Loading…

Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy

This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Breast (Edinburgh) 2023-10, Vol.71, p.69-73
Main Authors: Chen, Wei, Li, Fen-Xiang, Lu, Da-Lin, Jiang, Jun, Li, Junjie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223
container_end_page 73
container_issue
container_start_page 69
container_title Breast (Edinburgh)
container_volume 71
creator Chen, Wei
Li, Fen-Xiang
Lu, Da-Lin
Jiang, Jun
Li, Junjie
description This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) BC. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and pathological data of patients with confirmed diagnoses of invasive BC treated via combined NAC and dual-target therapy who underwent surgery at the Breast Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. The correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed via the χ2 test, while logistic regression was performed using the SAS 9.4 statistical analysis software. This study examined 224 patients with an overall pCR rate of approximately 59.82%, which included 36 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and 188 IHC(3+) cases with approximate pCR rates of 41.67% and 63.30%, respectively. Univariate and multifactorial analysis of the clinical and pathological data determined that age, menstrual status, family history, Ki67 expression, number of treatment cycles, and treatment regimen did not influence pCR. No statistical differences were evident between the univariate and multivariate models. However, the clinical stage, hormone receptor, and HER2 expression status significantly impacted pCR, with considerable consistent differences between the univariate and multifactor analyses. HER2 IHC(3+) BC displays a higher pCR rate than HER2 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive BC (p ≤ 0.05), with a positive correlation between the HER2 protein expression levels and the response to anti-HER2 therapy. •Different HER2 expression levels display different therapeutic responses.•The Ki67 expression level, menstrual status, age, and neoadjuvant therapy (EC-THP vs. TCbHP) are not independent pCR rate factors.•The clinical stage, HR, and HER2 expression status are significantly independent influencing factors for pCR.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_512c4f2edc434bcebe0d9a65e3252231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960977623005313</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_512c4f2edc434bcebe0d9a65e3252231</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2844091257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIREPhHyC0x1bVpuOP_bpQodKSSJWQ-Dhbs_Y4dbTZDbYTlBN_HYctFb1wGtnzzjOjdybL3jKYM2DV5XreecIQ5xy4mEM9B2ieZTNWCl4IaOB5NoO2gqKt6-okexXCGgBaUTUvsxNRl6xmZTnLfn101pKnQVPIO4o_iYY83lNO1jqN-pCPNl_cfOFn_OL88nb5dVFsx-Ci21OOg5lS4uI8d0M-zZNrTDCfm513wyoF7IuIfkUxH2hEs97tcYjHHh63h9fZC4t9oDcP8TT7fnvz7XpR3H3-tLz-cFfoUkAsrJSmgtY2Ddq25WVFBhmCEA2mV9tQRRYlCdmCtIZJKzvTGd1x0JXsOBen2XLimhHXauvdBv1BjejUn4_RrxT66HRPqmRcS8vJaClkp6kjMC1WJQleJhJLrKuJtd11mySjIXrsn0CfZgZ3r1bjXjGQaQUAiXD2QPDjjx2FqDYuaOp7TBbtguKNlNAyXtZJKiep9mMInuxjHwbqeAhqrSbj1fEQFNQqHUIqe_fvjI9FfzefBO8nASXX9468Ctodz8A4TzomW9z_O_wG7IXGdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2844091257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chen, Wei ; Li, Fen-Xiang ; Lu, Da-Lin ; Jiang, Jun ; Li, Junjie</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei ; Li, Fen-Xiang ; Lu, Da-Lin ; Jiang, Jun ; Li, Junjie</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) BC. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and pathological data of patients with confirmed diagnoses of invasive BC treated via combined NAC and dual-target therapy who underwent surgery at the Breast Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. The correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed via the χ2 test, while logistic regression was performed using the SAS 9.4 statistical analysis software. This study examined 224 patients with an overall pCR rate of approximately 59.82%, which included 36 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and 188 IHC(3+) cases with approximate pCR rates of 41.67% and 63.30%, respectively. Univariate and multifactorial analysis of the clinical and pathological data determined that age, menstrual status, family history, Ki67 expression, number of treatment cycles, and treatment regimen did not influence pCR. No statistical differences were evident between the univariate and multivariate models. However, the clinical stage, hormone receptor, and HER2 expression status significantly impacted pCR, with considerable consistent differences between the univariate and multifactor analyses. HER2 IHC(3+) BC displays a higher pCR rate than HER2 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive BC (p ≤ 0.05), with a positive correlation between the HER2 protein expression levels and the response to anti-HER2 therapy. •Different HER2 expression levels display different therapeutic responses.•The Ki67 expression level, menstrual status, age, and neoadjuvant therapy (EC-THP vs. TCbHP) are not independent pCR rate factors.•The clinical stage, HR, and HER2 expression status are significantly independent influencing factors for pCR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9776</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37517155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Clinicopathological features ; Female ; Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer ; Humans ; Neoadjuvant dual-targeted therapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Original ; Pathological complete response ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism ; Retrospective Studies ; Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Breast (Edinburgh), 2023-10, Vol.71, p.69-73</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4857-2908 ; 0000-0003-4510-8261</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10400900/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10400900/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37517155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fen-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Da-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junjie</creatorcontrib><title>Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy</title><title>Breast (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><description>This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) BC. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and pathological data of patients with confirmed diagnoses of invasive BC treated via combined NAC and dual-target therapy who underwent surgery at the Breast Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. The correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed via the χ2 test, while logistic regression was performed using the SAS 9.4 statistical analysis software. This study examined 224 patients with an overall pCR rate of approximately 59.82%, which included 36 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and 188 IHC(3+) cases with approximate pCR rates of 41.67% and 63.30%, respectively. Univariate and multifactorial analysis of the clinical and pathological data determined that age, menstrual status, family history, Ki67 expression, number of treatment cycles, and treatment regimen did not influence pCR. No statistical differences were evident between the univariate and multivariate models. However, the clinical stage, hormone receptor, and HER2 expression status significantly impacted pCR, with considerable consistent differences between the univariate and multifactor analyses. HER2 IHC(3+) BC displays a higher pCR rate than HER2 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive BC (p ≤ 0.05), with a positive correlation between the HER2 protein expression levels and the response to anti-HER2 therapy. •Different HER2 expression levels display different therapeutic responses.•The Ki67 expression level, menstrual status, age, and neoadjuvant therapy (EC-THP vs. TCbHP) are not independent pCR rate factors.•The clinical stage, HR, and HER2 expression status are significantly independent influencing factors for pCR.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Clinicopathological features</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant dual-targeted therapy</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pathological complete response</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIREPhHyC0x1bVpuOP_bpQodKSSJWQ-Dhbs_Y4dbTZDbYTlBN_HYctFb1wGtnzzjOjdybL3jKYM2DV5XreecIQ5xy4mEM9B2ieZTNWCl4IaOB5NoO2gqKt6-okexXCGgBaUTUvsxNRl6xmZTnLfn101pKnQVPIO4o_iYY83lNO1jqN-pCPNl_cfOFn_OL88nb5dVFsx-Ci21OOg5lS4uI8d0M-zZNrTDCfm513wyoF7IuIfkUxH2hEs97tcYjHHh63h9fZC4t9oDcP8TT7fnvz7XpR3H3-tLz-cFfoUkAsrJSmgtY2Ddq25WVFBhmCEA2mV9tQRRYlCdmCtIZJKzvTGd1x0JXsOBen2XLimhHXauvdBv1BjejUn4_RrxT66HRPqmRcS8vJaClkp6kjMC1WJQleJhJLrKuJtd11mySjIXrsn0CfZgZ3r1bjXjGQaQUAiXD2QPDjjx2FqDYuaOp7TBbtguKNlNAyXtZJKiep9mMInuxjHwbqeAhqrSbj1fEQFNQqHUIqe_fvjI9FfzefBO8nASXX9468Ctodz8A4TzomW9z_O_wG7IXGdA</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Chen, Wei</creator><creator>Li, Fen-Xiang</creator><creator>Lu, Da-Lin</creator><creator>Jiang, Jun</creator><creator>Li, Junjie</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-2908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4510-8261</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy</title><author>Chen, Wei ; Li, Fen-Xiang ; Lu, Da-Lin ; Jiang, Jun ; Li, Junjie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Clinicopathological features</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant dual-targeted therapy</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pathological complete response</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Trastuzumab - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fen-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Da-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Junjie</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Wei</au><au>Li, Fen-Xiang</au><au>Lu, Da-Lin</au><au>Jiang, Jun</au><au>Li, Junjie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy</atitle><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>69</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>69-73</pages><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><eissn>1532-3080</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the differences in efficacy between IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and IHC(3+) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The research also aimed to provide insight into treatment strategies for clinical HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) BC. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical and pathological data of patients with confirmed diagnoses of invasive BC treated via combined NAC and dual-target therapy who underwent surgery at the Breast Surgery Center of Sichuan Cancer Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. The correlation between the clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response (pCR) was analyzed via the χ2 test, while logistic regression was performed using the SAS 9.4 statistical analysis software. This study examined 224 patients with an overall pCR rate of approximately 59.82%, which included 36 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive and 188 IHC(3+) cases with approximate pCR rates of 41.67% and 63.30%, respectively. Univariate and multifactorial analysis of the clinical and pathological data determined that age, menstrual status, family history, Ki67 expression, number of treatment cycles, and treatment regimen did not influence pCR. No statistical differences were evident between the univariate and multivariate models. However, the clinical stage, hormone receptor, and HER2 expression status significantly impacted pCR, with considerable consistent differences between the univariate and multifactor analyses. HER2 IHC(3+) BC displays a higher pCR rate than HER2 IHC(2+)/FISH-positive BC (p ≤ 0.05), with a positive correlation between the HER2 protein expression levels and the response to anti-HER2 therapy. •Different HER2 expression levels display different therapeutic responses.•The Ki67 expression level, menstrual status, age, and neoadjuvant therapy (EC-THP vs. TCbHP) are not independent pCR rate factors.•The clinical stage, HR, and HER2 expression status are significantly independent influencing factors for pCR.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37517155</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.008</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4857-2908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4510-8261</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-9776
ispartof Breast (Edinburgh), 2023-10, Vol.71, p.69-73
issn 0960-9776
1532-3080
1532-3080
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_512c4f2edc434bcebe0d9a65e3252231
source ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Clinicopathological features
Female
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer
Humans
Neoadjuvant dual-targeted therapy
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Original
Pathological complete response
Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism
Retrospective Studies
Trastuzumab - therapeutic use
title Differences between the efficacy of HER2(2+)/FISH-positive and HER2(3+) in breast cancer during dual-target neoadjuvant therapy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A55%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20between%20the%20efficacy%20of%20HER2(2+)/FISH-positive%20and%20HER2(3+)%20in%20breast%20cancer%20during%20dual-target%20neoadjuvant%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Breast%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Chen,%20Wei&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=69-73&rft.issn=0960-9776&rft.eissn=1532-3080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2844091257%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-f44d609f88af99256eda1a0338a92598e6efa4e34904fd14f4bdbdcb20c64b223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2844091257&rft_id=info:pmid/37517155&rfr_iscdi=true