Loading…
Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwe...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC anesthesiology 2023-10, Vol.23 (1), p.1-351, Article 351 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3 |
container_end_page | 351 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | BMC anesthesiology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Tan, Jia Qi Wu, Hsiang-Ling Wang, Yi-Chien Cata, Juan P Chen, Jui-Tai Cherng, Yih-Giun Tai, Ying-Hsuan |
description | Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. Conclusions The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. Keywords: Opioids, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Prevention, Prophylaxis, Retching |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_52e23996582a48b1a3500a5d556d9e07</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A770681846</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_52e23996582a48b1a3500a5d556d9e07</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A770681846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEEqXwBzhF4sIlxR9xYnNBVcVHpUpc4GxNnMnGqyQOtrewf4FfzexuBSxClmXrnXcea8ZTFC85u-JcN28SF7rlFRPysLmpxKPigtckCaHk47_uT4tnKW0Z461m8qL4eb1kjzNm78o1hnXcT_DDp_K7z2PZk4DR92Eq_VLOIa6jX7DqIGFPSo5wj0vYpXIFgiy5coHEME0UhgWmDSYPb0s4knFJPu_L5ELEcobsRnK5MIaYy5R3_f558WSAKeGLh_Oy-Prh_ZebT9Xd54-3N9d3lVM1z5XBDgZmWAvOaS0azlg9DE4MEvuu1r0Aqr8liakOtGnYIOuBMa1qA1I7kJfF7YnbB9jaNfoZ4t4G8PYohLixEKkfE1olUEhjGqUF1LrjIBVjoHqlmt4ga4n17sRad92MvcNDU6Yz6Hlk8aPdhHvLWcMFbzgRXj8QYvi2w5Tt7JPDaYIFqbVWaC1VY4RWZH31j3UbdpH6fHAZRkSjzR_XBqgCvwyBHnYHqL1uW9ZoruuGXFf_cdHqcfb0jTh40s8SxCnBxZBSxOF3kZzZwwza0wxamj97nEEr5C8CG9FI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890061989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tan, Jia Qi ; Wu, Hsiang-Ling ; Wang, Yi-Chien ; Cata, Juan P ; Chen, Jui-Tai ; Cherng, Yih-Giun ; Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jia Qi ; Wu, Hsiang-Ling ; Wang, Yi-Chien ; Cata, Juan P ; Chen, Jui-Tai ; Cherng, Yih-Giun ; Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><description>Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. Conclusions The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. Keywords: Opioids, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Prevention, Prophylaxis, Retching</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2253</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analgesia ; Analgesics ; Analysis ; Anti-inflammatory agents ; Antiemetics ; Bupivacaine ; Cohort analysis ; Disease prevention ; Droperidol ; Drug dosages ; Fentanyl ; General anesthesia ; Intravenous administration ; Medical centers ; Medical personnel ; Medical records ; Morphine ; Narcotics ; Nausea ; Opioids ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Patients ; Postoperative nausea and vomiting ; Prevention ; Prophylaxis ; Regression analysis ; Retching ; Review boards ; Surgery ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>BMC anesthesiology, 2023-10, Vol.23 (1), p.1-351, Article 351</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612161/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2890061989?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jia Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hsiang-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yi-Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cata, Juan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jui-Tai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherng, Yih-Giun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><title>Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study</title><title>BMC anesthesiology</title><description>Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. Conclusions The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. Keywords: Opioids, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Prevention, Prophylaxis, Retching</description><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anti-inflammatory agents</subject><subject>Antiemetics</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Droperidol</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Medical centers</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative nausea and vomiting</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retching</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>1471-2253</issn><issn>1471-2253</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEEqXwBzhF4sIlxR9xYnNBVcVHpUpc4GxNnMnGqyQOtrewf4FfzexuBSxClmXrnXcea8ZTFC85u-JcN28SF7rlFRPysLmpxKPigtckCaHk47_uT4tnKW0Z461m8qL4eb1kjzNm78o1hnXcT_DDp_K7z2PZk4DR92Eq_VLOIa6jX7DqIGFPSo5wj0vYpXIFgiy5coHEME0UhgWmDSYPb0s4knFJPu_L5ELEcobsRnK5MIaYy5R3_f558WSAKeGLh_Oy-Prh_ZebT9Xd54-3N9d3lVM1z5XBDgZmWAvOaS0azlg9DE4MEvuu1r0Aqr8liakOtGnYIOuBMa1qA1I7kJfF7YnbB9jaNfoZ4t4G8PYohLixEKkfE1olUEhjGqUF1LrjIBVjoHqlmt4ga4n17sRad92MvcNDU6Yz6Hlk8aPdhHvLWcMFbzgRXj8QYvi2w5Tt7JPDaYIFqbVWaC1VY4RWZH31j3UbdpH6fHAZRkSjzR_XBqgCvwyBHnYHqL1uW9ZoruuGXFf_cdHqcfb0jTh40s8SxCnBxZBSxOF3kZzZwwza0wxamj97nEEr5C8CG9FI</recordid><startdate>20231028</startdate><enddate>20231028</enddate><creator>Tan, Jia Qi</creator><creator>Wu, Hsiang-Ling</creator><creator>Wang, Yi-Chien</creator><creator>Cata, Juan P</creator><creator>Chen, Jui-Tai</creator><creator>Cherng, Yih-Giun</creator><creator>Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231028</creationdate><title>Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study</title><author>Tan, Jia Qi ; Wu, Hsiang-Ling ; Wang, Yi-Chien ; Cata, Juan P ; Chen, Jui-Tai ; Cherng, Yih-Giun ; Tai, Ying-Hsuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anti-inflammatory agents</topic><topic>Antiemetics</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Droperidol</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Medical centers</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative nausea and vomiting</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retching</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jia Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hsiang-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yi-Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cata, Juan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jui-Tai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherng, Yih-Giun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC anesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Jia Qi</au><au>Wu, Hsiang-Ling</au><au>Wang, Yi-Chien</au><au>Cata, Juan P</au><au>Chen, Jui-Tai</au><au>Cherng, Yih-Giun</au><au>Tai, Ying-Hsuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study</atitle><jtitle>BMC anesthesiology</jtitle><date>2023-10-28</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>1-351</pages><artnum>351</artnum><issn>1471-2253</issn><eissn>1471-2253</eissn><abstract>Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. Conclusions The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. Keywords: Opioids, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Prevention, Prophylaxis, Retching</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2253 |
ispartof | BMC anesthesiology, 2023-10, Vol.23 (1), p.1-351, Article 351 |
issn | 1471-2253 1471-2253 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_52e23996582a48b1a3500a5d556d9e07 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analgesia Analgesics Analysis Anti-inflammatory agents Antiemetics Bupivacaine Cohort analysis Disease prevention Droperidol Drug dosages Fentanyl General anesthesia Intravenous administration Medical centers Medical personnel Medical records Morphine Narcotics Nausea Opioids Pain Pain perception Patients Postoperative nausea and vomiting Prevention Prophylaxis Regression analysis Retching Review boards Surgery Vomiting |
title | Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A44%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antiemetic%20prophylaxis%20with%20droperidol%20in%20morphine-based%20intravenous%20patient-controlled%20analgesia:%20a%20propensity%20score%20matched%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20anesthesiology&rft.au=Tan,%20Jia%20Qi&rft.date=2023-10-28&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=1-351&rft.artnum=351&rft.issn=1471-2253&rft.eissn=1471-2253&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA770681846%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890061989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A770681846&rfr_iscdi=true |