Loading…
Has the Landscape of Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer Changed? A Systematic Review and Post Hoc Analysis
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-causing death in the United States. As the most common malignancy in men, it is pertinent to explore whether novel immunotherapies may improve the quality of life and overall survival (OS) of patient populations. This systematic review and...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of men's health 2023-03, Vol.17 (2), p.15579883231165140-15579883231165140 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-c4a32395f6a00304c8b9d4fe62d3398ac5aa12d73a9225fa1e7eee1edfbffdcb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-c4a32395f6a00304c8b9d4fe62d3398ac5aa12d73a9225fa1e7eee1edfbffdcb3 |
container_end_page | 15579883231165140 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 15579883231165140 |
container_title | American journal of men's health |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ashraf, Muhammad Usman Farwa, Ume Siddiqa, Maryam Sarfraz, Azza Azeem, Nishwa Sarfraz, Zouina |
description | Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-causing death in the United States. As the most common malignancy in men, it is pertinent to explore whether novel immunotherapies may improve the quality of life and overall survival (OS) of patient populations. This systematic review and post hoc analysis curates a patient-by-patient pool of evidence adhering to PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. In total, 24 patients were analyzed for treatment history and associated variables including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at diagnosis and post-treatment, Gleason score, secondary tumor locations, success/failure of therapy, and post-immunotherapy outcomes including OS. In total, 10 types of immunotherapies were identified with Pembrolizumab (among 8 patients) followed by IMM-101 (among 6 patients) being the most commonly administered. The mean OS for all patients was 27.8 months (24 patients) with the relatively highest mean OS reported with IMM-101 (56 months) followed by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (30 months). This research article provides critical insights into the evolving landscape of immunotherapies being tested for PCa and addresses gaps in oncological research to advance the understanding of PCa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15579883231165140 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5343cd12811142b7aebb189ede6d8594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15579883231165140</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5343cd12811142b7aebb189ede6d8594</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2807638232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-c4a32395f6a00304c8b9d4fe62d3398ac5aa12d73a9225fa1e7eee1edfbffdcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk1vEzEQhlcIRNvAD-CCLHHhkuKx98M-VVEEJFIkKj7O1qw9m2y0uw72pij_HqcpgYI42Rq_83g-3ix7BfwaoKreQVFUWikpJEBZQM6fZJfH2FQrDU_PdyUvsqsYt5wXudTwPLuQFedClfIyaxcY2bghtsLBRYs7Yr5hy77fDz6FA-4OrPGB3QYfRxyJzXGwFNh8g8Oa3A2bsS-HOFKPY2vZZ7pr6QdLKHab9GzhLZsN2B1iG19kzxrsIr18OCfZtw_vv84X09Wnj8v5bDW1hZTj1OaY-tFFUyLnkudW1drlDZXCSakV2gIRhKskaiGKBoEqIgJyTd00ztZyki1PXOdxa3ah7TEcjMfW3Ad8WBsMqdiOTCFzaR0IBQC5qCukugalyVHpVKHzxLo5sXb7uidnaRgDdo-gj1-GdmPW_s4A56XmHBLh7QMh-O97iqPp22ip63Agv49GVFoet1WpJH3zl3Tr9yFNL6kUr0qpRJrMJIOTyqaNxEDNuRrg5ugK848rUs7rP9s4Z_yyQRJcnwQR1_T72_8TfwIPbL_F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2807638232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Has the Landscape of Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer Changed? A Systematic Review and Post Hoc Analysis</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>SAGE Open Access</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ashraf, Muhammad Usman ; Farwa, Ume ; Siddiqa, Maryam ; Sarfraz, Azza ; Azeem, Nishwa ; Sarfraz, Zouina</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashraf, Muhammad Usman ; Farwa, Ume ; Siddiqa, Maryam ; Sarfraz, Azza ; Azeem, Nishwa ; Sarfraz, Zouina</creatorcontrib><description>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-causing death in the United States. As the most common malignancy in men, it is pertinent to explore whether novel immunotherapies may improve the quality of life and overall survival (OS) of patient populations. This systematic review and post hoc analysis curates a patient-by-patient pool of evidence adhering to PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. In total, 24 patients were analyzed for treatment history and associated variables including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at diagnosis and post-treatment, Gleason score, secondary tumor locations, success/failure of therapy, and post-immunotherapy outcomes including OS. In total, 10 types of immunotherapies were identified with Pembrolizumab (among 8 patients) followed by IMM-101 (among 6 patients) being the most commonly administered. The mean OS for all patients was 27.8 months (24 patients) with the relatively highest mean OS reported with IMM-101 (56 months) followed by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (30 months). This research article provides critical insights into the evolving landscape of immunotherapies being tested for PCa and addresses gaps in oncological research to advance the understanding of PCa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1557-9883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15579883231165140</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37002863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Humans ; Immunotherapy ; Male ; Patients ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; Prostatic Disorders ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Quality of Life ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>American journal of men's health, 2023-03, Vol.17 (2), p.15579883231165140-15579883231165140</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023 2023 SAGE Publications Inc unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-c4a32395f6a00304c8b9d4fe62d3398ac5aa12d73a9225fa1e7eee1edfbffdcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-c4a32395f6a00304c8b9d4fe62d3398ac5aa12d73a9225fa1e7eee1edfbffdcb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5132-7455</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069001/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2807638232?