Loading…

Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty

Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2020-07, Vol.21 (1), p.498-498, Article 498
Main Authors: Miyasaka, Teruyuki, Saito, Mitsuru, Kurosaka, Daisaburo, Ikeda, Ryo, Yamanaka, Shoki, Marumo, Keishi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03
container_end_page 498
container_issue 1
container_start_page 498
container_title BMC musculoskeletal disorders
container_volume 21
creator Miyasaka, Teruyuki
Saito, Mitsuru
Kurosaka, Daisaburo
Ikeda, Ryo
Yamanaka, Shoki
Marumo, Keishi
description Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the final FC rotation, although intraoperative confirmation may be challenging. Therefore, rotational position is frequently determined with the posterior condylar axis (PCA) as a landmark. However, the thickness of the posterior condylar cartilage has not been considered and may not be represented on preoperative images. We used plain X-rays to measure the thickness of the medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage fragments postoperatively, and investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation. Fifty knees (19 men, 31 women) underwent primary TKA to treat medial knee osteoarthritis at our hospital between August 2015 and May 2017. All knees were treated using an Attune PS (DePuy Synthes, Inc., Warsaw, IN). We first measured the distance between the posterior femoral condyles, resected the posterior condyle, and measured the thickness of the resected cartilage fragments. We then took X-ray images from a direction tangential to the osteotomy surface, secured the cartilage fragments with digital calipers, and measured the thickness of the cartilage. We investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation of the residual medial and lateral cartilage with a trigonometric function. Medial condylar cartilage thickness averaged 0.6 ± 0.5 mm and the lateral condylar thickness averaged 1.8 ± 0.6 mm; posterior intercondylar distance averaged 46.1 ± 3.3 mm and average impact on rotation of the cartilage remnant was 1.5 ± 0.9° (- 0.1-3.9°). There may be measurement error of up to 4° in the maximum values compared with the preoperative plan in cases with short intercondylar distance. In cases where the FC external rotation angle is determined using the posterior condyles as landmarks, this angle can be affected by the intercondylar distance, especially in Japanese women who have small physical stature. This angle can potentially be much larger, so caution is advised. Our results suggest that several anatomical landmarks should be referenced to achieve accurate FC rotation.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12891-020-03537-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51517a7cb9684c06ac9fa188bfa1d304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A631907539</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_51517a7cb9684c06ac9fa188bfa1d304</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A631907539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9uFCEUxidGY2v1Bbwwk3jTm6n8GQa4MWkaq5s08UavCcPAlnUGRmBN9il8Zc9063bXGBI4ge_8yAdfVb3F6Apj0X3ImAiJG0RQgyijvCHPqnPcctyQlrfPj-qz6lXOG4QwF1S-rM4o4YRSjM6r36tp1qbU0dVzzMUmH1Pt7BSTHmsTw7AbdaqNTsWPem1rHYYjoQ9QHFSDz0UHY-sY6hSLLh4KAD_hpjkGGwr01QUEY_0jWGCmcp_iPOpcdq-rF06P2b55XC-q77efvt18ae6-fl7dXN81piOyNB3XiIrWCAGGnDGot1zqQeCeSUYGjgmXTDAtKCg5dp3ocDt0TDsusesRvahWe-4Q9UbNyU867VTUXj1sxLRWi2czWsUwwwAxvezgRtRpI53GQvQwDxS1wPq4Z83bfrKDAYdg9wR6ehL8vVrHX4pTIRgiALh8BKT4c2tzUZPPxo6jDjZusyItES2WFEmQvv9HuonbFOCpQEUZJkRS8aRaazDgg4twr1mg6rqjWCLO6MK6-o8KxmAnD79qnYf9kwaybzAp5pysO3jESC2RVPtIKoikeoikWsy9O36dQ8vfDNI_Mw_d3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2435122938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Miyasaka, Teruyuki ; Saito, Mitsuru ; Kurosaka, Daisaburo ; Ikeda, Ryo ; Yamanaka, Shoki ; Marumo, Keishi</creator><creatorcontrib>Miyasaka, Teruyuki ; Saito, Mitsuru ; Kurosaka, Daisaburo ; Ikeda, Ryo ; Yamanaka, Shoki ; Marumo, Keishi</creatorcontrib><description>Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the final FC rotation, although intraoperative confirmation may be challenging. Therefore, rotational position is frequently determined with the posterior condylar axis (PCA) as a landmark. However, the thickness of the posterior condylar cartilage has not been considered and may not be represented on preoperative images. We used plain X-rays to measure the thickness of the medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage fragments postoperatively, and investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation. Fifty knees (19 men, 31 women) underwent primary TKA to treat medial knee osteoarthritis at our hospital between August 2015 and May 2017. All knees were treated using an Attune PS (DePuy Synthes, Inc., Warsaw, IN). We first measured the distance between the posterior femoral condyles, resected the posterior condyle, and measured the thickness of the resected cartilage fragments. We then took X-ray images from a direction tangential to the osteotomy surface, secured the cartilage fragments with digital calipers, and measured the thickness of the cartilage. We investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation of the residual medial and lateral cartilage with a trigonometric function. Medial condylar cartilage thickness averaged 0.6 ± 0.5 mm and the lateral condylar thickness averaged 1.8 ± 0.6 mm; posterior intercondylar distance averaged 46.1 ± 3.3 mm and average impact on rotation of the cartilage remnant was 1.5 ± 0.9° (- 0.1-3.9°). There may be measurement error of up to 4° in the maximum values compared with the preoperative plan in cases with short intercondylar distance. In cases where the FC external rotation angle is determined using the posterior condyles as landmarks, this angle can be affected by the intercondylar distance, especially in Japanese women who have small physical stature. This angle can potentially be much larger, so