Loading…

Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study

Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC anesthesiology 2023-10, Vol.23 (1), p.1-351, Article 351
Main Authors: Tan, Jia Qi, Wu, Hsiang-Ling, Wang, Yi-Chien, Cata, Juan P, Chen, Jui-Tai, Cherng, Yih-Giun, Tai, Ying-Hsuan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3
container_end_page 351
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title BMC anesthesiology
container_volume 23
creator Tan, Jia Qi
Wu, Hsiang-Ling
Wang, Yi-Chien
Cata, Juan P
Chen, Jui-Tai
Cherng, Yih-Giun
Tai, Ying-Hsuan
description Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, p < 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. Conclusions The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. Keywords: Opioids, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Prevention, Prophylaxis, Retching
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_52e23996582a48b1a3500a5d556d9e07</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A770681846</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_52e23996582a48b1a3500a5d556d9e07</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A770681846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEEqXwBzhF4sIlxR9xYnNBVcVHpUpc4GxNnMnGqyQOtrewf4FfzexuBSxClmXrnXcea8ZTFC85u-JcN28SF7rlFRPysLmpxKPigtckCaHk47_uT4tnKW0Z461m8qL4eb1kjzNm78o1hnXcT_DDp_K7z2PZk4DR92Eq_VLOIa6jX7DqIGFPSo5wj0vYpXIFgiy5coHEME0UhgWmDSYPb0s4knFJPu_L5ELEcobsRnK5MIaYy5R3_f558WSAKeGLh_Oy-Prh_ZebT9Xd54-3N9d3lVM1z5XBDgZmWAvOaS0azlg9DE4MEvuu1r0Aqr8liakOtGnYIOuBMa1qA1I7kJfF7YnbB9jaNfoZ4t4G8PYohLixEKkfE1olUEhjGqUF1LrjIBVjoHqlmt4ga4n17sRad92MvcNDU6Yz6Hlk8aPdhHvLWcMFbzgRXj8QYvi2w5Tt7JPDaYIFqbVWaC1VY4RWZH31j3UbdpH6fHAZRkSjzR_XBqgCvwyBHnYHqL1uW9ZoruuGXFf_cdHqcfb0jTh40s8SxCnBxZBSxOF3kZzZwwza0wxamj97nEEr5C8CG9FI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890061989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tan, Jia Qi ; Wu, Hsiang-Ling ; Wang, Yi-Chien ; Cata, Juan P ; Chen, Jui-Tai ; Cherng, Yih-Giun ; Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jia Qi ; Wu, Hsiang-Ling ; Wang, Yi-Chien ; Cata, Juan P ; Chen, Jui-Tai ; Cherng, Yih-Giun ; Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><description>Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, p &lt; 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. Conclusions The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. Keywords: Opioids, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Prevention, Prophylaxis, Retching</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2253</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analgesia ; Analgesics ; Analysis ; Anti-inflammatory agents ; Antiemetics ; Bupivacaine ; Cohort analysis ; Disease prevention ; Droperidol ; Drug dosages ; Fentanyl ; General anesthesia ; Intravenous administration ; Medical centers ; Medical personnel ; Medical records ; Morphine ; Narcotics ; Nausea ; Opioids ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Patients ; Postoperative nausea and vomiting ; Prevention ; Prophylaxis ; Regression analysis ; Retching ; Review boards ; Surgery ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>BMC anesthesiology, 2023-10, Vol.23 (1), p.1-351, Article 351</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10612161/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2890061989?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jia Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hsiang-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yi-Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cata, Juan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jui-Tai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherng, Yih-Giun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><title>Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study</title><title>BMC anesthesiology</title><description>Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, p &lt; 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. Conclusions The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. Keywords: Opioids, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Prevention, Prophylaxis, Retching</description><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anti-inflammatory agents</subject><subject>Antiemetics</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Droperidol</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Medical centers</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Nausea</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative nausea and vomiting</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Retching</subject><subject>Review boards</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>1471-2253</issn><issn>1471-2253</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEEqXwBzhF4sIlxR9xYnNBVcVHpUpc4GxNnMnGqyQOtrewf4FfzexuBSxClmXrnXcea8ZTFC85u-JcN28SF7rlFRPysLmpxKPigtckCaHk47_uT4tnKW0Z461m8qL4eb1kjzNm78o1hnXcT_DDp_K7z2PZk4DR92Eq_VLOIa6jX7DqIGFPSo5wj0vYpXIFgiy5coHEME0UhgWmDSYPb0s4knFJPu_L5ELEcobsRnK5MIaYy5R3_f558WSAKeGLh_Oy-Prh_ZebT9Xd54-3N9d3lVM1z5XBDgZmWAvOaS0azlg9DE4MEvuu1r0Aqr8liakOtGnYIOuBMa1qA1I7kJfF7YnbB9jaNfoZ4t4G8PYohLixEKkfE1olUEhjGqUF1LrjIBVjoHqlmt4ga4n17sRad92MvcNDU6Yz6Hlk8aPdhHvLWcMFbzgRXj8QYvi2w5Tt7JPDaYIFqbVWaC1VY4RWZH31j3UbdpH6fHAZRkSjzR_XBqgCvwyBHnYHqL1uW9ZoruuGXFf_cdHqcfb0jTh40s8SxCnBxZBSxOF3kZzZwwza0wxamj97nEEr5C8CG9FI</recordid><startdate>20231028</startdate><enddate>20231028</enddate><creator>Tan, Jia Qi</creator><creator>Wu, Hsiang-Ling</creator><creator>Wang, Yi-Chien</creator><creator>Cata, Juan P</creator><creator>Chen, Jui-Tai</creator><creator>Cherng, Yih-Giun</creator><creator>Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231028</creationdate><title>Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study</title><author>Tan, Jia Qi ; Wu, Hsiang-Ling ; Wang, Yi-Chien ; Cata, Juan P ; Chen, Jui-Tai ; Cherng, Yih-Giun ; Tai, Ying-Hsuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anti-inflammatory agents</topic><topic>Antiemetics</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Droperidol</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Medical centers</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Nausea</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative nausea and vomiting</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Retching</topic><topic>Review boards</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Jia Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hsiang-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yi-Chien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cata, Juan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jui-Tai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherng, Yih-Giun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tai, Ying-Hsuan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC anesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Jia Qi</au><au>Wu, Hsiang-Ling</au><au>Wang, Yi-Chien</au><au>Cata, Juan P</au><au>Chen, Jui-Tai</au><au>Cherng, Yih-Giun</au><au>Tai, Ying-Hsuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study</atitle><jtitle>BMC anesthesiology</jtitle><date>2023-10-28</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>1-351</pages><artnum>351</artnum><issn>1471-2253</issn><eissn>1471-2253</eissn><abstract>Background There are limited real-world data regarding the use of droperidol for antiemetic prophylaxis in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). This study aimed to evaluate the antiemetic benefits and sedation effects of droperidol in morphine-based IV-PCA. Methods Patients who underwent major surgery and used morphine-based IV-PCA at a medical center from January 2020 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the rate of any postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) within 72 h after surgery. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with and without the addition of droperidol to IV-PCA infusate in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results After matching, 1,104 subjects were included for analysis. The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV (aOR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, p &lt; 0.0001). The antiemetic effect of droperidol was significant within 36 h after surgery and attenuated thereafter. Droperidol was significantly associated with a lower risk of antiemetic uses (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.41-0.80, p = 0.0011). The rate of unintentional sedation was comparable between the patients with (9.1%) and without (7.8%; p = 0.4481) the addition of droperidol. Postoperative opioid consumption and numeric rating scale acute pain scores were similar between groups. Conclusions The addition of droperidol to IV-PCA reduced the risk of PONV without increasing opiate consumption or influencing the level of sedation. However, additional prophylactic therapies are needed to prevent late-onset PONV. Keywords: Opioids, Postoperative nausea and vomiting, Prevention, Prophylaxis, Retching</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2253
ispartof BMC anesthesiology, 2023-10, Vol.23 (1), p.1-351, Article 351
issn 1471-2253
1471-2253
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_52e23996582a48b1a3500a5d556d9e07
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Analgesia
Analgesics
Analysis
Anti-inflammatory agents
Antiemetics
Bupivacaine
Cohort analysis
Disease prevention
Droperidol
Drug dosages
Fentanyl
General anesthesia
Intravenous administration
Medical centers
Medical personnel
Medical records
Morphine
Narcotics
Nausea
Opioids
Pain
Pain perception
Patients
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Prevention
Prophylaxis
Regression analysis
Retching
Review boards
Surgery
Vomiting
title Antiemetic prophylaxis with droperidol in morphine-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a propensity score matched cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A44%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antiemetic%20prophylaxis%20with%20droperidol%20in%20morphine-based%20intravenous%20patient-controlled%20analgesia:%20a%20propensity%20score%20matched%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20anesthesiology&rft.au=Tan,%20Jia%20Qi&rft.date=2023-10-28&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=1-351&rft.artnum=351&rft.issn=1471-2253&rft.eissn=1471-2253&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12871-023-02319-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA770681846%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-9ebaf0907acc88261004ffc2f3edb48d2a31974ff05ba8960f34f008549a38ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890061989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A770681846&rfr_iscdi=true