Can antipoverty programmes save lives? Quasi-experimental evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit in the USA

ObjectiveTo estimate the impact of state-level supplements of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) on mortality in the USA. The EITC supplements the wages of lower-income workers by providing larger returns when taxes are filed.SettingNationwide sample spanning 25 cohorts of people across every state...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ open 2020-08, Vol.10 (8), p.e037051-e037051
Main Authors: Muennig, Peter, Vail, Daniel, Hakes, Jahn K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Age
Datasets
Design
Disposable income
Earned income tax credit
Earnings
Economic indicators
Educational Status
Employment
Health insurance
Health Policy
Households
Humans
Income
Income Tax
Income taxes
Low income groups
Mortality
Obesity
Public health
Quasi-experimental methods
United States
Wisconsin
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ObjectiveTo estimate the impact of state-level supplements of the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) on mortality in the USA. The EITC supplements the wages of lower-income workers by providing larger returns when taxes are filed.SettingNationwide sample spanning 25 cohorts of people across every state in the USA.Participants793 000 respondents within the National Longitudinal Mortality Survey (NLMS) between 1986 and 2011, a representative sample of the USA.InterventionState-level supplementation to the EITC programme. Some, but not all, states added EITC supplementation to varying degrees beginning in 1986 (Wisconsin) and most recently in 2015 (California). Participants who were eligible in states with supplementary programmes were compared with those who were not eligible for supplementation. Comparisons were made both before and after implementation of the supplementary programme (a difference-in-difference, intent-to-treat analysis). This quasi-experimental approach further controls for age, gender, marital status, race or ethnicity, educational attainment, income and employment status.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was survival at 10 years. Secondary outcome measures included survival at 5 years and survival to the end of the intervention period.ResultsWe find an association between state supplemental EITC and survival, with a HR of 0.973 (95% CI=0.951–0.996) for each US$100 of EITC increase (p
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037051