Loading…

Bilateral versus unilateral orchidopexy: IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes

Cryptorchidism is a common genital disorder. Approximately 20% of azoospermic or infertile men reported having histories of cryptorchidism. Bilateral cryptorchidism may have been more condemned than unilateral cryptorchidism. Early treatment by orchidopexy is the definitive procedure for cryptorchid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) 2024-02, Vol.15, p.1294884-1294884
Main Authors: Fan, Lijuan, Shi, Lin, Liu, Shan, Zhang, Zhou, Shi, Juanzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cryptorchidism is a common genital disorder. Approximately 20% of azoospermic or infertile men reported having histories of cryptorchidism. Bilateral cryptorchidism may have been more condemned than unilateral cryptorchidism. Early treatment by orchidopexy is the definitive procedure for cryptorchid patients with cryptorchidism. However, fertility potency after orchidopexy may be adversely affected and assisted reproduction techniques will be required for infertile patients. To compare the reproductive outcomes between unilateral and bilateral orchidopexy groups. A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital, including a total of 99 infertile men who underwent orchidopexy to treat cryptorchidism and subsequently underwent their first IVF/ICSI-ET cycle. Men were grouped according to the laterality of their cryptorchidism and orchidopexy surgeries they received. Fertilization rate and live birth rate were chosen as parameters for evaluating outcomes. The sperm concentration and viability were significantly higher in unilateral orchidopexy group than in bilateral orchidopexy group (28.09 ± 27.99 vs 7.99 ± 14.68, =0.001; 33.34 ± 22.52 vs 11.95 ± 17.85, =0.001). Unilateral orchidopexy group showed lower demand for ICSI (66.07% vs 95.35%,
ISSN:1664-2392
1664-2392
DOI:10.3389/fendo.2024.1294884