A systematic literature review of existing conceptualisation and measurement of mental health literacy in adolescent research: current challenges and inconsistencies

• Published in: BMC public health 2020-05, Vol.20 (1), p.607-607, Article 607
• Main Authors: Mansfield, Rosie, Patalay, Praveetha, Humphrey, Neil
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Addictive behaviors; Adolescent; Adolescents; Age; Attitudes; Child & adolescent mental health; Childhood mental disorders; Conceptualisation; Domains; Drug abuse; Health education; Health literacy; Health promotion; Homogeneity; Illnesses; Intervention; Knowledge; Literature reviews; Measurement; Medical research; Mental disorders; Mental health; Mental health care; Mental health literacy; Psychological aspects; Public health; Quantitative psychology; Researchers; Self help; Stigma; Studies; Systematic literature review; Systematic review; Teenagers
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08734-1

With an increased political interest in school-based mental health education, the dominant understanding and measurement of mental health literacy (MHL) in adolescent research should be critically appraised. This systematic literature review aimed to investigate the conceptualisation and measurement of MHL in adolescent research and the extent of methodological homogeneity in the field for meta-analyses. Databases (PsycINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, ASSIA and ERIC) and grey literature were searched (1997-2017). Included articles used the term 'mental health literacy' and presented self-report data for at least one MHL domain with an adolescent sample (10-19 years). Definitions, methodological and contextual data were extracted and synthesised. Ninety-one articles were identified. There was evidence of conceptual confusion, methodological inconsistency and a lack of measures developed and psychometrically tested with adolescents. The most commonly assessed domains were mental illness stigma and help-seeking beliefs; however, frequency of assessment varied by definition usage and study design. Recognition and knowledge of mental illnesses were assessed more frequently than help-seeking knowledge. A mental-ill health approach continues to dominate the field, with few articles assessing knowledge of mental health promotion. MHL research with adolescent samples is increasing. Results suggest that a better understanding of what MHL means for this population is needed in order to develop reliable, valid and feasible adolescent measures, and explore mechanisms for change in improving adolescent mental health. We recommend a move away from 'mental disorder literacy' and towards critical 'mental health literacy'. Future MHL research should apply integrated, culturally sensitive models of health literacy that account for life stage and acknowledge the interaction between individuals' ability and social and contextual demands.