Loading…

Effectiveness of Design Procedures in Counteracting Second Order Effects in Steel Moment Resisting Frames

The seismic response of structures is always influenced by second order (P–Δ) effects. The importance of these effects becomes significant when the structure experiences large plastic deformations. Seismic codes indicate that P–Δ effects may be counteracted by means of an increase of the lateral str...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Metals (Basel ) 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.321
Main Authors: Barbagallo, Francesca, Bosco, Melina, Floridia, Andrea, Marino, Edoardo M., Rossi, Pier Paolo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a43c6e1486189b618862b94ff33ef3e089f31bf5736967fb01ec8cf06bdcb26d3
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 321
container_title Metals (Basel )
container_volume 13
creator Barbagallo, Francesca
Bosco, Melina
Floridia, Andrea
Marino, Edoardo M.
Rossi, Pier Paolo
description The seismic response of structures is always influenced by second order (P–Δ) effects. The importance of these effects becomes significant when the structure experiences large plastic deformations. Seismic codes indicate that P–Δ effects may be counteracted by means of an increase of the lateral strength required by a first order analysis, but the expressions of the Strength Amplification Factor (SAF) given in codes are often criticized by researchers. This paper proposes and validates a formulation of the SAF for Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs), which is a generalization of that derived in the past by some of the authors based on the response of SDOF systems. To this end, in a first stage of the research a set of steel MRFs is designed and analyzed neglecting P–Δ effects. The seismic response is determined by nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses and the mean annual frequency of exceedance of the Significant Damage (SD) and Near Collapse (NC) limit states is computed. In a second stage, each structure is re-designed and analyzed considering P–Δ effects. P–Δ effects are counteracted in design according to provisions of European, American and Canadian seismic codes or according to other formulations proposed in literature, such as that proposed by Bernal and that proposed by the authors. The accuracy of the design provisions accounting for P–Δ effects is determined by comparing the response of the structures designed in the first and in the second stages.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/met13020321
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5277fac9b4b54eeb9ddc105de5936fab</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A743186236</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5277fac9b4b54eeb9ddc105de5936fab</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A743186236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a43c6e1486189b618862b94ff33ef3e089f31bf5736967fb01ec8cf06bdcb26d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkV1rHSEQhpfSQkOSq_4BoZflpLrjuutlOPmEhISmvRY_xoOHs5qop5B_H3u2hDigw_C-D-NM131j9AxA0p8zVga0p9CzT91RT8dhxUfKPn_Iv3anpWxpO1MvqJRHXbj0Hm0NfzFiKSR5coElbCJ5zMmi22csJESyTvtYMeumjBvyhDZFRx6yw0wWwEH1VBF35D7NGCv51TjlIL_KesZy0n3xelfw9P973P25uvy9vlndPVzfrs_vVraXrK40ByuQ8UmwSZp2TaI3knsPgB6QTtIDM34YQUgxekMZ2sl6KoyzphcOjrvbheuS3qrnHGadX1XSQR0KKW-UzjXYHaqhH0evrTTcDBzRSOcso4PDQYLw2jTW94X1nNPLHktV27TPsbWvmlUOACPnTXW2qDa6QUP0qbZJtXA4hzYp9KHVz0cOrH0GRDP8WAw2p1Iy-vc2GVX_dqk-7BLeAOaVkYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2779533744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Design Procedures in Counteracting Second Order Effects in Steel Moment Resisting Frames</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Barbagallo, Francesca ; Bosco, Melina ; Floridia, Andrea ; Marino, Edoardo M. ; Rossi, Pier Paolo</creator><creatorcontrib>Barbagallo, Francesca ; Bosco, Melina ; Floridia, Andrea ; Marino, Edoardo M. ; Rossi, Pier Paolo</creatorcontrib><description>The seismic response of structures is always influenced by second order (P–Δ) effects. The importance of these effects becomes significant when the structure experiences large plastic deformations. Seismic codes indicate that P–Δ effects may be counteracted by means of an increase of the lateral strength required by a first order analysis, but the expressions of the Strength Amplification Factor (SAF) given in codes are often criticized by researchers. This paper proposes and validates a formulation of the SAF for Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs), which is a generalization of that derived in the past by some of the authors based on the response of SDOF systems. To this end, in a first stage of the research a set of steel MRFs is designed and analyzed neglecting P–Δ effects. The seismic response is determined by nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses and the mean annual frequency of exceedance of the Significant Damage (SD) and Near Collapse (NC) limit states is computed. In a second stage, each structure is re-designed and analyzed considering P–Δ effects. P–Δ effects are counteracted in design according to provisions of European, American and Canadian seismic codes or according to other formulations proposed in literature, such as that proposed by Bernal and that proposed by the authors. The accuracy of the design provisions accounting for P–Δ effects is determined by comparing the response of the structures designed in the first and in the second stages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/met13020321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Building codes ; Codes ; Deformation effects ; Design ; Ductility ; Earthquake damage ; Limit states ; nonlinear analyses ; second order effects ; seismic codes ; Seismic response ; Shear strength ; Steel ; Steel frames</subject><ispartof>Metals (Basel ), 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.321</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a43c6e1486189b618862b94ff33ef3e089f31bf5736967fb01ec8cf06bdcb26d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6901-6612 ; 0000-0001-9818-3690 ; 0000-0001-5760-1681 ; 0000-0001-6127-1507 ; 0000-0002-1680-0032</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2779533744/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2779533744?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barbagallo, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosco, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floridia, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Edoardo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Pier Paolo</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Design Procedures in Counteracting Second Order Effects in Steel Moment Resisting Frames</title><title>Metals (Basel )</title><description>The seismic response of structures is always influenced by second order (P–Δ) effects. The importance of these effects becomes significant when the structure experiences large plastic deformations. Seismic codes indicate that P–Δ effects may be counteracted by means of an increase of the lateral strength required by a first order analysis, but the expressions of the Strength Amplification Factor (SAF) given in codes are often criticized by researchers. This paper proposes and validates a formulation of the SAF for Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs), which is a generalization of that derived in the past by some of the authors based on the response of SDOF systems. To this end, in a first stage of the research a set of steel MRFs is designed and analyzed neglecting P–Δ effects. The seismic response is determined by nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses and the mean annual frequency of exceedance of the Significant Damage (SD) and Near Collapse (NC) limit states is computed. In a second stage, each structure is re-designed and analyzed considering P–Δ effects. P–Δ effects are counteracted in design according to provisions of European, American and Canadian seismic codes or according to other formulations proposed in literature, such as that proposed by Bernal and that proposed by the authors. The accuracy of the design provisions accounting for P–Δ effects is determined by comparing the response of the structures designed in the first and in the second stages.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Deformation effects</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Ductility</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Limit states</subject><subject>nonlinear analyses</subject><subject>second order effects</subject><subject>seismic codes</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Steel frames</subject><issn>2075-4701</issn><issn>2075-4701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkV1rHSEQhpfSQkOSq_4BoZflpLrjuutlOPmEhISmvRY_xoOHs5qop5B_H3u2hDigw_C-D-NM131j9AxA0p8zVga0p9CzT91RT8dhxUfKPn_Iv3anpWxpO1MvqJRHXbj0Hm0NfzFiKSR5coElbCJ5zMmi22csJESyTvtYMeumjBvyhDZFRx6yw0wWwEH1VBF35D7NGCv51TjlIL_KesZy0n3xelfw9P973P25uvy9vlndPVzfrs_vVraXrK40ByuQ8UmwSZp2TaI3knsPgB6QTtIDM34YQUgxekMZ2sl6KoyzphcOjrvbheuS3qrnHGadX1XSQR0KKW-UzjXYHaqhH0evrTTcDBzRSOcso4PDQYLw2jTW94X1nNPLHktV27TPsbWvmlUOACPnTXW2qDa6QUP0qbZJtXA4hzYp9KHVz0cOrH0GRDP8WAw2p1Iy-vc2GVX_dqk-7BLeAOaVkYg</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Barbagallo, Francesca</creator><creator>Bosco, Melina</creator><creator>Floridia, Andrea</creator><creator>Marino, Edoardo M.