Loading…

Wearable in-ear pulse oximetry validly measures oxygen saturation between 70% and 100%: A prospective agreement study

Objectives Postoperative monitoring outside intensive and post-anaesthesia care units is seldom, partly due to lack of suitable and approved systems. We therefore aim to validate the oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate measurement of the in-ear sensor c-med° alpha with a reference pulse oximeter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Digital health 2023-01, Vol.9, p.20552076231211169-20552076231211169
Main Authors: Bubb, Catherina AB, Weber, Michael, Kretsch, Nadine, Heim, Ralph, Zellhuber, Incinur, Schmid, Sebastian, Kagerbauer, Simone M, Kreuzer, Johannes, Schaller, Stefan J, Blobner, Manfred, Jungwirth, Bettina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-22676349beabc85711c0a6cf91d41447840dfab372e64a4fe6c83c71caba42f13
container_end_page 20552076231211169
container_issue
container_start_page 20552076231211169
container_title Digital health
container_volume 9
creator Bubb, Catherina AB
Weber, Michael
Kretsch, Nadine
Heim, Ralph
Zellhuber, Incinur
Schmid, Sebastian
Kagerbauer, Simone M
Kreuzer, Johannes
Schaller, Stefan J
Blobner, Manfred
Jungwirth, Bettina
description Objectives Postoperative monitoring outside intensive and post-anaesthesia care units is seldom, partly due to lack of suitable and approved systems. We therefore aim to validate the oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate measurement of the in-ear sensor c-med° alpha with a reference pulse oximeter. Methods This prospective agreement study was conducted in 12 healthy (ASA 1) adult (18–50 years) volunteers according to the EN ISO 80601-2-61. The sitting volunteers were equipped with the finger pulse oximeter Rad-5 and two c-med° alpha sensors in each ear. The inspiratory oxygen content was reduced via a tight-fitting breathing mask to achieve five defined plateaus with stable SpO2 between 99% and 70%. The deviation of the SpO2 and pulse rate measurements of the c-med° alpha from those of the Rad-5 was calculated using the mean square error (Arms). Bias and limits of agreement between both devices were calculated using the Bland-Altman technique. The precision was compared based on the repeatability coefficients. Results The c-med° alpha measured SpO2 had an Arms = 1.9% relative to the Rad-5, a non-significant bias (−0.1% (-0.2% to 0.0%)), levels of agreement from −4.0% to 3.8%, and the same repeatability coefficient (0.8% vs. 0.8%). The c-med° alpha measured pulse rate did not deviate from the one measured with the certified finger pulse oximeter (bias: 0.1 min−1 (0 to 0.1 min−1), level of agreement: −3.6 to 3.7 min−1, Arms: 1.8 min−1). Conclusions The c-med° alpha fulfils the EN ISO 80601-2-61 standard and is sufficiently accurate for measuring SpO2 and pulse rate in healthy adults at rest. Trial registration EUDAMED No. CIV-21-03-036033
doi_str_mv 10.1177/20552076231211169
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_530beee8f0c14e0c8153e47c7fe36de1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20552076231211169</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_530beee8f0c14e0c8153e47c7fe36de1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2895699975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-22676349beabc85711c0a6cf91d41447840dfab372e64a4fe6c83c71caba42f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UV1rFTEQXUTB0vYH-BaQgi_bZpJssvGtFD8KBV8UH8NsdvaSy35ck2x1_725XlFRfJrh5JwzmTlV9QL4NYAxN4I3jeBGCwkCALR9Up0dsfoIPv2jf15dprTnnIORxoI-q9bPhBG7kViY69KywzomYsu3MFGOG3vEMfTjxibCtEZK5WXb0cwS5jViDsvMOspfqUCGXzGcewacX71mt-wQl3Qgn8MjMdxFoonmzFJe--2iejZgmXP5s55Xn96--Xj3vn748O7-7vah9orrXAuhjZbKdoSdbxsD4DlqP1joFShlWsX7ATtpBGmFaiDtW-kNeOxQiQHkeXV_8u0X3LtDDBPGzS0Y3A9giTuHMQc_kmsk74ioHbgHRdy30EhSxpuBpO7p6PXq5FX2-rJSym4KydM44kzLmpxobaOttaYp1Jd_UffLGueyqRO2hFFIrSksOLF8OVSKNPz6IHB3zNX9k2vRXJ80CXf02_X_gu_i36Fq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920599787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wearable in-ear pulse oximetry validly measures oxygen saturation between 70% and 100%: A prospective agreement study</title><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bubb, Catherina AB ; Weber, Michael ; Kretsch, Nadine ; Heim, Ralph ; Zellhuber, Incinur ; Schmid, Sebastian ; Kagerbauer, Simone M ; Kreuzer, Johannes ; Schaller, Stefan J ; Blobner, Manfred ; Jungwirth, Bettina</creator><creatorcontrib>Bubb, Catherina AB ; Weber, Michael ; Kretsch, Nadine ; Heim, Ralph ; Zellhuber, Incinur ; Schmid, Sebastian ; Kagerbauer, Simone M ; Kreuzer, Johannes ; Schaller, Stefan J ; Blobner, Manfred ; Jungwirth, Bettina</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Postoperative monitoring outside intensive and post-anaesthesia care units is seldom, partly due to lack of suitable and approved systems. We therefore aim to validate the oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate measurement of the in-ear sensor c-med° alpha with a reference pulse oximeter. Methods This prospective agreement study was conducted in 12 healthy (ASA 1) adult (18–50 years) volunteers according to the EN ISO 80601-2-61. The sitting volunteers were equipped with the finger pulse oximeter Rad-5 and two c-med° alpha sensors in each ear. The inspiratory oxygen content was reduced via a tight-fitting breathing mask to achieve five defined plateaus with stable SpO2 