Loading…
Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines
Background This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain lo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brain and behavior 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e3285-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e3285 |
container_title | Brain and behavior |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Szczypien, Natasza Ruchay, Zoe Ruchay, Zino Müller, Sandra Verena Kaiser, Claudia Klawonn, Frank |
description | Background
This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs.
Methods
A total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline.
Results
Sex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex.
This study investigated the influence of female versus gender‐neutral human body outlines used in pain drawings to localize pain caused by endometriosis. No significant in size or localization of pain areas could be detected between the two different types of pain drawings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/brb3.3285 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51ff2f65a8c340c88e5c1db9fd13cfbb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_51ff2f65a8c340c88e5c1db9fd13cfbb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2879403607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kt1qFTEQxxdRbKm98AUk4I1enDYfm92sN9IWPwoFwY_rkGQnPTlkk2Oy2_Z45QsIPqNPYranLa1gApkw85s_w_CvqucEHxCM6aFOmh0wKvijapeShi4YbbvH9_471X7OK1wOJzWt8dNqh7WCs6Zlu9WvL3D15-fvvAbjrDOod9ZCgmAgIxfQWpXHR6O8-6FGF8OctDAoD6U2OghjRpduXCIIfRxgTC5ml9-gI2TisFbJ5dITLcpw5SFnpEJ_27-cBhWQjv0GxWn0LkB-Vj2xymfYv4l71bf3776efFycffpwenJ0tjB1i_lCNzXVRusOCDGKiFZhyufYYKFr280XFAXNmdYGK2KAKC56a5taC6HZXnW61e2jWsl1coNKGxmVk9eJmM6lSqMzHiQn1lLbcCUMq7ERArghve5sT5ixetZ6u9VaT3qA3pSVJOUfiD6sBLeU5_FCEtzSpm15UXh1o5Di9wnyKAeXDXivAsQpSyrarsaswW1BX_6DruKUQtmVpB2mQnDBaaFebymTYs4J7N00BMvZNHI2jZxNU9gX98e_I28tUoDDLXDpPGz-rySPPx-za8m_Yz3Qeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902885852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines</title><source>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Szczypien, Natasza ; Ruchay, Zoe ; Ruchay, Zino ; Müller, Sandra Verena ; Kaiser, Claudia ; Klawonn, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Szczypien, Natasza ; Ruchay, Zoe ; Ruchay, Zino ; Müller, Sandra Verena ; Kaiser, Claudia ; Klawonn, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>Background
This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs.
Methods
A total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline.
Results
Sex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex.
This study investigated the influence of female versus gender‐neutral human body outlines used in pain drawings to localize pain caused by endometriosis. No significant in size or localization of pain areas could be detected between the two different types of pain drawings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2162-3279</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-3279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3285</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37853673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Endometriosis ; Ethics ; Females ; Gender differences ; Gynecology ; Localization ; Medical research ; Original ; Pain ; pain drawing ; pain profile ; Participation ; Patients ; Questionnaires ; sex/gender differences ; Software</subject><ispartof>Brain and behavior, 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e3285-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9613-182X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2902885852/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2902885852?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11540,25730,27900,27901,36988,36989,44565,46026,46450,53765,53767,75095</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szczypien, Natasza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruchay, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruchay, Zino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Sandra Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klawonn, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines</title><title>Brain and behavior</title><addtitle>Brain Behav</addtitle><description>Background
This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs.
Methods
A total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline.
Results
Sex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex.
This study investigated the influence of female versus gender‐neutral human body outlines used in pain drawings to localize pain caused by endometriosis. No significant in size or localization of pain areas could be detected between the two different types of pain drawings.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>pain drawing</subject><subject>pain profile</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>sex/gender differences</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>2162-3279</issn><issn>2162-3279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kt1qFTEQxxdRbKm98AUk4I1enDYfm92sN9IWPwoFwY_rkGQnPTlkk2Oy2_Z45QsIPqNPYranLa1gApkw85s_w_CvqucEHxCM6aFOmh0wKvijapeShi4YbbvH9_471X7OK1wOJzWt8dNqh7WCs6Zlu9WvL3D15-fvvAbjrDOod9ZCgmAgIxfQWpXHR6O8-6FGF8OctDAoD6U2OghjRpduXCIIfRxgTC5ml9-gI2TisFbJ5dITLcpw5SFnpEJ_27-cBhWQjv0GxWn0LkB-Vj2xymfYv4l71bf3776efFycffpwenJ0tjB1i_lCNzXVRusOCDGKiFZhyufYYKFr280XFAXNmdYGK2KAKC56a5taC6HZXnW61e2jWsl1coNKGxmVk9eJmM6lSqMzHiQn1lLbcCUMq7ERArghve5sT5ixetZ6u9VaT3qA3pSVJOUfiD6sBLeU5_FCEtzSpm15UXh1o5Di9wnyKAeXDXivAsQpSyrarsaswW1BX_6DruKUQtmVpB2mQnDBaaFebymTYs4J7N00BMvZNHI2jZxNU9gX98e_I28tUoDDLXDpPGz-rySPPx-za8m_Yz3Qeg</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Szczypien, Natasza</creator><creator>Ruchay, Zoe</creator><creator>Ruchay, Zino</creator><creator>Müller, Sandra Verena</creator><creator>Kaiser, Claudia</creator><creator>Klawonn, Frank</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9613-182X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines</title><author>Szczypien, Natasza ; Ruchay, Zoe ; Ruchay, Zino ; Müller, Sandra Verena ; Kaiser, Claudia ; Klawonn, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>pain drawing</topic><topic>pain profile</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>sex/gender differences</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szczypien, Natasza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruchay, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruchay, Zino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Sandra Verena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klawonn, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Brain and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szczypien, Natasza</au><au>Ruchay, Zoe</au><au>Ruchay, Zino</au><au>Müller, Sandra Verena</au><au>Kaiser, Claudia</au><au>Klawonn, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines</atitle><jtitle>Brain and behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Behav</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e3285</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e3285-n/a</pages><issn>2162-3279</issn><eissn>2162-3279</eissn><abstract>Background
This study explores sex‐specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs.
Methods
A total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline.
Results
Sex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex.
This study investigated the influence of female versus gender‐neutral human body outlines used in pain drawings to localize pain caused by endometriosis. No significant in size or localization of pain areas could be detected between the two different types of pain drawings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37853673</pmid><doi>10.1002/brb3.3285</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9613-182X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2162-3279 |
ispartof | Brain and behavior, 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.e3285-n/a |
issn | 2162-3279 2162-3279 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_51ff2f65a8c340c88e5c1db9fd13cfbb |
source | Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Age Endometriosis Ethics Females Gender differences Gynecology Localization Medical research Original Pain pain drawing pain profile Participation Patients Questionnaires sex/gender differences Software |
title | Sex‐specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T10%3A29%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%E2%80%90specific%20differences%20in%20pain%20localization%20in%20female%20patients%20with%20endometriosis:%20A%20comparison%20of%20sexless%20and%20female%20human%20body%20outlines&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Szczypien,%20Natasza&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e3285&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e3285-n/a&rft.issn=2162-3279&rft.eissn=2162-3279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/brb3.3285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2879403607%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4705-b642bcbb9e11ca187a025a187608b4f9f9f9ea2eb53bbc0a1ce1a58dff64b88b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902885852&rft_id=info:pmid/37853673&rfr_iscdi=true |