Loading…

Home physiotherapy with vs. without supervision of physiotherapist for assessing manipulation under anaesthesia after total knee arthroplasty

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare home physiotherapy with or without supervision of physiotherapist for assessing manipulation under anaesthesia after total knee arthroplasty. A total of 900 patients (including 810 females and 90 males) who had undergone total knee arthroplas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthroplasty 2021-03, Vol.3 (1), p.10-10, Article 10
Main Authors: Londhe, Sanjay Bhalchandra, Shah, Ravi Vinod, Doshi, Amit Pankaj, Londhe, Shubhankar Sanjay, Subhedar, Kavita, Iyengar, Krishnan, Mukkannavar, Prashant
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare home physiotherapy with or without supervision of physiotherapist for assessing manipulation under anaesthesia after total knee arthroplasty. A total of 900 patients (including 810 females and 90 males) who had undergone total knee arthroplasty were divided into group A (n = 300) and group B (n = 600). Patients in group A had home physiotherapy on their own after discharge from hospital. The physiotherapist did not visit them at home. Patients in group B received home physiotherapy under supervision of physiotherapist for 6 weeks after discharge from hospital. Patients' age, range of motion of the knee, and forgotten joint score-12 were assessed. A p  0.05). Preoperatively, the mean range of motion of the knee in group A and B was 95.8° ± 18.1° and 95.4° ± 17.8°, respectively (p > 0.05). The mean forgotten joint score-12 of group A and B were 11.90 ± 11.3 and 11.72 ± 12.1 (p > 0.05), respectively. Six weeks after total knee arthroplasty, the mean ROM of the knee in group A and B was 109.7° ± 22.3° and 121° ± 21.5°, respectively (p  0.05). The rate of manipulation under anaesthesia was 3% in group A and 0.2% in group B (p 
ISSN:2524-7948
2524-7948
DOI:10.1186/s42836-020-00063-3