Loading…

Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach

Ecomorphs create the opportunity to investigate ecological adaptation because they encompass organisms that evolved characteristic morphologies under similar ecological demands. For over 50 years, scorpions have been empirically assigned to ecomorphs based on the characteristic morphologies that roc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC ecology and evolution 2022-02, Vol.22 (1), p.17-10, Article 17
Main Authors: Coelho, Pedro, Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni, Sousa, Pedro, Stockmann, Mark, van der Meijden, Arie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-8ce87c7e731e51b57934fcff0011b44720906bc1999661d1b3ec45201721265f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-8ce87c7e731e51b57934fcff0011b44720906bc1999661d1b3ec45201721265f3
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
container_title BMC ecology and evolution
container_volume 22
creator Coelho, Pedro
Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni
Sousa, Pedro
Stockmann, Mark
van der Meijden, Arie
description Ecomorphs create the opportunity to investigate ecological adaptation because they encompass organisms that evolved characteristic morphologies under similar ecological demands. For over 50 years, scorpions have been empirically assigned to ecomorphs based on the characteristic morphologies that rock, sand, vegetation, underground, and surface dwellers assume. This study aims to independently test the existence of scorpion ecomorphs by quantifying the association between their morphology and ecology across 61 species, representing 14 families of the Scorpiones order. Without a priori categorization of species into ecomorphs, we identified four groups based on microhabitat descriptors, which reflect how scorpion ecospace is clustered. Moreover, these microhabitat groups, i.e., ecotypes, have significantly divergent morphologies; therefore, they represent ecomorphs. These ecomorphs largely correspond with the ones previously described in the literature. Therefore, we retained the names Lithophilous, Psammophilous, and Pelophilous, and proposed the name Phytophilous for vegetation dwellers. Finally, we sought to map the morphology-ecology association in scorpions and found that the morphological regions most tightly associated with ecology are at the extremities. Moreover, the major trend in ecomorphological covariation is that longer walking legs and relatively slender pedipalps (pincers) are associated with sandy microhabitats, while the inverse morphological proportions are associated with rocky microhabitats. Scorpion ecomorphs are validated in a naïve approach, from ecological descriptors and whole body anatomy. This places them on a more solid quantitative footing for future studies of ecological adaptation in scorpions. Our results verify most of the previously defined ecomorphotypes and could be used as a current practice to understand the adaptive significance of ecological morphology.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_532731c114a34594af14ffbe781e57e2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A735421403</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_532731c114a34594af14ffbe781e57e2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A735421403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-8ce87c7e731e51b57934fcff0011b44720906bc1999661d1b3ec45201721265f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkttq3DAQhk1paUKaF-hFMfSmvXCq0dG-KYTQw0KgkLbXQtaOvAq25Ur20j5VH6IvVm2chiwUITSMvvk1I_6ieAnkAqCW7xLQWtKK0LyhkXVFnhSnVDFSKajp00fxSXGe0i0hhApglLPnxQkTILmU8rRQN4h70y9m9mNXJhvi5MNYog1DDnepXNLhwpSj-fN7j6WZphiM3b0onjnTJzy_P8-K7x8_fLv6XF1_-bS5uryurJDNXNUWa2UVKgYooBWqYdxZ5wgBaDlXlDREthaappESttAytFxQAooClcKxs2Kz6m6DudVT9IOJv3QwXt8lQuy0ibO3PWrB8shgAbhhXDTcOODOtajq_LZCmrXer1rT0g64tTjO0fRHosc3o9_pLux1XeeehMoCb-4FYvixYJr14JPFvjcjhiVpKmlDhGDygL5e0c7k1vzoQla0B1xfKiY4BU5Ypi7-Q-W1xcHbMKLzOX9U8PaoIDMz_pw7s6SkN19vjlm6sjaGlCK6h0mB6IOH9OohnT2k7zykSS569fiPHkr-OYb9BW5BvnY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2629055367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Coelho, Pedro ; Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ; Sousa, Pedro ; Stockmann, Mark ; van der Meijden, Arie</creator><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro ; Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ; Sousa, Pedro ; Stockmann, Mark ; van der Meijden, Arie</creatorcontrib><description>Ecomorphs create the opportunity to investigate ecological adaptation because they encompass organisms that evolved characteristic morphologies under similar ecological demands. For over 50 years, scorpions have been empirically assigned to ecomorphs based on the characteristic morphologies that rock, sand, vegetation, underground, and surface dwellers assume. This study aims to independently test the existence of scorpion ecomorphs by quantifying the association between their morphology and ecology across 61 species, representing 14 families of the Scorpiones order. Without a