Loading…

Construction and "Worldmaking": the Significance of Nelson Goodman's Pluralism

Goodman's style may be elusive sometimes, so that it may result difficult to interpret what he really has in mind. This is a consequence of his masterful use of irony and metaphorical language. This difficulty of interpretation affects important parts of his philosophical thoughts and had led t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theoria (Madrid, Spain) Spain), 2009-05, Vol.24 (2(65)), p.213-225
Main Author: de Donato-RodrĂ­guez, Xavier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Goodman's style may be elusive sometimes, so that it may result difficult to interpret what he really has in mind. This is a consequence of his masterful use of irony and metaphorical language. This difficulty of interpretation affects important parts of his philosophical thoughts and had led to misunderstandings. In the present article, I discuss the significance of Goodman's pluralism, one of his most relevant theses. I try to show that Goodman's pluralism does not lead to skepticism or the relativism of "anything goes". One of the most common arguments directed against Goodman's pluralism is that his attempt to provide a genuine standard of "rightness" fails, leaving us without a conception of truth or an appropriate substitute. I will argue that the conclusion of this argument is false, trying to show that Goodman's aim of defending an irrealist pluralism is perfectly coherent and defensible against the common interpretation of his critics.
ISSN:0495-4548
2171-679X
DOI:10.1387/theoria.443