caution is advised. Our results suggest that several anatomical landmarks should be referenced to achieve accurate FC rotation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03537-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32723310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty (knee) ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Articular cartilage ; Cartilage ; Cartilage diseases ; Female ; Femoral component ; Femur ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee replacement arthroplasty ; Male ; Musculoskeletal diseases ; Navigation systems ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Osteotomy ; Posterior condyle ; Prostheses and implants ; Radiographs ; Rotation ; Rotational alignment ; Surgeons ; Total knee arthroplasty ; Trigonometry ; Women</subject><ispartof>BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020-07, Vol.21 (1), p.498-498, Article 498</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1896-9138</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7388502/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2435122938?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32723310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miyasaka, Teruyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosaka, Daisaburo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanaka, Shoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marumo, Keishi</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty</title><title>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</title><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><description>Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the final FC rotation, although intraoperative confirmation may be challenging. Therefore, rotational position is frequently determined with the posterior condylar axis (PCA) as a landmark. However, the thickness of the posterior condylar cartilage has not been considered and may not be represented on preoperative images. We used plain X-rays to measure the thickness of the medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage fragments postoperatively, and investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation. Fifty knees (19 men, 31 women) underwent primary TKA to treat medial knee osteoarthritis at our hospital between August 2015 and May 2017. All knees were treated using an Attune PS (DePuy Synthes, Inc., Warsaw, IN). We first measured the distance between the posterior femoral condyles, resected the posterior condyle, and measured the thickness of the resected cartilage fragments. We then took X-ray images from a direction tangential to the osteotomy surface, secured the cartilage fragments with digital calipers, and measured the thickness of the cartilage. We investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation of the residual medial and lateral cartilage with a trigonometric function. Medial condylar cartilage thickness averaged 0.6 ± 0.5 mm and the lateral condylar thickness averaged 1.8 ± 0.6 mm; posterior intercondylar distance averaged 46.1 ± 3.3 mm and average impact on rotation of the cartilage remnant was 1.5 ± 0.9° (- 0.1-3.9°). There may be measurement error of up to 4° in the maximum values compared with the preoperative plan in cases with short intercondylar distance. In cases where the FC external rotation angle is determined using the posterior condyles as landmarks, this angle can be affected by the intercondylar distance, especially in Japanese women who have small physical stature. This angle can potentially be much larger, so caution is advised. Our results suggest that several anatomical landmarks should be referenced to achieve accurate FC rotation.</description><subject>Arthroplasty (knee)</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>Articular cartilage</subject><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Cartilage diseases</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral component</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee replacement arthroplasty</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal diseases</subject><subject>Navigation systems</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Osteotomy</subject><subject>Posterior condyle</subject><subject>Prostheses and implants</subject><subject>Radiographs</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Rotational alignment</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Total knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Trigonometry</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1471-2474</issn><issn>1471-2474</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9uFCEUxidGY2v1Bbwwk3jTm6n8GQa4MWkaq5s08UavCcPAlnUGRmBN9il8Zc9063bXGBI4ge_8yAdfVb3F6Apj0X3ImAiJG0RQgyijvCHPqnPcctyQlrfPj-qz6lXOG4QwF1S-rM4o4YRSjM6r36tp1qbU0dVzzMUmH1Pt7BSTHmsTw7AbdaqNTsWPem1rHYYjoQ9QHFSDz0UHY-sY6hSLLh4KAD_hpjkGGwr01QUEY_0jWGCmcp_iPOpcdq-rF06P2b55XC-q77efvt18ae6-fl7dXN81piOyNB3XiIrWCAGGnDGot1zqQeCeSUYGjgmXTDAtKCg5dp3ocDt0TDsusesRvahWe-4Q9UbNyU867VTUXj1sxLRWi2czWsUwwwAxvezgRtRpI53GQvQwDxS1wPq4Z83bfrKDAYdg9wR6ehL8vVrHX4pTIRgiALh8BKT4c2tzUZPPxo6jDjZusyItES2WFEmQvv9HuonbFOCpQEUZJkRS8aRaazDgg4twr1mg6rqjWCLO6MK6-o8KxmAnD79qnYf9kwaybzAp5pysO3jESC2RVPtIKoikeoikWsy9O36dQ8vfDNI_Mw_d3Q</recordid><startdate>20200728</startdate><enddate>20200728</enddate><creator>Miyasaka, Teruyuki</creator><creator>Saito, Mitsuru</creator><creator>Kurosaka, Daisaburo</creator><creator>Ikeda, Ryo</creator><creator>Yamanaka, Shoki</creator><creator>Marumo, Keishi</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-9138</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200728</creationdate><title>Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty</title><author>Miyasaka, Teruyuki ; Saito, Mitsuru ; Kurosaka, Daisaburo ; Ikeda, Ryo ; Yamanaka, Shoki ; Marumo, Keishi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty (knee)</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>Articular