priori categorization of species into ecomorphs, we identified four groups based on microhabitat descriptors, which reflect how scorpion ecospace is clustered. Moreover, these microhabitat groups, i.e., ecotypes, have significantly divergent morphologies; therefore, they represent ecomorphs. These ecomorphs largely correspond with the ones previously described in the literature. Therefore, we retained the names Lithophilous, Psammophilous, and Pelophilous, and proposed the name Phytophilous for vegetation dwellers. Finally, we sought to map the morphology-ecology association in scorpions and found that the morphological regions most tightly associated with ecology are at the extremities. Moreover, the major trend in ecomorphological covariation is that longer walking legs and relatively slender pedipalps (pincers) are associated with sandy microhabitats, while the inverse morphological proportions are associated with rocky microhabitats. Scorpion ecomorphs are validated in a naïve approach, from ecological descriptors and whole body anatomy. This places them on a more solid quantitative footing for future studies of ecological adaptation in scorpions. Our results verify most of the previously defined ecomorphotypes and could be used as a current practice to understand the adaptive significance of ecological morphology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2730-7182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2730-7182</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35164666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Animals ; Ecomorphological diversity ; Ecomorphology ; Environmental aspects ; Extremities ; Microhabitat ; Morphology (Animals) ; Physiological aspects ; Scorpions</subject><ispartof>BMC ecology and evolution, 2022-02, Vol.22 (1), p.17-10, Article 17</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-8ce87c7e731e51b57934fcff0011b44720906bc1999661d1b3ec45201721265f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-8ce87c7e731e51b57934fcff0011b44720906bc1999661d1b3ec45201721265f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845257/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845257/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockmann, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meijden, Arie</creatorcontrib><title>Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach</title><title>BMC ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>BMC Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Ecomorphs create the opportunity to investigate ecological adaptation because they encompass organisms that evolved characteristic morphologies under similar ecological demands. For over 50 years, scorpions have been empirically assigned to ecomorphs based on the characteristic morphologies that rock, sand, vegetation, underground, and surface dwellers assume. This study aims to independently test the existence of scorpion ecomorphs by quantifying the association between their morphology and ecology across 61 species, representing 14 families of the Scorpiones order. Without a priori categorization of species into ecomorphs, we identified four groups based on microhabitat descriptors, which reflect how scorpion ecospace is clustered. Moreover, these microhabitat groups, i.e., ecotypes, have significantly divergent morphologies; therefore, they represent ecomorphs. These ecomorphs largely correspond with the ones previously described in the literature. Therefore, we retained the names Lithophilous, Psammophilous, and Pelophilous, and proposed the name Phytophilous for vegetation dwellers. Finally, we sought to map the morphology-ecology association in scorpions and found that the morphological regions most tightly associated with ecology are at the extremities. Moreover, the major trend in ecomorphological covariation is that longer walking legs and relatively slender pedipalps (pincers) are associated with sandy microhabitats, while the inverse morphological proportions are associated with rocky microhabitats. Scorpion ecomorphs are validated in a naïve approach, from ecological descriptors and whole body anatomy. This places them on a more solid quantitative footing for future studies of ecological adaptation in scorpions. Our results verify most of the previously defined ecomorphotypes and could be used as a current practice to understand the adaptive significance of ecological morphology.