Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review

• Published in: BMC health services research 2023-01, Vol.23 (1), p.78-24, Article 78
• Main Authors: Appleton, Rebecca, Barnett, Phoebe, Vera San Juan, Norha, Tuudah, Elizabeth, Lyons, Natasha, Parker, Jennie, Roxburgh, Emily, Spyridonidis, Spyros, Tamworth, Millie, Worden, Minnie, Yilmaz, Melisa, Sevdalis, Nick, Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor, Needle, Justin J, Johnson, Sonia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: COVID-19 - epidemiology; Evaluation; Health Personnel; Health services; Humans; Implementation; Intervention; Medical care; Mental disorders; Mental Health; Mental health care; Mental Health Services; Pandemics; Psychiatric services; Quality management; Remote care; Systematic review; Taxonomy; Telemedicine; Telemental health
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08993-1

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid shift from traditional face-to-face care provision towards delivering mental health care remotely through telecommunications, often referred to as telemental health care. However, the manner and extent of telemental health implementation have varied considerably across settings and areas, and substantial barriers are encountered. There is, therefore, a need to identify what works best for service users and staff and establish the key mechanisms for efficient integration into routine care. We aimed to identify investigations of pre-planned strategies reported in the literature intended to achieve or improve effective and sustained implementation of telemental health approaches (including video calls, telephone calls, text messaging platforms or a combination of any of these approaches with face-to-face care), and to evaluate how different strategies influence implementation outcomes. A systematic review was conducted, with five databases searched for any relevant literature published between January 2010 and July 2021. Studies were eligible if they took place in specialist mental health services and focused on pre-planned strategies to achieve or improve the delivery of mental health care through remote communication between mental health professionals or between mental health professionals and service users, family members, unpaid carers, or peer supporters. All included studies were quality-assessed. Data were synthesised using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compilation of implementation strategies and the taxonomy of implementation outcomes. A total of 14 studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria from a total of 14,294 records of which 338 were assessed at full text. All ERIC implementation strategies were used by at least one study, the most commonly reported being 'Train and educate stakeholders'. All studies reported using a combination of several implementation strategies, with the mean number of strategies used per study of 3.5 (range 2-6), many of which were reported to result in an improvement in implementation over time. Few studies specifically investigated a single implementation strategy and its associated outcomes, making conclusions regarding the most beneficial strategy difficult to draw. Using a combination of implementation strategies appears to be a helpful method of supporting the implementation of telemental health. Further research is needed to test t