Loading…
Assessing tradeoffs of strategies for urban water conservation and fit for purpose water
•The methodology applied enabled assessing tradeoffs of demand reduction strategies.•Efficacy of demand reduction strategies is impacted by local climate and land use.•Stormwater use has large potential for demand reduction even in arid regions, but is a very costly. Improved understanding of the ef...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of hydrology: X 2020-08, Vol.8, p.100059, Article 100059 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •The methodology applied enabled assessing tradeoffs of demand reduction strategies.•Efficacy of demand reduction strategies is impacted by local climate and land use.•Stormwater use has large potential for demand reduction even in arid regions, but is a very costly.
Improved understanding of the effects of strategies that reduce demand for traditional water supplies (i.e. conservation and reuse) is important to foster the transition toward resilient municipal water supply systems. This study assesses water demand and cost tradeoffs among strategies in three U.S. cities; Denver, CO; Miami, FL; and Tucson, AZ. A comprehensive set of strategies to reduce demand for traditional supplies were evaluated individually and in combination, including: indoor conservation fixtures, irrigation efficiency, climate appropriate landscape, and use of alternate water sources (i.e. graywater, wastewater, stormwater, and roof runoff). TheIntegrated Urban Water Model (IUWM) is reconciled with the NSGA IImultiobjective optimization approach to explore tradeoffs and to identify optimal solutions. Results demonstrate differences in the set of optimal water demand reduction strategies across the three study cities due to unique differences in climate, land development patterns, and water use behaviors. Efficient irrigation systems were highly effective across the study cities when considering cost and demand reduction tradeoffs. Stormwater use has large potential for demand reduction even in arid regions, but is a very costly strategy. When alternate water sources are considered, wastewater use for irrigation and graywater use for toilet flushing at the multi-residential scale offer benefits for achieving a balance between cost and demand for traditional supplies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2589-9155 2589-9155 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.hydroa.2020.100059 |