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ecomorphological diversity</subject><subject>Ecomorphology</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Extremities</subject><subject>Microhabitat</subject><subject>Morphology (Animals)</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Scorpions</subject><issn>2730-7182</issn><issn>2730-7182</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkttq3DAQhk1paUKaF-hFMfSmvXCq0dG-KYTQw0KgkLbXQtaOvAq25Ur20j5VH6IvVm2chiwUITSMvvk1I_6ieAnkAqCW7xLQWtKK0LyhkXVFnhSnVDFSKajp00fxSXGe0i0hhApglLPnxQkTILmU8rRQN4h70y9m9mNXJhvi5MNYog1DDnepXNLhwpSj-fN7j6WZphiM3b0onjnTJzy_P8-K7x8_fLv6XF1_-bS5uryurJDNXNUWa2UVKgYooBWqYdxZ5wgBaDlXlDREthaappESttAytFxQAooClcKxs2Kz6m6DudVT9IOJv3QwXt8lQuy0ibO3PWrB8shgAbhhXDTcOODOtajq_LZCmrXer1rT0g64tTjO0fRHosc3o9_pLux1XeeehMoCb-4FYvixYJr14JPFvjcjhiVpKmlDhGDygL5e0c7k1vzoQla0B1xfKiY4BU5Ypi7-Q-W1xcHbMKLzOX9U8PaoIDMz_pw7s6SkN19vjlm6sjaGlCK6h0mB6IOH9OohnT2k7zykSS569fiPHkr-OYb9BW5BvnY</recordid><startdate>20220214</startdate><enddate>20220214</enddate><creator>Coelho, Pedro</creator><creator>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</creator><creator>Sousa, Pedro</creator><creator>Stockmann, Mark</creator><creator>van der Meijden, Arie</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220214</creationdate><title>Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach</title><author>Coelho, Pedro ; Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ; Sousa, Pedro ; Stockmann, Mark ; van der Meijden, Arie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-8ce87c7e731e51b57934fcff0011b44720906bc1999661d1b3ec45201721265f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ecomorphological diversity</topic><topic>Ecomorphology</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Extremities</topic><topic>Microhabitat</topic><topic>Morphology (Animals)</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Scorpions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockmann, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meijden, Arie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science in Context</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coelho, Pedro</au><au>Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni</au><au>Sousa, Pedro</au><au>Stockmann, Mark</au><au>van der Meijden, Arie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach</atitle><jtitle>BMC ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2022-02-14</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>17-10</pages><artnum>17</artnum><issn>2730-7182</issn><eissn>2730-7182</eissn><abstract>Ecomorphs create the opportunity to investigate ecological adaptation because they encompass organisms that evolved characteristic morphologies under similar ecological demands. For over 50 years, scorpions have been empirically assigned to ecomorphs based on the characteristic morphologies that rock, sand, vegetation, underground, and surface dwellers assume. This study aims to independently test the existence of scorpion ecomorphs by quantifying the association between their morphology and ecology across 61 species, representing 14 families of the Scorpiones order. Without a priori categorization of species into ecomorphs, we identified four groups based on microhabitat descriptors, which reflect how scorpion ecospace is clustered. Moreover, these microhabitat groups, i.e., ecotypes, have significantly divergent morphologies; therefore, they represent ecomorphs. These ecomorphs largely correspond with the ones previously described in the literature. Therefore, we retained the names Lithophilous, Psammophilous, and Pelophilous, and proposed the name Phytophilous for vegetation dwellers. Finally, we sought to map the morphology-ecology association in scorpions and found that the morphological regions most tightly associated with ecology are at the extremities. Moreover, the major trend in ecomorphological covariation is that longer walking legs and relatively slender pedipalps (pincers) are associated with sandy microhabitats, while the inverse morphological proportions are associated with rocky microhabitats. Scorpion ecomorphs are validated in a naïve approach, from ecological descriptors and whole body anatomy. This places them on a more solid quantitative footing for future studies of ecological adaptation in scorpions. Our results verify most of the previously defined ecomorphotypes and could be used as a current practice to understand the adaptive significance of ecological morphology.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35164666</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2730-7182
ispartof BMC ecology and evolution, 2022-02, Vol.22 (1), p.17-10, Article 17
issn 2730-7182
2730-7182
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_532731c114a34594af14ffbe781e57e2
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Adaptation, Physiological
Animals
Ecomorphological diversity
Ecomorphology
Environmental aspects
Extremities
Microhabitat
Morphology (Animals)
Physiological aspects
Scorpions
title Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reevaluating%20scorpion%20ecomorphs%20using%20a%20na%C3%AFve%20approach&rft.jtitle=BMC%20ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Coelho,%20Pedro&rft.date=2022-02-14&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=17-10&rft.artnum=17&rft.issn=2730-7182&rft.eissn=2730-7182&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA735421403%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-8ce87c7e731e51b57934fcff0011b44720906bc1999661d1b3ec45201721265f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2629055367&rft_id=info:pmid/35164666&rft_galeid=A735421403&rfr_iscdi=true