Loading…

Articulating the ultimate objectives of research capacity strengthening programmes: Why this is important and how we might achieve it. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]

'Research capacity strengthening' (RCS) is an umbrella term that can be used to describe a wide variety of activities conducted in support of diverse objectives premised upon distinct, potentially opposing, views. Despite this, the ultimate objective of RCS activities is rarely made explic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:F1000 research 2024, Vol.13, p.909
Main Authors: Pulford, Justin, Mutua, Meshack Nzesei, Bates, Imelda, Tagoe, Nadia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-6ce205f5c8c0114335401e9225c8989dd4a5cc22e82faabda94d933880e965683
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 909
container_title F1000 research
container_volume 13
creator Pulford, Justin
Mutua, Meshack Nzesei
Bates, Imelda
Tagoe, Nadia
description 'Research capacity strengthening' (RCS) is an umbrella term that can be used to describe a wide variety of activities conducted in support of diverse objectives premised upon distinct, potentially opposing, views. Despite this, the ultimate objective of RCS activities is rarely made explicit which can be problematic when diverse objectives are possible. By 'ultimate' objective we are referring to the overarching (often long-term) goal an RCS initiative is intended to contribute towards (e.g. better population health) as opposed to the more immediate 'proximate' (often short-term) objectives of any such activity (e.g. improved capacity to undertake infectious disease research). We argue a need for those funding, designing and implementing RCS initiatives to make clear statements as to the ultimate objective that they foresee their respective initiative contributing towards as well as the proposed pathway and associated assumptions that underlie their approach. Examples of distinct ultimate objectives for RCS initiatives are presented alongside fictitious examples of how they may be transparently reported from both a funder and implementor perspective. Such transparency should be routine within the scope of funding calls for RCS activities (even when such activities are only a minor component of the call), subsequent applications to those calls and any description of an applied RCS activity/ies and/or the associated outcomes thereof. The process of determining one's ultimate objective will further cause funders and actors to think through their respective initiatives more thoroughly and make informed choices and better designed RCS projects. Doing so would reduce any ambiguity associated with the use of the term 'research capacity strengthening' and would provide a stronger foundation for robust programme evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.12688/f1000research.153447.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51e984e5e8bb4b89a0ddd16d962c258c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_51e984e5e8bb4b89a0ddd16d962c258c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3102072637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-6ce205f5c8c0114335401e9225c8989dd4a5cc22e82faabda94d933880e965683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt9qFDEUxgdRbKl9BQ14482u-TczSXtVStVCwRvFC5GQSc7MZJmZrElml30w38_sblurN0Ig4fB9v3Ny-IriDcFLQish3rcEYxwggg6mX5KScV4vybPilGJeLQjH9PmT90lxHuMqO7CUrKL1y-KEScorQdlp8esqJGfmQSc3dSj1gOYhuVEnQL5ZgUluAxH5Fj20Q0avtXFph2IKMHXZMu2t6-C7oMcR4gX61u8yykW0P-Pah6SnhPRkUe-3aAtodF2fC6Z3sAHk0hJ930CIzk-IXKI1QMj9Ng62F0hvtTvM9qT641XxotVDhPP7-6z4-uHmy_Wnxd3nj7fXV3cLQ6Uki8oAxWVbGmEwIZyxkmMCktJckUJay3VpDKUgaKt1Y7XkVjImBAZZlZVgZ8XtkWu9Xql1yIsJO-W1U4eCD53S-_0NoMoMFhxKEE3DGyE1ttaSysqKGloKk1nvjqy8qZ8zxKRGFw0Mg57Az1ExgimuacXqLH37j3Tl5zDln2ZV_gjHuJRZVR9VJvgYA7SPAxKsDkFRfwVFHYOiSHa-vufPzQj20fcQiyy4PApanbORdnuM-sP5D_43lunQsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111440059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Articulating the ultimate objectives of research capacity strengthening programmes: Why this is important and how we might achieve it. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pulford, Justin ; Mutua, Meshack Nzesei ; Bates, Imelda ; Tagoe, Nadia</creator><creatorcontrib>Pulford, Justin ; Mutua, Meshack Nzesei ; Bates, Imelda ; Tagoe, Nadia</creatorcontrib><description>'Research capacity strengthening' (RCS) is an umbrella term that can be used to describe a wide variety of activities conducted in support of diverse objectives premised upon distinct, potentially opposing, views. Despite this, the ultimate objective of RCS activities is rarely made explicit which can be problematic when diverse objectives are possible. By 'ultimate' objective we are referring to the overarching (often long-term) goal an RCS initiative is intended to contribute towards (e.g. better population health) as opposed to the more immediate 'proximate' (often short-term) objectives of any such activity (e.g. improved capacity to undertake infectious disease research). We argue a need for those funding, designing and implementing RCS initiatives to make clear statements as to the ultimate objective that they foresee their respective initiative contributing towards as well as the proposed pathway and associated assumptions that underlie their approach. Examples of distinct ultimate objectives for RCS initiatives are presented alongside fictitious examples of how they may be transparently reported from both a funder and