21700c17db8db5eaf3f8e318ce0fd3eed155bbcc4726b59a151f4edd63ab003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3150451964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |