Loading…
Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy
This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Breast (Edinburgh) 2023-10, Vol.71, p.69-73 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223 |
container_end_page | 73 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | Breast (Edinburgh) |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Chen, Wei Li, Fen-Xiang Lu, Da-Lin Jiang, Jun Li, Junjie |
description | This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) BC.
A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and pathological data of patients with confirmed diagnoses of invasive BC treated via combined NAC and dual-target therapy who underwent surgery at the Breast Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. The correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed via the χ2 test, while logistic regression was performed using the SAS 9.4 statistical analysis software.
This study examined 224 patients with an overall pCR rate of approximately 59.82%, which included 36 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and 188 IHC(3+) cases with approximate pCR rates of 41.67% and 63.30%, respectively. Univariate and multifactorial analysis of the clinical and pathological data determined that age, menstrual status, family history, Ki67 expression, number of treatment cycles, and treatment regimen did not influence pCR. No statistical differences were evident between the univariate and multivariate models. However, the clinical stage, hormone receptor, and HER2 expression status significantly impacted pCR, with considerable consistent differences between the univariate and multifactor analyses.
HER2 IHC(3+) BC displays a higher pCR rate than HER2 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive BC (p ≤ 0.05), with a positive correlation between the HER2 protein expression levels and the response to anti-HER2 therapy.
•Different HER2 expression levels display different therapeutic responses.•The Ki67 expression level, menstrual status, age, and neoadjuvant therapy (EC-THP vs. TCbHP) are not independent pCR rate factors.•The clinical stage, HR, and HER2 expression status are significantly independent influencing factors for pCR. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_512c4f2edc434bcebe0d9a65e3252231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960977623005313</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_512c4f2edc434bcebe0d9a65e3252231</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2844091257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIREPhHyC0x1bVpuOP_bpQodKSSJWQ-Dhbs_Y4dbTZDbYTlBN_HYctFb1wGtnzzjOjdybL3jKYM2DV5XreecIQ5xy4mEM9B2ieZTNWCl4IaOB5NoO2gqKt6-okexXCGgBaUTUvsxNRl6xmZTnLfn101pKnQVPIO4o_iYY83lNO1jqN-pCPNl_cfOFn_OL88nb5dVFsx-Ci21OOg5lS4uI8d0M-zZNrTDCfm513wyoF7IuIfkUxH2hEs97tcYjHHh63h9fZC4t9oDcP8TT7fnvz7XpR3H3-tLz-cFfoUkAsrJSmgtY2Ddq25WVFBhmCEA2mV9tQRRYlCdmCtIZJKzvTGd1x0JXsOBen2XLimhHXauvdBv1BjejUn4_RrxT66HRPqmRcS8vJaClkp6kjMC1WJQleJhJLrKuJtd11mySjIXrsn0CfZgZ3r1bjXjGQaQUAiXD2QPDjjx2FqDYuaOp7TBbtguKNlNAyXtZJKiep9mMInuxjHwbqeAhqrSbj1fEQFNQqHUIqe_fvjI9FfzefBO8nASXX9468Ctodz8A4TzomW9z_O_wG7IXGdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2844091257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chen, Wei ; Li, Fen-Xiang ; Lu, Da-Lin ; Jiang, Jun ; Li, Junjie</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei ; Li, Fen-Xiang ; Lu, Da-Lin ; Jiang, Jun ; Li, Junjie</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) BC.
A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and pathological data of patients with confirmed diagnoses of invasive BC treated via combined NAC and dual-target therapy who underwent surgery at the Breast Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. The correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed via the χ2 test, while logistic regression was performed using the SAS 9.4 statistical analysis software.
This study examined 224 patients with an overall pCR rate of approximately 59.82%, which included 36 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and 188 IHC(3+) cases with approximate pCR rates of 41.67% and 63.30%, respectively. Univariate and multifactorial analysis of the clinical and pathological data determined that age, menstrual status, family history, Ki67 expression, number of treatment cycles, and treatment regimen did not influence pCR. No statistical differences were evident between the univariate and multivariate models. However, the clinical stage, hormone receptor, and HER2 expression status significantly impacted pCR, with considerable consistent differences between the univariate and multifactor analyses.
HER2 IHC(3+) BC displays a higher pCR rate than HER2 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive BC (p ≤ 0.05), with a positive correlation between the HER2 protein expression levels and the response to anti-HER2 therapy.
•Different HER2 expression levels display different therapeutic responses.•The Ki67 expression level, menstrual status, age, and neoadjuvant therapy (EC-THP vs. TCbHP) are not independent pCR rate factors.•The clinical stage, HR, and HER2 expression status are significantly independent influencing factors for pCR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9776</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37517155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Clinicopathological features ; Female ; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant dual-targeted therapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Original ; Pathological complete response ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism ; Retrospective Studies ; Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Breast (Edinburgh), 2023-10, Vol.71, p.69-73</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4857-2908 ; 0000-0003-4510-8261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10400900/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10400900/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37517155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fen-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Da-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junjie</creatorcontrib><title>Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy</title><title>Breast (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><description>This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) BC.
A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and pathological data of patients with confirmed diagnoses of invasive BC treated via combined NAC and dual-target therapy who underwent surgery at the Breast Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. The correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed via the χ2 test, while logistic regression was performed using the SAS 9.4 statistical analysis software.
This study examined 224 patients with an overall pCR rate of approximately 59.82%, which included 36 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and 188 IHC(3+) cases with approximate pCR rates of 41.67% and 63.30%, respectively. Univariate and multifactorial analysis of the clinical and pathological data determined that age, menstrual status, family history, Ki67 expression, number of treatment cycles, and treatment regimen did not influence pCR. No statistical differences were evident between the univariate and multivariate models. However, the clinical stage, hormone receptor, and HER2 expression status significantly impacted pCR, with considerable consistent differences between the univariate and multifactor analyses.
HER2 IHC(3+) BC displays a higher pCR rate than HER2 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive BC (p ≤ 0.05), with a positive correlation between the HER2 protein expression levels and the response to anti-HER2 therapy.
•Different HER2 expression levels display different therapeutic responses.•The Ki67 expression level, menstrual status, age, and neoadjuvant therapy (EC-THP vs. TCbHP) are not independent pCR rate factors.•The clinical stage, HR, and HER2 expression status are significantly independent influencing factors for pCR.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Clinicopathological features</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant dual-targeted therapy</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pathological complete response</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIREPhHyC0x1bVpuOP_bpQodKSSJWQ-Dhbs_Y4dbTZDbYTlBN_HYctFb1wGtnzzjOjdybL3jKYM2DV5XreecIQ5xy4mEM9B2ieZTNWCl4IaOB5NoO2gqKt6-okexXCGgBaUTUvsxNRl6xmZTnLfn101pKnQVPIO4o_iYY83lNO1jqN-pCPNl_cfOFn_OL88nb5dVFsx-Ci21OOg5lS4uI8d0M-zZNrTDCfm513wyoF7IuIfkUxH2hEs97tcYjHHh63h9fZC4t9oDcP8TT7fnvz7XpR3H3-tLz-cFfoUkAsrJSmgtY2Ddq25WVFBhmCEA2mV9tQRRYlCdmCtIZJKzvTGd1x0JXsOBen2XLimhHXauvdBv1BjejUn4_RrxT66HRPqmRcS8vJaClkp6kjMC1WJQleJhJLrKuJtd11mySjIXrsn0CfZgZ3r1bjXjGQaQUAiXD2QPDjjx2FqDYuaOp7TBbtguKNlNAyXtZJKiep9mMInuxjHwbqeAhqrSbj1fEQFNQqHUIqe_fvjI9FfzefBO8nASXX9468Ctodz8A4TzomW9z_O_wG7IXGdA</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Chen, Wei</creator><creator>Li, Fen-Xiang</creator><creator>Lu, Da-Lin</creator><creator>Jiang, Jun</creator><creator>Li, Junjie</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-2908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4510-8261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy</title><author>Chen, Wei ; Li, Fen-Xiang ; Lu, Da-Lin ; Jiang, Jun ; Li, Junjie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Clinicopathological features</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant dual-targeted therapy</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pathological complete response</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fen-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Da-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junjie</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Wei</au><au>Li, Fen-Xiang</au><au>Lu, Da-Lin</au><au>Jiang, Jun</au><au>Li, Junjie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy</atitle><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>69</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>69-73</pages><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><eissn>1532-3080</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) BC.
A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and pathological data of patients with confirmed diagnoses of invasive BC treated via combined NAC and dual-target therapy who underwent surgery at the Breast Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. The correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed via the χ2 test, while logistic regression was performed using the SAS 9.4 statistical analysis software.
This study examined 224 patients with an overall pCR rate of approximately 59.82%, which included 36 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and 188 IHC(3+) cases with approximate pCR rates of 41.67% and 63.30%, respectively. Univariate and multifactorial analysis of the clinical and pathological data determined that age, menstrual status, family history, Ki67 expression, number of treatment cycles, and treatment regimen did not influence pCR. No statistical differences were evident between the univariate and multivariate models. However, the clinical stage, hormone receptor, and HER2 expression status significantly impacted pCR, with considerable consistent differences between the univariate and multifactor analyses.
HER2 IHC(3+) BC displays a higher pCR rate than HER2 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive BC (p ≤ 0.05), with a positive correlation between the HER2 protein expression levels and the response to anti-HER2 therapy.
•Different HER2 expression levels display different therapeutic responses.•The Ki67 expression level, menstrual status, age, and neoadjuvant therapy (EC-THP vs. TCbHP) are not independent pCR rate factors.•The clinical stage, HR, and HER2 expression status are significantly independent influencing factors for pCR.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37517155</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.008</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-2908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4510-8261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-9776 |
ispartof | Breast (Edinburgh), 2023-10, Vol.71, p.69-73 |
issn | 0960-9776 1532-3080 1532-3080 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_512c4f2edc434bcebe0d9a65e3252231 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Breast Neoplasms - therapy Clinicopathological features Female Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer Humans Neoadjuvant dual-targeted therapy Neoadjuvant Therapy Original Pathological complete response Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism Retrospective Studies Trastuzumab - therapeutic use |
title | Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A55%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20between%20the%20efficacy%20of%20HER2(2+)/FISH-positive%20and%20HER2(3+)%20in%20breast%20cancer%20during%20dual-target%20neoadjuvant%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Breast%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Chen,%20Wei&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=69-73&rft.issn=0960-9776&rft.eissn=1532-3080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2844091257%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2844091257&rft_id=info:pmid/37517155&rfr_iscdi=true |