Inclusive education of refugee students with disabilities in higher education: a comparative case study

• Published in: Humanities & social sciences communications 2023-12, Vol.10 (1), p.942-11, Article 942
• Main Authors: Al-Hendawi, Maha, Alodat, Ali M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Access to education; Case studies; College students; Cultural factors; Disability; Displaced persons; Economic factors; Education policy; Handicapped accessibility; Higher education; Human capital; Human rights; Inclusive education; Interviews; Language instruction; People with disabilities; Refugees; Social factors; Students with disabilities; Sustainable development
• ISSN: 2662-9992; 2662-9992
• DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02410-6

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG-4) calls for the establishment of an inclusive education system for all students. As conflicts, persecution, and natural disasters continue to displace millions globally, the duration of refugee situations has become increasingly extended. The complexities of exile have further entangled the human rights issue, making it essential for affected individuals to seek sanctuary in other countries. These crises not only uproot families but also disrupt livelihoods and educational systems. Consequently, the onus has been on international laws and policies to promote and protect inclusive education as a human right for students with disabilities. In this study, using mixed methods, we first conducted interviews with two Syrian students with disabilities at Yarmouk University in Jordan and Qatar University in Qatar. Thematic analysis of these interviews yielded three primary themes: equity in educational opportunities, services provided, and challenges facing inclusive education. Following the interviews, we conducted a document analysis to evaluate the educational policies at both institutions. We used the 4-A framework for this evaluation, emphasizing that educational systems should be Available, Accessible, Acceptable, and Adaptable. The analysis indicated significant disparities in how closely each institution adheres to the principles of the 4-A framework. The findings indicate that inconsistencies in policy implementation, unequal access to financial aid, and difficulties in career planning are influenced by cultural, social, political, and economic factors.