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21945,25731,27830,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,44921,45309,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37002863$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashraf, Muhammad Usman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farwa, Ume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqa, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfraz, Azza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azeem, Nishwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfraz, Zouina</creatorcontrib><title>Has the Landscape of Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer Changed? A Systematic Review and Post Hoc Analysis</title><title>American journal of men's health</title><addtitle>Am J Mens Health</addtitle><description>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-causing death in the United States. As the most common malignancy in men, it is pertinent to explore whether novel immunotherapies may improve the quality of life and overall survival (OS) of patient populations. This systematic review and post hoc analysis curates a patient-by-patient pool of evidence adhering to PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. In total, 24 patients were analyzed for treatment history and associated variables including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at diagnosis and post-treatment, Gleason score, secondary tumor locations, success/failure of therapy, and post-immunotherapy outcomes including OS. In total, 10 types of immunotherapies were identified with Pembrolizumab (among 8 patients) followed by IMM-101 (among 6 patients) being the most commonly administered. The mean OS for all patients was 27.8 months (24 patients) with the relatively highest mean OS reported with IMM-101 (56 months) followed by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (30 months). This research article provides critical insights into the evolving landscape of immunotherapies being tested for PCa and addresses gaps in oncological research to advance the understanding of PCa.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen</subject><subject>Prostatic Disorders</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1557-9883</issn><issn>1557-9891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk1vEzEQhlcIRNvAD-CCLHHhkuKx98M-VVEEJFIkKj7O1qw9m2y0uw72pij_HqcpgYI42Rq_83g-3ix7BfwaoKreQVFUWikpJEBZQM6fZJfH2FQrDU_PdyUvsqsYt5wXudTwPLuQFedClfIyaxcY2bghtsLBRYs7Yr5hy77fDz6FA-4OrPGB3QYfRxyJzXGwFNh8g8Oa3A2bsS-HOFKPY2vZZ7pr6QdLKHab9GzhLZsN2B1iG19kzxrsIr18OCfZtw_vv84X09Wnj8v5bDW1hZTj1OaY-tFFUyLnkudW1drlDZXCSakV2gIRhKskaiGKBoEqIgJyTd00ztZyki1PXOdxa3ah7TEcjMfW3Ad8WBsMqdiOTCFzaR0IBQC5qCukugalyVHpVKHzxLo5sXb7uidnaRgDdo-gj1-GdmPW_s4A56XmHBLh7QMh-O97iqPp22ip63Agv49GVFoet1WpJH3zl3Tr9yFNL6kUr0qpRJrMJIOTyqaNxEDNuRrg5ugK848rUs7rP9s4Z_yyQRJcnwQR1_T72_8TfwIPbL_F</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Ashraf, Muhammad Usman</creator><creator>Farwa, Ume</creator><creator>Siddiqa, Maryam</creator><creator>Sarfraz, Azza</creator><creator>Azeem, Nishwa</creator><creator>Sarfraz, Zouina</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-7455</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Has the Landscape of Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer Changed? A Systematic Review and Post Hoc Analysis</title><author>Ashraf, Muhammad Usman ; Farwa, Ume ; Siddiqa, Maryam ; Sarfraz, Azza ; Azeem, Nishwa ; Sarfraz, Zouina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-c4a32395f6a00304c8b9d4fe62d3398ac5aa12d73a9225fa1e7eee1edfbffdcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen</topic><topic>Prostatic Disorders</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashraf, Muhammad Usman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farwa, Ume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqa, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfraz, Azza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azeem, Nishwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfraz, Zouina</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>American journal of men's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashraf, Muhammad Usman</au><au>Farwa, Ume</au><au>Siddiqa, Maryam</au><au>Sarfraz, Azza</au><au>Azeem, Nishwa</au><au>Sarfraz, Zouina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Has the Landscape of Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer Changed? A Systematic Review and Post Hoc Analysis</atitle><jtitle>American journal of men's health</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Mens Health</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>15579883231165140</spage><epage>15579883231165140</epage><pages>15579883231165140-15579883231165140</pages><issn>1557-9883</issn><eissn>1557-9891</eissn><abstract>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-causing death in the United States. As the most common malignancy in men, it is pertinent to explore whether novel immunotherapies may improve the quality of life and overall survival (OS) of patient populations. This systematic review and post hoc analysis curates a patient-by-patient pool of evidence adhering to PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. In total, 24 patients were analyzed for treatment history and associated variables including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at diagnosis and post-treatment, Gleason score, secondary tumor locations, success/failure of therapy, and post-immunotherapy outcomes including OS. In total, 10 types of immunotherapies were identified with Pembrolizumab (among 8 patients) followed by IMM-101 (among 6 patients) being the most commonly administered. The mean OS for all patients was 27.8 months (24 patients) with the relatively highest mean OS reported with IMM-101 (56 months) followed by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (30 months). This research article provides critical insights into the evolving landscape of immunotherapies being tested for PCa and addresses gaps in oncological research to advance the understanding of PCa.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>37002863</pmid><doi>10.1177/15579883231165140</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-7455</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1557-9883 |
ispartof | American journal of men's health, 2023-03, Vol.17 (2), p.15579883231165140-15579883231165140 |
issn | 1557-9883 1557-9891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5343cd12811142b7aebb189ede6d8594 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; SAGE Open Access; ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Humans Immunotherapy Male Patients Prostate cancer Prostate-Specific Antigen Prostatic Disorders Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Quality of Life Systematic review |
title | Has the Landscape of Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer Changed? A Systematic Review and Post Hoc Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A47%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Has%20the%20Landscape%20of%20Immunotherapy%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer%20Changed?%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Post%20Hoc%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20men's%20health&rft.au=Ashraf,%20Muhammad%20Usman&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=15579883231165140&rft.epage=15579883231165140&rft.pages=15579883231165140-15579883231165140&rft.issn=1557-9883&rft.eissn=1557-9891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15579883231165140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2807638232%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-c4a32395f6a00304c8b9d4fe62d3398ac5aa12d73a9225fa1e7eee1edfbffdcb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2807638232&rft_id=info:pmid/37002863&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15579883231165140&rfr_iscdi=true |