Loading…
Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study
The LOw RISk DCIS (LORIS) study was set up to compare conventional surgical treatment with active monitoring in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Recruitment to trials with a surveillance arm is known to be challenging, so strategies to maximise patient recruitment, aimed at both patients...
Saved in:
Published in: | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine 2023-10, Vol.24 (1), p.670-670, Article 670 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e1afeb80c7799d1d5c80d2e6dbbde628f0ed8c567abbe81c1939bd360d69c8c33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e1afeb80c7799d1d5c80d2e6dbbde628f0ed8c567abbe81c1939bd360d69c8c33 |
container_end_page | 670 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 670 |
container_title | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Wheelwright, Sally Matthews, Lucy Jenkins, Valerie May, Shirley Rea, Daniel Fairbrother, Pat Gaunt, Claire Young, Jennie Pirrie, Sarah Wallis, Matthew G Fallowfield, Lesley |
description | The LOw RISk DCIS (LORIS) study was set up to compare conventional surgical treatment with active monitoring in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Recruitment to trials with a surveillance arm is known to be challenging, so strategies to maximise patient recruitment, aimed at both patients and recruiting centres, were implemented.
Women aged ≥ 46 years with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of non-high-grade DCIS were eligible for 1:1 randomisation to either surgery or active monitoring. Prior to randomisation, all eligible women were invited to complete: (1) the Clinical Trials Questionnaire (CTQ) examining reasons for or against participation, and (2) interviews exploring in depth opinions about the study information sheets and film. Women agreeing to randomisation completed validated questionnaires assessing health status, physical and mental health, and anxiety levels. Hospital site staff were invited to communication workshops and refresher site initiation visits to support recruitment. Their perspectives on LORIS recruitment were collected via surveys and interviews.
Eighty percent (181/227) of eligible women agreed to be randomised. Over 40% of participants had high anxiety levels at baseline. On the CTQ, the most frequent most important reasons for accepting randomisation were altruism and belief that the trial offered the best treatment, whilst worries about randomisation and the influences of others were the most frequent most important reasons for declining. Most women found the study information provided clear and useful. Communication workshops for site staff improved knowledge and confidence but only about half said they themselves would join LORIS if eligible. The most common recruitment barriers identified by staff were low numbers of eligible patients and patient preference.
Recruitment to LORIS was challenging despite strategies aimed at both patients and site staff. Ensuring that recruiting staff support the study could improve recruitment in similar future trials.
ISRCTN27544579, prospectively registered on 22 May 2014. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_503fbba1f83546d5b5e97ab96d86990c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A768980792</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_503fbba1f83546d5b5e97ab96d86990c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A768980792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e1afeb80c7799d1d5c80d2e6dbbde628f0ed8c567abbe81c1939bd360d69c8c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbF39A15IwBtvtiaTyZc3UoofCwuFqtchk5zZzTKT1CRj6b833a21KxJCDifvecI5eZvmNcFnhEj-PhOKOV3itm4hMF12T5pTIjq25C1hTx_FJ82LnHcYd1TR7nlzQoWkksv2tJmuwKbZFx826CZOENCNL1vkZlvMiKxJ1oc4GeQDyr7MqERkUDLBxclncMjGUFIcxxqW5M34AY2QcwwZDSlOqGwBrS-vVt9QLrO7fdk8G8yY4dX9uWh-fP70_eLrcn35ZXVxvl5axruyBGIG6CW2QijliGNWYtcCd33vgLdywOBklQrT9yCJJYqq3lGOHVdWWkoXzerAddHs9HXyk0m3Ohqv94mYNtqk4u0ImmE69L0hg6Ss4471DFTlKu4kVwrbyvp4YF3P_QTOQm3YjEfQ45vgt3oTf2mCmeC08hfNu3tCij9nyEXX2VkYRxMgzlm3UgiqCBasSt_-I93FOYU6q70KU0YV_qvamNqBD0OsD9s7qD4XXCqJhWqr6uw_qrocTL7-Gwy-5o8K2kOBTTHnBMNDkwTrO8fpg-N0dZzeO053tejN4_E8lPyxGP0N3THR4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2877035390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study</title><source>PubMed Central(OA)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Wheelwright, Sally ; Matthews, Lucy ; Jenkins, Valerie ; May, Shirley ; Rea, Daniel ; Fairbrother, Pat ; Gaunt, Claire ; Young, Jennie ; Pirrie, Sarah ; Wallis, Matthew G ; Fallowfield, Lesley</creator><creatorcontrib>Wheelwright, Sally ; Matthews, Lucy ; Jenkins, Valerie ; May, Shirley ; Rea, Daniel ; Fairbrother, Pat ; Gaunt, Claire ; Young, Jennie ; Pirrie, Sarah ; Wallis, Matthew G ; Fallowfield, Lesley ; LORIS Trial Management Group ; on behalf of the LORIS Trial Management Group</creatorcontrib><description>The LOw RISk DCIS (LORIS) study was set up to compare conventional surgical treatment with active monitoring in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Recruitment to trials with a surveillance arm is known to be challenging, so strategies to maximise patient recruitment, aimed at both patients and recruiting centres, were implemented.