</creator><creator>Rossi, Pier Paolo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6901-6612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-3690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5760-1681</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-1507</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1680-0032</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Design Procedures in Counteracting Second Order Effects in Steel Moment Resisting Frames</title><author>Barbagallo, Francesca ; Bosco, Melina ; Floridia, Andrea ; Marino, Edoardo M. ; Rossi, Pier Paolo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a43c6e1486189b618862b94ff33ef3e089f31bf5736967fb01ec8cf06bdcb26d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Deformation effects</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Ductility</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Limit states</topic><topic>nonlinear analyses</topic><topic>second order effects</topic><topic>seismic codes</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Steel frames</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barbagallo, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosco, Melina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Floridia, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Edoardo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Pier Paolo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Metals (Basel )</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barbagallo, Francesca</au><au>Bosco, Melina</au><au>Floridia, Andrea</au><au>Marino, Edoardo M.</au><au>Rossi, Pier Paolo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Design Procedures in Counteracting Second Order Effects in Steel Moment Resisting Frames</atitle><jtitle>Metals (Basel )</jtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>321</spage><pages>321-</pages><issn>2075-4701</issn><eissn>2075-4701</eissn><abstract>The seismic response of structures is always influenced by second order (P–Δ) effects. The importance of these effects becomes significant when the structure experiences large plastic deformations. Seismic codes indicate that P–Δ effects may be counteracted by means of an increase of the lateral strength required by a first order analysis, but the expressions of the Strength Amplification Factor (SAF) given in codes are often criticized by researchers. This paper proposes and validates a formulation of the SAF for Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs), which is a generalization of that derived in the past by some of the authors based on the response of SDOF systems. To this end, in a first stage of the research a set of steel MRFs is designed and analyzed neglecting P–Δ effects. The seismic response is determined by nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses and the mean annual frequency of exceedance of the Significant Damage (SD) and Near Collapse (NC) limit states is computed. In a second stage, each structure is re-designed and analyzed considering P–Δ effects. P–Δ effects are counteracted in design according to provisions of European, American and Canadian seismic codes or according to other formulations proposed in literature, such as that proposed by Bernal and that proposed by the authors. The accuracy of the design provisions accounting for P–Δ effects is determined by comparing the response of the structures designed in the first and in the second stages.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/met13020321</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6901-6612</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-3690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5760-1681</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-1507</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1680-0032</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-4701
ispartof Metals (Basel ), 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.321
issn 2075-4701
2075-4701
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5277fac9b4b54eeb9ddc105de5936fab
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Analysis
Building codes
Codes
Deformation effects
Design
Ductility
Earthquake damage
Limit states
nonlinear analyses
second order effects
seismic codes
Seismic response
Shear strength
Steel
Steel frames
title Effectiveness of Design Procedures in Counteracting Second Order Effects in Steel Moment Resisting Frames
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A46%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Design%20Procedures%20in%20Counteracting%20Second%20Order%20Effects%20in%20Steel%20Moment%20Resisting%20Frames&rft.jtitle=Metals%20(Basel%20)&rft.au=Barbagallo,%20Francesca&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=321&rft.pages=321-&rft.issn=2075-4701&rft.eissn=2075-4701&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/met13020321&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA743186236%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-a43c6e1486189b618862b94ff33ef3e089f31bf5736967fb01ec8cf06bdcb26d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2779533744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A743186236&rfr_iscdi=true