cartilage</topic><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Cartilage diseases</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral component</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee replacement arthroplasty</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal diseases</topic><topic>Navigation systems</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Osteotomy</topic><topic>Posterior condyle</topic><topic>Prostheses and implants</topic><topic>Radiographs</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Rotational alignment</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Total knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Trigonometry</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miyasaka, Teruyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Mitsuru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurosaka, Daisaburo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamanaka, Shoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marumo, Keishi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miyasaka, Teruyuki</au><au>Saito, Mitsuru</au><au>Kurosaka, Daisaburo</au><au>Ikeda, Ryo</au><au>Yamanaka, Shoki</au><au>Marumo, Keishi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><date>2020-07-28</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>498</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>498-498</pages><artnum>498</artnum><issn>1471-2474</issn><eissn>1471-2474</eissn><abstract>Greater accuracy is needed when determining the final femoral component (FC) rotation during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), because this parameter affects soft tissue balance during flexion and patellar tracking. Anatomical markers, such as the epicondylar axis, are typically used to determine the final FC rotation, although intraoperative confirmation may be challenging. Therefore, rotational position is frequently determined with the posterior condylar axis (PCA) as a landmark. However, the thickness of the posterior condylar cartilage has not been considered and may not be represented on preoperative images. We used plain X-rays to measure the thickness of the medial and lateral posterior condylar cartilage fragments postoperatively, and investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation. Fifty knees (19 men, 31 women) underwent primary TKA to treat medial knee osteoarthritis at our hospital between August 2015 and May 2017. All knees were treated using an Attune PS (DePuy Synthes, Inc., Warsaw, IN). We first measured the distance between the posterior femoral condyles, resected the posterior condyle, and measured the thickness of the resected cartilage fragments. We then took X-ray images from a direction tangential to the osteotomy surface, secured the cartilage fragments with digital calipers, and measured the thickness of the cartilage. We investigated the effects of differences in cartilage thickness on final FC rotation of the residual medial and lateral cartilage with a trigonometric function. Medial condylar cartilage thickness averaged 0.6 ± 0.5 mm and the lateral condylar thickness averaged 1.8 ± 0.6 mm; posterior intercondylar distance averaged 46.1 ± 3.3 mm and average impact on rotation of the cartilage remnant was 1.5 ± 0.9° (- 0.1-3.9°). There may be measurement error of up to 4° in the maximum values compared with the preoperative plan in cases with short intercondylar distance. In cases where the FC external rotation angle is determined using the posterior condyles as landmarks, this angle can be affected by the intercondylar distance, especially in Japanese women who have small physical stature. This angle can potentially be much larger, so caution is advised. Our results suggest that several anatomical landmarks should be referenced to achieve accurate FC rotation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>32723310</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12891-020-03537-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-9138</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2474
ispartof BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020-07, Vol.21 (1), p.498-498, Article 498
issn 1471-2474
1471-2474
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51517a7cb9684c06ac9fa188bfa1d304
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Arthroplasty (knee)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Articular cartilage
Cartilage
Cartilage diseases
Female
Femoral component
Femur
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Femur - surgery
Humans
Joint replacement surgery
Joint surgery
Knee
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee replacement arthroplasty
Male
Musculoskeletal diseases
Navigation systems
Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Osteotomy
Posterior condyle
Prostheses and implants
Radiographs
Rotation
Rotational alignment
Surgeons
Total knee arthroplasty
Trigonometry
Women
title Impact of posterior femoral condylar cartilage and posterior intercondylar distance on rotation of femoral component in total knee arthroplasty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A51%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20posterior%20femoral%20condylar%20cartilage%20and%20posterior%20intercondylar%20distance%20on%20rotation%20of%20femoral%20component%20in%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=BMC%20musculoskeletal%20disorders&rft.au=Miyasaka,%20Teruyuki&rft.date=2020-07-28&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=498&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=498-498&rft.artnum=498&rft.issn=1471-2474&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12891-020-03537-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA631907539%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c629t-67a0384c88839fcc0be79ad81b5952d71279585a8367a71f68614d65af791fb03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2435122938&rft_id=info:pmid/32723310&rft_galeid=A631907539&rfr_iscdi=true