Women aged ≥ 46 years with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of non-high-grade DCIS were eligible for 1:1 randomisation to either surgery or active monitoring. Prior to randomisation, all eligible women were invited to complete: (1) the Clinical Trials Questionnaire (CTQ) examining reasons for or against participation, and (2) interviews exploring in depth opinions about the study information sheets and film. Women agreeing to randomisation completed validated questionnaires assessing health status, physical and mental health, and anxiety levels. Hospital site staff were invited to communication workshops and refresher site initiation visits to support recruitment. Their perspectives on LORIS recruitment were collected via surveys and interviews.
Eighty percent (181/227) of eligible women agreed to be randomised. Over 40% of participants had high anxiety levels at baseline. On the CTQ, the most frequent most important reasons for accepting randomisation were altruism and belief that the trial offered the best treatment, whilst worries about randomisation and the influences of others were the most frequent most important reasons for declining. Most women found the study information provided clear and useful. Communication workshops for site staff improved knowledge and confidence but only about half said they themselves would join LORIS if eligible. The most common recruitment barriers identified by staff were low numbers of eligible patients and patient preference.
Recruitment to LORIS was challenging despite strategies aimed at both patients and site staff. Ensuring that recruiting staff support the study could improve recruitment in similar future trials.
ISRCTN27544579, prospectively registered on 22 May 2014.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37838682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anxiety ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Carcinoma, Ductal ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; Consent ; DCIS ; Decision making ; Diagnosis ; Endocrine therapy ; Female ; Health Status ; Health surveys ; Humans ; Interviews ; LORIS ; Mammography ; Medical prognosis ; Medical screening ; Middle Aged ; Participation ; Patient interviews ; Patient preference ; Patient Selection ; Patients ; Personal preferences (Social sciences) ; Questionnaires ; Randomisation ; Registration ; Surgery ; Trials ; Womens health ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine, 2023-10, Vol.24 (1), p.670-670, Article 670</ispartof><rights>2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e1afeb80c7799d1d5c80d2e6dbbde628f0ed8c567abbe81c1939bd360d69c8c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e1afeb80c7799d1d5c80d2e6dbbde628f0ed8c567abbe81c1939bd360d69c8c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0657-2483</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576350/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576350/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37838682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wheelwright, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rea, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairbrother, Pat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunt, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Jennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirrie, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallowfield, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LORIS Trial Management Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the LORIS Trial Management Group</creatorcontrib><title>Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study</title><title>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine</title><addtitle>Trials</addtitle><description>The LOw RISk DCIS (LORIS) study was set up to compare conventional surgical treatment with active monitoring in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Recruitment to trials with a surveillance arm is known to be challenging, so strategies to maximise patient recruitment, aimed at both patients and recruiting centres, were implemented.
