Loading…
Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty
Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the f...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2020-07, Vol.21 (1), p.498-498, Article 498 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03 |
container_end_page | 498 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 498 |
container_title | BMC musculoskeletal disorders |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Miyasaka, Teruyuki Saito, Mitsuru Kurosaka, Daisaburo Ikeda, Ryo Yamanaka, Shoki Marumo, Keishi |
description | Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the final FC rotation, although intraoperative confirmation may be challenging. Therefore, rotational position is frequently determined with the posterior condylar axis (PCA) as a landmark. However, the thickness of the posterior condylar cartilage has not been considered and may not be represented on preoperative images. We used plain X-rays to measure the thickness of the medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage fragments postoperatively, and investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation.
Fifty knees (19 men, 31 women) underwent primary TKA to treat medial knee osteoarthritis at our hospital between August 2015 and May 2017. All knees were treated using an Attune PS (DePuy Synthes, Inc., Warsaw, IN). We first measured the distance between the posterior femoral condyles, resected the posterior condyle, and measured the thickness of the resected cartilage fragments. We then took X-ray images from a direction tangential to the osteotomy surface, secured the cartilage fragments with digital calipers, and measured the thickness of the cartilage. We investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation of the residual medial and lateral cartilage with a trigonometric function.
Medial condylar cartilage thickness averaged 0.6 ± 0.5 mm and the lateral condylar thickness averaged 1.8 ± 0.6 mm; posterior intercondylar distance averaged 46.1 ± 3.3 mm and average impact on rotation of the cartilage remnant was 1.5 ± 0.9° (- 0.1-3.9°). There may be measurement error of up to 4° in the maximum values compared with the preoperative plan in cases with short intercondylar distance.
In cases where the FC external rotation angle is determined using the posterior condyles as landmarks, this angle can be affected by the intercondylar distance, especially in Japanese women who have small physical stature. This angle can potentially be much larger, so caution is advised. Our results suggest that several anatomical landmarks should be referenced to achieve accurate FC rotation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12891-020-03537-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51517a7cb9684c06ac9fa188bfa1d304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A631907539</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_51517a7cb9684c06ac9fa188bfa1d304</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A631907539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9uFCEUxidGY2v1Bbwwk3jTm6n8GQa4MWkaq5s08UavCcPAlnUGRmBN9il8Zc9063bXGBI4ge_8yAdfVb3F6Apj0X3ImAiJG0RQgyijvCHPqnPcctyQlrfPj-qz6lXOG4QwF1S-rM4o4YRSjM6r36tp1qbU0dVzzMUmH1Pt7BSTHmsTw7AbdaqNTsWPem1rHYYjoQ9QHFSDz0UHY-sY6hSLLh4KAD_hpjkGGwr01QUEY_0jWGCmcp_iPOpcdq-rF06P2b55XC-q77efvt18ae6-fl7dXN81piOyNB3XiIrWCAGGnDGot1zqQeCeSUYGjgmXTDAtKCg5dp3ocDt0TDsusesRvahWe-4Q9UbNyU867VTUXj1sxLRWi2czWsUwwwAxvezgRtRpI53GQvQwDxS1wPq4Z83bfrKDAYdg9wR6ehL8vVrHX4pTIRgiALh8BKT4c2tzUZPPxo6jDjZusyItES2WFEmQvv9HuonbFOCpQEUZJkRS8aRaazDgg4twr1mg6rqjWCLO6MK6-o8KxmAnD79qnYf9kwaybzAp5pysO3jESC2RVPtIKoikeoikWsy9O36dQ8vfDNI_Mw_d3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435122938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Miyasaka, Teruyuki ; Saito, Mitsuru ; Kurosaka, Daisaburo ; Ikeda, Ryo ; Yamanaka, Shoki ; Marumo, Keishi</creator><creatorcontrib>Miyasaka, Teruyuki ; Saito, Mitsuru ; Kurosaka, Daisaburo ; Ikeda, Ryo ; Yamanaka, Shoki ; Marumo, Keishi</creatorcontrib><description>Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the final FC rotation, although intraoperative confirmation may be challenging. Therefore, rotational position is frequently determined with the posterior condylar axis (PCA) as a landmark. However, the thickness of the posterior condylar cartilage has not been considered and may not be represented on preoperative images. We used plain X-rays to measure the thickness of the medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage fragments postoperatively, and investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation.
Fifty knees (19 men, 31 women) underwent primary TKA to treat medial knee osteoarthritis at our hospital between August 2015 and May 2017. All knees were treated using an Attune PS (DePuy Synthes, Inc., Warsaw, IN). We first measured the distance between the posterior femoral condyles, resected the posterior condyle, and measured the thickness of the resected cartilage fragments. We then took X-ray images from a direction tangential to the osteotomy surface, secured the cartilage fragments with digital calipers, and measured the thickness of the cartilage. We investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation of the residual medial and lateral cartilage with a trigonometric function.
