Loading…

Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines

Background This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain lo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain and behavior 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e3285-n/a
Main Authors: Szczypien, Natasza, Ruchay, Zoe, Ruchay, Zino, Müller, Sandra Verena, Kaiser, Claudia, Klawonn, Frank
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 12
container_start_page e3285
container_title Brain and behavior
container_volume 13
creator Szczypien, Natasza
Ruchay, Zoe
Ruchay, Zino
Müller, Sandra Verena
Kaiser, Claudia
Klawonn, Frank
description Background This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs. Methods A total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline. Results Sex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable. Conclusions The findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex. This study investigated the influence of female versus gender‐neutral human body outlines used in pain drawings to localize pain caused by endometriosis. No significant in size or localization of pain areas could be detected between the two different types of pain drawings.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/brb3.3285
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51ff2f65a8c340c88e5c1db9fd13cfbb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_51ff2f65a8c340c88e5c1db9fd13cfbb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2879403607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kt1qFTEQxxdRbKm98AUk4I1enDYfm92sN9IWPwoFwY_rkGQnPTlkk2Oy2_Z45QsIPqNPYranLa1gApkw85s_w_CvqucEHxCM6aFOmh0wKvijapeShi4YbbvH9_471X7OK1wOJzWt8dNqh7WCs6Zlu9WvL3D15-fvvAbjrDOod9ZCgmAgIxfQWpXHR6O8-6FGF8OctDAoD6U2OghjRpduXCIIfRxgTC5ml9-gI2TisFbJ5dITLcpw5SFnpEJ_27-cBhWQjv0GxWn0LkB-Vj2xymfYv4l71bf3776efFycffpwenJ0tjB1i_lCNzXVRusOCDGKiFZhyufYYKFr280XFAXNmdYGK2KAKC56a5taC6HZXnW61e2jWsl1coNKGxmVk9eJmM6lSqMzHiQn1lLbcCUMq7ERArghve5sT5ixetZ6u9VaT3qA3pSVJOUfiD6sBLeU5_FCEtzSpm15UXh1o5Di9wnyKAeXDXivAsQpSyrarsaswW1BX_6DruKUQtmVpB2mQnDBaaFebymTYs4J7N00BMvZNHI2jZxNU9gX98e_I28tUoDDLXDpPGz-rySPPx-za8m_Yz3Qeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902885852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Szczypien, Natasza ; Ruchay, Zoe ; Ruchay, Zino ; Müller, Sandra Verena ; Kaiser, Claudia ; Klawonn, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Szczypien, Natasza ; Ruchay, Zoe ; Ruchay, Zino ; Müller, Sandra Verena ; Kaiser, Claudia ; Klawonn, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>Background This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs. Methods A total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline. Results Sex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable. Conclusions The findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex. This study investigated the influence of female versus gender‐neutral human body outlines used in pain drawings to localize pain caused by endometriosis. No significant in size or localization of pain areas could be detected between the two different types of pain drawings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2162-3279</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-3279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37853673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Endometriosis ; Ethics ; Females ; Gender differences ; Gynecology ; Localization ; Medical research ; Original ; Pain ; pain drawing ; pain profile ; Participation ; Patients ; Questionnaires ; sex/gender differences ; Software</subject><ispartof>Brain and behavior, 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e3285-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9613-182X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2902885852/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2902885852?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11540,25730,27900,27901,36988,36989,44565,46026,46450,53765,53767,75095</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szczypien, Natasza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruchay, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruchay, Zino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Sandra Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klawonn, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines</title><title>Brain and behavior</title><addtitle>Brain Behav</addtitle><description>Background This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs. Methods A total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline. Results Sex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable. Conclusions The findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex. This study investigated the influence of female versus gender‐neutral human body outlines used in pain drawings to localize pain caused by endometriosis. No significant in size or localization of pain areas could be detected between the two different types of pain drawings.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>pain drawing</subject><subject>pain profile</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>sex/gender differences</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>2162-3279</issn><issn>2162-3279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kt1qFTEQxxdRbKm98AUk4I1enDYfm92sN9IWPwoFwY_rkGQnPTlkk2Oy2_Z45QsIPqNPYranLa1gApkw85s_w_CvqucEHxCM6aFOmh0wKvijapeShi4YbbvH9_471X7OK1wOJzWt8dNqh7WCs6Zlu9WvL3D15-fvvAbjrDOod9ZCgmAgIxfQWpXHR6O8-6FGF8OctDAoD6U2OghjRpduXCIIfRxgTC5ml9-gI2TisFbJ5dITLcpw5SFnpEJ_27-cBhWQjv0GxWn0LkB-Vj2xymfYv4l71bf3776efFycffpwenJ0tjB1i_lCNzXVRusOCDGKiFZhyufYYKFr280XFAXNmdYGK2KAKC56a5taC6HZXnW61e2jWsl1coNKGxmVk9eJmM6lSqMzHiQn1lLbcCUMq7ERArghve5sT5ixetZ6u9VaT3qA3pSVJOUfiD6sBLeU5_FCEtzSpm15UXh1o5Di9wnyKAeXDXivAsQpSyrarsaswW1BX_6DruKUQtmVpB2mQnDBaaFebymTYs4J7N00BMvZNHI2jZxNU9gX98e_I28tUoDDLXDpPGz-rySPPx-za8m_Yz3Qeg</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Szczypien, Natasza</creator><creator>Ruchay, Zoe</creator><creator>Ruchay, Zino</creator><creator>Müller, Sandra Verena</creator><creator>Kaiser, Claudia</creator><creator>Klawonn, Frank</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9613-182X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines</title><author>Szczypien, Natasza ; Ruchay, Zoe ; Ruchay, Zino ; Müller, Sandra Verena ; Kaiser, Claudia ; Klawonn, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>pain drawing</topic><topic>pain profile</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>sex/gender differences</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szczypien, Natasza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruchay, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruchay, Zino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Sandra Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klawonn, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brain and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szczypien, Natasza</au><au>Ruchay, Zoe</au><au>Ruchay, Zino</au><au>Müller, Sandra Verena</au><au>Kaiser, Claudia</au><au>Klawonn, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines</atitle><jtitle>Brain and behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Behav</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e3285</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e3285-n/a</pages><issn>2162-3279</issn><eissn>2162-3279</eissn><abstract>Background This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs. Methods A total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline. Results Sex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable. Conclusions The findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex. This study investigated the influence of female versus gender‐neutral human body outlines used in pain drawings to localize pain caused by endometriosis. No significant in size or localization of pain areas could be detected between the two different types of pain drawings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37853673</pmid><doi>10.1002/brb3.3285</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9613-182X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2162-3279
ispartof Brain and behavior, 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e3285-n/a
issn 2162-3279
2162-3279
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51ff2f65a8c340c88e5c1db9fd13cfbb
source Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Age
Endometriosis
Ethics
Females
Gender differences
Gynecology
Localization
Medical research
Original
Pain
pain drawing
pain profile
Participation
Patients
Questionnaires
sex/gender differences
Software
title Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T10%3A29%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%E2%80%90specific%20differences%20in%20pain%20localization%20in%20female%20patients%20with%20endometriosis:%20A%20comparison%20of%20sexless%20and%20female%20human%20body%20outlines&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Szczypien,%20Natasza&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e3285&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e3285-n/a&rft.issn=2162-3279&rft.eissn=2162-3279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/brb3.3285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2879403607%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902885852&rft_id=info:pmid/37853673&rfr_iscdi=true