Women aged ≥ 46 years with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of non-high-grade DCIS were eligible for 1:1 randomisation to either surgery or active monitoring. Prior to randomisation, all eligible women were invited to complete: (1) the Clinical Trials Questionnaire (CTQ) examining reasons for or against participation, and (2) interviews exploring in depth opinions about the study information sheets and film. Women agreeing to randomisation completed validated questionnaires assessing health status, physical and mental health, and anxiety levels. Hospital site staff were invited to communication workshops and refresher site initiation visits to support recruitment. Their perspectives on LORIS recruitment were collected via surveys and interviews.
Eighty percent (181/227) of eligible women agreed to be randomised. Over 40% of participants had high anxiety levels at baseline. On the CTQ, the most frequent most important reasons for accepting randomisation were altruism and belief that the trial offered the best treatment, whilst worries about randomisation and the influences of others were the most frequent most important reasons for declining. Most women found the study information provided clear and useful. Communication workshops for site staff improved knowledge and confidence but only about half said they themselves would join LORIS if eligible. The most common recruitment barriers identified by staff were low numbers of eligible patients and patient preference.
Recruitment to LORIS was challenging despite strategies aimed at both patients and site staff. Ensuring that recruiting staff support the study could improve recruitment in similar future trials.
ISRCTN27544579, prospectively registered on 22 May 2014.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>DCIS</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Endocrine therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>LORIS</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patient interviews</subject><subject>Patient preference</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Personal preferences (Social sciences)</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Randomisation</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>1745-6215</issn><issn>1745-6215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbF39A15IwBtvtiaTyZc3UoofCwuFqtchk5zZzTKT1CRj6b833a21KxJCDifvecI5eZvmNcFnhEj-PhOKOV3itm4hMF12T5pTIjq25C1hTx_FJ82LnHcYd1TR7nlzQoWkksv2tJmuwKbZFx826CZOENCNL1vkZlvMiKxJ1oc4GeQDyr7MqERkUDLBxclncMjGUFIcxxqW5M34AY2QcwwZDSlOqGwBrS-vVt9QLrO7fdk8G8yY4dX9uWh-fP70_eLrcn35ZXVxvl5axruyBGIG6CW2QijliGNWYtcCd33vgLdywOBklQrT9yCJJYqq3lGOHVdWWkoXzerAddHs9HXyk0m3Ohqv94mYNtqk4u0ImmE69L0hg6Ss4471DFTlKu4kVwrbyvp4YF3P_QTOQm3YjEfQ45vgt3oTf2mCmeC08hfNu3tCij9nyEXX2VkYRxMgzlm3UgiqCBasSt_-I93FOYU6q70KU0YV_qvamNqBD0OsD9s7qD4XXCqJhWqr6uw_qrocTL7-Gwy-5o8K2kOBTTHnBMNDkwTrO8fpg-N0dZzeO053tejN4_E8lPyxGP0N3THR4w</recordid><startdate>20231014</startdate><enddate>20231014</enddate><creator>Wheelwright, Sally</creator><creator>Matthews, Lucy</creator><creator>Jenkins, Valerie</creator><creator>May, Shirley</creator><creator>Rea, Daniel</creator><creator>Fairbrother, Pat</creator><creator>Gaunt, Claire</creator><creator>Young, Jennie</creator><creator>Pirrie, Sarah</creator><creator>Wallis, Matthew G</creator><creator>Fallowfield, Lesley</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-2483</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231014</creationdate><title>Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study</title><author>Wheelwright, Sally ; Matthews, Lucy ; Jenkins, Valerie ; May, Shirley ; Rea, Daniel ; Fairbrother, Pat ; Gaunt, Claire ; Young, Jennie ; Pirrie, Sarah ; Wallis, Matthew G ; Fallowfield, Lesley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e1afeb80c7799d1d5c80d2e6dbbde628f0ed8c567abbe81c1939bd360d69c8c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>DCIS</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Endocrine therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>LORIS</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patient interviews</topic><topic>Patient preference</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Personal preferences (Social sciences)</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Randomisation</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wheelwright, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rea, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairbrother, Pat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunt, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Jennie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirrie, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallis, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fallowfield, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LORIS Trial Management Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of the LORIS Trial Management Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wheelwright, Sally</au><au>Matthews, Lucy</au><au>Jenkins, Valerie</au><au>May, Shirley</au><au>Rea, Daniel</au><au>Fairbrother, Pat</au><au>Gaunt, Claire</au><au>Young, Jennie</au><au>Pirrie, Sarah</au><au>Wallis, Matthew G</au><au>Fallowfield, Lesley</au><aucorp>LORIS Trial Management Group</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of the LORIS Trial Management Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study</atitle><jtitle>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Trials</addtitle><date>2023-10-14</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>670</epage><pages>670-670</pages><artnum>670</artnum><issn>1745-6215</issn><eissn>1745-6215</eissn><abstract>The LOw RISk DCIS (LORIS) study was set up to compare conventional surgical treatment with active monitoring in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Recruitment to trials with a surveillance arm is known to be challenging, so strategies to maximise patient recruitment, aimed at both patients and recruiting centres, were implemented.