Medial condylar cartilage thickness averaged 0.6 ± 0.5 mm and the lateral condylar thickness averaged 1.8 ± 0.6 mm; posterior intercondylar distance averaged 46.1 ± 3.3 mm and average impact on rotation of the cartilage remnant was 1.5 ± 0.9° (- 0.1-3.9°). There may be measurement error of up to 4° in the maximum values compared with the preoperative plan in cases with short intercondylar distance.
In cases where the FC external rotation angle is determined using the posterior condyles as landmarks, this angle can be affected by the intercondylar distance, especially in Japanese women who have small physical stature. This angle can potentially be much larger, so caution is advised. Our results suggest that several anatomical landmarks should be referenced to achieve accurate FC rotation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03537-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32723310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty (knee) ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Articular cartilage ; Cartilage ; Cartilage diseases ; Female ; Femoral component ; Femur ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee replacement arthroplasty ; Male ; Musculoskeletal diseases ; Navigation systems ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Osteotomy ; Posterior condyle ; Prostheses and implants ; Radiographs ; Rotation ; Rotational alignment ; Surgeons ; Total knee arthroplasty ; Trigonometry ; Women</subject><ispartof>BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020-07, Vol.21 (1), p.498-498, Article 498</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1896-9138</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7388502/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2435122938?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32723310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miyasaka, Teruyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosaka, Daisaburo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanaka, Shoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marumo, Keishi</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty</title><title>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</title><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><description>Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the final FC rotation, although intraoperative confirmation may be challenging. Therefore, rotational position is frequently determined with the posterior condylar axis (PCA) as a landmark. However, the thickness of the posterior condylar cartilage has not been considered and may not be represented on preoperative images. We used plain X-rays to measure the thickness of the medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage fragments postoperatively, and investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation.
Fifty knees (19 men, 31 women) underwent primary TKA to treat medial knee osteoarthritis at our hospital between August 2015 and May 2017. All knees were treated using an Attune PS (DePuy Synthes, Inc., Warsaw, IN). We first measured the distance between the posterior femoral condyles, resected the posterior condyle, and measured the thickness of the resected cartilage fragments. We then took X-ray images from a direction tangential to the osteotomy surface, secured the cartilage fragments with digital calipers, and measured the thickness of the cartilage. We investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation of the residual medial and lateral cartilage with a trigonometric function.
Medial condylar cartilage thickness averaged 0.6 ± 0.5 mm and the lateral condylar thickness averaged 1.8 ± 0.6 mm; posterior intercondylar distance averaged 46.1 ± 3.3 mm and average impact on rotation of the cartilage remnant was 1.5 ± 0.9° (- 0.1-3.9°). There may be measurement error of up to 4° in the maximum values compared with the preoperative plan in cases with short intercondylar distance.
In cases where the FC external rotation angle is determined using the posterior condyles as landmarks, this angle can be affected by the intercondylar distance, especially in Japanese women who have small physical stature. This angle can potentially be much larger, so caution is advised. Our results suggest that several anatomical landmarks should be referenced to achieve accurate FC rotation.</description><subject>Arthroplasty (knee)</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>Articular cartilage</subject><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Cartilage diseases</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral component</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee replacement arthroplasty</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal diseases</subject><subject>Navigation systems</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy</subject><subject>Posterior condyle</subject><subject>Prostheses and implants</subject><subject>Radiographs</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Rotational alignment</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Total knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Trigonometry</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1471-2474</issn><issn>1471-2474</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9uFCEUxidGY2v1Bbwwk3jTm6n8GQa4MWkaq5s08UavCcPAlnUGRmBN9il8Zc9063bXGBI4ge_8yAdfVb3F6Apj0X3ImAiJG0RQgyijvCHPqnPcctyQlrfPj-qz6lXOG4QwF1S-rM4o4YRSjM6r36tp1qbU0dVzzMUmH1Pt7BSTHmsTw7AbdaqNTsWPem1rHYYjoQ9QHFSDz0UHY-sY6hSLLh4KAD_hpjkGGwr01QUEY_0jWGCmcp_iPOpcdq-rF06P2b55XC-q77efvt18ae6-fl7dXN81piOyNB3XiIrWCAGGnDGot1zqQeCeSUYGjgmXTDAtKCg5dp3ocDt0TDsusesRvahWe-4Q9UbNyU867VTUXj1sxLRWi2czWsUwwwAxvezgRtRpI53GQvQwDxS1wPq4Z83bfrKDAYdg9wR6ehL8vVrHX4pTIRgiALh8BKT4c2tzUZPPxo6jDjZusyItES2WFEmQvv9HuonbFOCpQEUZJkRS8aRaazDgg4twr1mg6rqjWCLO6MK6-o8KxmAnD79qnYf9kwaybzAp5pysO3jESC2RVPtIKoikeoikWsy9O36dQ8vfDNI_Mw_d3Q</recordid><startdate>20200728</startdate><enddate>20200728</enddate><creator>Miyasaka, Teruyuki</creator><creator>Saito, Mitsuru</creator><creator>Kurosaka, Daisaburo</creator><creator>Ikeda, Ryo</creator><creator>Yamanaka, Shoki</creator><creator>Marumo, Keishi</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-9138</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200728</creationdate><title>Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty</title><author>Miyasaka, Teruyuki ; Saito, Mitsuru ; Kurosaka, Daisaburo ; Ikeda, Ryo ; Yamanaka, Shoki ; Marumo, Keishi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty (knee)</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>Articular cartilage</topic><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Cartilage diseases</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral component</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee replacement arthroplasty</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal diseases</topic><topic>Navigation systems</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy</topic><topic>Posterior condyle</topic><topic>Prostheses and implants</topic><topic>Radiographs</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Rotational alignment</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Total knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Trigonometry</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miyasaka, Teruyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosaka, Daisaburo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanaka, Shoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marumo, Keishi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miyasaka, Teruyuki</au><au>Saito, Mitsuru</au><au>Kurosaka, Daisaburo</au><au>Ikeda, Ryo</au><au>Yamanaka, Shoki</au><au>Marumo, Keishi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><date>2020-07-28</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>498</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>498-498</pages><artnum>498</artnum><issn>1471-2474</issn><eissn>1471-2474</eissn><abstract>Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the final FC rotation, although intraoperative confirmation may be challenging. Therefore, rotational position is frequently determined with the posterior condylar axis (PCA) as a landmark. However, the thickness of the posterior condylar cartilage has not been considered and may not be represented on preoperative images. We used plain X-rays to measure the thickness of the medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage fragments postoperatively, and investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation.
Fifty knees (19 men, 31 women) underwent primary TKA to treat medial knee osteoarthritis at our hospital between August 2015 and May 2017. All knees were treated using an Attune PS (DePuy Synthes, Inc., Warsaw, IN). We first measured the distance between the posterior femoral condyles, resected the posterior condyle, and measured the thickness of the resected cartilage fragments. We then took X-ray images from a direction tangential to the osteotomy surface, secured the cartilage fragments with digital calipers, and measured the thickness of the cartilage. We investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation of the residual medial and lateral cartilage with a trigonometric function.
Medial condylar cartilage thickness averaged 0.6 ± 0.5 mm and the lateral condylar thickness averaged 1.8 ± 0.6 mm; posterior intercondylar distance averaged 46.1 ± 3.3 mm and average impact on rotation of the cartilage remnant was 1.5 ± 0.9° (- 0.1-3.9°). There may be measurement error of up to 4° in the maximum values compared with the preoperative plan in cases with short intercondylar distance.
In cases where the FC external rotation angle is determined using the posterior condyles as landmarks, this angle can be affected by the intercondylar distance, especially in Japanese women who have small physical stature. This angle can potentially be much larger, so caution is advised. Our results suggest that several anatomical landmarks should be referenced to achieve accurate FC rotation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>32723310</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12891-020-03537-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-9138</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2474 |
ispartof | BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020-07, Vol.21 (1), p.498-498, Article 498 |
issn | 1471-2474 1471-2474 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51517a7cb9684c06ac9fa188bfa1d304 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Arthroplasty (knee) Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Articular cartilage Cartilage Cartilage diseases Female Femoral component Femur Femur - diagnostic imaging Femur - surgery Humans Joint replacement surgery Joint surgery Knee Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging Knee Joint - surgery Knee replacement arthroplasty Male Musculoskeletal diseases Navigation systems Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery Osteotomy Posterior condyle Prostheses and implants Radiographs Rotation Rotational alignment Surgeons Total knee arthroplasty Trigonometry Women |
title | Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A51%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20posterior%20femoral%20condylar%20cartilage%20and%20posterior%20intercondylar%20distance%20on%20rotation%20of%20femoral%20component%20in%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=BMC%20musculoskeletal%20disorders&rft.au=Miyasaka,%20Teruyuki&rft.date=2020-07-28&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=498&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=498-498&rft.artnum=498&rft.issn=1471-2474&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12891-020-03537-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA631907539%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435122938&rft_id=info:pmid/32723310&rft_galeid=A631907539&rfr_iscdi=true |