implementor perspective. Such transparency should be routine within the scope of funding calls for RCS activities (even when such activities are only a minor component of the call), subsequent applications to those calls and any description of an applied RCS activity/ies and/or the associated outcomes thereof. The process of determining one's ultimate objective will further cause funders and actors to think through their respective initiatives more thoroughly and make informed choices and better designed RCS projects. Doing so would reduce any ambiguity associated with the use of the term 'research capacity strengthening' and would provide a stronger foundation for robust programme evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-1402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-1402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.153447.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39246823</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Faculty of 1000 Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - organization &amp; administration ; Capacity Building ; Developing countries ; eng ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; LDCs ; Medical research ; Objectives ; Publication output ; Research capacity strengthening; evaluation; global South</subject><ispartof>F1000 research, 2024, Vol.13, p.909</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Pulford J et al.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Pulford J et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-6ce205f5c8c0114335401e9225c8989dd4a5cc22e82faabda94d933880e965683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0862-8199 ; 0000-0003-4756-8480</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3111440059/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3111440059?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,25734,27904,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39246823$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pulford, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutua, Meshack Nzesei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Imelda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagoe, Nadia</creatorcontrib><title>Articulating the ultimate objectives of research capacity strengthening programmes: Why this is important and how we might achieve it. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]</title><title>F1000 research</title><addtitle>F1000Res</addtitle><description>'Research capacity strengthening' (RCS) is an umbrella term that can be used to describe a wide variety of activities conducted in support of diverse objectives premised upon distinct, potentially opposing, views. Despite this, the ultimate objective of RCS activities is rarely made explicit which can be problematic when diverse objectives are possible. By 'ultimate' objective we are referring to the overarching (often long-term) goal an RCS initiative is intended to contribute towards (e.g. better population health) as opposed to the more immediate 'proximate' (often short-term) objectives of any such activity (e.g. improved capacity to undertake infectious disease research). We argue a need for those funding, designing and implementing RCS initiatives to make clear statements as to the ultimate objective that they foresee their respective initiative contributing towards as well as the proposed pathway and associated assumptions that underlie their approach. Examples of distinct ultimate objectives for RCS initiatives are presented alongside fictitious examples of how they may be transparently reported from both a funder and implementor perspective. Such transparency should be routine within the scope of funding calls for RCS activities (even when such activities are only a minor component of the call), subsequent applications to those calls and any description of an applied RCS activity/ies and/or the associated outcomes thereof. The process of determining one's ultimate objective will further cause funders and actors to think through their respective initiatives more thoroughly and make informed choices and better designed RCS projects. Doing so would reduce any ambiguity associated with the use of the term 'research capacity strengthening' and would provide a stronger foundation for robust programme evaluation.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Capacity Building</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>eng</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Publication output</subject><subject>Research capacity strengthening; evaluation; global South</subject><issn>2046-1402</issn><issn>2046-1402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt9qFDEUxgdRbKl9BQ14482u-TczSXtVStVCwRvFC5GQSc7MZJmZrElml30w38_sblurN0Ig4fB9v3Ny-IriDcFLQish3rcEYxwggg6mX5KScV4vybPilGJeLQjH9PmT90lxHuMqO7CUrKL1y-KEScorQdlp8esqJGfmQSc3dSj1gOYhuVEnQL5ZgUluAxH5Fj20Q0avtXFph2IKMHXZMu2t6-C7oMcR4gX61u8yykW0P-Pah6SnhPRkUe-3aAtodF2fC6Z3sAHk0hJ930CIzk-IXKI1QMj9Ng62F0hvtTvM9qT641XxotVDhPP7-6z4-uHmy_Wnxd3nj7fXV3cLQ6Uki8oAxWVbGmEwIZyxkmMCktJckUJay3VpDKUgaKt1Y7XkVjImBAZZlZVgZ8XtkWu9Xql1yIsJO-W1U4eCD53S-_0NoMoMFhxKEE3DGyE1ttaSysqKGloKk1nvjqy8qZ8zxKRGFw0Mg57Az1ExgimuacXqLH37j3Tl5zDln2ZV_gjHuJRZVR9VJvgYA7SPAxKsDkFRfwVFHYOiSHa-vufPzQj20fcQiyy4PApanbORdnuM-sP5D_43lunQsQ</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Pulford, Justin</creator><creator>Mutua, Meshack Nzesei</creator><creator>Bates, Imelda</creator><creator>Tagoe, Nadia</creator><general>Faculty of 1000 Ltd</general><general>F1000 Research Ltd</general><scope>C-E</scope><scope>CH4</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-8199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4756-8480</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Articulating the ultimate objectives of research capacity strengthening programmes: Why this is important and how we might achieve it. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]</title><author>Pulford, Justin ; Mutua, Meshack Nzesei ; Bates, Imelda ; Tagoe, Nadia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-6ce205f5c8c0114335401e9225c8989dd4a5cc22e82faabda94d933880e965683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Capacity Building</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>eng</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Publication output</topic><topic>Research capacity strengthening; evaluation; global South</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pulford, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutua, Meshack Nzesei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, Imelda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagoe, Nadia</creatorcontrib><collection>F1000Research</collection><collection>Faculty of 1000</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>F1000 research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pulford, Justin</au><au>Mutua, Meshack Nzesei</au><au>Bates, Imelda</au><au>Tagoe, Nadia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Articulating the ultimate objectives of research capacity strengthening programmes: Why this is important and how we might achieve it. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]</atitle><jtitle>F1000 research</jtitle><addtitle>F1000Res</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><spage>909</spage><pages>909-</pages><issn>2046-1402</issn><eissn>2046-1402</eissn><abstract>'Research capacity strengthening' (RCS) is an umbrella term that can be used to describe a wide variety of activities conducted in support of diverse objectives premised upon distinct, potentially opposing, views. Despite this, the ultimate objective of RCS activities is rarely made explicit which can be problematic when diverse objectives are possible. By 'ultimate' objective we are referring to the overarching (often long-term) goal an RCS initiative is intended to contribute towards (e.g. better population health) as opposed to the more immediate 'proximate' (often short-term) objectives of any such activity (e.g. improved capacity to undertake infectious disease research). We argue a need for those funding, designing and implementing RCS initiatives to make clear statements as to the ultimate objective that they foresee their respective initiative contributing towards as well as the proposed pathway and associated assumptions that underlie their approach. Examples of distinct ultimate objectives for RCS initiatives are presented alongside fictitious examples of how they may be transparently reported from both a funder and implementor perspective. Such transparency should be routine within the scope of funding calls for RCS activities (even when such activities are only a minor component of the call), subsequent applications to those calls and any description of an applied RCS activity/ies and/or the associated outcomes thereof. The process of determining one's ultimate objective will further cause funders and actors to think through their respective initiatives more thoroughly and make informed choices and better designed RCS projects. Doing so would reduce any ambiguity associated with the use of the term 'research capacity strengthening' and would provide a stronger foundation for robust programme evaluation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Faculty of 1000 Ltd</pub><pmid>39246823</pmid><doi>10.12688/f1000research.153447.1</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-8199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4756-8480</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-1402
ispartof F1000 research, 2024, Vol.13, p.909
issn 2046-1402
2046-1402
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51e984e5e8bb4b89a0ddd16d962c258c
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Biomedical Research - organization & administration
Capacity Building
Developing countries
eng
Humans
Infectious diseases
LDCs
Medical research
Objectives
Publication output
Research capacity strengthening
evaluation
global South
title Articulating the ultimate objectives of research capacity strengthening programmes: Why this is important and how we might achieve it. [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A46%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Articulating%20the%20ultimate%20objectives%20of%20research%20capacity%20strengthening%20programmes:%20Why%20this%20is%20important%20and%20how%20we%20might%20achieve%20it.%20%5Bversion%201;%20peer%20review:%20awaiting%20peer%20review%5D&rft.jtitle=F1000%20research&rft.au=Pulford,%20Justin&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=13&rft.spage=909&rft.pages=909-&rft.issn=2046-1402&rft.eissn=2046-1402&rft_id=info:doi/10.12688/f1000research.153447.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3102072637%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-6ce205f5c8c0114335401e9225c8989dd4a5cc22e82faabda94d933880e965683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111440059&rft_id=info:pmid/39246823&rfr_iscdi=true