Women aged ≥ 46 years with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of non-high-grade DCIS were eligible for 1:1 randomisation to either surgery or active monitoring. Prior to randomisation, all eligible women were invited to complete: (1) the Clinical Trials Questionnaire (CTQ) examining reasons for or against participation, and (2) interviews exploring in depth opinions about the study information sheets and film. Women agreeing to randomisation completed validated questionnaires assessing health status, physical and mental health, and anxiety levels. Hospital site staff were invited to communication workshops and refresher site initiation visits to support recruitment. Their perspectives on LORIS recruitment were collected via surveys and interviews.
Eighty percent (181/227) of eligible women agreed to be randomised. Over 40% of participants had high anxiety levels at baseline. On the CTQ, the most frequent most important reasons for accepting randomisation were altruism and belief that the trial offered the best treatment, whilst worries about randomisation and the influences of others were the most frequent most important reasons for declining. Most women found the study information provided clear and useful. Communication workshops for site staff improved knowledge and confidence but only about half said they themselves would join LORIS if eligible. The most common recruitment barriers identified by staff were low numbers of eligible patients and patient preference.
Recruitment to LORIS was challenging despite strategies aimed at both patients and site staff. Ensuring that recruiting staff support the study could improve recruitment in similar future trials.
ISRCTN27544579, prospectively registered on 22 May 2014.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>37838682</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-2483</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1745-6215 |
ispartof | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine, 2023-10, Vol.24 (1), p.670-670, Article 670 |
issn | 1745-6215 1745-6215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_503fbba1f83546d5b5e97ab96d86990c |
source | PubMed Central(OA); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Analysis Anxiety Biopsy Breast cancer Cancer Carcinoma, Ductal Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - diagnosis Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - surgery Care and treatment Clinical trials Consent DCIS Decision making Diagnosis Endocrine therapy Female Health Status Health surveys Humans Interviews LORIS Mammography Medical prognosis Medical screening Middle Aged Participation Patient interviews Patient preference Patient Selection Patients Personal preferences (Social sciences) Questionnaires Randomisation Registration Surgery Trials Womens health Workshops |
title | Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A54%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recruiting%20women%20with%20ductal%20carcinoma%20in%20situ%20to%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial:%20lessons%20from%20the%20LORIS%20study&rft.jtitle=Current%20controlled%20trials%20in%20cardiovascular%20medicine&rft.au=Wheelwright,%20Sally&rft.aucorp=LORIS%20Trial%20Management%20Group&rft.date=2023-10-14&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=670&rft.pages=670-670&rft.artnum=670&rft.issn=1745-6215&rft.eissn=1745-6215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA768980792%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-e1afeb80c7799d1d5c80d2e6dbbde628f0ed8c567abbe81c1939bd360d69c8c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2877035390&rft_id=info:pmid/37838682&rft_galeid=A768980792&rfr_iscdi=true |