between 99% and 70%. The deviation of the SpO2 and pulse rate measurements of the c-med° alpha from those of the Rad-5 was calculated using the mean square error (Arms). Bias and limits of agreement between both devices were calculated using the Bland-Altman technique. The precision was compared based on the repeatability coefficients. Results The c-med° alpha measured SpO2 had an Arms = 1.9% relative to the Rad-5, a non-significant bias (−0.1% (-0.2% to 0.0%)), levels of agreement from −4.0% to 3.8%, and the same repeatability coefficient (0.8% vs. 0.8%). The c-med° alpha measured pulse rate did not deviate from the one measured with the certified finger pulse oximeter (bias: 0.1 min−1 (0 to 0.1 min−1), level of agreement: −3.6 to 3.7 min−1, Arms: 1.8 min−1). Conclusions The c-med° alpha fulfils the EN ISO 80601-2-61 standard and is sufficiently accurate for measuring SpO2 and pulse rate in healthy adults at rest. Trial registration EUDAMED No. CIV-21-03-036033</description><identifier>ISSN: 2055-2076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2055-2076</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20552076231211169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Oxygen saturation ; Pulse oximetry ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>Digital health, 2023-01, Vol.9, p.20552076231211169-20552076231211169</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-22676349beabc85711c0a6cf91d41447840dfab372e64a4fe6c83c71caba42f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6683-9584 ; 0009-0009-3440-0428</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20552076231211169$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920599787?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21965,25752,27852,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,44944,45332</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bubb, Catherina AB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kretsch, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heim, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zellhuber, Incinur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kagerbauer, Simone M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuzer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaller, Stefan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blobner, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungwirth, Bettina</creatorcontrib><title>Wearable in-ear pulse oximetry validly measures oxygen saturation between 70% and 100%: A prospective agreement study</title><title>Digital health</title><description>Objectives Postoperative monitoring outside intensive and post-anaesthesia care units is seldom, partly due to lack of suitable and approved systems. We therefore aim to validate the oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate measurement of the in-ear sensor c-med° alpha with a reference pulse oximeter. Methods This prospective agreement study was conducted in 12 healthy (ASA 1) adult (18–50 years) volunteers according to the EN ISO 80601-2-61. The sitting volunteers were equipped with the finger pulse oximeter Rad-5 and two c-med° alpha sensors in each ear. The inspiratory oxygen content was reduced via a tight-fitting breathing mask to achieve five defined plateaus with stable SpO2 between 99% and 70%. The deviation of the SpO2 and pulse rate measurements of the c-med° alpha from those of the Rad-5 was calculated using the mean square error (Arms). Bias and limits of agreement between both devices were calculated using the Bland-Altman technique. The precision was compared based on the repeatability coefficients. Results The c-med° alpha measured SpO2 had an Arms = 1.9% relative to the Rad-5, a non-significant bias (−0.1% (-0.2% to 0.0%)), levels of agreement from −4.0% to 3.8%, and the same repeatability coefficient (0.8% vs. 0.8%). The c-med° alpha measured pulse rate did not deviate from the one measured with the certified finger pulse oximeter (bias: 0.1 min−1 (0 to 0.1 min−1), level of agreement: −3.6 to 3.7 min−1, Arms: 1.8 min−1). Conclusions The c-med° alpha fulfils the EN ISO 80601-2-61 standard and is sufficiently accurate for measuring SpO2 and pulse rate in healthy adults at rest. Trial registration EUDAMED No. CIV-21-03-036033</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Oxygen saturation</subject><subject>Pulse oximetry</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>2055-2076</issn><issn>2055-2076</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UV1rFTEQXUTB0vYH-BaQgi_bZpJssvGtFD8KBV8UH8NsdvaSy35ck2x1_725XlFRfJrh5JwzmTlV9QL4NYAxN4I3jeBGCwkCALR9Up0dsfoIPv2jf15dprTnnIORxoI-q9bPhBG7kViY69KywzomYsu3MFGOG3vEMfTjxibCtEZK5WXb0cwS5jViDsvMOspfqUCGXzGcewacX71mt-wQl3Qgn8MjMdxFoonmzFJe--2iejZgmXP5s55Xn96--Xj3vn748O7-7vah9orrXAuhjZbKdoSdbxsD4DlqP1joFShlWsX7ATtpBGmFaiDtW-kNeOxQiQHkeXV_8u0X3LtDDBPGzS0Y3A9giTuHMQc_kmsk74ioHbgHRdy30EhSxpuBpO7p6PXq5FX2-rJSym4KydM44kzLmpxobaOttaYp1Jd_UffLGueyqRO2hFFIrSksOLF8OVSKNPz6IHB3zNX9k2vRXJ80CXf02_X_gu_i36Fq</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Bubb, Catherina AB</creator><creator>Weber, Michael</creator><creator>Kretsch, Nadine</creator><creator>Heim, Ralph</creator><creator>Zellhuber, Incinur</creator><creator>Schmid, Sebastian</creator><creator>Kagerbauer, Simone M</creator><creator>Kreuzer, Johannes</creator><creator>Schaller, Stefan J</creator><creator>Blobner, Manfred</creator><creator>Jungwirth, Bettina</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-9584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3440-0428</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Wearable in-ear pulse oximetry validly measures oxygen saturation between 70% and 100%: A prospective agreement study</title><author>Bubb, Catherina AB ; Weber, Michael ; Kretsch, Nadine ; Heim, Ralph ; Zellhuber, Incinur ; Schmid, Sebastian ; Kagerbauer, Simone M ; Kreuzer, Johannes ; Schaller, Stefan J ; Blobner, Manfred ; Jungwirth, Bettina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-22676349beabc85711c0a6cf91d41447840dfab372e64a4fe6c83c71caba42f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Oxygen saturation</topic><topic>Pulse oximetry</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bubb, Catherina AB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kretsch, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heim, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zellhuber, Incinur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kagerbauer, Simone M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuzer, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaller, Stefan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blobner, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungwirth, Bettina</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Digital health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bubb, Catherina AB</au><au>Weber, Michael</au><au>Kretsch, Nadine</au><au>Heim, Ralph</au><au>Zellhuber, Incinur</au><au>Schmid, Sebastian</au><au>Kagerbauer, Simone M</au><au>Kreuzer, Johannes</au><au>Schaller, Stefan J</au><au>Blobner, Manfred</au><au>Jungwirth, Bettina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wearable in-ear pulse oximetry validly measures oxygen saturation between 70% and 100%: A prospective agreement study</atitle><jtitle>Digital health</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>20552076231211169</spage><epage>20552076231211169</epage><pages>20552076231211169-20552076231211169</pages><issn>2055-2076</issn><eissn>2055-2076</eissn><abstract>Objectives Postoperative monitoring outside intensive and post-anaesthesia care units is seldom, partly due to lack of suitable and approved systems. We therefore aim to validate the oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate measurement of the in-ear sensor c-med° alpha with a reference pulse oximeter. Methods This prospective agreement study was conducted in 12 healthy (ASA 1) adult (18–50 years) volunteers according to the EN ISO 80601-2-61. The sitting volunteers were equipped with the finger pulse oximeter Rad-5 and two c-med° alpha sensors in each ear. The inspiratory oxygen content was reduced via a tight-fitting breathing mask to achieve five defined plateaus with stable SpO2 between 99% and 70%. The deviation of the SpO2 and pulse rate measurements of the c-med° alpha from those of the Rad-5 was calculated using the mean square error (Arms). Bias and limits of agreement between both devices were calculated using the Bland-Altman technique. The precision was compared based on the repeatability coefficients. Results The c-med° alpha measured SpO2 had an Arms = 1.9% relative to the Rad-5, a non-significant bias (−0.1% (-0.2% to 0.0%)), levels of agreement from −4.0% to 3.8%, and the same repeatability coefficient (0.8% vs. 0.8%). The c-med° alpha measured pulse rate did not deviate from the one measured with the certified finger pulse oximeter (bias: 0.1 min−1 (0 to 0.1 min−1), level of agreement: −3.6 to 3.7 min−1, Arms: 1.8 min−1). Conclusions The c-med° alpha fulfils the EN ISO 80601-2-61 standard and is sufficiently accurate for measuring SpO2 and pulse rate in healthy adults at rest. Trial registration EUDAMED No. CIV-21-03-036033</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20552076231211169</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-9584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3440-0428</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2055-2076
ispartof Digital health, 2023-01, Vol.9, p.20552076231211169-20552076231211169
issn 2055-2076
2055-2076
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_530beee8f0c14e0c8153e47c7fe36de1
source SAGE Open Access; Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Agreements
Oxygen saturation
Pulse oximetry
Telemedicine
title Wearable in-ear pulse oximetry validly measures oxygen saturation between 70% and 100%: A prospective agreement study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A18%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wearable%20in-ear%20pulse%20oximetry%20validly%20measures%20oxygen%20saturation%20between%2070%25%20and%20100%25:%20A%20prospective%20agreement%20study&rft.jtitle=Digital%20health&rft.au=Bubb,%20Catherina%20AB&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=20552076231211169&rft.epage=20552076231211169&rft.pages=20552076231211169-20552076231211169&rft.issn=2055-2076&rft.eissn=2055-2076&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20552076231211169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2895699975%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-22676349beabc85711c0a6cf91d41447840dfab372e64a4fe6c83c71caba42f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920599787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20552076231211169&rfr_iscdi=true